Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Estimating parameter uncertainty in binding-energy models by the frequency-domain bootstrap

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1703.08844 v1 pith:FWQF7H2F submitted 2017-03-26 nucl-th

Estimating parameter uncertainty in binding-energy models by the frequency-domain bootstrap

classification nucl-th
keywords bootstrapestimateuncertaintydroperrorsfrequency-domainmethodmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose using the frequency-domain bootstrap (FDB) to estimate errors of modeling parameters when the modeling error is itself a major source of uncertainty. Unlike the usual bootstrap or the simple $\chi^2$ analysis, the FDB can take into account correlations between errors. It is also very fast compared to the the Gaussian process Bayesian estimate as often implemented for computer model calibration. The method is illustrated drop model of nuclear binding energies. We find that the FDB gives a more conservative estimate of the uncertainty in liquid drop parameters in better accord with more empirical estimates. For the nuclear physics application, there no apparent obstacle to apply the method to the more accurate and detailed models based on density-functional theory.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.