Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 57 references

The KT-relation alone classifies all chiral and achiral integrable n-site boundary states of the ABJM spin chain for n≤4.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-11 20:58 UTC pith:FV7EHX6W

load-bearing objection Clean algebraic classification of ABJM n-site integrable pairs from the KT-relation; solid subfield toolkit paper with one clearly flagged conditional vanishing theorem.

arxiv 2607.04203 v1 pith:FV7EHX6W submitted 2026-07-05 hep-th

Solving for the integrable boundary states of the ABJM spin chain from KT-relations

Nan Bai , Hui Yang , Mao-Zhong Shao This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords ABJM spin chainintegrable boundary statesKT-relationchiral and achiral statesn-site translational invariancereflection equationsClifford algebra solutions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Integrable boundary states in the alternating SU(4) spin chain of ABJM theory are states that pair with Bethe eigenstates in a controlled way, so that exact one-point functions and quench overlaps can be written. The paper treats the KT-relation as the defining constraint and solves it directly for every elementary block that is invariant under n-site translations, with n up to four. For odd n the relation becomes a pure state equation on the block; for even n it becomes an operator equation on a matrix M that builds the block. Chiral and achiral versions are treated separately. The result is a short, exhaustive list: nontrivial operator-valued Clifford solutions exist for the chiral one-site case; nontrivial c-number solutions exist for achiral two-site and for chiral four-site blocks whose constant K is symmetric or antisymmetric; every other combination (achiral one-site, chiral two-site, both three-site cases under the usual K, and generic sl(4) four-site) is forced to vanish. The classification therefore tells which translationally invariant boundary states are available for exact overlap calculations in ABJM defect setups.

Core claim

Direct solution of the KT-relation for n-site translationally invariant states of the ABJM alternating spin chain yields a complete list of chiral and achiral integrable pairs (elementary n-site block, matrix K(u)) for every n≤4: nontrivial Clifford-algebra operator solutions for chiral 1-site; SP-type solutions for achiral 2-site; constant invertible symmetric or antisymmetric K with the corresponding 4-site block M12 = P12 − 2K1K2−1 for the so(4) and sp(4) chiral cases; and factorization of every achiral 4-site block into a product of two achiral 2-site blocks. All other c-number combinations are trivial.

What carries the argument

The KT-relation: the mixed state-operator identity that equates the monodromy matrix acting on the boundary state times K(u) with K(u) times the crossed monodromy. For odd n it reduces to a pure state equation on the elementary block; for even n it reduces to an operator equation on the matrix that builds the block.

Load-bearing premise

In the three-site cases the matrix K is restricted at the outset to the known constant or linear solutions of the reflection equations; a more general invertible K that does not satisfy any reflection equation is not ruled out.

What would settle it

Construct an invertible K(u) that does not solve the SP or SNP reflection equation yet still produces a nonzero c-number three-site block satisfying the corresponding KT state equations; any such pair would falsify the claim that those sectors are empty.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs chiral and achiral integrable boundary states of the alternating SU(4) ABJM spin chain by solving the KT-relation for n-site translationally invariant states with n≤4. For odd n the KT-relation is reduced to state equations on the elementary block and K(u); for even n it becomes an operator equation. The authors obtain a complete classification of integrable pairs (elementary block, K(u)) under the stated assumptions: nontrivial operator-valued Clifford solutions for chiral 1-site states; vanishing of nontrivial c-number solutions for achiral 1-site, chiral 2-site and both 3-site cases (the latter when K is taken from known SP/SNP reflection solutions); SP-type solutions for achiral 2-site; constant invertible symmetric/antisymmetric K with M12=P12-2K1K2-1 for the so(4)/sp(4) branches of chiral 4-site; and factorization of achiral 4-site into products of achiral 2-site blocks. Results are summarized in Table 1 and cross-checked against the fusion construction of [50] for the 4-site chiral solutions.

Significance. The work supplies a systematic, direct solution of the KT-relation for the ABJM alternating chain without presupposing that K(u) solves a reflection equation (except as a sufficient ansatz for the 3-site vanishing theorems). This yields both new operator-valued 1-site states and a clean classification of c-number multi-site states that matches and extends earlier fusion constructions. The explicit reductions to state/operator equations, the rank and Schur-lemma arguments for so(4)/sp(4)/sl(4), and the Mathematica verification of the 4-site solutions are concrete technical contributions that will be useful for overlap computations and defect correlators in ABJM. The conditional character of the 3-site results is already flagged by the authors, so the classification stands as stated.

minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract / Table 1] In §5.1–5.2 the restriction of K(u) to known SP/SNP solutions is stated clearly, but a single sentence in the abstract or Table 1 caption emphasizing that the 3-site vanishing is conditional would further reduce any possible misreading.
  2. [§3.1] The Clifford realization (3.18) is given without an explicit check that the four generators satisfy the Euclidean Clifford algebra; a one-line verification or reference would help the reader.
  3. [Throughout] A few typographical inconsistencies appear (e.g., spacing around KT-relation, occasional missing spaces after periods). A light copy-edit would improve readability.
  4. [§6.1 / Appendix C] Appendix C is used only for the 4-site analysis; a brief forward reference in §6.1 would make the logical flow clearer.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: KT-relations are solved directly as the definition of integrable pairs; reflection matrices enter only as a sufficient (explicitly non-necessary) restriction for the 3-site vanishing theorems.

full rationale

The paper takes the chiral/achiral KT-relations (2.12)–(2.13) as the definition of an integrable pair (|Φ angle, K(u)) and reduces them, for odd n, to pure state equations and, for even n, to pure operator equations on the elementary block. These equations are solved by direct algebraic manipulations (Clifford realization for 1-site chiral; rank arguments and partial traces for 2-site; Laurent expansion + Schur’s lemma on so(4)/sp(4)/sl(4) for 4-site). The resulting K(u) is recognized a posteriori as an SP- or SNP-type matrix; the reflection equations themselves are never imposed as necessary conditions except in the explicitly restricted 3-site analysis (§5.1–5.2), where the authors state they are using the known constant/linear solutions of appendices A–B merely as a sufficient ansatz and prove only the conditional vanishing of the c-number block. Coincidence of the 4-site solutions with the fusion construction of the overlapping-author paper [50] is noted after an independent derivation, not used as a premise. There are no fitted parameters, no self-referential uniqueness theorems, and no renaming of external empirical patterns. The classification in Table 1 is therefore self-contained under the scope stated in the abstract.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The paper rests on the standard R-matrix formulation of the ABJM spin chain, the definition of chiral/achiral KT-relations as sufficient conditions for integrability, and ordinary linear-algebra facts (rank, Schur lemma, Clifford algebra). No free parameters are fitted; the only modeling choices are the restriction to n-site translational invariance, invertibility of K for generic u, and (for n=3) the use of known reflection-equation solutions as an ansatz for K.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The ABJM planar scalar sector is described by the alternating SU(4) R-matrices R(u)=uI+P and R-bar(u)=-(u+2)I+Q that satisfy the Yang–Baxter equations.
    Taken as standard from Minahan–Zarembo and Bak–Rey; used throughout §2 to define monodromy and transfer matrices.
  • domain assumption A pair (|Ψ⟩,K(u)) satisfying the chiral or achiral KT-relation is integrable (i.e., produces the corresponding transfer-matrix eigenvalue relation).
    Stated as a sufficient condition in §2 following Gombor–Pozsgay; the whole classification is the set of solutions of these equations.
  • ad hoc to paper K(u) is invertible for generic spectral parameter u and admits a Laurent expansion about infinity with invertible constant term.
    Imposed in §6.1 (and used for rank arguments elsewhere) to extract the leading-order commutant structure; not derived from the KT-relation itself.
  • ad hoc to paper For the 3-site analysis it is sufficient to take K(u) from the known constant/linear solutions of the SNP/SP reflection equations.
    Explicitly adopted in §5.1–5.2; the vanishing proofs are conditional on this restriction.
invented entities (1)
  • integrable pair (|φ⟩,K(u)) no independent evidence
    purpose: Packages the elementary n-site block and the auxiliary matrix that together solve the reduced KT equation.
    Terminological convenience introduced in §2; not a new physical object, merely a name for solutions of the already-defined KT-relation.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 32317 in / 2964 out tokens · 26183 ms · 2026-07-11T20:58:18.089167+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study integrable boundary states of the alternating SU(4) spin chain arising in ABJM theory. Starting from the $KT$-relation, we directly solve the integrability constraints for states with $n$-site translational invariance. For odd and even $n$, these constraints are reduced respectively to state equations and operator equations for the elementary $n$-site block and the matrix $K(u)$. We analyze chiral and achiral cases for $n\leq4$. In the 1-site case we allow general operator-valued integrable pairs with an internal space, while in the remaining cases we focus on $c$-number solutions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 51 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Ghoshal and A

    S. Ghoshal and A. B. Zamolodchikov,Boundary S matrix and boundary state in two-dimensional integrable quantum field theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9(1994), 3841-3886 [erratum: Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9(1994), 4353] [arXiv:hep-th/9306002]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  2. [2]

    Piroli, B

    L. Piroli, B. Pozsgay and E. Vernier,What is an integrable quench?, Nucl. Phys. B925, 362-402 (2017) [arXiv:1709.04796]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    Pozsgay, L

    B. Pozsgay, L. Piroli and E. Vernier,Integrable Matrix Product States from boundary integrability, SciPost Phys.6, no.5, 062 (2019) [arXiv:1812.11094]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    Caux and F

    J.-S. Caux and F. H. L. Essler,Time evolution of local observables after quenching to an integrable model, Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) no.25, 257203 [arXiv:1301.3806]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    Wouters, J

    B. Wouters, J. De Nardis, M. Brockmann, D. Fioretto, M. Rigol and J.-S. Caux,Quenching the anisotropic Heisenberg chain: exact solution and generalized Gibbs ensemble predictions, Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 117202 [arXiv:1405.0172]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    Pozsgay, M

    B. Pozsgay, M. Mestyán, M. A. Werner, M. Kormos, G. Zaránd and G. Takács,Correlations after quantum quenches in the XXZ spin chain: failure of the generalized Gibbs ensemble, Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 117203 [arXiv:1405.2843]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  7. [7]

    Mestyán, B

    M. Mestyán, B. Bertini, L. Piroli and P. Calabrese,Exact solution for the quench dynamics of a nested integrable system, J. Stat. Mech.1708(2017) no.8, 083103 [arXiv:1705.00851]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Piroli, E

    L. Piroli, E. Vernier, P. Calabrese and B. Pozsgay,Integrable quenches in nested spin chains I: the exact steady states, J. Stat. Mech.1906(2019) no.6, 063103 [arXiv:1811.00432]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906

  9. [9]

    Piroli, E

    L. Piroli, E. Vernier, P. Calabrese and B. Pozsgay,Integrable quenches in nested spin chains II: fusion of boundary transfer matrices, J. Stat. Mech.1906(2019) no.6, 063104 [arXiv:1812.05330]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906

  10. [10]

    Rylands, B

    C. Rylands, B. Bertini and P. Calabrese,Integrable quenches in the Hubbard model, J. Stat. Mech.2210(2022), 103103 [arXiv:2206.07985]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    Rylands, P

    C. Rylands, P. Calabrese and B. Bertini,Solution of the BEC to BCS Quench in One Dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) no.2, 023001 [arXiv:2209.00956 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    de Leeuw, C

    M. de Leeuw, C. Kristjansen and K. Zarembo,One-point Functions in Defect CFT and Integrability, JHEP08(2015), 098 [arXiv:1506.06958]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  13. [13]

    Buhl-Mortensen, M

    I. Buhl-Mortensen, M. de Leeuw, C. Kristjansen and K. Zarembo,One-point Functions in AdS/dCFT from Matrix Product States, JHEP02(2016), 052 [arXiv:1512.02532]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  14. [14]

    de Leeuw, C

    M. de Leeuw, C. Kristjansen and S. Mori,AdS/dCFT one-point functions of the SU(3) sector, Phys. Lett. B763(2016), 197-202 [arXiv:1607.03123]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    de Leeuw, A

    M. de Leeuw, A. C. Ipsen, C. Kristjansen, K. E. Vardinghus and M. Wilhelm,Two-point functions in AdS/dCFT and the boundary conformal bootstrap equations, JHEP08(2017), 020 [arXiv:1705.03898]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    Buhl-Mortensen, M

    I. Buhl-Mortensen, M. de Leeuw, A. C. Ipsen, C. Kristjansen and M. Wilhelm,Asymptotic One-Point Functions in Gauge-String Duality with Defects, Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) no.26, 261604 [arXiv:1704.07386]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    De Leeuw, C

    M. De Leeuw, C. Kristjansen and G. Linardopoulos,Scalar one-point functions and matrix product states of AdS/dCFT, Phys. Lett. B781(2018), 238-243 [arXiv:1802.01598]. – 32 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    Komatsu and Y

    S. Komatsu and Y. Wang,Non-perturbative defect one-point functions in planarN= 4 super-Yang-Mills, Nucl. Phys. B958(2020), 115120 [arXiv:2004.09514 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    Kristjansen, D

    C. Kristjansen, D. Müller and K. Zarembo,Integrable boundary states in D3-D5 dCFT: beyond scalars, JHEP08(2020), 103 [arXiv:2005.01392]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Holguin and H

    A. Holguin and H. Kawai,Integrability and conformal blocks for surface defects inN= 4 SYM, JHEP11(2025), 043 [arXiv:2503.09944]

    arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Chalabi, C

    A. Chalabi, C. Kristjansen and C. Su,Integrable corners in the space of Gukov-Witten surface defects, Phys. Lett. B866(2025), 139512 [arXiv:2503.22598]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Linardopoulos and K

    G. Linardopoulos and K. Zarembo,String integrability of defect CFT and dynamical reflection matrices, JHEP05(2021), 203 [arXiv:2102.12381]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Linardopoulos,String theory methods for defect CFTs, [arXiv:2501.11985]

    G. Linardopoulos,String theory methods for defect CFTs, [arXiv:2501.11985]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    Jiang, S

    Y. Jiang, S. Komatsu and E. Vescovi,Structure constants inN= 4 SYM at finite coupling as worldsheet g-function, JHEP07(2020) no.07, 037 [arXiv:1906.07733]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Jiang, S

    Y. Jiang, S. Komatsu and E. Vescovi,Exact Three-Point Functions of Determinant Operators in PlanarN= 4Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) no.19, 191601 [arXiv:1907.11242]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    De Leeuw, T

    M. De Leeuw, T. Gombor, C. Kristjansen, G. Linardopoulos and B. Pozsgay,Spin Chain Overlaps and the Twisted Yangian, JHEP01(2020), 176 [arXiv:1912.09338]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    Kristjansen and K

    C. Kristjansen and K. Zarembo,’t Hooft loops and integrability, JHEP08(2023), 184 [arXiv:2305.03649]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Ivanovskiy, S

    V. Ivanovskiy, S. Komatsu, V. Mishnyakov, N. Terziev, N. Zaigraev and K. Zarembo, Vacuum Condensates on the Coulomb Branch, [arXiv:2405.19043]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Gombor and Z

    T. Gombor and Z. Bajnok,Dual overlaps and finite coupling ’t Hooft loops, JHEP12(2024), 034 [arXiv:2408.14901]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Kristjansen and K

    C. Kristjansen and K. Zarembo,’t Hooft loops in N=4 super-Yang-Mills, JHEP02(2025), 179 [arXiv:2412.01972]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Coronado, S

    F. Coronado, S. Komatsu and K. Zarembo,Coulomb branch and integrability, JHEP10 (2025), 143 [arXiv:2506.07222]

    arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Demjaha and K

    R. Demjaha and K. Zarembo,String integrability on the Coulomb branch, JHEP09(2025), 154 [arXiv:2506.17955]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Gombor and A

    T. Gombor and A. Holguin,Boundary integrability from the fuzzy three sphere, Phys. Lett. B 872, 140078 (2026) [arXiv:2510.27463]

    arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    Gombor and B

    T. Gombor and B. Pozsgay,On factorized overlaps: Algebraic Bethe Ansatz, twists, and Separation of Variables, Nucl. Phys. B967(2021), 115390 [arXiv:2101.10354]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Gombor,On exact overlaps for gl(N) symmetric spin chains, Nucl

    T. Gombor,On exact overlaps for gl(N) symmetric spin chains, Nucl. Phys. B983(2022), 115909 [arXiv:2110.07960]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    Gombor,Exact overlaps for all integrable two-site boundary states ofgl(N) symmetric spin chains, JHEP05(2024), 194 [arXiv:2311.04870]

    T. Gombor,Exact overlaps for all integrable two-site boundary states ofgl(N) symmetric spin chains, JHEP05(2024), 194 [arXiv:2311.04870]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Gombor,Exact Overlaps for All Integrable Matrix Product States of Rational Spin Chains, Phys

    T. Gombor,Exact Overlaps for All Integrable Matrix Product States of Rational Spin Chains, Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) no.15, 150402 [arXiv:2410.23282]. – 33 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Gombor,Derivations for the MPS overlap formulas of rational spin chains, JHEP10 (2025), 035 [arXiv:2505.20234]

    T. Gombor,Derivations for the MPS overlap formulas of rational spin chains, JHEP10 (2025), 035 [arXiv:2505.20234]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Aharony, O

    O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis and J. Maldacena,N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals, JHEP10, 091 (2008) [arXiv:0806.1218 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  40. [40]

    J. A. Minahan and K. Zarembo,The Bethe ansatz for superconformal Chern-Simons, JHEP 09, 040 (2008) [arXiv:0806.3951 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  41. [41]

    Bak and S

    D. Bak and S. J. Rey,Integrable Spin Chain in Superconformal Chern-Simons Theory, JHEP 10, 053 (2008) [arXiv:0807.2063 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  42. [42]

    P. Yang, Y. Jiang, S. Komatsu and J. B. Wu,Three-point functions in ABJM and Bethe Ansatz, JHEP01(2022), 002 [arXiv:2103.15840]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    Kristjansen, D

    C. Kristjansen, D. L. Vu and K. Zarembo,Integrable domain walls in ABJM theory, JHEP 02(2022), 070 [arXiv:2112.10438]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    Gombor and C

    T. Gombor and C. Kristjansen,Overlaps for matrix product states of arbitrary bond dimension in ABJM theory, Phys. Lett. B834(2022), 137428 [arXiv:2207.06866]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    Yang,Integrable boundary states from maximal giant gravitons in ABJM theory, Phys

    P. Yang,Integrable boundary states from maximal giant gravitons in ABJM theory, Phys. Lett. B846(2023), 138194 [arXiv:2208.12010]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    Jiang, J

    Y. Jiang, J. B. Wu and P. Yang,Wilson-loop one-point functions in ABJM theory, JHEP09 (2023), 047 [arXiv:2306.05773]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    J. B. Wu and P. Yang,Three-point functions in Aharony-Bergman-Jafferis-Maldacena theory and integrable boundary states, JHEP02(2025), 030 [arXiv:2408.03643]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Bai and M

    N. Bai and M. Z. Shao,Integrable matrix product states of ABJM theory from projecting method, Mod. Phys. Lett. A40(2025) no.19n20, 2550068 [arXiv:2411.09282]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Liu and J

    Y. Liu and J. B. Wu,Chiral Integrable Boundary States in the SU(4) Alternating Spin Chain, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.69, 231011 (2026) [arXiv:2507.03489]

    arXiv 2026

  50. [50]

    Y. Liu, N. Bai, M. Z. Shao and J. B. Wu,Chiral Integrable Boundary States of ABJM Spin Chain from Reflection Equations, [arXiv:2602.01697]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    Linardopoulos,String integrability of the ABJM defect, JHEP06(2022), 033 [arXiv:2202.06824]

    G. Linardopoulos,String integrability of the ABJM defect, JHEP06(2022), 033 [arXiv:2202.06824]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  52. [52]

    P. Yang, Y. Jiang, S. Komatsu and J. B. Wu,D-branes and orbit average, SciPost Phys.12, no.2, 055 (2022) [arXiv:2103.16580]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    Gombor and Z

    T. Gombor and Z. Bajnok,Boundary states, overlaps, nesting and bootstrapping AdS/dCFT, JHEP10(2020), 123 [arXiv:2004.11329]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  54. [54]

    Mezincescu and R

    L. Mezincescu and R. I. Nepomechie,Fusion procedure for open chains, J. Phys. A25 (1992), 2533-2544

    1992

  55. [55]

    Bai,A general fusion procedure for opengl(N)spin chains: application to the ABJM spin chain, JHEP01(2026), 075 [arXiv:2507.19394]

    N. Bai,A general fusion procedure for opengl(N)spin chains: application to the ABJM spin chain, JHEP01(2026), 075 [arXiv:2507.19394]

    arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Arnaudon, J

    D. Arnaudon, J. Avan, N. Crampe, A. Doikou, L. Frappat and E. Ragoucy,General boundary conditions for the sl(N) and sl(M|N) open spin chains, J. Stat. Mech.0408(2004), P08005 [arXiv:math-ph/0406021]. – 34 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  57. [57]

    A. I. Molev and E. Ragoucy,Representations of reflection algebras, Rev. Math. Phys.14 (2002) 317 [arXiv:math/0107213] – 35 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002