REVIEW
Estimating parameter uncertainty in binding-energy models by the frequency-domain bootstrap
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Estimating parameter uncertainty in binding-energy models by the frequency-domain bootstrap
read the original abstract
We propose using the frequency-domain bootstrap (FDB) to estimate errors of modeling parameters when the modeling error is itself a major source of uncertainty. Unlike the usual bootstrap or the simple $\chi^2$ analysis, the FDB can take into account correlations between errors. It is also very fast compared to the the Gaussian process Bayesian estimate as often implemented for computer model calibration. The method is illustrated drop model of nuclear binding energies. We find that the FDB gives a more conservative estimate of the uncertainty in liquid drop parameters in better accord with more empirical estimates. For the nuclear physics application, there no apparent obstacle to apply the method to the more accurate and detailed models based on density-functional theory.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.