Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 130 references

HD 38230 B is a gravitationally bound white dwarf companion to the nearby K-dwarf HD 38230, with a dynamical mass of 0.71 solar masses.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 00:33 UTC pith:FRGLLNN6

load-bearing objection A genuinely new nearby Sirius-like system with a solid bound-companion detection; the dynamical mass is plausible but its quoted precision leans on hand-adjusted literature astrometry. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.28720 v1 pith:FRGLLNN6 submitted 2026-07-30 astro-ph.SR

A New Sirius-like System at Only 21 Parsecs: An Elusive White Dwarf Companion to the Nearby K-dwarf HD 38230

classification astro-ph.SR PACS 97.20.Rp97.80.-d
keywords white dwarfsSirius-like systemsbinary starshigh-contrast imagingradial velocityastrometrydynamical massHD 38230
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reports the discovery that a faint point source near the K-dwarf HD 38230, previously flagged as a background star, is actually a gravitationally bound white dwarf companion. Combining six years of direct imaging, over 25 years of radial velocities, and space-based astrometry, the authors show the two stars share a common orbit and fit a period of about 1,400 years. The fit yields a model-independent dynamical mass of 0.71 solar masses for the white dwarf. At 21 parsecs, the system becomes the 11th-nearest known Sirius-like system, showing that the local census of white dwarfs in binaries is still incomplete. Precise white dwarf masses are rare and anchor stellar evolution models.

Core claim

The authors establish that the point-like source CC1, located about 4.7 arcseconds from the K0V star HD 38230, is not a background star but a gravitationally bound companion. Combining direct imaging detections spanning 2011–2017, over 25 years of radial velocity measurements, and absolute astrometry from two space missions, they show the object co-moves with the primary and is inconsistent with a stationary background object. Its infrared colors place it unambiguously on the white dwarf sequence. A joint Keplerian orbit fit yields P = 1390 (+310/−200) yr, a semi-major axis of 144 AU, eccentricity 0.45, and a dynamical mass of 0.71 (+0.06/−0.05) M_sun for the white dwarf, independent of whit

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is a Bayesian Keplerian orbit fit that simultaneously models relative astrometry from direct imaging, radial velocity time series, and absolute astrometric accelerations (a proper motion anomaly). The load-bearing identity is Kepler's third law: the same gravitational orbit that produces a ~100 m/s radial velocity drift over 26 years and a small proper motion kick in the primary also produces the slow, ~2.3 km/s tangential motion of the companion across the sky. Fitting all three data sets together converts these indirect signals into a direct measurement of the companion's mass. The companion's white dwarf nature is established by its position on color-magnitude diagra

Load-bearing premise

The orbit fit assumes that a single constant +1.9° rotation plus inflated error bars fully account for systematic differences between the new astrometry and the older literature measurements; if those older epochs carry additional unmodeled distortions, the quoted period and mass would be biased.

What would settle it

A single new high-contrast imaging epoch of HD 38230 taken now would test the orbital prediction: if the measured separation and position angle disagree with the posterior prediction by more than the stated uncertainties, the orbit (and thus the dynamical mass) is wrong. Alternatively, a spectrum of HD 38230 B giving a surface gravity that rules out a 0.71 M_sun white dwarf would refute the interpretation.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • HD 38230 B becomes one of only a handful of white dwarfs with a mass measured dynamically, independent of atmosphere models; at 0.71 M_sun it sits near the peak of the white dwarf mass distribution.
  • The ~6–10 Gyr system age and the white dwarf's likely ~3.2 Gyr cooling age imply the white dwarf formed from an early-A or late-B progenitor of ~1.9 or ~2.8 M_sun, linking the system to the initial-final mass relation.
  • Because Gaia gave no astrometric solution for the companion, this discovery shows that the local Sirius-like census is incomplete and that high-contrast imaging remains necessary to find wide white dwarf companions.
  • The measured mass, combined with a future spectrum of the white dwarf, will test white dwarf cooling models by comparing dynamical and spectroscopic masses.
  • The lack of barium enhancement in the primary indicates the AGB progenitor did not pollute the K-dwarf, consistent with a wide, non-interacting binary that avoided mass transfer.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 20–25 pc deficit in Sirius-like systems reflects real incompleteness, a systematic high-contrast imaging survey of all nearby K and G dwarfs with radial velocity trends could reveal several more hidden white dwarfs, possibly closing the gap with the <20 pc count.
  • The paper's reconciliation of archival astrometry via a constant rotation suggests that other 'background' sources in old high-contrast imaging data may be misidentified companions; re-analysing archival epochs with modern distortion solutions could be a cheap discovery channel.
  • A model-independent check of the 1,390-year period could come from a single new imaging epoch: the predicted separation/position angle at the current epoch is precise enough that a deviation would reveal a biased orbit or an unseen third body.
  • The dynamical mass of 0.71 M_sun, once a spectrum is obtained, will provide a rare direct calibration point for the white-dwarf initial-final mass relation and cooling tracks at a specific mass.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reports the discovery of a white dwarf companion to the nearby K0V star HD 38230 using archival Keck/NIRC2 imaging, Gaia data, and literature imaging. The candidate CC1 is shown to be a common-proper-motion companion by a background-motion test, while CC2 is shown to be a background source. Photometry places CC1 on the white-dwarf sequence in Gaia and infrared color-magnitude diagrams. The authors combine relative astrometry, Keck/HIRES radial velocities, and Hipparcos-Gaia absolute astrometry in an orvara orbital fit, obtaining P = 1390(+310/-200) yr, a = 144(+21/-15) AU, and a dynamical white-dwarf mass M_B = 0.71(+0.06/-0.05) M_sun. They rank the system as the 11th-nearest Sirius-like system and argue that the local white-dwarf census remains incomplete.

Significance. If the mass measurement is robust, this is a valuable addition to the small sample of white dwarfs with model-independent dynamical masses and demonstrates that Gaia alone is insufficient for completing the local census of Sirius-like systems. The paper has notable strengths: it uses public archival data and standard open-source tools (orvara, htof, backtracks), reports priors and convergence checks, and presents a very strong statistical case for bound status: the stationary-background chi-squared for CC1 is enormous (843068.5), while CC2 is clearly background. The white-dwarf identification from G-Ks vs M_G is also compelling. However, the headline precision on M_B rests on a fragile treatment of the only independent imaging epochs, a point that the authors partly acknowledge in Section 3.3 and Section 5.2. Until that sensitivity is quantified, the dynamical mass should be regarded as preliminary rather than precise.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.3, Table 2] The treatment of the ShaneAO/PHARO relative astrometry is the load-bearing weakness of the dynamical mass claim. The fixed +1.9 deg position-angle rotation is motivated, but the uncertainty inflation to 30-50 mas and 0.5 deg is explicitly described as chosen 'as required to bring them into ~1sigma agreement with our best-fit solution.' This means those three epochs are effectively given negligible weight and cannot independently validate the NIRC2+Gaia arc that defines the observed orbit. Because the paper itself states in Section 5.2 that relative astrometry is the dominant uncertainty, the quoted posteriors for P and M_B do not include the systematic freedom hidden in this step. I request a sensitivity analysis: (i) refit without the three Hirsch et al. epochs, (ii) refit with the PA rotation and uncertainty inflation as free parameters with physically motivated priors, or (iii) recali
  2. [Section 4.3 / Table 3] The precision of M_B = 0.71(+0.06/-0.05) M_sun may be over-stated for an orbit that is only observed over ~6 years of a ~1400-year period. The mass is effectively determined by the instantaneous acceleration from RVs and the Hipparcos-Gaia proper-motion anomaly, in combination with the relative astrometry that fixes the current separation and position angle. A systematic PA error of only ~0.2 deg is relevant at the precision claimed: for example, the 2015 NIRC2 PA (217.765 deg) and the near-contemporaneous Gaia value (217.55 deg in Table 2) differ by 0.215 deg, which is comparable to the discrepancies being accommodated by the ad hoc uncertainty inflation. The reported 1-sigma interval should be expanded to include a term for frame-systematic errors, or the analysis should demonstrate explicitly that such errors do not bias M_B by more than ~0.05 M_sun. As written, the 0.05-0.06 M_sun pr
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract / Section 4.2] The phrase 'photometry consistent only with a white dwarf' is stronger than the evidence: no spectrum is available and the Gaia BP/RP photometry is flagged as unreliable. The G-Ks photometry strongly excludes a main-sequence star, but 'consistent with' without 'only' would be safer until spectroscopy confirms the atmospheric composition.
  2. [Section 1] In the definition of Sirius-like systems, 'spectral type earlier than>M' appears to contain a typographical artifact; it should read 'earlier than M' or 'not later than M.'
  3. [Section 3.2 / Table 2] The Gaia relative astrometry is assigned a notional 5 mas / 0.08 deg uncertainty 'to aid convergence.' This is reasonable, but the sensitivity of M_B to this adopted uncertainty should be stated, since the Gaia point is used as a high-weight anchor in the fit.
  4. [Section 4.1] The statement that the helical background fit 'did not converge' is vague. The chi-squared for the stationary-background hypothesis is already overwhelming, so this is not a major issue, but a quantitative statement (e.g., fit diverged or upper limit on acceptable proper motion) would be cleaner.
  5. [References / Table 4] Table 4 lists HD 38230 B as spectral type 'D' with no subtype; this is acceptable given the absence of spectroscopy, but the table column header should note that the classification is photometric only.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No constructional circularity: the orbit and mass are joint inferences from independent astrometry, RVs, and HGCA data; the only caveat is uncertainty inflation for three literature epochs, which is a data-quality limitation rather than a circular step.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. HD 38230 B's bound status comes from a backtracks comparison of relative astrometry against a stationary background track; its white-dwarf nature comes from CMD placement; and the quoted orbit and mass come from a joint fit of independent datasets (Keck/NIRC2 plus Gaia relative astrometry, 114 Keck/HIRES RVs spanning ~26 yr, and HGCA proper-motion anomalies) using the public orvara/htof tools. M_B = 0.71(+0.06/-0.05) M_sun is a fitted model parameter, not an input, and no equation in the paper defines it in terms of a fitted quantity by construction. Self-citations to HGCA, orvara, and htof are to publicly available, externally used code/catalogs and are not load-bearing circular support. The one genuine caveat is in Section 3.3/Table 2: the authors 'arbitrarily increase the uncertainties on these points to 30-50 mas and 0.5°, as required to bring them into ≈1σ agreement with our best-fit solution.' This means the three ShaneAO/PHARO literature epochs provide little independent constraint, and the quoted mass precision rests mainly on NIRC2/Gaia astrometry, RVs, and HGCA. The paper itself flags relative astrometry as the dominant uncertainty in Section 5.2. This is a robustness and calibration concern, not a definitional or fitted-input circularity: the mass is not equal to any input by construction, and the central claim has independent content. Score 2 reflects only minor, non-load-bearing self-citations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

12 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The model free parameters are the usual orbital elements and nuisance terms; the two hand-tuned astrometric adjustments (rotation and uncertainty inflation) are the main worry because they directly influence the quoted P and M_B. Axioms are standard dynamical/photometric assumptions, with the ad-hoc one being the validity of those astrometric corrections.

free parameters (12)
  • Companion mass M_B = 0.71 (+0.06/−0.05) M_sun
    Fitted in orvara MCMC; central result.
  • Semi-major axis a = 144 (+21/−15) AU
    Fitted; orbital scale.
  • Eccentricity e = 0.45 (+0.09/−0.13)
    Fitted; partial-arc shape parameter.
  • Inclination i = 125.9° (+2.0/−2.1)
    Fitted in orvara.
  • Other orbital elements (Omega, omega, mean longitude, T0) = Omega=133°, omega=51°, lambda=317°, T0=2581485
    Fitted in orvara MCMC.
  • RV jitter = 2.51 (+0.22/−0.20) m/s
    Fitted nuisance term.
  • RV zero-point offset = not quoted
    Fitted nuisance term in orvara.
  • Primary mass M_A = 0.82±0.02 M_sun
    Adopted from MIST isochrone fit as Gaussian prior; companion mass scales with it.
  • Parallax = 47.855±0.020 mas
    Adopted from Gaia DR3 as Gaussian prior.
  • Gaia relative-astrometry uncertainty = 5 mas, 0.08°
    Adopted notional uncertainty to aid convergence (Li et al. 2021).
  • ShaneAO/PHARO uncertainty inflation = 30–50 mas, 0.5°
    Hand-set post hoc to bring literature epochs into agreement with the best-fit model.
  • ShaneAO position-angle rotation = +1.9°
    Hand-set post hoc to align Hirsch et al. (2021) position angles.
axioms (7)
  • standard math Keplerian two-body dynamics correctly describes the HD 38230 AB motion.
    Used throughout §3.3 orbit fit.
  • domain assumption orvara and htof correctly translate fitted orbits into Hipparcos/Gaia epoch astrometry and HGCA proper motions.
    §3.3; relies on the software's treatment of scan angles, spacecraft attitude, and proper-motion definitions.
  • domain assumption The HIRES RV zero-point corrections applied in Teklu et al. (2025) remove the 2004 instrument upgrade offset and nightly zero-point changes.
    §2.2; the RVs are treated as a single dataset without fitting a pre/post offset.
  • domain assumption The MIST isochrone fit yields accurate primary mass/radius used as Gaussian prior.
    §3.1; M_A = 0.82±0.02 M_sun is adopted from the fit and propagates into the companion mass.
  • domain assumption The 40-pc Gaia EDR3 Catalogue of Nearby Stars provides an unbiased WD/M-dwarf sequence for CMD classification.
    §4.2; used to identify HD 38230 B as a WD via G−Ks colour.
  • domain assumption CC1 lies at the same distance as HD 38230 A when computing absolute magnitudes.
    §4.2; justified by common-motion binding test but not directly measured via parallax.
  • ad hoc to paper The +1.9° rotation and inflated uncertainties on ShaneAO/PHARO astrometry are valid corrections for reference-frame differences.
    §2.1.2, §3.3; chosen to make literature epochs agree with the best-fit model.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 23919 in / 15216 out tokens · 139998 ms · 2026-08-03T00:33:53.882136+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

White dwarfs are among the rarest and faintest stars found in the solar neighbourhood and are therefore persistently challenging to detect. Whereas the \textit{Gaia} mission has vastly expanded our knowledge of isolated white dwarfs, limited contrast sensitivity means that white dwarfs companions to much brighter solar-type stars are easily missed, leaving a subset of white dwarfs in "Sirius-like systems" that can only be discovered via high-contrast imaging. Here we report the discovery of a white dwarf companion to the nearby K0V star HD 38230 (HIP 27207). The companion, HD 38230 B, was originally detected with Keck/NIRC2 observations taken as part of the TRENDS high-contrast imaging survey, was detected by \textit{Gaia} without an astrometric solution, and was independently observed using Lick/ShaneAO and Palomar/PHARO in the literature. Combining these multiple imaging detections spanning 6 years, we demonstrate that HD 38230 B is a gravitationally bound companion and has photometry consistent only with a white dwarf. Our analysis of the binary orbit, combining relative astrometry with over 25 years of precise radial velocity observations and \textit{Hipparcos-Gaia} astrometry, results in strong constraints on the $P$ = $1390^{+310}_{-200}$ year orbit despite the short observational span, and provides a precise dynamical mass of $M_B$ = $0.71^{+0.06}_{-0.05}$ $M_\odot$ for the white dwarf. At 21 pc, this is the 11th-nearest Sirius-like system known to date, highlighting residual incompleteness in the local white dwarf census.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.28720 by Alexander Venner, Cl\'emence Fontanive, Elisabeth C. Matthews, Hai Fu, Justin R. Crepp, Kyle Franson, Logan A. Pearce, Qier An, Timothy D. Brandt.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Data, model, and residual map of fits to CC1, CC2, and HD 38230 (behind the slightly-transmissive Lyot mask) for one image in the 2011 epoch. and a radius 𝑅∗ of 0.81±0.03 𝑅⊙, which conform well with expectations for a main-sequence K0 star. 3.2. NIRC2 Imaging Analysis To prepare the images for analysis, we linearized the in￾tensity of each science and calibration image in python us￾ing the methodology of t… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (Top) Relative astrometry for CC1 (diamonds) and CC2 (squares) over time. HD 38230 is located at [0,0] and marked by an orange star. Zero-motion model tracks beginning from the 2011 epoch are shown for both companion candidates. CC2 ad￾heres closely to the stationary background track, indicating it is not associated with HD 38230 A, whereas CC1 shows comparatively little relative motion (highlighted inset)… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The location of HD 38230 B on colour-magnitude diagrams of local stars. We have constructed two colour-magnitude diagrams for stars within 40 pc based on the Gaia EDR3 Catalogue of Nearby Stars (Gaia Collaboration et al. 2021) comparing Gaia BP-RP versus 𝑀𝐺 (left) and 𝐺-𝐾𝑠 versus 𝑀𝐺 (right), covering the sum of available photometric observations for the companion. In both cases HD 38230 B falls on the whit… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Keplerian orbit fit to HD 38230 B. In all panels, colored curves show 100 random orbits drawn from the posterior distribution, color-coded by companion mass; the maximum-likelihood orbit is shown in black. Top row: Projected separation (left) and position angle (right) of HD 38230 B relative to the primary as a function of time. Middle row: Proper motion in R.A. (𝜇𝛼, left) and Dec. (𝜇𝛿, right) from the HGC… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Corner plot of the posterior distributions for the primary mass 𝑀𝐴, companion mass 𝑀𝐵, semi-major axis 𝑎, eccentricity 𝑒, and inclination 𝑖 of HD 38230 AB. Dashed vertical lines mark the median and 68% credible intervals. Contours show the 1𝜎 and 2𝜎 credible regions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

130 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Where are all the Sirius-like binary systems?. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1433 , archivePrefix =. 1307.8047 , primaryClass =

  2. [2]

    Journal for the History of Astronomy , year = 2009, month = may, volume =

    The Discovery of the Existence of White Dwarf Stars: 1862 to 1930. Journal for the History of Astronomy , year = 2009, month = may, volume =. doi:10.1177/002182860904000201 , adsurl =

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    The Dynamical Mass and Three-dimensional Orbit of HR7672B: A Benchmark Brown Dwarf with High Eccentricity. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/751/2/97 , archivePrefix =. 1112.1725 , primaryClass =

  4. [4]

    The TRENDS High-contrast Imaging Survey. II. Direct Detection of the HD 8375 Tertiary. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/771/1/46 , archivePrefix =. 1210.7374 , primaryClass =

  5. [5]

    The TRENDS High-contrast Imaging Survey. III. A Faint White Dwarf Companion Orbiting HD 114174. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/1 , archivePrefix =. 1305.0571 , primaryClass =

  6. [6]

    The TRENDS High-contrast Imaging Survey. V. Discovery of an Old and Cold Benchmark T-dwarf Orbiting the Nearby G-star HD 19467. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/781/1/29 , archivePrefix =. 1311.0280 , primaryClass =

  7. [7]

    The TRENDS High-contrast Imaging Survey. VI. Discovery of a Mass, Age, and Metallicity Benchmark Brown Dwarf. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/831/2/136 , archivePrefix =. 1604.00398 , primaryClass =

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    Astrophysical false positives in direct imaging for exoplanets: a white dwarf close to a rejuvenated star. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321179 , archivePrefix =. 1304.4130 , primaryClass =

  9. [9]

    The TRENDS High-contrast Imaging Survey. IV. The Occurrence Rate of Giant Planets around M Dwarfs. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/781/1/28 , archivePrefix =. 1307.5849 , primaryClass =

  10. [10]

    MagAO Imaging of Long-period Objects (MILO). II. A Puzzling White Dwarf around the Sun-like Star HD 11112. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/831/2/177 , archivePrefix =. 1609.02576 , primaryClass =

  11. [11]

    The TRENDS High-contrast Imaging Survey. VII. Discovery of a Nearby Sirius-like White Dwarf System (HD 169889). , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad381 , archivePrefix =. 1807.06012 , primaryClass =

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    Discovery of a White Dwarf Companion to HD 159062. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1b11 , archivePrefix =. 1905.06440 , primaryClass =

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    A new white dwarf companion around the star GJ 3346. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa590 , archivePrefix =. 2002.10467 , primaryClass =

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    The McDonald Accelerating Stars Survey (MASS): White Dwarf Companions Accelerating the Sun-like Stars 12 Psc and HD 159062. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd243 , archivePrefix =. 2012.04847 , primaryClass =

  15. [15]

    , keywords =

    Dynamical masses and ages of Sirius-like systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1849 , archivePrefix =. 2303.08198 , primaryClass =

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Five New Sirius-like White Dwarf Main-sequence Star Systems with MagAO-X. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/addb50 , archivePrefix =. 2505.14439 , primaryClass =

  17. [17]

    , keywords =

    Absence of a correlation between white dwarf planetary accretion and primordial stellar metallicity. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1506 , archivePrefix =. 2406.18638 , primaryClass =

  18. [18]

    , keywords =

    The initial-final mass relationship from white dwarfs in common proper motion pairs. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078111 , archivePrefix =. 0710.1542 , primaryClass =

  19. [19]

    , keywords =

    The Initial-Final Mass Relation among White Dwarfs in Wide Binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/144 , archivePrefix =. 1112.0281 , primaryClass =

  20. [20]

    , keywords =

    Improved Constraints on the Initial-to-final Mass Relation of White Dwarfs Using Wide Binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2f49 , archivePrefix =. 2102.07790 , primaryClass =

  21. [21]

    , keywords =

    Precise Ages of Field Stars from White Dwarf Companions. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaee74 , archivePrefix =. 1802.06663 , primaryClass =

  22. [22]

    , keywords =

    A crystallizing white dwarf in a Sirius-like quadruple system. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1719 , archivePrefix =. 2306.03140 , primaryClass =

  23. [23]

    , keywords =

    Serendipitous observation of a white dwarf companion to a JWST/MIRI coronagraphic calibrator. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slae106 , archivePrefix =. 2410.11568 , primaryClass =

  24. [24]

    , keywords =

    Fundamental Tests of White Dwarf Cooling Physics with Wide Binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6303 , archivePrefix =. 2407.18763 , primaryClass =

  25. [25]

    , keywords =

    The Gaia white dwarf revolution. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.newar.2024.101705 , archivePrefix =. 2402.14960 , primaryClass =

  26. [26]

    , keywords =

    Imprints of white dwarf recoil in the separation distribution of Gaia wide binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2186 , archivePrefix =. 1807.06011 , primaryClass =

  27. [27]

    , keywords =

    A million binaries from Gaia eDR3: sample selection and validation of Gaia parallax uncertainties. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab323 , archivePrefix =. 2101.05282 , primaryClass =

  28. [28]

    The TRENDS High-contrast Imaging Survey. I. Three Benchmark M Dwarfs Orbiting Solar-type Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/761/1/39 , archivePrefix =. 1210.3000 , primaryClass =

  29. [29]

    The TRENDS High-contrast Imaging Survey. VIII. Compendium of Benchmark Objects. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab71fb , archivePrefix =. 2010.11866 , primaryClass =

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    Understanding the Impacts of Stellar Companions on Planet Formation and Evolution: A Survey of Stellar and Planetary Companions within 25 pc. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd639 , archivePrefix =. 2012.09190 , primaryClass =

  31. [31]

    Photometric content and validation

    Gaia Early Data Release 3. Photometric content and validation. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039587 , archivePrefix =. 2012.01916 , primaryClass =

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    The LCES HIRES/Keck Precision Radial Velocity Exoplanet Survey. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa66ca , archivePrefix =. 1702.03571 , primaryClass =

  33. [33]

    , keywords =

    An updated catalog of HIRES/Keck radial velocity measurements: Including Ca II H&K measurements. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555034 , archivePrefix =. 2509.06072 , primaryClass =

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    The Hipparcos-Gaia Catalog of Accelerations. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaec06 , archivePrefix =. 1811.07283 , primaryClass =

  35. [35]

    , keywords =

    The Hipparcos-Gaia Catalog of Accelerations: Gaia EDR3 Edition. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abf93c , archivePrefix =. 2105.11662 , primaryClass =

  36. [36]

    Binarity from proper motion anomaly

    Stellar and substellar companions of nearby stars from Gaia DR2. Binarity from proper motion anomaly. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834371 , archivePrefix =. 1811.08902 , primaryClass =

  37. [37]

    , keywords =

    True Masses of the Long-period Companions to HD 92987 and HD 221420 from Hipparcos-Gaia Astrometry. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abf932 , archivePrefix =. 2104.13941 , primaryClass =

  38. [38]

    , year = 1997, month = jul, volume =

    The HIPPARCOS Catalogue. , year = 1997, month = jul, volume =

  39. [39]

    , keywords =

    Validation of the new Hipparcos reduction. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078357 , archivePrefix =. 0708.1752 , primaryClass =

  40. [40]

    , keywords =

    The Gaia mission. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629272 , archivePrefix =. 1609.04153 , primaryClass =

  41. [41]

    Summary of the content and survey properties

    Gaia Data Release 3. Summary of the content and survey properties. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 , archivePrefix =. 2208.00211 , primaryClass =

  42. [42]

    , keywords =

    The Tycho-2 catalogue of the 2.5 million brightest stars. , keywords =

  43. [43]

    , keywords =

    The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS). , keywords =. doi:10.1086/498708 , adsurl =

  44. [44]

    doi:10.26131/IRSA1 , adsurl =

    AllWISE Source Catalog. doi:10.26131/IRSA1 , adsurl =

  45. [45]

    Contributions to the Nearby Stars (NStars) Project: Spectroscopy of Stars Earlier than M0 within 40 Parsecs: The Northern Sample. I. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/378365 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0308182 , primaryClass =

  46. [46]

    , keywords =

    Stellar Characterization of Keck HIRES Spectra with The Cannon. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9f96 , archivePrefix =. 2007.02942 , primaryClass =

  47. [47]

    The catalogue of radial velocity standard stars

    Gaia Data Release 2. The catalogue of radial velocity standard stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832795 , archivePrefix =. 1804.09370 , primaryClass =

  48. [48]

    Estimating Distances from Parallaxes. V. Geometric and Photogeometric Distances to 1.47 Billion Stars in Gaia Early Data Release 3. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd806 , archivePrefix =. 2012.05220 , primaryClass =

  49. [49]

    Spectroscopic Properties of Cool Stars (SPOCS). I. 1040 F, G, and K Dwarfs from Keck, Lick, and AAT Planet Search Programs. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/430500 , adsurl =

  50. [50]

    Structure and Evolution of Nearby Stars with Planets. II. Physical Properties of -0.5ex 1000 Cool Stars from the SPOCS Catalog. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/509763 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0607235 , primaryClass =

  51. [51]

    , keywords =

    Homogeneous abundance analysis of FGK dwarf, subgiant, and giant stars with and without giant planets. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525770 , adsurl =

  52. [52]

    , keywords =

    Calculating Galactic Space Velocities and Their Uncertainties, with an Application to the Ursa Major Group. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/114370 , adsurl =

  53. [53]

    , keywords =

    Local kinematics and the local standard of rest. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16253.x , archivePrefix =. 0912.3693 , primaryClass =

  54. [54]

    , keywords =

    Elemental abundance trends in the Galactic thin and thick disks as traced by nearby F and G dwarf stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031213 , adsurl =

  55. [55]

    , keywords =

    The AMBRE project: The thick thin disk and thin thick disk of the Milky Way. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731494 , archivePrefix =. 1712.02358 , primaryClass =

  56. [56]

    , keywords =

    The Ages and Masses of a Million Galactic-disk Main-sequence Turnoff and Subgiant Stars from the LAMOST Galactic Spectroscopic Surveys. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa80e4 , archivePrefix =. 1707.06236 , primaryClass =

  57. [57]

    , keywords =

    A method to estimate stellar ages from kinematical data. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty119 , archivePrefix =. 1801.04046 , primaryClass =

  58. [58]

    , keywords =

    Chemo-kinematic Ages of Eccentric-planet-hosting M Dwarf Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad40e , archivePrefix =. 1807.06017 , primaryClass =

  59. [59]

    , keywords =

    MESA Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST) 0: Methods for the Construction of Stellar Isochrones. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8 , archivePrefix =. 1601.05144 , primaryClass =

  60. [60]

    Mesa Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST). I. Solar-scaled Models. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102 , archivePrefix =. 1604.08592 , primaryClass =

  61. [61]

    , keywords =

    A Cool Earth-sized Planet Candidate Transiting a Tenth Magnitude K-dwarf From K2. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adf06f , archivePrefix =. 2601.19870 , primaryClass =

  62. [62]

    , year = 1951, month = nov, volume =

    The Ba II Stars. , year = 1951, month = nov, volume =. doi:10.1086/145488 , adsurl =

  63. [63]

    , year = 1954, month = nov, volume =

    Classification of the S-Type Stars. , year = 1954, month = nov, volume =. doi:10.1086/145937 , adsurl =

  64. [64]

    Barium and related stars, and their white-dwarf companions. I. Giant stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834630 , archivePrefix =. 1904.03975 , primaryClass =

  65. [65]

    Barium and related stars, and their white-dwarf companions. II. Main-sequence and subgiant starss. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935390 , archivePrefix =. 1904.04095 , primaryClass =

  66. [66]

    , keywords =

    The binary nature of the barium stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/183252 , adsurl =

  67. [67]

    , keywords =

    The barium stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/131310 , adsurl =

  68. [68]

    The Impact of Stellar Multiplicity on Planetary Systems. I. The Ruinous Influence of Close Binary Companions. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/1/8 , adsurl =

  69. [69]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    The Palomar/Keck Adaptive Optics Survey of Young Solar Analogs: Evidence for a Universal Companion Mass Function. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/181/1/62 , adsurl =

  70. [70]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , keywords =

    First Light Adaptive Optics Images from the Keck II Telescope: A New Era of High Angular Resolution Imagery. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , keywords =. doi:10.1086/316543 , adsurl =

  71. [71]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Improving Galactic Center Astrometry by Reducing the Effects of Geometric Distortion. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/331 , adsurl =

  72. [72]

    , year = 2016, month = sep, volume =

    A New Distortion Solution for NIRC2 on the Keck II Telescope. , year = 2016, month = sep, volume =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/128/967/095004 , adsurl =

  73. [73]

    , keywords =

    Orbital Motion of the Wide Planetary-mass Companion GSC 6214-210 b: No Evidence for Dynamical Scattering. , keywords =. 2019. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aafacb , adsurl =

  74. [74]

    , keywords =

    Boyajian's Star B: The Co-moving Companion to KIC 8462852 A. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abdd33 , archivePrefix =. 2101.06313 , primaryClass =

  75. [75]

    , year = 2016, month = jan, volume =

    Dynamic temperature selection for parallel tempering in Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations. , year = 2016, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2422 , archivePrefix =. 1501.05823 , primaryClass =

  76. [76]

    , year = 2013, month = mar, volume =

    emcee: The MCMC Hammer. , year = 2013, month = mar, volume =. doi:10.1086/670067 , archivePrefix =. 1202.3665 , primaryClass =

  77. [77]

    , keywords =

    Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 , archivePrefix =. 1307.6212 , primaryClass =

  78. [78]

    , keywords =

    The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f , archivePrefix =. 1801.02634 , primaryClass =

  79. [79]

    , keywords =

    The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 , archivePrefix =. 2206.14220 , primaryClass =

  80. [80]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.14838370 , url =

    William O Balmer and Gilles Otten and Tomas Stolker , title =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.14838370 , url =

Showing first 80 references.