Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A million binaries from Gaia eDR3: sample selection and validation of Gaia parallax uncertainties

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.05282 v3 pith:KQVZKNFR submitted 2021-01-13 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

A million binaries from Gaia eDR3: sample selection and validation of Gaia parallax uncertainties

classification astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA
keywords cataloggaiabinariessourcesstarsuncertaintiesbinarychance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We construct from Gaia eDR3 an extensive catalog of spatially resolved binary stars within $\approx$ 1 kpc of the Sun, with projected separations ranging from a few au to 1 pc. We estimate the probability that each pair is a chance alignment empirically, using the Gaia catalog itself to calculate the rate of chance alignments as a function of observables. The catalog contains 1.3 (1.1) million binaries with >90% (>99%) probability of being bound, including 16,000 white dwarf -- main sequence (WD+MS) binaries and 1,400 WD+WD binaries. We make the full catalog publicly available, as well as the queries and code to produce it. We then use this sample to calibrate the published Gaia DR3 parallax uncertainties, making use of the binary components' near-identical parallaxes. We show that these uncertainties are generally reliable for faint stars ($G\gtrsim 18$), but are underestimated significantly for brighter stars. The underestimates are generally $\le 30\%$ for isolated sources with well-behaved astrometry, but are larger (up to 80%) for apparently well-behaved sources with a companion within $\lesssim 4$ arcsec, and much larger for sources with poor astrometric fits. We provide an empirical fitting function to inflate published $\sigma_{\varpi}$ values for isolated sources. The public catalog offers wide ranging follow-up opportunities: from calibrating spectroscopic surveys, to precisely constraining ages of field stars, to the masses and the initial-final mass relation of white dwarfs, to dynamically probing the Galactic tidal field.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Twentieth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: First All-Sky BOSS Spectra, eROSITA-SDSS-V Mapper Coordinated Observations, and a Preview of the Local Volume Mapper

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    DR20 releases over three million BOSS spectra (first southern-hemisphere SDSS-V optical data), 169 LVM integral-field tiles over six targets, and eighteen value-added catalogs.

  2. BOSS-CLAM: Utilizing a Constrained Linear Absorption Model to Infer Stellar Parameters from BOSS Spectra

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A new generative pipeline, BOSS-CLAM, infers temperature, gravity, metallicity, and alpha-abundance for 1,708,214 SDSS-V BOSS spectra and releases a validated clean catalog of 915,514 stars.

  3. White dwarfs within 13 pc: Insights from ultraviolet spectroscopy

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    UV spectroscopy of the 44 nearest white dwarfs reveals a 2–6% temperature discrepancy between UV and optical model fits, six UV-only metal detections, and a 30% planetary debris accretion rate.