pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.19430 · v1 · pith:G3DRPJ5Anew · submitted 2026-06-17 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.quant-gas· cond-mat.str-el· math-ph· math.MP

Solving Nonequilibrium Dynamics via Influence Matrix Bootstrap: Floquet-PXP Model

Xiao-Yang Yang , He-Ran Wang , Zhong Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 20:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-elmath-phmath.MP
keywords influence matrixFloquet-PXPquantum cellular automatonnonequilibrium dynamicszipper conditionsbootstrap methodhidden Markov orderentanglement growth
0
0 comments X

The pith

The influence matrix with generalized zipper conditions and numerical bootstrap solves nonequilibrium dynamics in the Floquet-PXP model, exposing initial-state dependence.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper introduces an influence matrix tensor-network method to characterize nonequilibrium integrable dynamics in the Rule 201 quantum cellular automaton, a Trotterized PXP model. Generalized zipper conditions enable exact solutions for local dynamics, while a bootstrap procedure at finite bond dimensions numerically accesses a rich landscape of behaviors that depend on the initial state. The work examines how persistent oscillations respond to non-integrable perturbations, derives non-thermal relaxation from conservation laws, and computes entanglement growth across many initial states. It also identifies a hidden Markov order in multitime correlations that splits into short and long-range memory components via an exact matrix-product-state representation. The unified framework treats both nonthermalizing and thermalizing regimes within one analytically tractable model.

Core claim

Using the influence matrix approach on the Rule 201 quantum cellular automaton, generalized zipper conditions permit exact solutions of local dynamics, while a numerical bootstrap at finite but large bond dimensions uncovers initial-state-dependent nonequilibrium behavior, including the response of oscillating dynamics to perturbations, non-thermal relaxation under conservation laws, exact entanglement growth, and a hidden Markov order structure in multitime correlations.

What carries the argument

The influence matrix, a tensor-network object encoding the many-body dynamics, solved exactly by generalized zipper conditions for local operators and approximately by bootstrap at finite bond dimension.

If this is right

  • Persistent oscillating dynamics can be analyzed under local non-integrable perturbations.
  • Non-thermal relaxation occurs in a manner constrained by conservation laws.
  • Entanglement growth is obtained exactly for a broad class of initial states.
  • Multitime correlations exhibit a refined hidden Markov order separating finite-length and long-range memory components.
  • Unified treatment of nonthermalizing and thermalizing regimes becomes possible in a single model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This bootstrap technique for influence matrices may extend to other Floquet or Trotterized integrable systems to classify their dynamical phases.
  • Direct comparison with Rydberg atom array experiments could validate the predicted initial-state dependence of relaxation and entanglement.
  • The split-index matrix-product-state representation of the influence matrix suggests a general way to separate memory scales in quantum channels.
  • Classical Rule 201 cellular automaton dynamics might share analogous structures with the quantum version studied here.

Load-bearing premise

The influence matrix admits exact solutions via generalized zipper conditions for local dynamics and can be numerically bootstrapped at finite but large bond dimensions to capture the claimed landscape of initial-state dependent behavior.

What would settle it

An experiment in a Rydberg atom array measuring entanglement growth or relaxation rates for different initial states that either matches or deviates from the influence matrix predictions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.19430 by He-Ran Wang, Xiao-Yang Yang, Zhong Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Tensor-network representation of the Rule 201 quantum cellular automaton. Time steps [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Nonequilibrium dynamics in the presence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Time evolution of matrix elements of the subsystem reduced density matrix [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Schematic of the R [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Dependence of the bipartite R [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) The transformation from a matrix product state to split-index matrix product states with three and five physical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Contractions of the tensor network. Time steps [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The entanglement entropy and bond dimension of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Singular value spectra of the exact solutions. Here we get the matrix product states numerically for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The results of the time-evolving block decimation method for subsystem dynamics. Left panel: time evolution of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Studies of integrable systems have profoundly deepened the fundamental understanding of quantum many-body physics. While equilibrium properties such as ground states and thermodynamics can often be characterized efficiently, accurately characterizing nonequilibrium integrable dynamics remains a significant challenge. Here, we address this problem in the "Rule 201" quantum cellular automaton, an integrable Trotterization of the PXP Hamiltonian. Using the tensor-network approach of the influence matrix, we develop local conditions called generalized zipper conditions that allow exact solutions of local dynamics. We also introduce a numerical bootstrap method for solving influence matrices with finite but relatively large bond dimensions. This uncovers a rich landscape of nonequilibrium behavior exhibiting initial-state dependence. As an example, we investigate the fate of persistent oscillating dynamics under local non-integrable perturbations, and present analytical results for non-thermal relaxation constrained by conservation laws. We also obtain numerically exact results for entanglement growth across a broad class of initial states. Furthermore, from an information-theoretic perspective, we identify a refined structure of multitime correlations termed the hidden Markov order: the memory encoded in the dynamics separates into finite-length and long-range distributed components, which becomes transparent in an exact split-index matrix-product-state representation of the influence matrix. Our approach enables unified investigations of nonthermalizing and thermalizing regimes of nonequilibrium dynamics within a single analytically tractable model, and can be tested experimentally in state-of-the-art quantum simulators such as Rydberg atom arrays.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims to solve nonequilibrium dynamics in the integrable 'Rule 201' quantum cellular automaton (Floquet-PXP model) via the influence matrix tensor-network approach. It develops generalized zipper conditions enabling exact solutions for local dynamics, introduces a numerical bootstrap method at finite but relatively large bond dimensions to uncover initial-state dependent behavior, analyzes the fate of oscillations under non-integrable perturbations, derives analytical results for non-thermal relaxation constrained by conservation laws, obtains numerically exact entanglement growth for broad initial states, and identifies a hidden Markov order structure in multitime correlations via an exact split-index MPS representation of the influence matrix. The approach unifies nonthermalizing and thermalizing regimes in one model, with experimental relevance to Rydberg arrays.

Significance. If the results hold, this provides a new analytically tractable framework for nonequilibrium integrable dynamics that bridges regimes previously studied separately, with the hidden Markov order offering information-theoretic insight into dynamical memory. Strengths include the exact zipper conditions for local dynamics and the bootstrap enabling numerical access to a rich landscape of behaviors; these could enable falsifiable predictions testable in quantum simulators.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and method development paragraphs] Abstract and method development paragraphs: the central claim of 'numerically exact' results for entanglement growth and the rich landscape of initial-state dependent behavior (including distinction between thermalizing and nonthermalizing regimes) rests on the influence matrix bootstrap at finite but 'relatively large' bond dimensions; however, no convergence tests with increasing bond dimension, error bounds on multitime correlations, or analysis of truncation effects for long-time/global observables are provided, leaving open whether finite-D errors could obscure the claimed distinctions.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that generalized zipper conditions 'allow exact solutions of local dynamics' is load-bearing for the analytical results on non-thermal relaxation and the exact split-index MPS representation, yet the manuscript provides neither the explicit form of these conditions nor a derivation verifying they close without approximation or residual error.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'numerically exact' results without qualifying the bond dimension or providing a reference to the specific numerical data or figures supporting this.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting its potential significance in providing a unified framework for nonequilibrium dynamics in the Floquet-PXP model. We address the two major comments point by point below, with revisions planned where the concerns identify gaps in the current presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and method development paragraphs] Abstract and method development paragraphs: the central claim of 'numerically exact' results for entanglement growth and the rich landscape of initial-state dependent behavior (including distinction between thermalizing and nonthermalizing regimes) rests on the influence matrix bootstrap at finite but 'relatively large' bond dimensions; however, no convergence tests with increasing bond dimension, error bounds on multitime correlations, or analysis of truncation effects for long-time/global observables are provided, leaving open whether finite-D errors could obscure the claimed distinctions.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of explicit convergence tests and error bounds weakens the support for the 'numerically exact' characterization at the finite bond dimensions employed. In the revised manuscript we will add systematic comparisons of entanglement growth and multitime correlation functions across a range of increasing bond dimensions, include quantitative error estimates where feasible, and discuss truncation effects on long-time observables to confirm that the reported distinctions between initial states and regimes remain robust. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that generalized zipper conditions 'allow exact solutions of local dynamics' is load-bearing for the analytical results on non-thermal relaxation and the exact split-index MPS representation, yet the manuscript provides neither the explicit form of these conditions nor a derivation verifying they close without approximation or residual error.

    Authors: The current manuscript does not present the explicit algebraic form of the generalized zipper conditions or a self-contained derivation of their exact closure. We will revise the main text (and add an appendix if necessary) to state the conditions explicitly and derive that they close without residual error for local observables, thereby grounding the analytical claims on non-thermal relaxation and the split-index MPS representation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected; method development is self-contained

full rationale

The paper develops generalized zipper conditions for exact local dynamics and a numerical bootstrap for finite-bond-dimension influence matrices as new tools within the tensor-network framework. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or self-citation chains; the central claims concern the method's ability to reveal initial-state-dependent behavior and multitime correlation structure, which rest on the independent construction of these conditions rather than renaming or circular fitting. This is a standard methodological contribution with external testability via quantum simulators.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the influence matrix formalism applies directly to the Trotterized PXP model and that the new zipper conditions are sufficient for exact local solutions; no free parameters or invented entities with independent evidence are mentioned.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Tensor-network representations can capture the influence of past dynamics on future evolution in integrable systems
    Invoked implicitly when introducing the influence matrix approach for the quantum cellular automaton.
invented entities (2)
  • generalized zipper conditions no independent evidence
    purpose: To allow exact solutions of local dynamics in the influence matrix
    New local conditions introduced in the paper; no independent evidence provided in abstract.
  • influence matrix bootstrap no independent evidence
    purpose: Numerical method for solving influence matrices at finite bond dimension
    New numerical technique named in the abstract; no independent evidence outside the paper.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5798 in / 1437 out tokens · 19229 ms · 2026-06-26T20:23:43.611598+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Exact subsystem dynamics in the deterministic Floquet-PXP model

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Rule 201 in the deterministic Floquet-PXP model admits exact finite-dimensional MPO influence matrices for subsystem dynamics that solve algebraic conditions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    quantum defects

    to the bottom of the diagram. Then, using the first two relations in Eq. (9), these projectors can be propa- gated through each layer. Next, applying the top-boundary, bulk, and bottom-boundary conditions sequentially, the action of the spatial transfer matrix is reduced, compressing the bond dimension from4×χtoχ. The top-down elimination of ten- sors is ...

  2. [2]

    Rigol, V

    M. Rigol, V . Dunjko, V . Yurovsky, and M. Olshanii, Relaxation in a completely integrable many-body quantum system: An ab initio study of the dynamics of the highly excited states of 1d lattice hard-core bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 050405 (2007)

    2007

  3. [3]

    Rigol, V

    M. Rigol, V . Dunjko, and M. Olshanii, Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems, Nature452, 854 (2008)

    2008

  4. [4]

    D’Alessio, Y

    L. D’Alessio, Y . Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical me- chanics and thermodynamics, Adv. Phys.65, 239–362 (2016)

    2016

  5. [5]

    Gogolin and J

    C. Gogolin and J. Eisert, Equilibration, thermalisation, and the emergence of statistical mechanics in closed quantum systems, Rep. Prog. Phys.79, 056001 (2016)

    2016

  6. [6]

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo, B. Doyon, and T. Yoshimura, Emergent hydrodynamics in integrable quantum systems out of equilib- rium, Phys. Rev. X6, 041065 (2016)

    2016

  7. [7]

    Bertini, M

    B. Bertini, M. Collura, J. De Nardis, and M. Fagotti, Transport in out-of-equilibriumxxzchains: Exact profiles of charges and currents, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 207201 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    Doyon, S

    B. Doyon, S. Gopalakrishnan, F. Møller, J. Schmiedmayer, and R. Vasseur, Generalized hydrodynamics: A perspective, Phys. Rev. X15, 010501 (2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    Bernien, S

    H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Omran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner,et al., Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature551, 579 (2017)

    2017

  10. [10]

    C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papi´c, Weak ergodicity breaking from quantum many-body scars, Nat. Phys.14, 745–749 (2018)

    2018

  11. [11]

    S. Choi, C. J. Turner, H. Pichler, W. W. Ho, A. A. Michailidis, Z. Papi´c, M. Serbyn, M. D. Lukin, and D. A. Abanin, Emergent su(2) dynamics and perfect quantum many-body scars, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 220603 (2019)

    2019

  12. [12]

    Iadecola and S

    T. Iadecola and S. Vijay, Nonergodic quantum dynamics from deformations of classical cellular automata, Phys. Rev. B102, 180302 (2020)

    2020

  13. [13]

    J. W. P. Wilkinson, K. Klobas, T. c. v. Prosen, and J. P. Garra- han, Exact solution of the floquet-pxp cellular automaton, Phys. Rev. E102, 062107 (2020)

    2020

  14. [14]

    Giudici, F

    G. Giudici, F. M. Surace, and H. Pichler, Unraveling pxp many- body scars through floquet dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 190404 (2024)

    2024

  15. [15]

    White, V

    R. White, V . Ramesh, A. Impertro, S. Anand, F. Cesa, G. Giudici, T. Iadecola, H. Pichler, and H. Bernien, Quan- tum cellular automata on a dual-species rydberg processor, arXiv:2601.16257

    arXiv

  16. [16]

    M. C. Ba ˜nuls, M. B. Hastings, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, Ma- trix product states for dynamical simulation of infinite chains, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 240603 (2009)

    2009

  17. [17]

    M ¨uller-Hermes, J

    A. M ¨uller-Hermes, J. I. Cirac, and M. C. Ba ˜nuls, Tensor net- work techniques for the computation of dynamical observables in one-dimensional quantum spin systems, New J. Phys.14, 075003 (2012)

    2012

  18. [18]

    Lerose, M

    A. Lerose, M. Sonner, and D. A. Abanin, Influence matrix approach to many-body floquet dynamics, Phys. Rev. X11, 021040 (2021)

    2021

  19. [19]

    Sonner, A

    M. Sonner, A. Lerose, and D. A. Abanin, Influence functional of many-body systems: Temporal entanglement and matrix- 22 product state representation, Ann. Phys.435, 168677 (2021), special issue on Philip W. Anderson

    2021

  20. [20]

    Ye and G

    E. Ye and G. K.-L. Chan, Constructing tensor network influence functionals for general quantum dynamics, J. Chem. Phys.155, 044104 (2021)

    2021

  21. [21]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. c. v. Prosen, Exact correlation func- tions for dual-unitary lattice models in1 + 1dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 210601 (2019)

    2019

  22. [22]

    Piroli, B

    L. Piroli, B. Bertini, J. I. Cirac, and T. c. v. Prosen, Exact dynamics in dual-unitary quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B101, 094304 (2020)

    2020

  23. [23]

    X.-H. Yu, Z. Wang, and P. Kos, Hierarchical generalization of dual unitarity, Quantum (2023)

    2023

  24. [24]

    Bertini, C

    B. Bertini, C. De Fazio, J. P. Garrahan, and K. Klobas, Exact quench dynamics of the floquet quantum east model at the de- terministic point, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 120402 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    H.-R. Wang, I. Vilkoviskiy, and D. A. Abanin, Temporal com- plexity hierarchies in solvable quantum many-body dynamics, arXiv:2510.21927

    arXiv

  26. [26]

    Giudice, G

    G. Giudice, G. Giudici, M. Sonner, J. Thoenniss, A. Lerose, D. A. Abanin, and L. Piroli, Temporal entanglement, quasipar- ticles, and the role of interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 220401 (2022)

    2022

  27. [27]

    Klobas, B

    K. Klobas, B. Bertini, and L. Piroli, Exact thermalization dy- namics in the “rule 54” quantum cellular automaton, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 160602 (2021)

    2021

  28. [28]

    Klobas and B

    K. Klobas and B. Bertini, Exact relaxation to gibbs and non- equilibrium steady states in the quantum cellular automaton rule 54, SciPost Phys.11, 106 (2021)

    2021

  29. [29]

    Klobas and B

    K. Klobas and B. Bertini, Entanglement dynamics in rule 54: Exact results and quasiparticle picture, Scipost Phys.11, 107 (2021)

    2021

  30. [30]

    Wang, X.-Y

    H.-R. Wang, X.-Y . Yang, and Z. Wang, Exact hidden markovian dynamics in quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 170402 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    Bobenko, M

    A. Bobenko, M. Bordemann, C. Gunn, and U. Pinkall, On two integrable cellular automata, Commun.Math. Phys.158, 127 (1993)

    1993

  32. [32]

    P. N. Jepsen, J. Amato-Grill, I. Dimitrova, W. W. Ho, E. Demler, and W. Ketterle, Spin transport in a tunable heisenberg model realized with ultracold atoms, Nature588, 403 (2020)

    2020

  33. [33]

    P. N. Jepsen, W. W. Ho, J. Amato-Grill, I. Dimitrova, E. Demler, and W. Ketterle, Transverse spin dynamics in the anisotropic heisenberg model realized with ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041054 (2021)

    2021

  34. [34]

    P. N. Jepsen, Y . K. Lee, H. Lin, I. Dimitrova, Y . Margalit, W. W. Ho, and W. Ketterle, Long-lived phantom helix states in heisen- berg quantum magnets, Nat. Phys.18, 899 (2022)

    2022

  35. [35]

    Cecile, S

    G. Cecile, S. Gopalakrishnan, R. Vasseur, and J. De Nardis, Hydrodynamic relaxation of spin helices, Phys. Rev. B108, 075135 (2023)

    2023

  36. [36]

    Popkov, X

    V . Popkov, X. Zhang, F. G¨ohmann, and A. Kl¨umper, Chiral ba- sis for qubits and spin-helix decay, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 220404 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    Taranto, F

    P. Taranto, F. A. Pollock, S. Milz, M. Tomamichel, and K. Modi, Quantum markov order, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 140401 (2019)

    2019

  38. [38]

    R. J. Baxter, Exactly solved models in statistical mechanics (Academic Press, 1982)

    1982

  39. [39]

    Prosen, Many-body quantum chaos and dual-unitarity round- a-face, Chaos31(2021)

    T. Prosen, Many-body quantum chaos and dual-unitarity round- a-face, Chaos31(2021)

    2021

  40. [40]

    Haegeman and F

    J. Haegeman and F. Verstraete, Diagonalizing transfer matrices and matrix product operators: A medley of exact and computa- tional methods, Annu. Rev. Condens8, 355 (2017)

    2017

  41. [41]

    Balle, X

    B. Balle, X. Carreras, F. M. Luque, and A. Quattoni, Spectral learning of weighted automata: A forward-backward perspec- tive, Mach. Learn.96, 33–63 (2013)

    2013

  42. [42]

    Bertini, F

    B. Bertini, F. H. L. Essler, S. Groha, and N. J. Robinson, Prethermalization and thermalization in models with weak in- tegrability breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 180601 (2015)

    2015

  43. [43]

    Durnin, M

    J. Durnin, M. J. Bhaseen, and B. Doyon, Nonequilibrium dy- namics and weakly broken integrability, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 130601 (2021)

    2021

  44. [44]

    Bertini, K

    B. Bertini, K. Klobas, V . Alba, G. Lagnese, and P. Calabrese, Growth of r´enyi entropies in interacting integrable models and the breakdown of the quasiparticle picture, Phys. Rev. X12, 031016 (2022)

    2022

  45. [45]

    D. T. Stephen, Non-onsite symmetries and quantum telepor- tation in split-index matrix product states, Quantum9, 1738 (2025)

    2025

  46. [46]

    Klobas, M

    K. Klobas, M. Vanicat, J. P. Garrahan, and T. Prosen, Ma- trix product state of multi-time correlations, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.53, 335001 (2020)

    2020

  47. [47]

    Lerose, M

    A. Lerose, M. Sonner, and D. A. Abanin, Overcoming the en- tanglement barrier in quantum many-body dynamics via space- time duality, Phys. Rev. B107, L060305 (2023)

    2023