Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 127 references

The entire linear chiral response of a two-dimensional fluid is the Newtonian stress rotated by 90 degrees, one coefficient and one mechanical action per channel.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 19:19 UTC pith:G2ZXYTXI

load-bearing objection Solid first-principles 2D chiral hydrodynamics with a usable base-state library; the cavity math is clean, but the single-group claim rests on an unmeasured microscopic spin-screening length. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.24279 v1 pith:G2ZXYTXI submitted 2026-07-27 cond-mat.soft physics.flu-dyn

Steady base states in a two-dimensional chiral fluid. The chiral Stokes cavity

Francisco Vega Reyes This is my paper
classification cond-mat.soft physics.flu-dyn PACS 47.10.ad47.15.G-83.10.Ff05.70.Ln
keywords chiral active fluidodd viscosityantisymmetric stressspin hydrodynamicschiral Stokes cavitymodified Helmholtz equationtwo-dimensional flowangular momentum conservation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper derives the hydrodynamics of a two-dimensional fluid that carries a net microscopic spin field, without forcing the stress tensor to be symmetric. Angular-momentum conservation alone produces an odd stress that is exactly the classical Newtonian stress turned by a quarter turn. That single operation pairs pressure with chiral pressure, bulk and shear viscosities with their odd partners, and the spin-flux gradient with its rotated image—no extra cross-couplings. With that structure in hand, the simplest steady states become elementary: rest states are organised by a holomorphic pressure pair, inhomogeneous activity forces azimuthal currents, and a boundary-driven confined flow (the chiral Stokes cavity) reduces to a modified Helmholtz–Poisson system controlled by one dimensionless group. That group sets the crossover from a screened single vortex to sign-reversing vortical cells, and the theory recovers earlier phenomenological models as special cases while giving quantitative predictions for spinning-disk experiments.

Core claim

Enforcing angular-momentum conservation without assuming stress symmetry, the full linear chiral response of a two-dimensional fluid is generated from the Newtonian stress by one physically natural operation—the 90° rotation through which chirality acts. Applied channel by channel in the irreducible decomposition, the rotation assigns each classical coefficient a unique chiral partner and a unique mechanical action. Steady confined flow then obeys a modified Helmholtz–Poisson system whose single control parameter αL organises both circular and square cavities and drives the transition from screened single-vortex flow to interior sign reversal at the first Dirichlet eigenvalue of the domain.

What carries the argument

The translation–rotation correspondence: the Levi-Civita tensor maps each irreducible Newtonian channel (isotropic pressure, bulk viscosity, deviatoric strain rate, spin-flux gradient) onto a unique parity-odd partner. That map produces the complete odd stress and spin flux, reduces incompressible steady spin to an algebraic slave of vorticity, and yields the modified Helmholtz equation ∇²ω = α²ω that governs the chiral Stokes cavity.

Load-bearing premise

The spin diffusion length is assumed microscopic, of order the particle radius, so that spin flux can be dropped in the bulk and the steady spin field is locked algebraically to the local vorticity.

What would settle it

In a confined suspension of air-fluidised chiral disks, measure whether the steady vorticity field crosses from a single screened vortex to interior sign reversal when the dimensionless group |α|L passes the first Dirichlet eigenvalue of the container (j₀,₁ for a disk, π√2 for a square), at fixed material parameters.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Quiescent chiral states exist only when the applied torque density is harmonic; non-harmonic activity forces flow.
  • A single mesoscopic length α⁻¹ controls both forced azimuthal edge currents and boundary-driven cavity flow.
  • Odd viscosity is silent in the bulk vorticity of incompressible flow and appears only as a pressure shift and wall traction.
  • Earlier phenomenological chiral-fluid models are recovered as the infinite-rotational-drag limit in which spin is prescribed rather than solved.
  • Wall torque on a resting chiral suspension measures the entrainment coefficient β without requiring flow.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If couple-stress diffusion is not microscopic, the algebraic spin closure fails and the cavity should show an extra boundary layer of thickness ℓ_s that the present single-group phenomenology cannot capture.
  • The holomorphic chiral complex potential suggests that multiply connected domains will force azimuthal currents purely from topology, analogous to circulation periods in ideal flow.
  • The same αL organisation should appear in any confined chiral suspension whose substrate drag sets a finite screening length, independent of the microscopic origin of the active torque.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript formulates the two-dimensional hydrodynamics of a fluid carrying a particle-spin field, retaining angular-momentum conservation and an antisymmetric stress. It classifies fluids according to the body couple, writes the Newtonian and odd stress sectors through a channel-by-channel Levi-Civita rotation, and derives a chiral pressure proportional to the spin–vorticity mismatch together with a two-term spin flux. For incompressible flow with negligible bulk spin diffusion, the author obtains algebraic spin closure, holomorphic quiescent states, forced axisymmetric states, and a boundary-driven “chiral Stokes cavity” governed by ∇²ψ=−ω and ∇²ω=α²ω. The disk problem is solved analytically and the square problem numerically, with screened and oscillatory regimes separated by the relevant Dirichlet eigenvalue.

Significance. If the stated closure and boundary model apply, this is a useful and elegantly organized base-state theory for confined chiral fluids. Particular strengths are the deviatoric stress decomposition, the exact hydrostatic family (including its freedom from the spin-diffusion approximation), the closed-form disk solution, the spectral interpretation of the disk and square crossovers, and the publicly available Python code. The wall-torque relation, pressure–vorticity shift, and |α|L thresholds are falsifiable predictions. The quantitative cavity claims are nevertheless conditional on a microscopic spin-screening length and on the prescribed wall-vorticity condition; those limits need sharper treatment before the results can be read as experimentally quantitative.

major comments (4)
  1. [§5.4, Eqs. (6.2)–(6.3); §8, Eqs. (8.3), (8.13)–(8.16)] The bulk spin-flux neglect is load-bearing for the cavity reduction but is supported only by the dimensional estimate κ∼μ_R a². Retaining κ in Eq. (6.2) gives, for a Fourier mode, q²[μ+μ_R/2−μ_R²/(2μ_R+Γ_Ω+κq²)]=−Γ: α² becomes q-dependent, a second radial scale appears, and the sign-reversal threshold is shifted. Please add the finite-κ linear correction or a quantitative smallness criterion, including its effect on the first critical value, and present Eqs. (8.13)–(8.16) explicitly as the ℓ_s/L→0 limit.
  2. [§5.4, Eq. (6.3); §8.1] For the kind-II-a balance, the relaxation coefficient multiplying Ω is 2μ_R+Γ_Ω, whereas Eq. (6.3) defines ℓ_s=√(κ/2μ_R). This is especially problematic in the active branch, where μ_R<0 is contemplated and positivity must come from Γ_Ω. The screening estimate should therefore be stated in terms of the actual coefficient in Eq. (8.3), and the relation κ∼|μ_R|a² justified as a magnitude estimate rather than used to say that the couple-stress issue is “settled.”
  3. [§8.2, Eq. (8.17); Appendix A.1] The prescribed constant wall vorticity is introduced as a working convention and then determines the Dirichlet thresholds j_{0,1} and π√2. Appendix A gives a plausible wall-layer interpretation, but no wall constitutive law or matching calculation shows that a single α-independent Dirichlet value is appropriate; with finite κ, Ω or C·n data also enter. Since the crossover and proposed experimental tests are boundary-spectrum statements, please either derive/justify the condition from a wall-layer model or quantify its robustness under a Robin or prescribed-slip alternative, and otherwise frame the results as conditional.
  4. [§5.1, Eq. (5.2); §5.2, Eq. (5.10)] Angular-momentum conservation leads to Eq. (3.18), but it does not by itself imply that the odd stress is the rotated Newtonian stress in Eq. (5.2), nor that p_R must vanish at rigid co-rotation. Those are constitutive inputs requiring explicit assumptions—linearity, locality, isotropy, broken parity, and the chosen reference state. Because “one coefficient per channel” and “derived from first principles” are central claims, please supply the symmetry classification or qualify these statements as a constitutive model.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§1.1; §1.3; §9.2; Acknowledgments] The last paragraph says the paper will “compare its predictions quantitatively with experimental data,” but §1.3 and §9 state that this comparison is in preparation, and no data comparison appears. The acknowledgments also say experimental data “used in this work” were taken by collaborators. These statements should be made consistent.
  2. [§8, after Eq. (8.16)] The generic discussion following Eq. (8.15) first invokes boundary conditions derived from no-slip, then says no-slip is not imposed. This would be clearer if the prescribed-vorticity/slip boundary problem were introduced before the numerical-method discussion.
  3. [§8.2] The symbol τ(A) appears in the circular-cavity paragraph and solution, while τ_a is used elsewhere. Please make the activity notation consistent.
  4. [Figures 4 and 6] The separate color scales in Figs. 4 and 6 make the claimed amplification and relative strength of the reversed cells difficult to assess. A common scale for selected panels, or an additional quantitative profile/colorbar annotation, would help.
  5. [§8.3; Appendix A.2] Please report the grid size and convergence level used for the plotted square-cavity solutions in the main text or figure caption, rather than only referring generally to Appendix A and the repository.
  6. [Abstract; §8.3] The phrase “a single dimensionless group controls both geometries” should be qualified: |α| times a domain size organizes each geometry, but the critical value and eigenfunctions remain shape-dependent.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No load-bearing circularity: cavity solutions and channel structure follow forward from balance laws plus a stated constitutive ansatz; experimental comparison is deferred, not fitted.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [§5.1, Eqs. (5.1)–(5.2); abstract claim on rotation generating entire chiral response]
    "the stress tensor of the kind-II fluid is the sum of σ_I and a new contribution, coined the odd stress, which we write as the rotated version of σ_I: σ_II = σ_I + σ_odd, where σ_odd_ij = ε_ik[−σ* δ_kj + 2μ_odd d_kj] = p_R ε_ij + ζ_odd(∇·u)ε_ij + 2μ_odd ε_ik d_kj"

    The abstract and §5 claim to show that the entire chiral response is generated from the Newtonian stress by a single 90° rotation with one coefficient per channel. In §5.1 that odd stress is introduced by writing it as the rotated copy of σ_I. Once that constitutive form is adopted, the partner-channel map (Table 1) is true by construction of the ansatz plus 2D tensor algebra, not an independent derivation. Mild only: consequences (silence of μ_odd/κ_odd, cavity PDE, holomorphic hydrostatics) are still non-trivial deductions from the choice, and no data are fitted.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and mostly non-circular. Conservative/convective balances (2.1–3.3), the implication that a body couple forces a non-symmetric stress (3.15–3.18), the kinematic selection p_R = μ_R(Ω − ω/2) (5.10), the incompressible reduction, and the modified Helmholtz–Poisson cavity system (8.14–8.16) with closed-form disk and numerical square solutions are obtained forward from the stated equations. Recovery of Han et al. and Marini Bettolo Marconi et al. as Γ_Ω → ∞ / prescribed-spin limits is presented as a consistency check, not an input. López-Castaño et al. (2022) and the code repo are cited for deferred comparison and reproducibility; they do not force the analytic claims. The only mild self-definitional note is that the odd stress is introduced by writing it as the rotated Newtonian stress (§5.1), after which the one-coefficient-per-channel map is immediate; that is a constitutive modelling choice framed as a first-principles show, not a fitted prediction or a self-citation uniqueness theorem. The skeptic’s concern about the dimensional neglect of κ∇²Ω is a correctness/assumption risk, not circularity. Score 1.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 8 axioms · 3 invented entities

Load-bearing content is continuum angular-momentum balance without stress symmetry, linear Navier–Stokes-order constitutive response, 2D incompressibility with constant coefficients, and the microscopic estimate that spin diffusion is confined to particle-scale boundary layers. Transport coefficients remain free material parameters; no new microscopic particle or force is postulated beyond standard active torque and substrate drag.

free parameters (6)
  • rotational viscosity μ_R (and sign)
    Sets chiral pressure p_R=μ_R(Ω−ω/2) and enters α via μ'_R; sign selects dissipative vs active cavity branch. Not computed here; left as material parameter.
  • shear viscosity μ and odd viscosity μ_odd
    Newtonian and rotated deviatoric coefficients; μ_odd drops from incompressible vorticity dynamics but shifts pressure. Material inputs.
  • substrate drags Γ and Γ_Ω
    Translational and rotational friction densities; essential to α²=Γ/(μ+μ'_R). Without Γ the confined chiral coupling vanishes.
  • spin viscosity κ (and odd spin viscosity κ_odd)
    Enter spin flux; κ sets ℓ_s. Bulk theory sets ∇·C=0 after estimating κ∼μ_R a².
  • wall vorticity Dirichlet value ω_w
    Effective boundary datum replacing no-slip; magnitude is an unresolved wall-layer property ‘to be determined by experiment’ (Appendix A).
  • active torque density τ_a
    Prescribed material source for kind II-a; uniform in cavity problem, possibly spatially varying in hydrostatic/azimuthal base states.
axioms (8)
  • domain assumption Angular-momentum balance is enforced with a dynamical spin field; stress need not be symmetric when body couple τ_0 ≠ 0.
    §3.3, Eqs. 3.15–3.18; classical structured-fluid starting point (Dahler & Scriven; Eringen), not proved here.
  • domain assumption Constitutive response is linear in first gradients (Navier–Stokes order); Burnett-order vorticity gradients are excluded from spin flux.
    §5.4; standard hydrodynamic closure.
  • ad hoc to paper Odd stress equals the Levi-Civita rotation of the Newtonian stress (channel-by-channel), not a more general parity-odd tensor.
    §5.1 constitutive construction motivated by transverse microscopic forces; conservation alone does not uniquify this form.
  • domain assumption Chiral pressure is p_R = μ_R(Ω − ω/2), the unique linear pseudoscalar that vanishes in rigid co-rotation.
    §5.2 kinematic selection argument.
  • ad hoc to paper Spin screening length is microscopic (ℓ_s ≲ a), so bulk spin flux divergence is negligible and steady Ω is algebraically slaved to ω.
    §5.4–§6 dimensional estimate κ∼μ_R a²; load-bearing for cavity reduction.
  • domain assumption Incompressible flow, constant transport coefficients, steady Stokes (negligible advection) for base states and cavity.
    §6–§8 stated regime.
  • domain assumption Kind II-a: body couple is intrinsic active torque plus substrate rotational drag; no external axial field feedback.
    §5 classification; scope restriction of the solved base states.
  • ad hoc to paper Cavity boundary data: impermeability ψ=0 and prescribed wall vorticity ω=ω_w; no-slip not imposed.
    §8.2 and Appendix A; motivated by active edge currents but not derived from a resolved wall layer.
invented entities (3)
  • chiral complex potential χ = p + i p_R independent evidence
    purpose: Organizes quiescent states as holomorphic functions; mechanical and chiral pressures as conjugate harmonics.
    Named construct in §7.1; mathematically the Cauchy–Riemann form of ∇p = ∇* p_R, not a new physical field.
  • chiral Stokes cavity (modified Helmholtz–Poisson confined flow) independent evidence
    purpose: Canonical boundary-driven steady base state analogous to lid-driven cavity.
    §8 definition; falsifiable via measured vorticity profiles vs αL.
  • entrainment coefficient β and modified rotational viscosity μ'_R independent evidence
    purpose: Package spin–vorticity coupling and screening length for steady states.
    Derived composites of μ_R, Γ_Ω (§7–§8), not independent ontological additions.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-grok45-kimik3 · 38006 in / 4627 out tokens · 92255 ms · 2026-07-31T19:19:24.097260+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We develop from first principles the hydrodynamics of a two-dimensional chiral fluid, i.e. one carrying a net microscopic angular-momentum (spin) field. Enforcing angular-momentum conservation without imposing stress-tensor symmetry, we derive the full form of the stress tensor and of the spin flux, and we show that the entire chiral response is generated from the classical Newtonian one by a single operation of direct physical origin --- the $90^{\circ}$ rotation through which chirality acts, mirrored at the particle level by transverse forces (Caprini & Marini Bettolo Marconi 2025). Applied to the irreducible (deviatoric) decomposition, the rotation assigns to each classical channel a chiral partner --- pressure to chiral pressure, bulk and shear viscosities to their odd counterparts, the spin-flux gradient to its rotated image --- one coefficient and one mechanical action per channel, with no further cross-couplings. In this representation the steady base states become elementary. Quiescent states are organised by a holomorphic chiral complex potential, the mechanical and chiral pressures forming a conjugate harmonic pair subject to a topological existence condition; inhomogeneous activity forces azimuthal flows; and a boundary-driven confined flow, the chiral Stokes cavity, obeys a modified Helmholtz--Poisson system, solved in closed form in a circular domain and numerically in a square one. A single dimensionless group controls both geometries and sets the crossover from a screened, single-vortex regime to a sequence of sign-reversing vortical structures. The theory yields quantitative predictions, amenable to direct comparison with experiments on air-fluidised chiral disks (L\'opez-Casta\~no et al. 2022), and recovers the phenomenological frameworks of the chiral-fluid literature as particular cases.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.24279 by Francisco Vega Reyes.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Why a non-vanishing spin field forces an antisymmetric stress. (a) Achiral fluid: the tangential tractions exerted by the neighbouring fluid on a square element form two couples of opposite sense — that of the 𝑥-faces (𝜎𝑦 𝑥 ) and that of the 𝑦-faces (𝜎𝑥 𝑦). With the particle spins averaging to zero, the element has no internal reservoir to absorb a net torque (an uncancelled couple would impart a divergent… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Mechanical action of the channels of the shear component 𝜎 II 𝑥 𝑦 in a kind-II fluid. Arrows in the Result rows denote the tractions exerted on the fluid element by its surroundings (𝑡 𝑗 = 𝜎𝑗𝑙𝑛𝑙 , with 𝒏 the outward normal); each column shows one channel, with the response for either sign of the corresponding transport coefficient. From left to right: the Newtonian shear stress 𝜎 I 𝑥 𝑦 — shear begets shear… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Mechanical action of the odd channel of the diagonal component 𝜎 odd 𝑥 𝑥 = 2𝜇 odd𝑑𝑥 𝑦, with the same traction convention as in figure 2: shear strain produces normal traction, completing the 90◦ correspondence — shear → normal here mirrors normal → shear there. Together, the two figures display the full action of the parity-breaking operator 𝜖 on the symmetric-traceless sector of the Newtonian stress. 0 X0… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Chiral Stokes cavity flow in a circular domain of radius 𝑎, from the closed-form solution (8.18)– (8.19). Colour: vorticity 𝜔/𝜔𝑤; streamlines with thickness proportional to |𝒖| 1/2 . (a) Dissipative branch, 𝛼 real: 𝜔 ∝ 𝐼0 (𝛼𝑟), monotonic and nodeless. (b) Active branch with 𝑘𝑎 < 𝑗0,1 = 2.405: 𝜔 ∝ 𝐽0 (𝑘𝑟), amplified towards the centre but still of one sign. (c) Active branch with 𝑗0,1 < 𝑘𝑎 < 𝑗0,2: 𝐽0 (𝑘𝑟) p… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Radial profiles of (a) vorticity, (b) azimuthal velocity and (c) stream function in the circular cavity, from (8.18)–(8.19), for the three regimes of figure 4. In the supercritical case the vorticity and the circulation reverse at distinct radii: 𝜔 vanishes at𝑟1 = 𝑗0,1/𝑘 = 0.601 𝑎 (dotted line), whereas 𝑢 𝜃 vanishes at𝑟 ′ 1 = 𝑗1,1/𝑘 = 0.958 𝑎 (dash-dotted line), where 𝜓 attains an interior extremum and a t… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Chiral Stokes cavity flow in a square domain of side 𝐿, obtained numerically under the boundary conditions (8.17) with 𝜔𝑤 > 0. Colour: vorticity 𝜔/𝜔𝑤; streamlines with thickness proportional to |𝒖| 1/2 . (a) Dissipative branch, 𝛼 2 > 0: the wall vorticity is screened monotonically into the bulk over the length 𝛼 −1 and the interior relaxes towards irrotational behaviour. (b) Active branch below the first D… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

127 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and Tsimring, Lev S

    Aranson, Igor S. and Tsimring, Lev S. , title =. Reviews of Modern Physics , year = 2006, volume = 78, number = 2, month = jun, pages =. doi:10.1103/revmodphys.78.641 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.78.641 2006

  2. [2]

    Avron, J. E. , title =. Journal of Statistical Physics , year = 1998, volume = 92, number =. doi:10.1023/a:1023084404080 , url =

    doi:10.1023/a:1023084404080 1998

  3. [3]

    and Souslov, A

    Banerjee, D. and Souslov, A. and Abanov, A. G. and Vitelli, V. , journal =. Odd viscosity in chiral active fluids , doi =. 2017 , volume =

    2017

  4. [4]

    Batchelor, G. K. , title =. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511800955 , url =

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511800955

  5. [5]

    and Izri, Z

    Beppu, K. and Izri, Z. and Sato, T. and Yamanishi, Y. and Sumino, Y. and Maeda, Y. T. , journal =. Edge current and pairing order transition in chiral bacterial vortices , doi =. 2021 , volume =

    2021

  6. [6]

    and Fakhri, Nikta and Marchetti, M

    Bowick, Mark J. and Fakhri, Nikta and Marchetti, M. Cristina and Ramaswamy, Sriram , title =. Physical Review X , year = 2022, volume = 12, number = 1, month = feb, issn =. doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.010501 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.010501 2022

  7. [7]

    Boyer, P. D. , journal =. The. 1997 , volume =

    1997

  8. [8]

    Braginskii, S. I. , title =. Reviews of Plasma Physics , editor =. 1965 , note =

    1965

  9. [9]

    1972 , author =

    Kinetic theory , publisher =. 1972 , author =

    1972

  10. [10]

    Analytical and numerical studies of the structure of steady separated flows , volume =. J. Fluid Mech. , author =. 1966 , pages =. doi:10.1017/S0022112066000545 , number =

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022112066000545 1966

  11. [11]

    Burnett , title =

    D. Burnett , title =. Proc. London Math. Soc. , year =

  12. [12]

    and Marini Bettolo Marconi, U

    Caprini, L. and Marini Bettolo Marconi, U. , title =. Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =

  13. [13]

    and Tailleur, Julien , title =

    Cates, Michael E. and Tailleur, Julien , title =. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics , year = 2015, volume = 6, number = 1, month = mar, pages =. doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031214-014710 , url =

    doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031214-014710 2015

  14. [14]

    1981 , isbn =

    Chandrasekhar, Subrahmanyan , title =. 1981 , isbn =

    1981

  15. [15]

    Chapman and T

    C. Chapman and T. G. Cowling , year =. The Mathematical Theory of Non-Uniform Gases , publisher =

  16. [16]

    and Rinaldi, C

    Chaves, A. and Rinaldi, C. and Elborai, S. and He, X. and Zahn, M. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =

  17. [17]

    and Dahler, John S

    Condiff, Duane W. and Dahler, John S. , title =. The Physics of Fluids , year = 1964, volume = 7, number = 6, month = June, pages =. doi:10.1063/1.1711295 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1711295 1964

  18. [18]

    Dahler, J. S. and Scriven, L. E. , title =. Nature , volume =

  19. [19]

    and Löwen, Hartmut and

    Debets, Vincent E. and Löwen, Hartmut and. Glassy Dynamics in Chiral Fluids , journal =. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.058201 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.058201

  20. [20]

    and Gonnella, Giuseppe and Pagonabarraga, Ignacio , title =

    Digregorio, Pasquale and Levis, Demian and Suma, Antonio and Cugliandolo, Leticia F. and Gonnella, Giuseppe and Pagonabarraga, Ignacio , title =. Physical Review Letters , year = 2018, volume = 121, number = 9, month = aug, issn =. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.098003 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.098003 2018

  21. [21]

    and Pagonabarraga, I

    Di Gregorio, P. and Pagonabarraga, I. and Vega Reyes, F. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2026 , doi =

    2026

  22. [22]

    and Heidenreich, S

    Dunkel, J. and Heidenreich, S. and Drescher, K. and Wensink, H. H. and B. Fluid dynamics of bacterial turbulence , doi =. Physical Review Letters , year =

  23. [23]

    and Wang, H

    Elston, T. and Wang, H. and Oster, G. , journal =. Energy transduction in. 1998 , volume =

    1998

  24. [24]

    Eringen, A. C. , title =. J. Math. Mech. , volume =

  25. [25]

    Ferziger, J. H. and Peri\'c, M. , title =

  26. [26]

    2012 , doi =

    Theodore Frankel , title =. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  27. [27]

    and Fruchart, M

    Han, M. and Fruchart, M. and Scheibner, C. and Vaikuntanathan, S. and de Pablo, J. J. and Vitelli, V. , title =. Nat. Phys. , volume =

  28. [28]

    Hancock, W. O. , journal =. Myosin regulatory mechanisms , doi =. 2018 , volume =

    2018

  29. [29]

    Hilbert , title =

    D. Hilbert , title =. Math. Ann. , year =

  30. [30]

    and Noda, Y

    Hirokawa, N. and Noda, Y. and Tanaka, Y. and Niwa, S. , journal =. Kinesin superfamily motor proteins and intracellular transport , doi =. 2009 , volume =

    2009

  31. [31]

    Javier and Dufty, James W

    Brey, J. Javier and Dufty, James W. and Kim, Chang Sub and Santos, Andrés , title =. Physical Review E , year = 1998, volume = 58, number = 4, month = Oct, pages =. doi:10.1103/physreve.58.4638 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physreve.58.4638 1998

  32. [32]

    , title =

    Klymko, Katherine and Mandal, Dibyendu and Mandadapu, Kranthi K. , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 2017 , doi =

    2017

  33. [33]

    Kull, F. J. and Endow, S. A. and Pyle, A. M. and Block, S. M. , journal =. Force generation by kinesin and myosin cytoskeletal motor proteins , doi =. 2013 , volume =

    2013

  34. [34]

    Physics Letters A , year = 2015, volume = 379, number =

    Lingam, Manasvi , title =. Physics Letters A , year = 2015, volume = 379, number =. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2015.03.014 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2015.03.014 2015

  35. [35]

    and Márquez Seco, Alejandro and Márquez Seco, Alicia and Rodríguez-Rivas, Álvaro and Reyes, Francisco Vega , title =

    López-Castaño, Miguel A. and Márquez Seco, Alejandro and Márquez Seco, Alicia and Rodríguez-Rivas, Álvaro and Reyes, Francisco Vega , title =. Physical Review Research , year = 2022, volume = 4, number = 3, month = sep, issn =. doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.033230 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.033230 2022

  36. [36]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , year = 2022, volume = 119, number = 42, month = Oct, issn =

    Lou, Xin and Yang, Qing and Ding, Yu and Liu, Peng and Chen, Ke and Zhou, Xin and Ye, Fangfu and Podgornik, Rudolf and Yang, Mingcheng , title =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , year = 2022, volume = 119, number = 42, month = Oct, issn =. doi:10.1073/pnas.2201279119 , url =

    doi:10.1073/pnas.2201279119 2022

  37. [37]

    Marchetti, M. C. and Joanny, J. F. and Ramaswamy, S. and Liverpool, T. B. and Prost, J. and Rao, Madan and Simha, R. Aditi , title =. Reviews of Modern Physics , year = 2013, volume = 85, number = 3, month = jul, pages =. doi:10.1103/revmodphys.85.1143 , url =

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.85.1143 2013

  38. [38]

    New Journal of Physics , year = 2026, volume = 28, number = 6, month = May, pages = 064401, issn =

    Marini Bettolo Marconi, Umberto and Petrini, Alessandro and Maire, Raphael and Caprini, Lorenzo , title =. New Journal of Physics , year = 2026, volume = 28, number = 6, month = May, pages = 064401, issn =. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ae6c55 , url =

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ae6c55 2026

  39. [39]

    , title =

    Markovich, Tomer and Lubensky, Tom C. , title =. Physical Review Letters , year = 2021, volume = 127, number = 4, month = jul, issn =. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.048001 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.048001 2021

  40. [40]

    New Journal of Physics , year = 2019, volume = 21, number = 11, month = Nov, pages = 112001, issn =

    Markovich, Tomer and Tjhung, Elsen and Cates, Michael E , title =. New Journal of Physics , year = 2019, volume = 21, number = 11, month = Nov, pages = 112001, issn =. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab54af , url =

    doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab54af 2019

  41. [41]

    Melcher, J. R. and Taylor, G. I. , title =. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , volume =

  42. [42]

    and Rosensweig, R

    Moskowitz, R. and Rosensweig, R. E. , title =. Appl. Phys. Lett. , volume =

  43. [43]

    and Yasuda, R

    Noji, H. and Yasuda, R. and Yoshida, M. and Kinosita, K. Jr. , journal =. Direct observation of the rotation of. 1997 , volume =

    1997

  44. [44]

    and Klymko, Katherine and GrandPre, Trevor and Geissler, Phillip L

    Omar, Ahmad K. and Klymko, Katherine and GrandPre, Trevor and Geissler, Phillip L. , title =. Physical Review Letters , year = 2021, volume = 126, number = 18, month = may, issn =. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.188002 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.188002 2021

  45. [45]

    Petroff, A. P. and Wu, X.-L. and Libchaber, A. , journal =. Fast-moving bacteria self-organize into active two-dimensional crystals of rotating cells , doi =. 2015 , volume =

    2015

  46. [46]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2416 , url =

    Eliot Quataert and Tobias Heinemann and Anatoly Spitkovsky , title =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2416 , url =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2416

  47. [47]

    , title =

    Vega Reyes, Francisco and Santos, Andrés and Kremer, Gilberto M. , title =. Physical Review E , year = 2014, volume = 89, number = 2, month = feb, issn =. doi:10.1103/physreve.89.020202 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.89.020202 2014

  48. [48]

    Rosensweig, R. E. , title =

  49. [49]

    Rosensweig, R. E. and Popplewell, J. and Johnston, R. J. , title =. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. , volume =

  50. [50]

    Saville, D. A. , title =. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , volume =

  51. [51]

    Shankar, P. N. and Deshpande, M. D. , title =. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , volume =. 2000 , doi =

    2000

  52. [52]

    Shliomis, M. I. , title =. Sov. Phys. JETP , volume =

  53. [53]

    Shliomis, M. I. , title =. Phys. Rev. Fluids , volume =

  54. [54]

    and Junge, W

    Sielaff, H. and Junge, W. , journal =. Torque, chemistry and efficiency in molecular motors: a study of the rotary--chemical coupling in. 2015 , volume =

    2015

  55. [55]

    and Aranson, I

    Sokolov, A. and Aranson, I. S. and Kessler, J. O. and Goldstein, R. E. , journal =. Collective behavior of terminating bacteria , doi =. 2007 , volume =

    2007

  56. [56]

    and Bililign, E

    Soni, V. and Bililign, E. S. and Magkiriadou, S. and Sacanna, S. and Bartolo, D. and Shelley, M. J. and Irvine, W. T. M. , title =. Nat. Phys. , volume =

  57. [57]

    and Block, S

    Svoboda, K. and Block, S. M. , journal =. Force and velocity measured for single kinesin molecules , doi =. 1994 , volume =

    1994

  58. [58]

    Sweeney, H. L. and Houdusse, A. , journal =. Structural and functional insights into the myosin motor mechanism , doi =. 2010 , volume =

    2010

  59. [59]

    Tan, T. H. and others , journal =. Odd dynamics of living chiral crystals , doi =. 2022 , volume =

    2022

  60. [60]

    and Toupin, R

    Truesdell, C. and Toupin, R. The Classical Field Theories. Principles of Classical Mechanics and Field Theory / Prinzipien der Klassischen Mechanik und Feldtheorie. 1960. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-45943-6_2

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-45943-6_2 1960

  61. [61]

    and Ye, Fangfu and Rodriguez, Juan and Gollub, J

    Tsai, J.-C. and Ye, Fangfu and Rodriguez, Juan and Gollub, J. P. and Lubensky, T. C. , title =. Physical Review Letters , year = 2005, volume = 94, number = 21, month = May, issn =. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.214301 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.214301 2005

  62. [62]

    Vale, R. D. and Reese, T. S. and Sheetz, M. P. , journal =. Identification of a novel force-generating protein, kinesin, involved in microtubule-based motility , doi =. 1985 , volume =

    1985

  63. [63]

    and Pérez, A

    Vega, F. and Pérez, A. T. , title =. Physics of Fluids , year = 2002, volume = 14, number = 8, month = Aug, pages =. doi:10.1063/1.1488146 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1488146 2002

  64. [64]

    GitHub repository , howpublished =

    Francisco. GitHub repository , howpublished =. 2026 , publisher =

    2026

  65. [65]

    and Oster, G

    Wang, H. and Oster, G. , journal =. Energy transduction in the. 1998 , volume =

    1998

  66. [66]

    Wensink, H. H. and Dunkel, J. and Heidenreich, S. and Drescher, K. and Goldstein, R. E. and L. Meso-scale turbulence in living fluids , doi =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA , year =

  67. [67]

    and Noji, H

    Yasuda, R. and Noji, H. and Kinosita, K. Jr. and Yoshida, M. , journal =. 1998 , volume =

    1998

  68. [68]

    Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology , year = 2001, volume = 2, number = 9, month = sep, pages =

    Yoshida, Masasuke and Muneyuki, Eiro and Hisabori, Toru , title =. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology , year = 2001, volume = 2, number = 9, month = sep, pages =. doi:10.1038/35089509 , url =

    work page doi:10.1038/35089509 2001

  69. [69]

    Zaitsev, V. M. and Shliomis, M. I. , title =. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. , volume =

  70. [70]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , year = 2026, volume = 165, number = 3, pages = 034501, doi =

    Maire, Rapha\"el and Petrini, Alessandro and Marini Bettolo Marconi, Umberto and Caprini, Lorenzo , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , year = 2026, volume = 165, number = 3, pages = 034501, doi =

    2026

  71. [73]

    & Tsimring, Lev S

    Aranson, Igor S. & Tsimring, Lev S. 2006 Patterns and collective behavior in granular media: Theoretical concepts . Reviews of Modern Physics 78 (2), 641–692

    2006

  72. [74]

    Avron, J. E. 1998 Odd viscosity . Journal of Statistical Physics 92 (3–4), 543–557

    1998

  73. [75]

    , Souslov, A

    Banerjee, D. , Souslov, A. , Abanov, A. G. & Vitelli, V. 2017 Odd viscosity in chiral active fluids . Nature Communications 8 , 1573

    2017

  74. [76]

    Batchelor, G. K. 1967 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics\/ . Cambridge University Press

    1967

  75. [77]

    , Izri, Z

    Beppu, K. , Izri, Z. , Sato, T. , Yamanishi, Y. , Sumino, Y. & Maeda, Y. T. 2021 Edge current and pairing order transition in chiral bacterial vortices . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 118 (39), e2107461118

    2021

  76. [78]

    , Fakhri, Nikta , Marchetti, M

    Bowick, Mark J. , Fakhri, Nikta , Marchetti, M. Cristina & Ramaswamy, Sriram 2022 Symmetry, thermodynamics, and topology in active matter . Physical Review X 12 (1)

    2022

  77. [79]

    Boyer, P. D. 1997 The ATP synthase --- a splendid molecular machine . Annual Review of Biochemistry 66 , 717--749

    1997

  78. [80]

    Braginskii, S. I. 1965 Transport processes in a plasma . In Reviews of Plasma Physics\/ (ed. M. A. Leontovich ) , , vol. 1 , pp. 205--311 . New York: Consultants Bureau , translated from the Russian

    1965

  79. [81]

    Javier , Dufty, James W

    Brey, J. Javier , Dufty, James W. , Kim, Chang Sub & Santos, Andrés 1998 Hydrodynamics for granular flow at low density . Physical Review E 58 (4), 4638–4653

    1998

  80. [82]

    Brush, S. G. 1972 Kinetic theory\/ , International Series of Monographs in Natural Philosophy 42 , vol. 3 . Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press

    1972

Showing first 80 references.