Quantum Spin Liquid in a depleted triangular lattice Iridate K$_x$Ir$_y$O$_2$

Kavita Mehlawat; Yogesh Singh

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Quantum Spin Liquid in a depleted triangular lattice Iridate K$_x$Ir$_y$O$_2$

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read K0.85Ir0.79O2 is a candidate gapless quantum spin liquid.

desk verdict A solid first characterization of a genuinely new stuffed-honeycomb iridate; the gapless QSL claim is plausible but underdetermined by bulk thermodynamic data, so referee it with the disorder question on the table. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08475 v1 pith:G3AEWWGS submitted 2019-08-22 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Kavita Mehlawat , Yogesh Singh This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords quantumspinliquidKitaevphysicsiridatehoneycomblatticetriangulargeometricalfrustrationspin-orbitMottinsulatorheatcapacity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the growth and physical property measurements of a new layered iridate, K0.85Ir0.79O2, whose magnetic layers form a depleted triangular, or stuffed honeycomb, lattice of edge-sharing IrO6 octahedra. The authors argue that this material is a candidate gapless quantum spin liquid: its iridium moments behave as effective spins 1/2 with strong antiferromagnetic exchange (Weiss temperature about -180 K), yet neither magnetic ordering nor spin freezing appears down to 1.8 K. The heat capacity shows a broad, field-insensitive anomaly near 30 K and a T-linear low-temperature term with gamma about 10 mJ/mol $K^{2}$, which the paper interprets as evidence for gapless magnetic excitations. If correct, the material provides a new tunable platform connecting triangular- and honeycomb-lattice Kitaev physics.

What carries the argument

The structural motif is the depleted triangular lattice: layers of edge-sharing IrO6 octahedra form a perfect honeycomb lattice, with iridium atoms partially occupying the hexagonal voids, so the material sits between the triangular and honeycomb limits and is expected to generate bond-directional, Kitaev-like anisotropic exchange under strong spin-orbit coupling. The argument for gaplessness is carried by a subtraction: the heat capacity of Na2SnO3, rescaled for atomic mass, is taken as the approximate lattice phonon background; subtracting it leaves a magnetic Cmag with a broad ~30 K anomaly and a T-linear term. That subtraction is what converts the raw C/T data into evidence for gapless spin-liquid excitations.

What would settle it

Measure the phonon density of states of K0.85Ir0.79O2 directly with inelastic neutron scattering, or measure heat capacity of a nonmagnetic isostructural analogue with similar mass, and recompute the magnetic contribution; if the T-linear term and the ~30 K broad anomaly vanish under an accurate phonon subtraction, the gapless quantum spin liquid interpretation is refuted. Similarly, muon spin rotation or neutron diffraction below 1.8 K detecting static magnetic order or spin freezing would falsify the no-order claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that K0.85Ir0.79O2 hosts a gapless quantum spin liquid state. The evidence chain runs as follows: susceptibility fits give S_eff = 1/2 and $\theta$ = -180(9) K, indicating strongly interacting antiferromagnetic moments; no transition or spin-glass cusp is seen in susceptibility down to 1.8 K; and heat capacity shows no sharp anomaly, a broad ~30 K maximum insensitive to a 5 T field, and a low-temperature C approximately gamma T + $\beta$ $T^{3}$ with gamma about 10 mJ/mol $K^{2}$. The T-linear term in an insulator is presented as the signature of gapless excitations of an unconventional nature. The authors acknowledge deviations from a pure Kitaev model, including the negative Weiss temperature and the T-linear rather than $T^{2}$ heat capacity, but maintain that the data are consistent with a gapless quantum spin liquid state.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the heat capacity contains a magnetic T-linear term depends on the assumption that Na2SnO3, rescaled for mass, is a good stand-in for the phonon contribution in K0.85Ir0.79O2; if the true lattice background differs, the broad anomaly and the T-linear term could change, and so could the gapless conclusion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

K0.85Ir0.79O2 becomes a new experimental platform for Kitaev physics on a lattice that interpolates between triangular and honeycomb geometries.
The absence of magnetic order down to 1.8 K despite |theta| approx 180 K establishes a strong-frustration regime in a 5d spin-orbit Mott insulator.
The T-linear heat capacity with gamma approx 10 mJ/mol K^2 implies the low-energy excitations are gapless; if the quantum spin liquid picture is right, this is consistent with a spinon Fermi surface rather than a gapped Z2 spin liquid.
The field insensitivity of the specific heat near 30 K suggests the broad anomaly is not due to conventional magnons or a field-tunable transition.
The stoichiometry can be tuned through the potassium content x, so varying x between the triangular and honeycomb regimes provides a direct way to map the evolution of magnetic phases between these limits.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the gapless quantum spin liquid interpretation survives a more accurate phonon subtraction, the residual gamma would imply a spinon Fermi surface; a natural test is low-temperature thermal conductivity, which should show a finite residual term in a clean enough sample.
The role of stacking faults is not settled by this paper; a disorder-driven explanation of the power-law heat capacity would make the material a random-singlet or valence-bond-glass candidate, so distinguishing stacking-fault disorder from intrinsic quantum spin liquid physics is a key next measurement.
The comparison with Na2SnO3 could be validated by measuring heat capacity of a nonmagnetic isostructural analogue with similar mass, or by tuning x into the triangular regime to see how the broad anomaly and gamma evolve.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things to know. This is the first physical-property paper on K0.85Ir0.79O2, a honeycomb iridate with the triangular voids partially occupied by Ir — a structure that genuinely interpolates between triangular and honeycomb and a reasonable place to look for Kitaev-like physics. And the paper is honest about what it has: susceptibility and heat capacity consistent with a gapless QSL, but not proof of one. The disorder alternative is on the table and the authors say so.

What is new and good: crystal growth of a new family, S_eff = 1/2 moments with θ ≈ −180 K, no magnetic order or spin freezing down to 1.8 K, a broad ~30 K heat-capacity anomaly that does not move in field, and a T-linear low-T term with γ ≈ 10 mJ/mol K². The entropy recovered by 100 K is about half of R ln2, which is fine for a frustrated magnet with strong interactions. The paper frames the main claim as 'consistent with,' and it does not oversell. The connection to the companion structure paper (ref. 34) is clear.

The soft spots are real and in proportion. The phonon subtraction uses Na2SnO3 rescaled for mass; the authors call it approximate, and the inferred Cmag—including the size of γ—rides on that assumption. The crystals are small (~8 mg, randomly oriented), there is no muSR, neutron scattering, or thermal conductivity, and the material has 39% Ir occupancy in the honeycomb voids plus visible stacking faults. A random-singlet/valence-bond-glass state is a perfectly good explanation for the same observations: power-law low-T heat capacity, no long-range order, broad field-insensitive anomaly. That is not a fatal flaw in an experimental first report, but it is exactly the load-bearing ambiguity that the paper's strongest claim cannot resolve. The authors acknowledge this in the Summary. The low-T power-law exponent changing with field is interesting but not sharpened here.

Citation pattern is normal for this niche; nothing strikes me as self-serving. The writing has some copyediting artifacts (a dangling 'like,' stray figure-caption encoding), minor.

Bottom line: this deserves a serious referee. It is a new material, the measurements are careful enough for a first report, and the interpretation, while underdetermined, is not wrong on its face. I would send it to review with the explicit request that the referee think hard about the random-singlet scenario and about whether the phonon subtraction is robust. If I were working on Kitaev physics, I would cite it as a candidate platform. I'd bring it to reading group as a useful example of a well-hedged experimental claim.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the discovery and bulk characterization of a new layered iridate, K0.85Ir0.79O2, whose Ir layers form a honeycomb lattice with partially occupied triangular voids, placing it between the triangular and honeycomb lattice limits relevant to Kitaev physics. Magnetic susceptibility measurements on single crystals show S_eff = 1/2 local moments with a Curie-Weiss temperature of approximately -180 K and no magnetic order or spin freezing down to 1.8 K. Heat capacity measurements show no sharp anomaly, a broad maximum near 30 K that is insensitive to magnetic field, and a T-linear low-temperature term with gamma ~ 10 mJ/mol K^2 after subtracting an approximate lattice contribution based on Na2SnO3. The authors interpret these results as consistent with a gapless quantum spin liquid, while explicitly noting that the possible role of stacking-fault disorder in producing the low-temperature power-law behavior requires future investigation.

Significance. If the gapless QSL interpretation holds, this material is a valuable new experimental platform that interpolates between the triangular and honeycomb lattices in the context of Kitaev-Heisenberg physics. The paper's strengths include the growth and identification of a new iridate family, careful bulk susceptibility and heat-capacity measurements, standard and transparent fitting procedures, and an appropriately cautious phrasing in several passages that acknowledges the approximate lattice subtraction and the potential role of disorder. However, the evidence presented is exclusively bulk thermodynamic; no microscopic probe is reported, and the central QSL claim is underdetermined relative to a disorder-driven random-singlet or valence-bond-glass scenario. The significance is therefore real but conditional on additional experimental substantiation.

major comments (2)

[Heat Capacity] The extraction of the magnetic heat capacity C_mag and, in particular, the T-linear coefficient gamma ~ 10 mJ/mol K^2 depends entirely on the assumption that Na2SnO3, rescaled for atomic mass, accurately represents the phonon contribution of K0.85Ir0.79O2. The manuscript acknowledges this is 'approximate' but provides no error estimate, no sensitivity analysis, and no alternative phonon model. Because the broad anomaly near 30 K and the T-linear term are the central evidence for gapless excitations, this subtraction is load-bearing; if the true lattice contribution differs, the inferred gamma and anomaly could be substantially altered. The authors should show the raw C/T versus T^2 data with the fitted lattice contribution, quantify the uncertainty in gamma, and discuss whether a phonon or defect contribution could mimic the reported behavior.
[Summary and Discussion] The reported observations—no magnetic order, a broad field-insensitive C/T anomaly, and a T-linear or power-law low-temperature heat capacity—are also the standard signatures of a random-singlet or valence-bond-glass state driven by disorder, and the paper itself notes that 'the possible role of disorder (apparent in the stacking faults) in producing the power-law C(T) at low temperatures also needs investigation.' The title and abstract nevertheless assert a quantum spin liquid, while the evidence is only 'consistent with' that interpretation. Without microscopic probes such as muSR, neutron scattering, or low-temperature thermal conductivity, or a quantitative characterization of the stacking-fault disorder, the data cannot distinguish intrinsic spinon excitations from a disordered singlet state. The authors should either add such evidence or explicitly reframe the central claim as a candidate gapless QSL and state in the abstract and title that a disorder-driven scenario is equally consistent with the current data.

minor comments (5)

[Heat Capacity] The sentence 'similar to the behaviour seen in several quantum spin liquid materials like.' is incomplete and ends abruptly; it should either be completed or removed.
[Introduction] The word 'ellusive' should be 'elusive'.
[Summary and Discussion] The word 'interplotes' should be 'interpolates'.
[Summary and Discussion] The formula K0.85(Ir0.39/3Ir2/3)O2 is ambiguous; writing the fractional occupation explicitly as K0.85(Ir0.39/3Ir2/3)O2 would improve readability.
[Magnetic Susceptibility] The Curie-Weiss fit is described as applying to data 'above T≈200 K' but the temperature range of the fit and the goodness of fit are not reported; stating the exact fit range and residuals would aid reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper reports measurements and standard fits, and its QSL interpretation is a consistency argument, not a derivation from the conclusion.

full rationale

The paper is an experimental characterization of K0.85Ir0.79O2. Its central claim that the material is a gapless quantum spin liquid candidate is supported by susceptibility and heat-capacity data: Curie-Weiss analysis gives S_eff = 1/2 and theta = -180 K; no magnetic order or spin freezing is observed down to 1.8 K; heat capacity shows a field-insensitive broad anomaly near 30 K and a T-linear low-temperature term with gamma ~ 10 mJ/mol K^2. None of these steps is circular in the sense of the analysis. The Curie-Weiss fit is a standard two-parameter fit to high-temperature susceptibility, not a fit that assumes the QSL conclusion. The T-linear term is extracted from the measured heat capacity with an approximate lattice subtraction using Na2SnO3, which is an external reference compound, not a self-citation and not a parameter fitted to the target data. The QSL interpretation is explicitly stated as 'consistent with' the data (abstract and Summary), not derived from a model whose inputs already encode the outcome. The paper does invoke its own prior structural work (ref. 34) for the crystal structure, but that is ordinary citation of a separately reported experimental/DFT determination and does not by itself establish the magnetic ground state. The main weakness, acknowledged by the authors, is that a disorder-driven random-singlet state could also explain the power-law C(T) and lack of magnetic order; but that is an underdetermination/correctness concern, not circularity. No equation is defined in terms of the claim, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' own work. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on fitted Curie-Weiss parameters, a fitted gamma coefficient, and two domain assumptions (S_eff=1/2 from Ir4+, Na2SnO3 as phonon reference). No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)

Curie-Weiss chi0 = -1.1(7) x 10^-4 cm3/mol
Temperature-independent susceptibility term from the fit to chi(T)
Curie constant C = 0.391(3) cm3 K/Ir mol
Fit parameter used to infer S_eff=1/2
Weiss temperature theta = -180(9) K
Fit parameter giving interaction scale, used to infer strong antiferromagnetic exchange
gamma (T-linear heat capacity coefficient) = 10 mJ/mol K^2
From fit of C/T vs T^2 at low T; central evidence for gapless excitations

assumptions (3)

domain assumption Ir4+ in edge-sharing octahedra with strong spin-orbit coupling gives an effective spin-1/2 moment
Used to interpret the Curie constant and connect to Kitaev physics (Introduction, refs 4-6).
domain assumption Na2SnO3 heat capacity, rescaled for mass, approximates the lattice heat capacity of K0.85Ir0.79O2
Used to estimate Cmag; if the phonon spectra differ, the inferred magnetic heat capacity changes (Heat Capacity section).
domain assumption Collection of randomly oriented crystals gives an isotropic powder average susceptibility
The crystals were randomly oriented, so anisotropy is averaged; any anisotropic effects could alter the Curie-Weiss parameters (Magnetic Susceptibility section).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Spin Liquid in a depleted triangular lattice Iridate K$_x$Ir$_y$O$_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/G3AEWWGS

@misc{pith2026190808475,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Spin Liquid in a depleted triangular lattice Iridate K$_x$Ir$_y$O$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/G3AEWWGS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08475}
}

abstract

We report discovery of a new iridate family K$_x$Ir$_y$O$_2$ with depleted triangular lattice planes made up of edge sharing IrO$_6$ octahedra separated by K planes. Such a material interpolates between the triangular and honeycomb lattices and is a new playground for Kitaev physics. The materials are Mott insulators with $y = 1 - x/4$. Physical property measurements for the $x \approx 0.85$ material are reported. Using magnetic susceptibility $\chi$ versus temperature $T$ measurements we find $S_{eff} = 1/2$ moments interacting strongly with a Weiss temperature $\theta \approx - 180$~K and no magnetic order or spin freezing down to $T = 1.8$~K\@. Heat capacity shows a broad maximum around $30$~K which is insensitive to magnetic fields and a $T$-linear low temperature behaviour with $\gamma \sim 10$~mJ/mol~K$^2$. These results are consistent with a gapless QSL state in K$_{0.85}$Ir$_{0.79}$O$_2$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08475 by the authors.

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. (Color online) (a) Heat capacity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Large off diagonal exchange couplings and spin liquid states in $\mathbf{C_3}$ symmetric iridates
cond-mat.str-el 2019-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

C3-symmetric K2IrO3 is predicted to have off-diagonal exchange couplings about ten times larger than Na2IrO3, and exact diagonalization shows such couplings can stabilize spin liquid phases.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Mila, Eur

F. Mila, Eur. J. Phys. 21 , 499 (2000)

work page 2000
[2]

Balents, Nature (London) 464 , 199 (2010)

L. Balents, Nature (London) 464 , 199 (2010)

work page 2010
[3]

Kitaev, Annals of Physics 321 , 2 (2006)

A. Kitaev, Annals of Physics 321 , 2 (2006)

work page 2006
[4]

Jackeli, and G

G. Jackeli, and G. Khaliullin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 , 017205 (2009)

work page 2009
[5]

Chaloupka, G

J. Chaloupka, G. Jackeli, and G. Khaliullin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 , 027204 (2010)

work page 2010
[6]

S. M. Winter, A. A. Tsirlin, M. Daghofer, J. van den Brink, Y. Singh, P. Gegenwart, and R. Valenti, J. of Phys: Condensed Matter 29 , 493002 (2017)

work page 2017
[7]

Trebst, arxiv:1701.07056 (2017)

S. Trebst, arxiv:1701.07056 (2017)

arXiv 2017
[8]

Singh, and P

Y. Singh, and P. Gegenwart, Phys. Rev. B 82 , 064412 (2010)

work page 2010

Show all 38 references

[9]

X. Liu, T. Berlijn, W-G. Yin, W. Ku, A. Tsvelik, Y-J. Kim, H. Gretarsson, Y. Singh, P. Gegenwart, and J. P. Hill, Phys. Rev. B 83 (22), 220403(R) (2011)

2011
[10]

Kimchi and Y.-Z

I. Kimchi and Y.-Z. You, Phys. Rev. B 84 , 180407(R) (2011)

2011
[11]

S. K. Choi, R. Coldea, A. N. Kolmogorov, T. Lancaster, I. I. Mazin, S. J. Blundell, P. G. Radaelli, Y. Singh, P. Gegenwart, K. R. Choi, S. W. Cheong, P. J. Baker, C. Stock, and J. Taylor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 , 127204 (2012)

2012
[12]

F. Ye, S. Chi, H. Cao, B. C. Chakoumakos, J. A. Fernandez-Baca, R. Custelcean, T. F. Qi, O. B. Korneta, and G. Cao, Phys. Rev. B 85 , 180403(R) (2012)

2012
[13]

Singh, S

Y. Singh, S. Manni, J. Reuther, T. Berlijn, R. Thomale, W. Ku, S. Trebst, and P. Gegenwart. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 , 127203 (2012)

2012
[14]

Gretarsson, J

H. Gretarsson, J. P. Clancy, X. Liu, J. P. Hill, E. Bozin, Y. Singh, S. Manni, P. Gegenwart, J. Kim, A. H. Said, D. Casa, T. Gog, M. H. Upton, H-S. Kim, J. Yu, V. M. Katukuri, L. Hozoi, J. van den Brink, Young-June Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 , 076402 (2013)

2013
[15]

Comin, G

R. Comin, G. Levy, B. Ludbrook, Z.-H. Zhu, C. N. Veenstra, J. A. Rosen, Y. Singh, P. Gegenwart, D. Stricker, J. N. Hancock, D. vanderMarel, I. S. Elfimov, and A. Damascelli. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 , 266406 (2012)

2012
[16]

Chaloupka, G

J. Chaloupka, G. Jackeli, and G. Khaliullin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 , 097204 (2013)

2013
[17]

Gretarsson, J

H. Gretarsson, J. P. Clancy, Y. Singh, P. Gegenwart, J. P. Hill, J. Kim, M. H. Upton, A. H. Said, D. Casa, T. Gog, Y-J. Kim, Phys. Rev. B 87 , 220407(R) (2013)

2013
[18]

Foyevtsova, H

K. Foyevtsova, H. O. Jeschke, I. I. Mazin, D. I. Khomskii, R. Valenti, Phys. Rev. B 88 , 035107 (2013)

2013
[19]

V. M. Katukuri, S. Nishimoto, V. Yushankhai, A. Stoyanova, H. Kandpal, S. Choi, R. Coldea, I. Rousochatzakis, L. Hozoi, and J. van den Brink, New J. Phys. 16 , 013056 (2014)

2014
[20]

Yamaji, Y

Y. Yamaji, Y. Nomura, M. Kurita, R. Arita, and M. Imada, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 , 107201 (2014)

2014
[21]

Sizyuk, C

Y. Sizyuk, C. Price, P. Wo ̈lfle, and N. B. Perkins, Phys. Rev. B 90, 155126 (2014)

2014
[22]

S. H. Chun, J-W. Kim, J. Kim, H. Zheng, C. C. Stoumpos, C. D. Malliakas, J. F. Mitchell, K. Mehlawat, Yogesh Singh, Y. Choi, T. Gog, A. Al-Zein, M. Moretti Sala, M. Krisch, J. Chaloupka, G. Jackeli, G. Khaliullin, and B. J. Kim, Nature Phys. 11 , 462(2015)

2015
[23]

Kitagawa, T

K. Kitagawa, T. Takayama, Y. Matsumoto, A. Kato, R. Takano, Y. Kishimoto, S. Bette, R. Dinnebier, G. Jackeli, and H. Takagi, Nature (London) 554 , 341 (2018)

2018
[24]

Abramchuk, C

M. Abramchuk, C. Ozsoy-Keskinbora, J. W. Krizan, K. R. Metz, D. C. Bell, and F. Tafti, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 , 15371 (2017)

2017
[25]

Y. S. Choi, C. H. Lee, S. Lee, Sungwon Yoon, W.-J. Lee, J. Park, Anzar Ali, Yogesh Singh, Jean-Christophe Orain, Gareoung Kim, Jong-Soo Rhyee, Wei-Tin Chen, Fangcheng Chou, and Kwang-Yong Choi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 , 167202 (2019)

2019
[26]

Kimchi and A

I. Kimchi and A. Vishwanath, Phys. Rev. B 89 , 014414 (2014)

2014
[27]

Rousochatzakis, U

I. Rousochatzakis, U. K. Rossler, J. van den Brink, and M. Daghofer, Phys. Rev. B 93 , 104417 (2016)

2016
[28]

Huang, M

Q. Huang, M. L. Foo, R. A. Pascal, J. W. Lynn, B. H. Toby, T. He, H. W. Zandbergen, and R. J. Cava, Phys. Rev. B 70 , 184110 (2004)

2004
[29]

Jansen and R

M. Jansen and R. Hoppe, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 408 , 97 (1974)

1974
[30]

Hironaka, K

Y. Hironaka, K. Kubota, and S. Komaba, Chem. Com- mun. 53 , 3693 (2017)

2017
[31]

Nakamura, J

S. Nakamura, J. Ohtake, N. Yonezawa, and S. Iida, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 65 , 358 (1996)

1996
[32]

Shibasaki, T

S. Shibasaki, T. Nakano, I. Terasaki, K. Yubuta, and T. Kajitani, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 22 , 115603 (2010)

2010
[33]

Zhang, S.-T

B.-B. Zhang, S.-T. Dong, Y. B. Chen, L.-Y. Zhang, J. Zhou, S. H. Yao, Z.-B. Gu, S.-T. Zhang, and Y.-F. Chen, Cryst. Eng. Comm. 15 , 5050 (2013)

2013
[34]

R. D. Johnson, I. Broeders, K. Mehlawat, Y. Li, Yogesh Singh, R. Valenti, and R. Coldea, arXiv:1908.04584v1 (2019)

2019 arXiv
[35]

J. Nasu, M. Udagawa, and Y. Motome, Phys. Rev. B 92 , 115122 (2015)

2015
[36]

Yamaji, T

Y. Yamaji, T. Suzuki, T. Yamada, S. I. Suga, N. Kawashima, and M. Imada, Phys. Rev. B 93 , 174425 (2016)

2016
[37]

Manni, Synthesis and investigation of frustrated Honeycomb lattice iridates and rhodates

S. Manni, Synthesis and investigation of frustrated Honeycomb lattice iridates and rhodates. Ph.D. thesis, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (2014)

2014
[38]

Freund, S

F. Freund, S. C. Williams, R. D. Johnson, R. Coldea, P. Gegenwart, and A. Jesche, Nature Scientific Reports 6 , 35362 (2016). references document

2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Mila, Eur

F. Mila, Eur. J. Phys. 21 , 499 (2000)

work page 2000

[2] [2]

Balents, Nature (London) 464 , 199 (2010)

L. Balents, Nature (London) 464 , 199 (2010)

work page 2010

[3] [3]

Kitaev, Annals of Physics 321 , 2 (2006)

A. Kitaev, Annals of Physics 321 , 2 (2006)

work page 2006

[4] [4]

Jackeli, and G

G. Jackeli, and G. Khaliullin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 , 017205 (2009)

work page 2009

[5] [5]

Chaloupka, G

J. Chaloupka, G. Jackeli, and G. Khaliullin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 , 027204 (2010)

work page 2010

[6] [6]

S. M. Winter, A. A. Tsirlin, M. Daghofer, J. van den Brink, Y. Singh, P. Gegenwart, and R. Valenti, J. of Phys: Condensed Matter 29 , 493002 (2017)

work page 2017

[7] [7]

Trebst, arxiv:1701.07056 (2017)

S. Trebst, arxiv:1701.07056 (2017)

arXiv 2017

[8] [8]

Singh, and P

Y. Singh, and P. Gegenwart, Phys. Rev. B 82 , 064412 (2010)

work page 2010