Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Lifting the Veil on Composition, Risks, and Mitigations of the Large Language Model Supply Chain

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.21218 v3 pith:G42C2ZDL submitted 2024-10-28 cs.SE

Lifting the Veil on Composition, Risks, and Mitigations of the Large Language Model Supply Chain

classification cs.SE
keywords chainsupplyllmsriskscomponentscompositiondifferentexisting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have sparked significant impact with regard to both intelligence and productivity. Numerous enterprises have integrated LLMs into their applications to solve their own domain-specific tasks. However, integrating LLMs into specific scenarios is a systematic process that involves substantial components, which are collectively referred to as the LLM supply chain. A comprehensive understanding of LLM supply chain composition, as well as the relationships among its components, is crucial for enabling effective mitigation measures for different related risks. While existing literature has explored various risks associated with LLMs, there remains a notable gap in systematically characterizing the LLM supply chain from the dual perspectives of contributors and consumers. In this work, we develop a structured taxonomy encompassing risk types, risky actions, and corresponding mitigations across different stakeholders and components of the supply chain. We believe that a thorough review of the LLM supply chain composition, along with its inherent risks and mitigation measures, would be valuable for industry practitioners to avoid potential damages and losses, and enlightening for academic researchers to rethink existing approaches and explore new avenues of research.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AgentFlow: Building Agent Dependency Graphs for Static Analysis of Agent Programs

    cs.SE 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    AgentFlow builds a framework-agnostic Agent Dependency Graph from agent program source code to support static analyses such as BOM generation and prompt-to-tool risk detection, evaluated on 5,399 real programs across ...

  2. Towards Demystifying and Repairing LLM-in-the-Loop Vulnerabilities

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Authors create LLMCVE dataset of LLM-in-the-loop vulnerabilities and demonstrate that agent-based repair methods achieve low success rates on them, particularly prompt injections at 28.57% Pass@1.

  3. Towards Demystifying and Repairing LLM-in-the-Loop Vulnerabilities

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LiL vulnerabilities are more severe than ecosystem and conventional bugs and drop LLM-based repair Pass@1 by ~10.8%, with three categories often at 0% success.

  4. The Art of (Mis)alignment: How Fine-Tuning Methods Effectively Misalign and Realign LLMs in Post-Training

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ORPO is most effective at misaligning LLMs while DPO excels at realigning them, though it reduces utility, revealing an asymmetry between attack and defense methods.