Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Dual-Branch Temperature Scaling Calibration for Long-Tailed Recognition

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.08366 v1 pith:FYHZTUXQ submitted 2023-08-16 cs.LG

Dual-Branch Temperature Scaling Calibration for Long-Tailed Recognition

classification cs.LG
keywords calibrationtemperatureminoritymodelsamplescategoriesclassesdifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The calibration for deep neural networks is currently receiving widespread attention and research. Miscalibration usually leads to overconfidence of the model. While, under the condition of long-tailed distribution of data, the problem of miscalibration is more prominent due to the different confidence levels of samples in minority and majority categories, and it will result in more serious overconfidence. To address this problem, some current research have designed diverse temperature coefficients for different categories based on temperature scaling (TS) method. However, in the case of rare samples in minority classes, the temperature coefficient is not generalizable, and there is a large difference between the temperature coefficients of the training set and the validation set. To solve this challenge, this paper proposes a dual-branch temperature scaling calibration model (Dual-TS), which considers the diversities in temperature parameters of different categories and the non-generalizability of temperature parameters for rare samples in minority classes simultaneously. Moreover, we noticed that the traditional calibration evaluation metric, Excepted Calibration Error (ECE), gives a higher weight to low-confidence samples in the minority classes, which leads to inaccurate evaluation of model calibration. Therefore, we also propose Equal Sample Bin Excepted Calibration Error (Esbin-ECE) as a new calibration evaluation metric. Through experiments, we demonstrate that our model yields state-of-the-art in both traditional ECE and Esbin-ECE metrics.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.