Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

GitHub Typo Corpus: A Large-Scale Multilingual Dataset of Misspellings and Grammatical Errors

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.12893 v1 pith:G4IYX6JD submitted 2019-11-28 cs.CL

GitHub Typo Corpus: A Large-Scale Multilingual Dataset of Misspellings and Grammatical Errors

classification cs.CL
keywords datasettypoeditserrorsgithubgrammaticallarge-scalemisspellings
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The lack of large-scale datasets has been a major hindrance to the development of NLP tasks such as spelling correction and grammatical error correction (GEC). As a complementary new resource for these tasks, we present the GitHub Typo Corpus, a large-scale, multilingual dataset of misspellings and grammatical errors along with their corrections harvested from GitHub, a large and popular platform for hosting and sharing git repositories. The dataset, which we have made publicly available, contains more than 350k edits and 65M characters in more than 15 languages, making it the largest dataset of misspellings to date. We also describe our process for filtering true typo edits based on learned classifiers on a small annotated subset, and demonstrate that typo edits can be identified with F1 ~ 0.9 using a very simple classifier with only three features. The detailed analyses of the dataset show that existing spelling correctors merely achieve an F-measure of approx. 0.5, suggesting that the dataset serves as a new, rich source of spelling errors that complement existing datasets.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Library Hallucinations in LLM-Generated Code: A Risk Analysis Grounded in Developer Queries

    cs.SE 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A study of seven LLMs finds that realistic prompt variations such as one-character misspellings trigger library hallucinations in up to 26% of cases, fabricated names in up to 99%, and time-based prompts in up to 85%,...

  2. Clotho: Measuring Task-Specific Pre-Generation Test Adequacy for LLM Inputs

    cs.SE 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Clotho ranks LLM test inputs by failure likelihood using pre-generation hidden states and GMMs, achieving 0.716 ROC-AUC after labeling 5.4% of inputs on average across eight tasks and three models, with transfer to pr...

  3. Clotho: Measuring Task-Specific Pre-Generation Test Adequacy for LLM Inputs

    cs.SE 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    Clotho ranks LLM test inputs by failure likelihood using a Gaussian mixture model over pre-generation hidden states of passing inputs, reaching 0.716 ROC-AUC with 5.4% labelling and transferring from open-weight to pr...