Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Preference Restrictions in Computational Social Choice: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.09092 v2 pith:FUKAGGRO submitted 2022-05-18 cs.GT econ.TH

Preference Restrictions in Computational Social Choice: A Survey

classification cs.GT econ.TH
keywords choicecomputationalpreferencepreferencessocialsurveyalgorithmsdomains
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Social choice becomes easier on restricted preference domains such as single-peaked, single-crossing, and Euclidean preferences. Many impossibility theorems disappear, the structure makes it easier to reason about preferences, and computational problems can be solved more efficiently. In this survey, we give a thorough overview of many classic and modern restricted preference domains and explore their properties and applications. We do this from the viewpoint of computational social choice, letting computational problems drive our interest, but we include a comprehensive discussion of the economics and social choice literatures as well. Particular focus areas of our survey include algorithms for recognizing whether preferences belong to a particular preference domain, and algorithms for winner determination of voting rules that are hard to compute if preferences are unrestricted.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Algorithms for Structured Elections under Thiele Voting Rules

    cs.GT 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    Thiele winner determination is FPT on Voter-Interval instances by max approvals per candidate and per voter, polynomial-time when each candidate has ≤2 approvers, and FPT by optimal total score.

  2. Snowveil: A Framework for Decentralised Preference Discovery

    cs.GT 2025-12 reject novelty 6.0

    Snowveil is a gossip-based decentralized preference aggregation protocol claiming almost-sure finite-time convergence and O(n) expected convergence time using a Borda-plurality rule.