Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

SocialEval: Evaluating Social Intelligence of Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.00900 v1 pith:FRBLHKS4 submitted 2025-06-01 cs.CL

SocialEval: Evaluating Social Intelligence of Large Language Models

classification cs.CL
keywords llmssocialevaluationhumansinterpersonalabilityexhibitgoal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

LLMs exhibit promising Social Intelligence (SI) in modeling human behavior, raising the need to evaluate LLMs' SI and their discrepancy with humans. SI equips humans with interpersonal abilities to behave wisely in navigating social interactions to achieve social goals. This presents an operational evaluation paradigm: outcome-oriented goal achievement evaluation and process-oriented interpersonal ability evaluation, which existing work fails to address. To this end, we propose SocialEval, a script-based bilingual SI benchmark, integrating outcome- and process-oriented evaluation by manually crafting narrative scripts. Each script is structured as a world tree that contains plot lines driven by interpersonal ability, providing a comprehensive view of how LLMs navigate social interactions. Experiments show that LLMs fall behind humans on both SI evaluations, exhibit prosociality, and prefer more positive social behaviors, even if they lead to goal failure. Analysis of LLMs' formed representation space and neuronal activations reveals that LLMs have developed ability-specific functional partitions akin to the human brain.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LLM Agents for Deliberative Collaboration: A Study on Joint Decision Making Under Partial Observability

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A benchmark for LLM agents in partially observable joint decision-making reveals that deliberation challenges current models but can enable reflection and error correction.

  2. SAVOIR: Learning Social Savoir-Faire via Shapley-based Reward Attribution

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SAVOIR combines prospective expected utility valuation with Shapley values for fair credit assignment in social dialogue RL, achieving SOTA on SOTOPIA where a 7B model matches or exceeds GPT-4o and Claude-3.5-Sonnet.