Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Testing Dark Energy Models with Gamma-Ray Bursts Calibrated from the Observational H(z) Data through a Gaussian Process

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.14291 v3 pith:FVBAS2CC submitted 2022-12-29 astro-ph.CO

Testing Dark Energy Models with Gamma-Ray Bursts Calibrated from the Observational H(z) Data through a Gaussian Process

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords datamethoda118calibratecosmology-independentdarkenergyflat
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We use a cosmology-independent method to calibrate gamma-ray burst (GRB) from the observational Hubble data (OHD) with the cosmic chronometers method. By using Gaussian Process to reconstruct OHD, we calibrate the Amati relation ($E_{\rm p}$--$E_{\rm iso}$) to construct a GRB Hubble diagram with the A118 data set, and constrain Dark Energy models in a flat space with the Markov Chain Monte Carlo numerical method. With the cosmology-independent GRBs at $1.4<z\leq8.2$ in the A118 data set and the Pantheon sample of type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) at $0.01<z\leq2.3$, we obtained $\Omega_{\rm m}$ = $0.379^{+0.033}_{-0.024}$, $h$ = $0.701^{+0.0035}_{-0.0035}$, $w$ = $-1.25^{+0.14}_{-0.12}$, $w_a$ = $-0.84^{+0.81}_{-0.38}$ for the flat Chevallier-Polarski-Linder model at the 1$\sigma$ confidence level. We find no significant evidence supporting deviations from the standard $\Lambda$CDM model.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Model-independent test of the cosmic distance duality relation with recent observational data

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0

    Two model-independent methods applied to latest SN and BAO data find the cosmic distance duality relation consistent with observations within 1 sigma and no evidence of violation.

  2. New constraints on cosmic anisotropy from galaxy clusters using an improved dipole fitting method

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Galaxy cluster observations yield two preferred directions with cosmic anisotropy amplitude of about 5.3 times 10 to the minus 4 at roughly 1 sigma overall significance, though higher in the XMM-Newton subsample.

  3. Investigating the cosmic distance duality relation with gamma-ray bursts

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0

    Combined gamma-ray burst and multi-probe data show no significant violation of the cosmic distance duality relation and prefer a Planck-like Hubble constant.

  4. Mapping the redshift drift at various redshifts through cosmography

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Cosmographic Taylor and Padé models fitted to Pantheon+SH0ES+GRB+DESI BAO data yield redshift drift predictions compatible with ΛCDM and ω0ω1CDM at 1-2σ, with mock drift data tightening q0 and j0 bounds.