Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Privacy in Federated Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.08904 v1 pith:FUDGMK5D submitted 2024-08-12 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords privacylearningchapterdatafederatedmodelriskssecure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Federated Learning (FL) represents a significant advancement in distributed machine learning, enabling multiple participants to collaboratively train models without sharing raw data. This decentralized approach enhances privacy by keeping data on local devices. However, FL introduces new privacy challenges, as model updates shared during training can inadvertently leak sensitive information. This chapter delves into the core privacy concerns within FL, including the risks of data reconstruction, model inversion attacks, and membership inference. It explores various privacy-preserving techniques, such as Differential Privacy (DP) and Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMPC), which are designed to mitigate these risks. The chapter also examines the trade-offs between model accuracy and privacy, emphasizing the importance of balancing these factors in practical implementations. Furthermore, it discusses the role of regulatory frameworks, such as GDPR, in shaping the privacy standards for FL. By providing a comprehensive overview of the current state of privacy in FL, this chapter aims to equip researchers and practitioners with the knowledge necessary to navigate the complexities of secure federated learning environments. The discussion highlights both the potential and limitations of existing privacy-enhancing techniques, offering insights into future research directions and the development of more robust solutions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Deep Learning Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CR 2025-01 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    A structured literature review that taxonomizes model inversion attacks and defenses and provides a public resource repository.

  2. Federated Learning Architecture: Data Privacy and System Security Approaches

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 2.5 of 10

    CKKS plus differential privacy in FedAvg yields usable accuracy on Framingham, Pima, and Bank Marketing, with larger privacy budget growth as clients increase and data shrinks.

Pith tools