REVIEW 3 cited by
The Benefits of a Concise Chain of Thought on Problem-Solving in Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this paper, we introduce Concise Chain-of-Thought (CCoT) prompting. We compared standard CoT and CCoT prompts to see how conciseness impacts response length and correct-answer accuracy. We evaluated this using GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 with a multiple-choice question-and-answer (MCQA) benchmark. CCoT reduced average response length by 48.70% for both GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 while having a negligible impact on problem-solving performance. However, on math problems, GPT-3.5 with CCoT incurs a performance penalty of 27.69%. Overall, CCoT leads to an average per-token cost reduction of 22.67%. All code, data, and supplemental materials are available on GitHub at https://github.com/matthewrenze/jhu-concise-cot
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Less Languages, Less Tokens: An Efficient Unified Logic Cross-lingual Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Framework
UL-XCoT maintains competitive accuracy on multilingual benchmarks while cutting decoding tokens by over 50% through per-query language selection and logic-space trajectory pruning.
-
Efficient Reasoning on the Edge
LoRA adapters, budget-forced GRPO, dynamic switching, parallel verification and FPTQuant enable practical chain-of-thought reasoning on quantized Qwen2.5-7B for edge devices.
-
Better Starts, Better Ends: Bootstrapped Iterative Self-Reasoning Distillation for Compressed Reasoning
Warm-starting on-policy self-distillation with a correctness-filtered, prompt-switched SFT bootstrap improves compression and accuracy of reasoning traces across math benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.