Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Testing the Cosmic Anisotropy with Supernovae Data: Hemisphere Comparison and Dipole Fitting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1804.03087 v3 pith:G52AHRQU submitted 2018-04-09 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-th

classification astro-ph.COgr-qchep-th
keywords methodsmethodcosmicworkanisotropycasescomparisondipole
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The cosmological principle is one of the cornerstones in modern cosmology. It assumes that the universe is homogeneous and isotropic on cosmic scales. Both the homogeneity and the isotropy of the universe should be tested carefully. In the present work, we are interested in probing the possible preferred direction in the distribution of type Ia supernovae (SNIa). To our best knowledge, two main methods have been used in almost all of the relevant works in the literature, namely the hemisphere comparison (HC) method and the dipole fitting (DF) method. However, the results from these two methods are not always approximately coincident with each other. In this work, we test the cosmic anisotropy by using these two methods with the Joint Light-Curve Analysis (JLA) and simulated SNIa datasets. In many cases, both methods work well, and their results are consistent with each other. However, in the cases with two (or even more) preferred directions, the DF method fails while the HC method still works well. This might shed new light on our understanding of these two methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. New constraints on cosmic anisotropy from galaxy clusters using an improved dipole fitting method

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Galaxy cluster observations yield two preferred directions with cosmic anisotropy amplitude of about 5.3 times 10 to the minus 4 at roughly 1 sigma overall significance, though higher in the XMM-Newton subsample.

  2. Alleviating the Hubble Tension with a Local Void and Transitions of the Absolute Magnitude

    astro-ph.CO 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Deep LTB void models with two or three distance-dependent jumps in the supernova absolute magnitude fit Pantheon+ and Planck data well and push the inferred local Hubble constant toward the SH0ES value.

Pith tools