pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00217 · v1 · pith:FRUDRF4Wnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM

The Rubin Observatory Target-of-Opportunity System in the First Year of Operations

Sean Patrick MacBride , R. Lynne Jones , Peter Yoachim , Tiago Ribeiro , Leanne P. Guy , Shreya Anand , Erin Leigh Howard , Ian S. Sullivan
show 36 more authors
Daniel L. Wang Eric C. Bellm Robert Armstrong W. M. Wood-Vasey Alex Drlica-Wagner Kenneth Herner Gautham Narayan Tatiana Acero-Cuellar Federica Bettina Bianco Igor Andreoni Bruno O. S\'anchez John Banovetz Anastasia Alexov Erik Dennihy Robert D. Blum Yousuke Utsumi Marcelle Soares-Santos Robert H. Lupton Keith Bechtol \v{Z}eljko Ivezi\'c Kris Mortensen Paulina Venegas Yijung Kang Alysha B. Shugart Narayan Khadka Kshitija Kelkar Danica \v{Z}ilkov\'a Kevin Fanning Christopher W. Walter Chris Weaver Fabian Araneda-Baltierra Andreja Gomboc J. Anthony Tyson Colin Orion Chandler Pedro H. Bernardinelli Devanshi Singh
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 17:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM
keywords Rubin ObservatoryLSSTTarget of Opportunitytransientsgravitational waveshigh-energy neutrinosobservatory operationssurvey efficiency
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Rubin Observatory Target of Opportunity system was reviewed for efficiency after its first year responding to alerts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reviews the Target of Opportunity system at the Vera C. Rubin Observatory during its first year of operations. It examines the targets pursued since LSST first light and measures the system's overall efficiency. The review covers responses to events such as gravitational wave detections, high-energy neutrinos, and other astrophysical phenomena. The system uses 3 percent of the ten-year Legacy Survey of Space and Time to enable these special observations outside normal survey mode. A sympathetic reader would care because the assessment shows how the observatory can function as a discovery machine for exotic transients.

Core claim

The paper establishes through operational review that the Rubin Target of Opportunity system has been implemented and its performance assessed based on the first year of data since LSST first light, including the specific targets observed and the efficiency metrics achieved.

What carries the argument

The Target of Opportunity system, which diverts 3 percent of LSST survey time for rapid response to external alerts outside the standard observing mode.

If this is right

  • The system has demonstrated responses to gravitational wave events, high-energy neutrinos, and potentially hazardous asteroids.
  • Efficiency metrics supply a baseline for refining operations over the remaining survey years.
  • Special attention to the system is required to maximize performance given its departure from standard LSST mode.
  • The 3 percent allocation integrates with the main survey to capture transients that would otherwise be missed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The review could guide alert-response designs at other large surveys facing similar multi-messenger demands.
  • Accumulating data over multiple years might reveal seasonal or hardware-related variations not apparent in the initial period.
  • Effective ToO operations could raise the overall yield of coordinated discoveries linking Rubin data with other facilities.

Load-bearing premise

The first-year operational data and efficiency metrics presented are representative and sufficient to evaluate the system's performance without additional external validation or longer baseline.

What would settle it

An independent audit of observatory logs that finds large discrepancies with the reported efficiency numbers or targets pursued would challenge the review's conclusions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00217 by Alex Drlica-Wagner, Alysha B. Shugart, Anastasia Alexov, Andreja Gomboc, Bruno O. S\'anchez, Christopher W. Walter, Chris Weaver, Colin Orion Chandler, Danica \v{Z}ilkov\'a, Daniel L. Wang, Devanshi Singh, Eric C. Bellm, Erik Dennihy, Erin Leigh Howard, Fabian Araneda-Baltierra, Federica Bettina Bianco, Gautham Narayan, Ian S. Sullivan, Igor Andreoni, J. Anthony Tyson, John Banovetz, Keith Bechtol, Kenneth Herner, Kevin Fanning, Kris Mortensen, Kshitija Kelkar, Leanne P. Guy, Marcelle Soares-Santos, Narayan Khadka, Paulina Venegas, Pedro H. Bernardinelli, Peter Yoachim, R. Lynne Jones, Robert Armstrong, Robert D. Blum, Robert H. Lupton, Sean Patrick MacBride, Shreya Anand, Tatiana Acero-Cuellar, Tiago Ribeiro, \v{Z}eljko Ivezi\'c, W. M. Wood-Vasey, Yijung Kang, Yousuke Utsumi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The Rubin ToO response workflow. Time flows from left to right. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The Rubin pointings for the 3I/ATLAS ToO, with four distinct pointings in the region of 3I/ATLAS, but only [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Left: The localization skymap associated with S250725j, with the executed Rubin pointings overlaid. The 50% [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: The visits in i band on the night of November 14, 2025. The total area covered on the night in g band, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: Images of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS from a cutout of a single LSSTCam CCD. The position of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The NSF/DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory is a discovery machine, with unprecedented survey speed, which can be used to identify exotic astrophysical transients. In its prime mission, the ten year Legacy Survey of Space and Time will use 3% of its total time for Target of Opportunity observations, which includes response to gravitational wave events, high energy neutrinos, potentially-hazardous asteroids, and other astrophysical phenomena. Target of Opportunity observations exist outside of the usual LSST operational mode, requiring special attention to maximize performance. We review the Rubin Target of Opportunity system during its first year of Rubin Observatory operations, the Targets of Opportunity pursued since LSST first light, and the overall efficiency of the system.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Target-of-Opportunity (ToO) system during its first year of operations. It describes the allocation of 3% of LSST survey time for ToO observations in response to gravitational-wave events, high-energy neutrinos, potentially hazardous asteroids, and other astrophysical transients, and states that it covers the specific ToOs pursued since LSST first light together with an assessment of overall system efficiency.

Significance. An operational review documenting actual first-year ToO triggers, response latencies, and efficiency metrics for a major time-domain facility would be a useful reference for multi-messenger and transient astronomy. The current text, however, supplies no quantitative data, selection criteria, or performance numbers, so the claimed review cannot be assessed and the potential significance remains unrealized.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract: the manuscript states that a review of the ToO system, the targets pursued since first light, and overall efficiency was performed, yet supplies no data, methods, selection criteria, or quantitative results; the central claims therefore cannot be evaluated from the available text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their comments on our manuscript. We agree that the current version does not supply the quantitative data, methods, selection criteria, or performance metrics needed to substantiate the claims of a review of the ToO system, targets pursued, and efficiency. We will revise the manuscript to incorporate these elements.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: the manuscript states that a review of the ToO system, the targets pursued since first light, and overall efficiency was performed, yet supplies no data, methods, selection criteria, or quantitative results; the central claims therefore cannot be evaluated from the available text.

    Authors: We accept the referee's assessment. The present manuscript text describes the ToO allocation and system at a high level but does not include the specific quantitative results, response latencies, efficiency metrics, selection criteria, or lists of pursued targets. In the revised version we will add these data and methods so that the review can be properly evaluated. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: purely descriptive operational review

full rationale

The paper is a factual review of the Rubin ToO system, targets pursued since first light, and first-year efficiency metrics. It contains no derivations, equations, predictions, fitted parameters, or first-principles results. The central claims are observational summaries of operational data with no load-bearing mathematical steps that could reduce to self-definition, fitted inputs, or self-citations. This is the expected outcome for a purely descriptive operations paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No mathematical claims, derivations, or new physical models; the paper is an operational status report with no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5874 in / 923 out tokens · 19401 ms · 2026-07-02T17:03:35.102716+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products,

    Ivezi´ c,ˇZ. et al., “LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products,”Astro- phys. J.873(2), 111 (2019)

    2019

  2. [2]

    Survey Cadence Optimization Committee’s Phase 3 Recommendations,

    Rubin’s Survey Cadence Optimization Committee, Bianco, F. B., Jones, R. L., Anguita, T., Bauer, F. E., Edwards, L. O. V., Jha, S. W., Mandelbaum, R., Miller, A. A., Olsen, K., Slater, C. T., Smartt, S. J., Strader, J., Street, R. A., Volk, K., and Yoachim, P., “Survey Cadence Optimization Committee’s Phase 3 Recommendations,” Project Science Technical Not...

    2025

  3. [3]

    Scheduling the lsst: Commissioning the rubin feature based scheduler,

    Jones, L., “Scheduling the lsst: Commissioning the rubin feature based scheduler,”Ground-based and Air- borne Telescopes XI(2026). SPIE Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation 14151-33

    2026

  4. [4]

    Rubin ToO 2024: Envisioning the Vera C. Rubin Observatory LSST Target of Opportunity program,

    Andreoni, I., Margutti, R., Banovetz, J., Greenstreet, S., Hebert, C.-A., Lister, T., Palmese, A., Pira- nomonte, S., Smartt, S. J., Smith, G. P., Stein, R., Ahumada, T., Anand, S., Auchettl, K., Bannister, M. T., Bellm, E. C., Bloom, J. S., Bolin, B. T., Bom, C. R., Brethauer, D., Brucker, M. J., Buckley, D. A. H., Chandra, P., Chornock, R., Christensen,...

    work page arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Advanced LIGO,

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Aasi, J., Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T., Abernathy, M. R., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V., Affeldt, C., Aggarwal, N., Aguiar, O. D., Ain, A., Ajith, P., Alemic, A., Allen, B., Amariutei, D., Anderson, S. B., Anderson, W. G., Arai, K., Araya, M. C., Arceneaux, C., Areeda, J. S...

    2015

  6. [6]

    The IceCube Neutrino Observatory: instrumentation and online systems,

    Aartsen, M. G., Ackermann, M., Adams, J., Aguilar, J. A., Ahlers, M., Ahrens, M., Altmann, D., Andeen, K., Anderson, T., Ansseau, I., Anton, G., Archinger, M., Arg¨ uelles, C., Auer, R., Auffenberg, J., Axani, S., Baccus, J., Bai, X., Barnet, S., Barwick, S. W., Baum, V., Bay, R., Beattie, K., Beatty, J. J., Becker Tjus, J., Becker, K.-H., Bendfelt, T., B...

    2017

  7. [7]

    Sentry: An Automated Close Approach Monitoring System for Near-Earth Objects,

    Chamberlin, A. B., Chesley, S. R., Chodas, P. W., Giorgini, J. D., Keesey, M. S., Wimberly, R. N., and Yeomans, D. K., “Sentry: An Automated Close Approach Monitoring System for Near-Earth Objects,” in [AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #33],AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts33, 41.08 (Nov. 2001)

    2001

  8. [8]

    The Near-Earth Object Surveyor Mission,

    Mainzer, A., Masiero, J., Wright, E., Cutri, R., Abell, P., Bauer, J., Bottke, W., Carey, S., Kelley, M., Lawler, C., Schambeau, C., Vaquero, M., and NEO Surveyor Team, “The Near-Earth Object Surveyor Mission,” in [AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #54],AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts54, 409.02 (Dec. 2022)

    2022

  9. [9]

    SNEWS 2.0: a next-generation supernova early warning system for multi-messenger astronomy,

    Al Kharusi, S., BenZvi, S. Y., Bobowski, J. S., Bonivento, W., Brdar, V., Brunner, T., Caden, E., Clark, M., Coleiro, A., Colomer-Molla, M., Crespo-Anad´ on, J. I., Depoian, A., Dornic, D., Fischer, V., Franco, D., Fulgione, W., Gallo Rosso, A., Geske, M., Griswold, S., Gromov, M., Haggard, D., Habig, A., Halim, O., Higuera, A., Hill, R., Horiuchi, S., Is...

    2021

  10. [10]

    The Super-Kamiokande detector,

    Fukuda, S., Fukuda, Y., Hayakawa, T., Ichihara, E., Ishitsuka, M., Itow, Y., Kajita, T., Kameda, J., Kaneyuki, K., Kasuga, S., Kobayashi, K., Kobayashi, Y., Koshio, Y., Miura, M., Moriyama, S., Nakahata, M., Nakayama, S., Namba, T., Obayashi, Y., Okada, A., Oketa, M., Okumura, K., Oyabu, T., Sakurai, N., Shiozawa, M., Suzuki, Y., Takeuchi, Y., Toshito, T....

    2003

  11. [11]

    LSST Alerts: Key Numbers,

    Graham, M. L., Bellm, E. C., Guy, L. P., Slater, C. T., Dubois-Felsmann, G. P., Juri´ c, M., and Rubin Observatory Data Management System Science Team, “LSST Alerts: Key Numbers,” Data Management Technical Note DMTN-102, NSF-DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory (April 2024)

    2024

  12. [12]

    Plans and Policies for LSST Alert Distribution,

    Bellm, E., Blum, R., Graham, M., Guy, L., Ivezi´ c, ˇZ., O’Mullane, W., Patterson, M., Swinbank, J., and Willman, B., “Plans and Policies for LSST Alert Distribution,” Data Management Controlled Document LDM-612, NSF-DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory (July 2020)

    2020

  13. [13]

    SCIMMA: Build- ing an integrated time-domain ecosystem,

    Brazier, A., Araneda Baltierra, F., Hanna, C., Howell, A., Jones, D., Manning, T. A., Matheson, T., Mc- Cully, C., Narayan, G., Nation, J., Petravick, D., Tapia, R., Weaver, C., and Wolski, R., “SCIMMA: Build- ing an integrated time-domain ecosystem,” in [American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #245], American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstract...

    2025

  14. [14]

    Sasquatch: Rubin Observatory metrics and telemetry service,

    Fausti Neto, A., “Sasquatch: Rubin Observatory metrics and telemetry service,” Data Management Tech- nical Note DMTN-290, NSF-DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory (May 2024)

    2024

  15. [15]

    Handling Targets of Opportunity,

    Ribeiro, T., “Handling Targets of Opportunity,” Telescope and Site Technical Note TSTN-035, NSF-DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory (June 2022)

    2022

  16. [16]

    lsst/rubin scheduler: v3.22.0,

    Yoachim, P., Jones, L., Eric H. Neilsen, J., MacBride, S., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Ross, Espada, G., and humna, “lsst/rubin scheduler: v3.22.0,” (Jan. 2026)

    2026

  17. [17]

    Alert Production with the Vera C. Rubin Observatory,

    Vera C. Rubin Observatory Team, “Alert Production with the Vera C. Rubin Observatory,” Technical Note RTN-114, NSF-DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory (February 2026)

    2026

  18. [18]

    Vera C. Rubin Observatory auxiliary telescope commissioning as a control system pathfinder,

    Ingraham, P., Clements, A. W., Ribeiro, T., Reuter, M. A., Fisher-Levine, M., Hoblitt, J., Lupton, R. H., Thomas, S., Stubbs, C. W., Arndt, K. T., Callahan, N., Claver, C. F., Colleoni, F., Corral, L., Doherty, P., Economou, F., Fausti Neto, A., Jenness, T., Khine, H., Krughoff, K. S., Mondrik, N., Menanteau, F., Mills, D. J., O’Mullane, W., Reil, K. A., ...

    2020

  19. [19]

    LSST Commissioning Camera,

    SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory and NSF-DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory, “LSST Commissioning Camera,” (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    The Rubin Observatory Target-of-Opportunity Mock Data Challenge,

    MacBride, S. P., “The Rubin Observatory Target-of-Opportunity Mock Data Challenge,” Technical Note RTN-107, NSF-DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory (December 2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    The LSST Science Pipelines Software: Optical Survey Pipeline Reduction and Analysis Environment,

    Rubin Observatory Science Pipelines Developers, “The LSST Science Pipelines Software: Optical Survey Pipeline Reduction and Analysis Environment,” Project Science Technical Note PSTN-019, NSF-DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory (December 2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    The Dark Energy Survey Data Release 2,

    Abbott, T. M. C., Adam´ ow, M., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Amon, A., Annis, J., Avila, S., Bacon, D., Banerji, M., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Bertin, E., Bhargava, S., Bridle, S. L., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carnero Rosell, A., Carrasco Kind, M., Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Cawthon, R., Chang, C., Choi, A., Conselice, C., Costanzi, M....

    2021

  23. [23]

    The DECam Local Volume Exploration Survey Data Release 2,

    Drlica-Wagner, A., Ferguson, P. S., Adam´ ow, M., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Bacon, D., Bechtol, K., Bell, E. F., Bertin, E., Bilaji, P., Bocquet, S., Bom, C. R., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carballo- Bello, J. A., Carlin, J. L., Carnero Rosell, A., Carrasco Kind, M., Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Cerny, W., Chang, C., Choi, Y., Conseli...

    2022

  24. [24]

    The DECADE cosmic shear project I: A new weak lensing shape catalog of 107 million galaxies,

    Anbajagane, D., Zhang, Z., Chang, C., Tan, C. Y., Adamow, M., Secco, L. F., Becker, M. R., Ferguson, P. S., Drlica-Wagner, A., Gruendl, R. A., Herron, K., Tong, A., Troxel, M. A., Sanchez-Cid, D., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Chicoine, N., Teixeira, R., Alarcon, A., Suson, D., Alsina, A. N., Amon, A., Bom, C. R., Carballo-Bello, J. A., Cerny, W., Choi, A., Choi, Y...

    2025

  25. [25]

    Discovery and Preliminary Characterization of a Third Interstellar Object: 3I/ATLAS,

    Seligman, D. Z., Micheli, M., Farnocchia, D., Denneau, L., Noonan, J. W., Hsieh, H. H., Santana-Ros, T., Tonry, J., Auchettl, K., Conversi, L., Devog` ele, M., Faggioli, L., Feinstein, A. D., Fenucci, M., Ferrais, M., Frincke, T., Gillon, M., Hainaut, O. R., Hart, K., Hoffman, A., Holt, C. E., Hoogendam, W. B., Huber, M. E., Jehin, E., Kareta, T., Keane, ...

    2025

  26. [26]

    NSF-DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory Observations of Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS (C/2025 N1)

    Chandler, C. O., Bernardinelli, P. H., Juri´ c, M., Singh, D., Hsieh, H. H., Sullivan, I., Jones, R. L., Kurlander, J. A., Vavilov, D., Eggl, S., Holman, M., Spoto, F., Schwamb, M. E., MacArthur, L. A., Makadia, R., Micheli, M., Heinze, A., Christensen, E. J., Beebe, W., Roodman, A., Lim, K.-T., Jenness, T., Bosch, J., Smart, B. M., Bellm, E., MacBride, S...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS: discovery and physical description,

    Bolin, B. T., Belyakov, M., Fremling, C., Graham, M. J., Abdelaziz, A. M., Elhosseiny, E., Gray, C. L., Ingebretsen, C., Jewett, G., Lisse, C. M., Karpov, S., Kilic, M., Maˇ sek, M., Molham, M., Roderick, D., Takey, A., Abron, L.-M., Coughlin, M. W., Hsieh, C.-H., Noll, K. S., and Wong, I., “Interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS: discovery and physical description,...

    2025

  28. [28]

    Gcn - circulars - 41206 - ligo/virgo/kagra s250725j: Decam desgw epoch 1-2 candidates,

    McMahon, I. and MacBride, S. P., “Gcn - circulars - 41206 - ligo/virgo/kagra s250725j: Decam desgw epoch 1-2 candidates,” (Jul 2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    Gcn - circulars - 41177 - ligo/virgo/kagra s250725j: Decam gw-mmads candidates,

    Hall, X., Hu, L., and Cabrera, T., “Gcn - circulars - 41177 - ligo/virgo/kagra s250725j: Decam gw-mmads candidates,” (Jul 2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    Gcn - circulars - 41595 - ligo/virgo/kagra s250725j: Obser- vations with the nsf-doe vera c. rubin observatory,

    MacBride, S. P., Anand, S., and Howard, E., “Gcn - circulars - 41595 - ligo/virgo/kagra s250725j: Obser- vations with the nsf-doe vera c. rubin observatory,” (Aug 2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    Gcn - circulars - 42707 - ligo/virgo/kagra s251112cm: Ob- servations with the nsf-doe vera c. rubin observatory,

    MacBride, S. P., Anand, S., and Howard, E., “Gcn - circulars - 42707 - ligo/virgo/kagra s251112cm: Ob- servations with the nsf-doe vera c. rubin observatory,” (Nov 2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    Gcn - circulars - 43257 - ligo/virgo/kagra s251112cm: Can- didates with the nsf-doe vera c. rubin observatory,

    Anand, S., MacBride, S. P., and Howard, E., “Gcn - circulars - 43257 - ligo/virgo/kagra s251112cm: Can- didates with the nsf-doe vera c. rubin observatory,” (Dec 2025)

    2025

  33. [33]

    Nsf-doe vera c. rubin observatory follow-up of the sub-solar mass gravitational wave candidate s251112cm,

    Anand, S., MacBride, S. P., and et. al, “Nsf-doe vera c. rubin observatory follow-up of the sub-solar mass gravitational wave candidate s251112cm,” In preparation

  34. [34]

    What is love: learnings and challenges in developing a real time monitoring system for obser- vatory operations,

    Aranda, S., “What is love: learnings and challenges in developing a real time monitoring system for obser- vatory operations,”Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes XI(2026). SPIE Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation

    2026

  35. [35]

    ObsLocTap: Publishing the Rubin Observing Schedule,

    O’Mullane, W., “ObsLocTap: Publishing the Rubin Observing Schedule,” Data Management Technical Note DMTN-263, NSF-DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory (October 2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    The Gravita- tional Wave Treasure Map: A Tool to Coordinate, Visualize, and Assess the Electromagnetic Follow-up of Gravitational-wave Events,

    Wyatt, S. D., Tohuvavohu, A., Arcavi, I., Lundquist, M. J., Howell, D. A., and Sand, D. J., “The Gravita- tional Wave Treasure Map: A Tool to Coordinate, Visualize, and Assess the Electromagnetic Follow-up of Gravitational-wave Events,”The Astrophysical Journal894, 127 (May 2020)

    2020