pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in

arxiv: 2507.13409 · v3 · submitted 2025-07-17 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP · astro-ph.GA

NSF-DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory Observations of Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS (C/2025 N1)

Colin Orion Chandler , Pedro H. Bernardinelli , Mario Juri\'c , Devanshi Singh , Henry H. Hsieh , Ian Sullivan , R. Lynne Jones , Jacob A. Kurlander
show 298 more authors
Dmitrii Vavilov Siegfried Eggl Matthew Holman Federica Spoto Megan E. Schwamb Lauren A. MacArthur Rahil Makadia Marco Micheli Aren Heinze Eric J. Christensen Wilson Beebe Aaron Roodman Kian-Tat Lim Tim Jenness James Bosch Brianna M. Smart Eric Bellm Sean MacBride Meredith L. Rawls Sarah Greenstreet Colin Slater \v{Z}eljko Ivezi\'c Robert D. Blum Andrew Connolly Gregory Daues Michelle Gower J. Bryce Kalmbach Michele T. Bannister Luke Dones Rosemary C. Dorsey Davide Farnocchia Wesley C. Fraser John C. Forbes Cesar Fuentes Carrie E. Holt Laura Inno Geraint H. Jones Matthew M. Knight Chris J. Lintott Tim Lister Robert Lupton Mark Jesus M. Magbanua Renu Malhotra Beatrice E. A. Mueller Joseph Murtagh Nitya Pandey William T. Reach Nalin H. Samarasinha Darryl Z. Seligman Colin Snodgrass Michael Solontoi Gyula M. Szab\'o Peter Vere\v{s} Ellie White Maria Womack Leslie A. Young Russ Allbery Shreya Anand Roberto Armellin \'Eric Aubourg Chrysa Avdellidou Farrukh Azfar James Bauer Keith Bechtol Valerie Becker Matthew Belyakov Susan D. Benecchi Ivano Bertini Dennis Bodewits Patricia Boeshaar Bryce T. Bolin Maitrayee Bose Alexandre Boucaud Rodrigo C. Boufleur Dominique Boutigny Andrew Bradshaw Felipe Braga-Ribas Johan Bregeon Laura E. Buchanan Daniel Calabrese J. I. B. Camargo Neven Caplar Jeffrey L. Carlin Benoit Carry Juan Pablo Carvajal Ross Ceballo Hsin-Fang Chiang Yumi Choi C\'eline Combet Luiz da Costa Preeti Cowan John Franklin Crenshaw Steve Croft Matija \'Cuk Philip N. Daly Filippo D'Ammando Felipe Daruich Guillaume Daubard James R. A. Davenport Tansu Daylan Jennifer Delgado Stephanie J. H. Deppe Hadrien A. R. Devillepoix Peter E. Doherty Abbie Donaldson Holger Drass Gregory P. Dubois-Felsmann Frossie Economou Marielle R. Eduardo Ioana Sotuela Elorriaga Anthony Englert Kevin Fanning Grigori Fedorets Peter S. Ferguson Maryann Benny Fernandes Agn\`es Fert\'e Merlin Fisher-Levine Mark L Freytag Maxwell K. Frissell Marco Fulle Poshak Gandhi John Gates David W. Gerdes Alex R. Gibbs A. Fraser Gillan Massimiliano Giordano Orsini T. Glanzman Iain Goodenow Altair Ramos Gomes-J\'unior Miranda R. Gorsuch Mikael Granvik Wen Guan Leanne P. Guy Mark Hammergren Andrew Hanushevsky Fabio Hernandez \v{A}dis Herrol\'d Daniel Hestroffer Joshua Hoblitt Matthew J. Hopkins Simone Ieva Patrick Ingraham David H. Irving Buell T. Jannuzi M. James Jee David Jimenez Claire Juramy Steven M. Kahn Yijung Kang Arun Kannawadi Edward Karavakis JJ Kavelaars Kshitija Kelkar Michael S. P. Kelley Lee S. Kelvin Ivan Kotov Alec Koumjian G\'abor Kov\'acs K. Simon Krughoff Agnieszka Kryszczy\'nska Petr Kub\'anek Craig Lage Travis J. Lange Pierre-Fran\c{c}ois L\'eget Laurent Le Guillou Benjamin Levine W. Garrett Levine Zhuofu (Chester) Li Shuang Liang Javier Licandro Hsing Wen Lin Carey Lisse Nate B. Lust Ryan R. Lyttle Ashish A. Mahabal Max Mahlke Gabriele Mainetti Rachel Mandelbaum Steven J. Margheim Giuliano Margoti Phil Marshall Du\v{s}an Mar\v{c}eta Guillem Megias Homar Mario D. Melita Felipe Menanteau Joshua Meyers Dave Mills Marc Moniez C.A.L. Morales Mar\'in Naomi Morato Surhud More Christopher B. Morrison Kris Mortensen Youssef Moulane Karlo Mrakov\v{c}i\'c Fritz Mueller Marco A. Mu\~noz-Guti\'errez Homer Neal F. M. Newcomer Erfan Nourbakhsh Paul O'Connor Drew Oldag William J. Oldroyd William O'Mullane Cyrielle Opitom Dagmara Oszkiewicz Gary L. Page Jack Patterson Maria T Patterson Matthew J. Payne Eske M. Pedersen Julien Peloton Chrystian Luciano Pereira John R. Peterson Stephen R. Pietrowicz Andr\'es A. Plazas Malag\'on Edyta Podlewska-Gaca Daniel Polin Rebekah Polen Hannah Mary Margaret Pollek Yongqiang Qiu Bruno Quint Markus Rabus Darin Ragozzine Jayadev Rajagopal Arianna Ranabhat Kevin Reil Tiago Ribeiro Malena Rice Stephen T. Ridgway Steven M. Ritz Andrew S. Rivkin James E. Robinson Agata Ro\.zek Eli Rykoff Luis E. Salazar Manzano Andrei Salnikov Bruno O. S\'anchez David Sanmartim Gal Sarid Charles A. Schambeau Rafe H. Schindler Samuel J. Schmidt German Schumacher Theo Schutt Daniel Scolnic Robert Seaman Jacques Sebag Nima Sedaghat Jacqueline Seron Richard A. Shaw Alysha Shugart Jonathan Sick Jaladh Singhal Amir Siraj Michael C. Sitarz Shahram Sobhani Christine Soldahl Dallin Spencer Brian Stalder Steven Stetzler Alan Strauss Christopher W. Stubbs Krzysztof L. Suberlak Adam Snyder John D. Swinbank L\'aszl\'o Szigeti Michael Tauraso Dan S. Taranu John Gregg Thayer Sandrine Thomas Adam Thornton Luca Tonietti Laura Toribio San Cipriano David E. Trilling Chadwick A. Trujillo Te-Wei Tsai Douglas L. Tucker Max Turri Tony Tyson Elana K. Urbach Wouter van Reeven Antonia Sierra Villarreal Stelios Voutsinas Christopher W. Walter Yuankun (David) Wang Charlotte Ward Michael Warner Maxine West Ian Wong W. M. Wood-Vasey Emerson Whittaker Bin Yang Quanzhi Ye Peter Yoachim R. Zanmar Sanchez Jinshuo Zhang Conghao Zhou
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 04:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.GA
keywords interstellar comet3I/ATLASRubin Observatoryphotometrydust-to-nucleus ratiocometary colorsastrometryLSST
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Rubin Observatory photometry of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS yields a near-nucleus dust-to-nucleus scattering cross-section ratio of at least 13.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports recovery of the third known interstellar comet in Rubin Observatory images taken before and after its discovery, including precise positions and multi-band brightness measurements. These data allow calculation of specific colors across the griz y filters and show no detectable short-term changes in brightness. Combining the Rubin photometry with an external upper limit on the nucleus size produces the dust ratio estimate, which indicates that scattering from dust dominates over the nucleus itself. The observations serve as an early demonstration of the kinds of measurements a large-scale survey can deliver on such objects.

Core claim

We recover detections of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS in Rubin ugrizy images spanning June 21 to July 20 2025, measure on-sky positions to roughly 70 mas, and obtain grizy magnitudes to 0.01 mag precision with no variability above that level. Using the Rubin photometry together with an upper-limit nucleus size from separate Hubble observations we derive a near-nucleus dust-to-nucleus scattering cross-section ratio eta of at least 13 on July 2. The measured colors are g minus r equals 0.657 plus or minus 0.013 mag, r minus i equals 0.235 plus or minus 0.018 mag, i minus z equals 0.147 plus or minus 0.042 mag, and z minus y equals 0.047 plus or minus 0.052 mag.

What carries the argument

The near-nucleus dust-to-nucleus scattering cross-section ratio eta, obtained by comparing Rubin photometry to an external upper limit on nucleus size.

If this is right

  • Dust scattering dominates the observed brightness of 3I/ATLAS near the time of the July 2 observation.
  • The object shows no short-term photometric variability above the 0.01 mag level in the Rubin data.
  • The measured colors provide a baseline spectral characterization for this interstellar comet.
  • These early large-aperture observations preview the data products the Legacy Survey of Space and Time will generate once routine operations begin.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar dust ratios on future interstellar objects could be compared directly to Solar System comets to test for compositional differences.
  • Repeated color measurements over weeks or months would reveal whether the dust properties change as the comet approaches the Sun.
  • If the same eta threshold appears in additional Rubin detections, it would suggest that most interstellar comets carry substantial near-nucleus dust envelopes.
  • Extending the analysis to include later Rubin epochs could test whether eta remains constant or evolves with heliocentric distance.

Load-bearing premise

The Hubble Space Telescope upper limit on nucleus size is taken at face value without independent re-derivation or validation in this work.

What would settle it

A future direct measurement of the nucleus radius larger than the Hubble upper limit used here, combined with the same dust photometry, would produce an eta value below 13.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.13409 by Aaron Roodman, Abbie Donaldson, Adam Snyder, Adam Thornton, A. Fraser Gillan, Agata Ro\.zek, Agn\`es Fert\'e, Agnieszka Kryszczy\'nska, Alan Strauss, Alec Koumjian, Alexandre Boucaud, Alex R. Gibbs, Altair Ramos Gomes-J\'unior, Alysha Shugart, Amir Siraj, Andrei Salnikov, Andr\'es A. Plazas Malag\'on, Andrew Bradshaw, Andrew Connolly, Andrew Hanushevsky, Andrew S. Rivkin, Anthony Englert, Antonia Sierra Villarreal, Aren Heinze, Arianna Ranabhat, Arun Kannawadi, Ashish A. Mahabal, Beatrice E. A. Mueller, Benjamin Levine, Benoit Carry, Bin Yang, Brianna M. Smart, Brian Stalder, Bruno O. S\'anchez, Bruno Quint, Bryce T. Bolin, Buell T. Jannuzi, C.A.L. Morales Mar\'in, Carey Lisse, Carrie E. Holt, C\'eline Combet, Cesar Fuentes, Chadwick A. Trujillo, Charles A. Schambeau, Charlotte Ward, Chris J. Lintott, Christine Soldahl, Christopher B. Morrison, Christopher W. Stubbs, Christopher W. Walter, Chrysa Avdellidou, Chrystian Luciano Pereira, Claire Juramy, Colin Orion Chandler, Colin Slater, Colin Snodgrass, Conghao Zhou, Craig Lage, Cyrielle Opitom, Dagmara Oszkiewicz, Dallin Spencer, Daniel Calabrese, Daniel Hestroffer, Daniel Polin, Daniel Scolnic, Dan S. Taranu, Darin Ragozzine, Darryl Z. Seligman, Dave Mills, Davide Farnocchia, David E. Trilling, David H. Irving, David Jimenez, David Sanmartim, David W. Gerdes, Dennis Bodewits, Devanshi Singh, Dmitrii Vavilov, Dominique Boutigny, Douglas L. Tucker, Drew Oldag, Du\v{s}an Mar\v{c}eta, Edward Karavakis, Edyta Podlewska-Gaca, Elana K. Urbach, Eli Rykoff, Ellie White, Emerson Whittaker, Erfan Nourbakhsh, \'Eric Aubourg, Eric Bellm, Eric J. Christensen, Eske M. Pedersen, Fabio Hernandez, Farrukh Azfar, Federica Spoto, Felipe Braga-Ribas, Felipe Daruich, Felipe Menanteau, Filippo D'Ammando, F. M. Newcomer, Fritz Mueller, Frossie Economou, G\'abor Kov\'acs, Gabriele Mainetti, Gal Sarid, Gary L. Page, Geraint H. Jones, German Schumacher, Giuliano Margoti, Gregory Daues, Gregory P. Dubois-Felsmann, Grigori Fedorets, Guillaume Daubard, Guillem Megias Homar, Gyula M. Szab\'o, Hadrien A. R. Devillepoix, Hannah Mary Margaret Pollek, Henry H. Hsieh, Holger Drass, Homer Neal, Hsin-Fang Chiang, Hsing Wen Lin, Iain Goodenow, Ian Sullivan, Ian Wong, Ioana Sotuela Elorriaga, Ivan Kotov, Ivano Bertini, Jack Patterson, Jacob A. Kurlander, Jacqueline Seron, Jacques Sebag, Jaladh Singhal, James Bauer, James Bosch, James E. Robinson, James R. A. Davenport, Javier Licandro, Jayadev Rajagopal, J. Bryce Kalmbach, Jeffrey L. Carlin, Jennifer Delgado, J. I. B. Camargo, Jinshuo Zhang, JJ Kavelaars, Johan Bregeon, John C. Forbes, John D. Swinbank, John Franklin Crenshaw, John Gates, John Gregg Thayer, John R. Peterson, Jonathan Sick, Joseph Murtagh, Joshua Hoblitt, Joshua Meyers, Juan Pablo Carvajal, Julien Peloton, Karlo Mrakov\v{c}i\'c, Keith Bechtol, Kevin Fanning, Kevin Reil, Kian-Tat Lim, Kris Mortensen, Krzysztof L. Suberlak, Kshitija Kelkar, K. Simon Krughoff, L\'aszl\'o Szigeti, Laura E. Buchanan, Laura Inno, Laura Toribio San Cipriano, Lauren A. MacArthur, Laurent Le Guillou, Leanne P. Guy, Lee S. Kelvin, Leslie A. Young, Luca Tonietti, Luis E. Salazar Manzano, Luiz da Costa, Luke Dones, Maitrayee Bose, Malena Rice, Marc Moniez, Marco A. Mu\~noz-Guti\'errez, Marco Fulle, Marco Micheli, Maria T Patterson, Maria Womack, Marielle R. Eduardo, Mario D. Melita, Mario Juri\'c, Mark Hammergren, Mark Jesus M. Magbanua, Mark L Freytag, Markus Rabus, Maryann Benny Fernandes, Massimiliano Giordano Orsini, Matija \'Cuk, Matthew Belyakov, Matthew Holman, Matthew J. Hopkins, Matthew J. Payne, Matthew M. Knight, Maxine West, Max Mahlke, Max Turri, Maxwell K. Frissell, Megan E. Schwamb, Meredith L. Rawls, Merlin Fisher-Levine, Michael C. Sitarz, Michael Solontoi, Michael S. P. Kelley, Michael Tauraso, Michael Warner, Michele T. Bannister, Michelle Gower, Mikael Granvik, Miranda R. Gorsuch, M. James Jee, Nalin H. Samarasinha, Naomi Morato, Nate B. Lust, Neven Caplar, Nima Sedaghat, Nitya Pandey, Patricia Boeshaar, Patrick Ingraham, Paul O'Connor, Pedro H. Bernardinelli, Peter E. Doherty, Peter S. Ferguson, Peter Vere\v{s}, Peter Yoachim, Petr Kub\'anek, Philip N. Daly, Phil Marshall, Pierre-Fran\c{c}ois L\'eget, Poshak Gandhi, Preeti Cowan, Quanzhi Ye, Rachel Mandelbaum, Rafe H. Schindler, Rahil Makadia, Rebekah Polen, Renu Malhotra, Richard A. Shaw, R. Lynne Jones, Robert D. Blum, Robert Lupton, Roberto Armellin, Robert Seaman, Rodrigo C. Boufleur, Rosemary C. Dorsey, Ross Ceballo, Russ Allbery, Ryan R. Lyttle, R. Zanmar Sanchez, Samuel J. Schmidt, Sandrine Thomas, Sarah Greenstreet, Sean MacBride, Shahram Sobhani, Shreya Anand, Shuang Liang, Siegfried Eggl, Simone Ieva, Stelios Voutsinas, Stephanie J. H. Deppe, Stephen R. Pietrowicz, Stephen T. Ridgway, Steve Croft, Steven J. Margheim, Steven M. Kahn, Steven M. Ritz, Steven Stetzler, Surhud More, Susan D. Benecchi, Tansu Daylan, Te-Wei Tsai, T. Glanzman, Theo Schutt, Tiago Ribeiro, Tim Jenness, Tim Lister, Tony Tyson, Travis J. Lange, \v{A}dis Herrol\'d, Valerie Becker, \v{Z}eljko Ivezi\'c, Wen Guan, Wesley C. Fraser, W. Garrett Levine, William J. Oldroyd, William O'Mullane, William T. Reach, Wilson Beebe, W. M. Wood-Vasey, Wouter van Reeven, Yijung Kang, Yongqiang Qiu, Youssef Moulane, Yuankun (David) Wang, Yumi Choi, Zhuofu (Chester) Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: 3I/ATLAS minimum co-addition from UT 2025 July 3, 21×30 s r-band images acquired by NSF-DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory. The FOV is 15′′ × 15′′, with North up and East left. et al. 2017; Trilling et al. 2018), yet the object exhib￾ited significant non-gravitational acceleration (Micheli et al. 2018; ’Oumuamua ISSI Team et al. 2019) and an unusually large light curve amplitude indicating an elon￾gated or flat… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Gallery of serendipitous observations of 3I/ATLAS from the NSF-DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory (site code X05). All images are 30′′ × 30′′ and have been reprojected so that North appears up, and East to the left. The anti-solar (yellow, black-outlined arrow) and anti-motion (black, red-outlined arrow) directions are indicated. All dates and times are TAI. (a) 2025 June 21 08:11:32. (b) 2025 June 22 02:32:47.… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: 3I/ATLAS imaged on UT 2025 July 3 by the NSF-DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory as a part of commissioning. All images are 30 s r-band exposures with North up, East left, and the anti-solar −⊙ and anti-motion −v vectors shown inset at the top-left. Exposure midpoints (TAI ISO) are overplotted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: 3I/ATLAS (center, indicated) observations after UT 2025 July 3. North is up, East left, with the anti-solar (yellow arrow) and anti-motion (black arrow with red outline) shown as in 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: On the left is a cutout from a crowded field (visit id=2025070100200) centered on 3I/ATLAS. The red ring represents the LSST Science Pipeline’s aperture photometry radius (see Section 4.7). In the image, 3I/ATLAS is seen nestled between four sources (two to the left, two to the right). The brighter three (one to the left, and two to the right) have been detected as separate and deblended (marked with yello… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The three panels show the positional residuals between our windowed centroid measurements and a reference measurement for stars (left, using the LSST Science Pipelines as reference), asteroids (center, using JPL Horizons as a reference), and 3I/ATLAS (right, again using JPL Horizons). In each panel, the black points represent individual measurements, and the red square represents the median value per coord… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Contour plots (using 10 logarithmically-spaced contour levels ranging from the peak value of each image to the average background level in each image) of LSST images of 3I/ATLAS (left panel) and a nearby (within 1 arcmin of the target) reference field star from the same image (right) from (a) UT 2025 June 21 and (b) UT 2025 July 2, centered on the target. The FOV of each panel is 5′′ × 5 ′′. North (N), Eas… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Astrometric residuals of 3I/ATLAS based on data available at the MPC up until 2025-07-15 (MPC Solution 20250715). Top: Residuals in Right Ascension corrected for Declination vs Declination plotted in units of the goodness of fit parameter χ. Regions of constant χ are also shown. Bottom: Declination-corrected Residuals in Right Ascen￾sion vs Declination. In both panels, the Rubin data points are shown as te… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Top: The two horizontal panels show time series PSF and aperture flux measurements f /⟨f⟩ for the 28 viable r band images of 3I/ATLAS taken on July 2nd 2025. The gray shaded area represents the variability expected from the mean light curve amplitude A. Bottom left: Probability distribution of the mean PSF magnitude yielded by this procedure, with the vertical line indicating the mean measurement ⟨mr⟩ = 1… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: 3I/ATLAS metrics plotted versus time from UT 2024 January 1 to UT 2028 January 1. The vertical dashed red line indicates UT 2025 July 12; this is the date elements were retrieved from JPL Horizons (Giorgini et al. 1996). The r [au] panel indicates the heliocentric distance of 3I/ATLAS. The T-mag panel indicates the JPL Horizons-computed total magnitude of 3I/ATLAS; T-mag should be considered a very rough … view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Radial profile measurements of 3I/ATLAS (blue circles) and a set of four vetted comparison stars (yellow shaded region), along with polynomial fits (solid blue line and dashed yellow line, respectively). Data points beyond 3σ from the polynomial fit were clipped (grey markers, when present), and the function was re-fit. The signal floor is in￾dicated by a horizontal green dashed line. Vertical dashed line… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: One-dimensional surface brightness pro￾files (measured perpendicular to the direction of apparent non-sidereal motion) of 3I/ATLAS (solid blue lines) and see￾ing-convolved model nuclei with linearly spaced coma levels (i.e., ηi = 0.5(i − 1)) ranging from η = 0 (solid black lines) to η = 3 (dashed black line, with profiles corresponding to intermediate η values shown as dotted black lines) for data from (a… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Synchrone-syndyne grid for 3I/ATLAS on UT 2025 July 2 for isotropic dust emission. The position of the object is at the center of the plot (at ∆RA = ∆Dec = 0 arcsec), where (essentially overlapping) solid colored lines correspond to syndynes, along which particles of specified sizes should be found (where particle sizes are parameter￾ized by β; particle radii, a, in µm, are approximately given by a = β −1… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Sky-map of the final SV observations distribution of 3I/ATLAS. The SV here is simulated from recorded point￾ings already enacted and nominal operations thereafter. The black points represent individual observations of 3I/ATLAS, with the yellow star highlighting its final observation in the SV on UT 2025 August 22. The red solid line marks the ecliptic plane, and the solid and dashed blue lines mark the ga… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report on the observation and measurement of astrometry, photometry, morphology, and activityof the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS, also designated C/2025 N1 (ATLAS) with the NSF-DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory. Comet 3I/ATLAS, the third known interstellar object, was discovered on UT 2025 July 1. Rubin Observatory had coincidentally collected images of the object's region of the sky during routine commissioning. Facilitated by Rubin's high resolution and large aperture, we successfully recovered object detections from Rubin observations spanning UT 2025 June 21 (10 days before discovery, when 3I/ATLAS was 4.5 au from the Sun) through the date of discovery, and we acquired additional images through UT 2025 July 20 as part of commissioning. We measure on-sky locations of 3I/ATLAS in Rubin ugrizy bands, with a typical precision of about 70 mas, and briefly describe the reason this is coarser than our measured static source astrometric precision of about 3 mas in Rubin images. We measure grizy magnitudes of 3I/ATLAS photometry at about 0.01 mag precision, detecting no short-term photometric variability above 0.01 mag. We derive an estimated near-nucleus dust-to-nucleus scattering cross-section ratio of eta >= 13 on UT 2025 July 2 based on Rubin photometry and an upper limit nucleus size computed from Hubble Space Telescope observations. We find Rubin colors of g - r = (0.657 +/- 0.013) mag, r - i = (0.235 +/- 0.018) mag, i - z = (0.147 +/- 0.042) mag, z - y = (0.047 +/- 0.052) mag. These data represent the earliest observations of this object by a large (>=8-meter class) telescope and illustrate the type of measurements (and discoveries) Rubin's Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) will begin to provide after it begins in early 2026.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports early observations of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS (C/2025 N1) from Rubin Observatory commissioning data spanning June 21 to July 20 2025. It presents astrometric positions measured at ~70 mas precision in ugrizy bands, photometry at ~0.01 mag precision with no detected short-term variability above that level, derived colors g-r = 0.657±0.013, r-i = 0.235±0.018, i-z = 0.147±0.042, z-y = 0.047±0.052, and a lower limit eta >=13 on the near-nucleus dust-to-nucleus scattering cross-section ratio obtained on UT 2025 July 2 by combining Rubin total cross-section measurements with an external HST nucleus-size upper limit. These are presented as the earliest large-telescope data on the object and as a demonstration of LSST capabilities.

Significance. If the measurements hold, the work supplies timely, high-precision photometry and colors for the third known interstellar object, enabling comparisons with prior interstellar visitors and Solar System comets. The direct reduction of Rubin images against external catalogs avoids circularity in the reported values. The eta lower limit provides a quantitative indicator of dust activity, and the overall dataset illustrates Rubin's performance for faint, moving targets ahead of the LSST survey.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and results section on eta: the reported lower bound eta >=13 is obtained by subtracting an HST-derived upper-limit nucleus scattering cross-section from the total cross-section measured in the Rubin photometry on UT 2025 July 2. The manuscript cites the HST observations but does not restate or validate the albedo, phase-function, or SNR assumptions used to convert the non-detection into a size limit. Because eta is defined as the dust-to-nucleus ratio, any revision to the adopted nucleus radius directly changes the numerical floor; this dependency should be quantified or cross-checked within the present work for robustness.
minor comments (1)
  1. The brief explanation for the difference between the 70 mas moving-object astrometric precision and the 3 mas static-source precision could be expanded with a short quantitative discussion of the dominant error sources (e.g., trailing, catalog uncertainties).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the manuscript and for the recommendation of minor revision. We address the single major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and results section on eta: the reported lower bound eta >=13 is obtained by subtracting an HST-derived upper-limit nucleus scattering cross-section from the total cross-section measured in the Rubin photometry on UT 2025 July 2. The manuscript cites the HST observations but does not restate or validate the albedo, phase-function, or SNR assumptions used to convert the non-detection into a size limit. Because eta is defined as the dust-to-nucleus ratio, any revision to the adopted nucleus radius directly changes the numerical floor; this dependency should be quantified or cross-checked within the present work for robustness.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from greater transparency on the HST assumptions. In the revised version we will expand the relevant paragraph in the results section to explicitly restate the albedo, phase-function, and SNR thresholds adopted in the cited HST non-detection analysis. We will also add a short sensitivity discussion (or supplementary table) showing how the eta >=13 floor shifts under plausible variations in the assumed nucleus radius, thereby quantifying the dependency directly within this work. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: eta >=13 and colors are direct reductions from independent Rubin photometry plus external HST nucleus limit

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain consists of direct astrometric and photometric reductions of Rubin ugrizy images against external catalogs, yielding colors at ~0.01 mag precision and a total scattering cross-section on UT 2025 July 2. The eta >=13 lower bound is obtained by subtracting an independent upper-limit nucleus cross-section (from separate HST observations) from the Rubin total; this is a straightforward arithmetic combination of two externally sourced quantities rather than any self-referential definition, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation. No equations or steps reduce the reported results to the paper's own inputs by construction, and the measurements remain falsifiable against standard catalogs without internal circular dependencies.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an observational report whose central claims rest on standard telescope calibration and image-reduction assumptions rather than new theoretical constructs.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard astrometric and photometric reduction pipelines produce unbiased positions and magnitudes when applied to moving solar-system objects.
    Invoked implicitly when reporting 70 mas and 0.01 mag precisions from Rubin commissioning data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 7533 in / 1243 out tokens · 26050 ms · 2026-05-19T04:59:37.043570+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Volatile Inventory of 3I/ATLAS as seen with JWST/MIRI

    astro-ph.EP 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    JWST mid-IR observations of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS yield the first direct methane detection and confirm strongly enhanced CO2:H2O mixing ratios relative to solar system comets.

  2. Searching for Ultracool Dwarfs in Early LSST Data Products

    astro-ph.SR 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    Early LSST data recovers known ultracool dwarfs and yields 89 candidates with 17 unique to this work, forecasting over 17,000 detections in Data Preview 2 using synthetic populations.

  3. A Physical Model for the Ice Coma of the Interstellar, Hyperactive Comet 3I/ATLAS

    astro-ph.EP 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A Haser model tracking the fading of icy grain albedo by sublimation explains the exponential surface brightness profiles and photometry of comet 3I/ATLAS, with total ice scattering cross-section peaking at 3-4 au.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 114 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    D., & Thompson, D

    A’Hearn, M. F., Schleicher, D. G., Millis, R. L., Feldman, P. D., & Thompson, D. T. 1984, AJ, 89, 579, doi: 10.1086/113552

    work page doi:10.1086/113552 1984

  2. [2]

    R., Serra-Ricart, M., Licandro, J., et al

    Alarcon, M. R., Serra-Ricart, M., Licandro, J., et al. 2025, Deep g’-band Imaging of Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS from the Two-meter Twin Telescope (TTT), The Astronomer’s Telegram, No. 17264. https://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=17264

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Alard, C., & Lupton, R. H. 1998, ApJ, 503, 325, doi: 10.1086/305984

    work page doi:10.1086/305984 1998

  4. [4]

    2006, A&A, 458, 1007, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20064971

    Alvarez-Candal, A., & Licandro, J. 2006, A&A, 458, 1007, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20064971

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20064971 2006

  5. [5]

    L., Lara, L

    Alvarez-Candal, A., Rizos, J. L., Lara, L. M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.07312, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.07312

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.07312 2025

  6. [6]

    T., Schwamb, M

    Bannister, M. T., Schwamb, M. E., Fraser, W. C., et al. 2017, ApJ, 851, L38, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaa07c

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaa07c 2017

  7. [7]

    Belton, M. J. S., Hainaut, O. R., Meech, K. J., et al. 2018, ApJL, 856, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aab370

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aab370 2018

  8. [8]

    H., Bernstein, G

    Bernardinelli, P. H., Bernstein, G. M., Jindal, N., et al. 2023, ApJS, 269, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acf6bf

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acf6bf 2023

  9. [9]

    2006, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XV ASP Conference Series, Vol

    Berthier, J., Vachier, F., Thuillot, W., et al. 2006, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XV ASP Conference Series, Vol. 351 (Orem, UT: Astronomical Society of the Pacific), 367

    work page 2006

  10. [10]

    1996, A&AS, 117, 393, doi: 10.1051/aas:1996164

    Bertin, E., & Arnouts, S. 1996, Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, 117, 393, doi: 10.1051/aas:1996164

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:1996164 1996

  11. [11]

    B., Jones, L., Ivezi´ c, v., Ritz, S., & Rubin Project Science Team

    Bianco, F. B., Jones, L., Ivezi´ c, v., Ritz, S., & Rubin Project Science Team. 2022, Updated estimates of the Rubin system throughput and expected LSST image depth, Rubin Observatory Project Document PSTN-054. https://pstn-054.lsst.io

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    W., Feldman, P

    Bodewits, D., Noonan, J. W., Feldman, P. D., et al. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 867, doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-1095-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-020-1095-2 2020

  13. [13]

    T., Belyakov, M., Gray, C

    Bolin, B. T., Belyakov, M., Gray, C. L., et al. 2025, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 17284, 1

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    T., Weaver, H

    Bolin, B. T., Weaver, H. A., Fernandez, Y. R., et al. 2018, ApJL, 852, L2, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaa0c9

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaa0c9 2018

  15. [15]

    T., Lisse, C

    Bolin, B. T., Lisse, C. M., Kasliwal, M. M., et al. 2020, AJ, 160, 26, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab9305

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab9305 2020

  16. [16]

    T., Belyakov, M., Fremling, C., et al

    Bolin, B. T., Belyakov, M., Fremling, C., et al. 2025, Interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS: discovery and physical description. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.05252

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    T., Sato, H., & et al

    Borisov, G., Durig, D. T., Sato, H., & et al. 2019, Central Bureau Electronic Telegrams, 1

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    2018, PASJ, 70, S5, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx080

    Bosch, J., Armstrong, R., Bickerton, S., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S5, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx080

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psx080 2018

  19. [19]

    F., Vokrouhlick´ y, D., Marshall, R., et al

    Bottke, W. F., Vokrouhlick´ y, D., Marshall, R., et al. 2023, PSJ, 4, 168, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/ace7cd

    work page doi:10.3847/psj/ace7cd 2023

  20. [20]

    2018, AJ, 155, 245, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabd81

    Mottola, S. 2018, AJ, 155, 245, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabd81

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabd81 2018

  21. [21]

    2025, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 17283, 1

    Champagne, C., McClure, L., Emery, J., et al. 2025, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 17283, 1

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    O., Kueny, J

    Chandler, C. O., Kueny, J. K., Trujillo, C. A., Trilling, D. E., & Oldroyd, W. J. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 892, L38, doi: 10/gg36xz

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    O., Trujillo, C

    Chandler, C. O., Trujillo, C. A., Oldroyd, W. J., et al. 2024, The Astronomical Journal, 167, 156, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad1de2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad1de2 2024

  24. [24]

    2025, Construction Completeness and Operations Readiness Criteria, Commissioning Technical Note SITCOMTN-005, NSF-DOE Vera C

    Claver, C., Bauer, A., Bechtol, K., et al. 2025, Construction Completeness and Operations Readiness Criteria, Commissioning Technical Note SITCOMTN-005, NSF-DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory. https://sitcomtn-005.lsst.io/ 33

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    V., Ragozzine, D., Granvik, M., & Stephens, D

    Cook, N. V., Ragozzine, D., Granvik, M., & Stephens, D. C. 2016, ApJ, 825, 51, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/51

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/825/1/51 2016

  26. [26]

    A., Milam, S

    Cordiner, M. A., Milam, S. N., Biver, N., et al. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 861, doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-1087-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-020-1087-2 2020

  27. [27]

    2020, ApJL, 893, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab8455 de Le´ on, J., Licandro, J., Serra-Ricart, M., et al

    Cremonese, G., Fulle, M., Cambianica, P., et al. 2020, ApJL, 893, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab8455 de Le´ on, J., Licandro, J., Serra-Ricart, M., et al. 2019, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 3, 131, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/ab449c de Le´ on, J., Licandro, J., de la Fuente Marcos, C., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 495, 2053, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1190

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab8455 2020

  28. [28]

    E., Bannister, M

    Deam, S. E., Bannister, M. T., Opitom, C., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.05051, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.05051

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.05051 2025

  29. [29]

    2025, MPEC

    Denneau, L., Siverd, R., Tonry, J., et al. 2025, MPEC

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    C., Hopkins, M

    Dorsey, R. C., Hopkins, M. J., Bannister, M. T., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.16741, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2502.16741

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.16741 2025

  31. [31]

    Tumbling motion of 1I/'Oumuamua reveals body's violent past

    Drahus, M., Guzik, P., Waniak, W., et al. 2017, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1712.00437, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1712.00437

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1712.00437 2017

  32. [32]

    B., & Chesley, S

    Eggl, S., Farnocchia, D., Chamberlin, A. B., & Chesley, S. R. 2020, Icarus, 339, 113596

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    2017, AJ, 153, 133, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa5c8a

    Engelhardt, T., Jedicke, R., Vereˇ s, P., et al. 2017, AJ, 153, 133, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa5c8a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa5c8a 2017

  34. [34]

    L., Kelley, M

    Farnham, T. L., Kelley, M. S. P., & Bauer, J. M. 2021, PSJ, 2, 236, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/ac323d

    work page doi:10.3847/psj/ac323d 2021

  35. [35]

    R., & Chamberlin, A

    Farnocchia, D., Chesley, S. R., & Chamberlin, A. B. 2016, in AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    J., & Probstein, R

    Finson, M. J., & Probstein, R. F. 1968a, ApJ, 154, 327, doi: 10.1086/149761

    work page doi:10.1086/149761

  37. [37]

    L., & Probstein, R

    Finson, M. L., & Probstein, R. F. 1968b, ApJ, 154, 353, doi: 10.1086/149762

    work page doi:10.1086/149762

  38. [38]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2303.17980, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2303.17980

    Fitzsimmons, A., Meech, K., Matr` a, L., & Pfalzner, S. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2303.17980, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2303.17980

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.17980 2023

  39. [39]

    J., et al

    Fitzsimmons, A., Hainaut, O., Meech, K. J., et al. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 885, L9, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab49fc

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab49fc 2019

  40. [40]

    T., Honscheid, K., et al

    Flaugher, B., Diehl, H. T., Honscheid, K., et al. 2015, The Astronomical Journal, 150, 150, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/150/5/150

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/150/5/150 2015

  41. [41]

    C., Pravec, P., Fitzsimmons, A., et al

    Fraser, W. C., Pravec, P., Fitzsimmons, A., et al. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 383, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0398-z Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0398-z 2018

  42. [42]

    M., Brasseur, C

    Ginsburg, A., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., Brasseur, C. E., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 98, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aafc33

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aafc33 2019

  43. [43]

    D., Yeomans, D

    Giorgini, J. D., Yeomans, D. K., Chamberlin, A. B., et al. 1996, American Astronomical Society, 28, 25.04

    work page 1996

  44. [44]

    2022, The Rubin Data Products, Abridged (2022), Zenodo, Version 2, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7011229

    Graham, M. 2022, The Rubin Data Products, Abridged (2022), Zenodo, Version 2, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7011229

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.7011229 2022

  45. [45]

    2022, Find Orb: Orbit determination from observations, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2202.016

    Gray, B. 2022, Find Orb: Orbit determination from observations, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2202.016

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 53, doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0931-8

    Guzik, P., Drahus, M., Rusek, K., et al. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 53, doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0931-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0931-8 2020

  47. [47]

    1980, A&A, 91, 221

    Hardorp, J. 1980, A&A, 91, 221

    work page 1980

  48. [48]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  49. [49]

    J., Bernardinelli, P

    Holman, M. J., Bernardinelli, P. H., Schwamb, M. E., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.02140, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.02140

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.02140 2025

  50. [50]

    J., Bannister, M

    Hopkins, M. J., Bannister, M. T., & Lintott, C. 2025, AJ, 169, 78, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad9eb3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad9eb3 2025

  51. [51]

    J., Dorsey, R

    Hopkins, M. J., Dorsey, R. C., Forbes, J. C., et al. 2025, From a Different Star: 3I/ATLAS in the context of the ¯Otautahi-Oxford interstellar object population model. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.05318

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    H., Ishiguro, M., Lacerda, P., & Jewitt, D

    Hsieh, H. H., Ishiguro, M., Lacerda, P., & Jewitt, D. 2011, AJ, 142, 29, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/142/1/29

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/142/1/29 2011

  53. [53]

    H., & Jewitt, D

    Hsieh, H. H., & Jewitt, D. 2005, ApJ, 624, 1093, doi: 10.1086/429250

    work page doi:10.1086/429250 2005

  54. [54]

    H., Denneau, L., Wainscoat, R

    Hsieh, H. H., Denneau, L., Wainscoat, R. J., et al. 2015, Icarus, 248, 289, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.10.031

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2014.10.031 2015

  55. [55]

    H., Noonan, J

    Hsieh, H. H., Noonan, J. W., Kelley, M. S. P., et al. 2025, PSJ, 6, 3, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/ad9199

    work page doi:10.3847/psj/ad9199 2025

  56. [56]

    Hui, M.-T., Ye, Q.-Z., F¨ ohring, D., Hung, D., & Tholen, D. J. 2020, AJ, 160, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab9df8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab9df8 2020

  57. [57]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 873, 111, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  58. [58]

    2020, ApJL, 888, L23, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab621b

    Jewitt, D., Hui, M.-T., Kim, Y., et al. 2020, ApJL, 888, L23, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab621b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab621b 2020

  59. [59]

    2019, ApJL, 886, L29, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab530b —

    Jewitt, D., & Luu, J. 2019, ApJL, 886, L29, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab530b —. 2025, Interstellar Interloper C/2025 N1 is Active, The Astronomer’s Telegram, No. 17263. https://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=17263

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab530b 2019

  60. [60]

    2017, ApJL, 850, L36, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9b2f

    Jewitt, D., Luu, J., Rajagopal, J., et al. 2017, ApJL, 850, L36, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9b2f

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa9b2f 2017

  61. [61]

    Jewitt, D., & Seligman, D. Z. 2023, ARA&A, 61, 197, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-054221 34

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-054221 2023

  62. [62]

    B., Yoachim, P., & Neilsen, E

    Jones, L., Bianco, F. B., Yoachim, P., & Neilsen, E. 2025, https://survey-strategy.lsst.io, v0.1.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15128504

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.15128504 2025

  63. [63]

    L., Yoachim, P., Chandrasekharan, S., et al

    Jones, R. L., Yoachim, P., Chandrasekharan, S., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9149, Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems V, ed. A. B. Peck, C. R. Benn, & R. L. Seaman, 0, doi: 10.1117/12.2056835

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2056835 2014

  64. [64]

    K., & Ammon, K

    Jordi, K., Grebel, E. K., & Ammon, K. 2006, A&A, 460, 339, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066082

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066082 2006

  65. [65]

    Joye, W. A. 2006, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XV ASP Conference Series, Vol. 351, 574– Juri´ c, M., Kantor, J., Lim, K. T., et al. 2017, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 512, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXV, ed. N. P. F. Lorente, K. Shortridge, & R. Wayth, 279, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.15...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1512.07914 2006

  66. [66]

    2025, Galactic Trajectories of Interstellar Objects 1I/’Oumuamua, 2I/Borisov, and 3I/Atlas

    Kakharov, S., & Loeb, A. 2025, Galactic Trajectories of Interstellar Objects 1I/’Oumuamua, 2I/Borisov, and 3I/Atlas. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02739

    work page arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    2020, ApJL, 895, L34, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab9228

    Kim, Y., Jewitt, D., Mutchler, M., et al. 2020, ApJL, 895, L34, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab9228

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab9228 2020

  68. [68]

    M., Kokotanekova, R., & Samarasinha, N

    Knight, M. M., Kokotanekova, R., & Samarasinha, N. H. 2024, in Comets III, ed. K. J. Meech, M. R. Combi, D. Bockel´ ee-Morvan, S. N. Raymodn, & M. E. Zolensky (University of Arizona Press), 361–404

    work page 2024

  69. [69]

    M., Protopapa, S., Kelley, M

    Knight, M. M., Protopapa, S., Kelley, M. S. P., et al. 2017, ApJL, 851, L31, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9d81

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa9d81 2017

  70. [70]

    2017, MNRAS, 471, 2974, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1716

    Kokotanekova, R., Snodgrass, C., Lacerda, P., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 2974, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1716

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1716 2017

  71. [71]

    Kurucz, R. L. 1993, VizieR Online Data Catalog: Model Atmospheres (Kurucz, 1979), VI/39, VizieR Online Data Catalog. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993yCat.6039....0K

    work page 1993

  72. [72]

    K., Pitrou, A., & Seibert, S

    Lam, S. K., Pitrou, A., & Seibert, S. 2015, in Proceedings of the Second Workshop on the LLVM Compiler Infrastructure in HPC, 1–6

    work page 2015

  73. [73]

    W., Mierle, K., Blanton, M., & Roweis, S

    Lang, D., Hogg, D. W., Mierle, K., Blanton, M., & Roweis, S. 2010, Astronomical Journal, 139, 1782, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/5/1782

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/139/5/1782 2010

  74. [74]

    2025, The Consolidated Database of Image

    Lim, K.-T. 2025, The Consolidated Database of Image

    work page 2025

  75. [76]

    X., & Jewitt, D

    Luu, J. X., & Jewitt, D. C. 1992, Icarus, 97, 276, doi: 10.1016/0019-1035(92)90134-S

    work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(92)90134-s 1992

  76. [77]

    R., & Eggl, S

    Makadia, R., Farnocchia, D., Chesley, S. R., & Eggl, S. 2025, The Planetary Science Journal, 6, 85

    work page 2025

  77. [78]

    Marcus, J. N. 2007, International Comet Quarterly, 29, 39 Marˇ ceta, D., & Seligman, D. Z. 2023, PSJ, 4, 230, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/ad08c1

    work page doi:10.3847/psj/ad08c1 2007

  78. [79]

    2019, MNRAS, 489, 3003, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2380

    Mashchenko, S. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 3003, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2380

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2380 2019

  79. [80]

    J., Cochran, A

    McKay, A. J., Cochran, A. L., Dello Russo, N., & DiSanti, M. A. 2020, ApJL, 889, L10, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab64ed

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab64ed 2020

  80. [81]

    E., & Mommert, M

    McNeill, A., Trilling, D. E., & Mommert, M. 2018, ApJL, 857, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aab9ab

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aab9ab 2018

Showing first 80 references.