Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Confining kinks. $\zeta$-regularized one-loop kink mass shifts in exotic field theories

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that scalar theories can be built in which every quantum perturbation of a kink is a bound mode, so no zero-point renormalization is needed, and the zeta-regularized one-loop mass shift is finite and negative.

desk verdict A clean, inventive construction of soliton models with purely discrete perturbation spectra, but the one-loop mass shifts rest on an unargued zeta-regularization prescription. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.20440 v1 pith:G5O6WK37 submitted 2025-06-25 hep-th math-phmath.MP

Luis Inzunza , Juan Mateos Guilarte , Pablo Pais This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath-phmath.MP MSC 81T1081Q60
keywords kinksone-loopmassshiftzeta-functionregularizationDarbouxtransformationrationallydeformedharmonicoscillatorconfiningexceptionalorthogonalpolynomialsscalarfieldtheoryin1+1dimensions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper constructs a new family of (1+1)-dimensional scalar field theories whose kink solutions have a purely discrete spectrum of quantum perturbation modes, so all perturbations are trapped and vanish at infinity. Because every perturbation mode is bound, there is no propagating meson sector around the vacuum and zero-point renormalization is unnecessary. The authors compute the one-loop kink mass shift using zeta-function regularization of the divergent frequency sum and obtain finite negative values: about $-0.147\lambda\hbar$ for the Error kink and about $-1.854\lambda\hbar$ for the Owen kink, with a general formula for the whole deformed family. These shifts are significant because they are finite without any vacuum subtraction, and their negative sign points to an attractive quantum force that reinforces confinement.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the stability (Schrödinger) operator governing kink perturbations, whose spectrum is purely discrete and bounded below; in all examples it is a rationally deformed harmonic oscillator built by Darboux transformations from seed states $\{\psi_J,\psi_{J+1}\}$. This technique builds a new Schrödinger equation from a known one by intertwining operators and deletes selected bound levels, producing a spectrum with gaps. The ground state of the deformed operator fixes the entire classical theory—the scalar potential, the kink profile, and the classical kink mass—while the full eigenvalue list enters the one-loop correction through the spectral zeta function $\zeta_\omega(s)=\sum_n\omega_n^{-s}$, whose analytic continuation at $s=-1$ yields $Q$. The same operator therefore carries both the confinement property and the quantum correction.

What would settle it

Compute the Error kink one-loop mass shift with an independent regulator, such as a heat-kernel or momentum cutoff applied to the same discrete spectrum, and check whether it reproduces $(\hbar\lambda/\sqrt{2})\zeta(-1/2)\approx -0.147\lambda\hbar$; a different value would show the analytic continuation is not selecting the physical mass shift.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that there exist scalar theories in $1+1$ dimensions, built by reversing the stability analysis, in which every quantum perturbation around a kink is a bound state. Starting from a one-dimensional Schrödinger operator with a normalized ground state $\psi_0$, the scalar potential and kink are reconstructed as $V(x)=(\psi_0(x)/\psi_0(0))^2$ and $\varphi(x)=\sqrt{2}\,\psi_0(0)^{-1}\int_0^x\psi_0(y)\,dy$, so the stability equation holds by construction. Using Darboux transformations on the harmonic oscillator produces rationally deformed operators whose spectra are discrete with gaps; the ground states are Gaussian times rational functions, and the corresponding kinks are expressed through the error function, the Owen $T$ function, and integrals of deformed Hermite functions. Because the perturbation potential grows without bound at infinity, the vacuum sector has no normalizable modes, so no zero-point subtraction is performed. The spectral zeta function of the discrete frequencies then gives finite one-loop mass shifts: $Q_E\approx -0.147\lambda\hbar$, $Q_O\approx -1.854\lambda\hbar$, and $Q_J=(\hbar\lambda/\sqrt{2})(\zeta(-1/2)-\sqrt{J}-\sqrt{J+1})$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the zeta-regularized analytic continuation of the divergent zero-point frequency sum, evaluated at $s=-1$, is the physically correct one-loop mass shift when there is no vacuum sector to subtract.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For the Error kink, the one-loop shift is $Q=(\hbar\lambda/\sqrt{2})\zeta(-1/2)\approx -0.147\lambda\hbar$, finite and negative.
  • For the Owen kink, the Darboux deletion of two levels changes the shift to $Q=(\hbar\lambda/\sqrt{2})(\zeta(-1/2)-1-\sqrt{2})\approx -1.854\lambda\hbar$, a markedly larger negative correction.
  • For the deformed family with seed pair $(J,J+1)$, the shift is $Q=(\hbar\lambda/\sqrt{2})(\zeta(-1/2)-\sqrt{J}-\sqrt{J+1})$, so removing higher levels makes the correction increasingly negative.
  • In all of these theories the vacuum sector carries no propagating mesons, so ultraviolet renormalization of the kink mass is bypassed entirely.
  • The negative sign of each shift, in analogy with the Casimir effect, suggests an attractive quantum force pulling perturbations toward the kink center and reinforcing confinement.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension: because the inverse-stability recipe only requires a Schrödinger system with a normalizable ground state, confining kinks should exist for many solvable operators beyond harmonic-oscillator deformations, including reflectionless potentials and delta-potential systems.
  • Extension: if the zeta value at $s=-1$ is the physical shift, then in the $J$-family the classical kink observables approach the Error kink as $J$ grows while the quantum correction grows as $-\sqrt{J}$, a regime where classical and quantum behavior diverge sharply and a numerical lattice check would be decisive.
  • Extension: the infinite walls at $|\phi|=\phi_v$ suggest a path-integral quantization with a restricted field range; working this out would test whether the zeta-regularized shift survives or receives boundary corrections.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs (1+1)-dimensional scalar field theories whose kink solutions have purely discrete, bounded fluctuation spectra. The construction reverses the usual stability analysis: starting from a Schrödinger operator with a normalizable ground state, the authors define the scalar potential through the square of the ground state, so that the perturbation equation is exactly the chosen operator. Using the harmonic oscillator and its Darboux deformations, they obtain the Error kink, the Owen kink, and a family of deformed confining kinks. Because all perturbation modes are square-integrable and the scalar potential is extended to infinity beyond the vacua, the vacuum sector contains no propagating modes. The paper then defines the one-loop mass shift as the zeta-regularized zero-point sum (ℏλ/2)Σω_n, yielding the finite values Q≈−0.147λℏ, −1.854λℏ, and Q=(ℏλ/√2)[ζ(−1/2)−√J−√(J+1)] for the respective models.

Significance. If the regularization step is accepted, this is a clean, explicit family of solvable kink models with a purely discrete fluctuation spectrum, which is a novel combination of stability analysis, Darboux transformations, and zeta-function techniques. The classical construction is internally consistent; the spectra of the deformed oscillators and the zeta sums in Eqs. (60), (75), and (88) are evaluated correctly, and the paper gives explicit formulas for potentials, kink profiles, and masses. The paper also makes a concrete falsifiable prediction: the one-loop mass shifts are finite, negative, and grow in magnitude with the deformation index J. The main weakness is that the central quantitative result—the physical meaning of the zeta-regularized zero-point sum—is not justified, so the numerical values in Eqs. (61), (76), and (89) are currently convention-dependent.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2.2, Eqs. (32)–(33)] The identification of Q=(ℏλ/2)ζω(−1) as the physical one-loop kink mass shift is not established. In standard kink quantization the one-loop shift is the difference between the kink and vacuum zero-point energies, which cancels the divergence and fixes the finite part. Here the vacuum sector is empty because of the infinite walls, so no such subtraction exists; normal ordering of Eq. (31) would give Q=0, and other regulators (e.g., a heat-kernel cutoff or a hard momentum cutoff) generally produce different finite parts. The paper does not provide a physical definition—such as the pole of the kink two-point function or an explicit renormalization condition—that selects the analytic continuation at s=−1. This is load-bearing because Eqs. (61), (76), and (89) all follow from this choice.
  2. [Sec. 4.3, Eqs. (87) and (89)] The large-J behavior displayed by Eqs. (87) and (89) is a symptom that the result may track the regularization prescription rather than a physical observable. As J→∞ the classical mass M_J approaches the Error-kink mass M0, while the quantum correction behaves as Q≈−(ℏλ/√2)√(2J), which diverges. A physically defined mass shift should not diverge when a spectral gap is moved to infinity; the paper should either reconcile this with an explicit physical renormalization computation or explain why the divergence is a genuine effect of the confining-wall limit.
  3. [Sec. 4.1, Eq. (54) and Sec. 4.2, Eq. (74)] The ad hoc extension of the scalar potential to V=∞ outside |ϕ|=ϕv is load-bearing for the claim that no vacuum subtraction is needed, because the absence of vacuum modes follows directly from this infinite-wall choice. The paper notes this extension is chosen 'by hand' but does not analyze whether the one-loop shift is independent of the extension. A finite-wall regularization of the potential beyond the vacua could produce a nonempty vacuum sector and hence a regulator-dependent remainder; the authors should show that the kink fluctuation sector and the resulting mass shift are insensitive to this extension, or state explicitly that the result is defined only within the chosen convention.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3, after Eq. (49)] The word 'espectrum' should be 'spectrum'.
  2. [Sec. 4.3, Eq. (94)] 'adding and substantiating terms' should read 'adding and subtracting terms'.
  3. [Sec. 2.1, Eqs. (15)–(18)] The notation V(x) is used for both the field-theoretic potential evaluated on the kink profile and the potential as a function of the field; this can confuse the reader, especially in Eqs. (15)–(18), where V(x) and V(φ) appear in the same derivation.
  4. [Sec. 4.2, Eq. (74)] In the piecewise definition of V^(1,2)(ϕ), the middle branch written as '0 ϕ = 0' appears to be a typo; presumably it should be '0 at |ϕ|=φ_v' or similar.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

The derivation is not circular: the models are explicitly engineered from chosen Schrödinger spectra, and the mass shifts are direct zeta evaluations of those spectra rather than fitted or self-citation-dependent results.

full rationale

The paper's construction is self-contained and inverse: it fixes a Schrödinger operator (shifted harmonic oscillator or Darboux-deformed rational version), takes its normalizable ground state, and builds V(x), the kink profile, and the scalar potential via Eqs. (17)-(18). The stability potential U(x)=∂²V/∂ϕ² evaluated at the kink reproduces the chosen operator by construction, which is the point of the method rather than a circular prediction. The one-loop mass shifts in Eqs. (61), (76), and (89) are obtained by substituting the known discrete spectra into the spectral zeta function defined in Eq. (33) and evaluating at s=-1; no parameter is fitted to data and no target output is assumed. The self-citations [14,23,24] are used only to remark on hidden symmetries of rationally deformed oscillators and do not carry the central derivation; the Darboux machinery is attributed to standard references [7,8] and the Krein-Adler theorem to [28,29]. The physical interpretation of the zeta-regularized sum as the one-loop kink mass shift, in the absence of a vacuum sector to subtract, is a scheme-definition and interpretation question rather than a circularity: the paper is explicit that Q is defined by Eq. (32) and regularized via Eq. (33). Whether that defines the physically correct mass shift is a correctness concern, not a case where an equation reduces to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's results rest on standard mathematical tools (Darboux transformations, Krein-Adler theorem, spectral zeta functions) and on two modeling choices specific to this work: the arbitrary infinite-wall continuation of the scalar potential beyond the vacua, and the identification of the ζ-regularized zero-point sum with the physical one-loop mass shift. No parameters are fitted to data.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math The stability map V(x) = (ψ0(x)/ψ0(0))², φ(x) = √2/ψ0(0) ∫ ψ0, M = 2ν²⟨ψ0|ψ0⟩/(λψ0(0)²) connects any normalizable nodeless ground state ψ0 to a scalar theory with a kink.
    Derived in Section 2.1, Eqs. (15)-(18). Depends on the zero-energy Schrödinger equation (17) and the assumed boundary conditions (19).
  • ad hoc to paper The scalar potential is extended beyond the vacua with infinite walls: V(φ)=∞ for |φ|>φv.
    Section 4.1, Eq. (54); motivates the empty vacuum sector. The paper notes the continuation is free but does not explore alternatives.
  • domain assumption The one-loop mass shift is Q = (ℏλ/2)ζ_ω(-1), the analytic continuation of the spectral zeta function.
    Section 2.2, Eqs. (32)-(33). Standard in zeta-regularization of Casimir-type sums, but here applied without a vacuum sector subtraction; scheme-dependence is not discussed.
  • standard math Removing pairs of subsequent oscillator levels (ψJ, ψJ+1) via Darboux/Krein-Adler yields a nonsingular rational deformation with the stated spectrum.
    Section 4.2-4.3, Eqs. (62)-(83), citing Krein-Adler theorem [28,29] and exceptional polynomials [9-14].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Confining kinks. $\zeta$-regularized one-loop kink mass shifts in exotic field theories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/G5O6WK37

@misc{pith2026250620440,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Confining kinks. $\zeta$-regularized one-loop kink mass shifts in exotic field theories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/G5O6WK37}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.20440}
}
abstract

By combining stability analysis of scalar field theories with the Darboux transformation technique, we create models featuring kink-like solutions whose quantum perturbations are all bounded. On the one hand, the stability analysis relates scalar theories with Schr\"odinger equations, whose solutions serve as quantum perturbation modes. On the other hand, the Darboux transformation allows for constructing new exotic but solvable Schr\"odinger equations. This framework relates the quantum harmonic oscillator and its rational deformations to exotic scalar theories featuring non-trivial potentials. Depending on the structure of the spectrum of perturbation frequencies, these potentials may have various local maximums, minimums, and inflection points. The stationary solutions take the form of the definite integral over a finite interval of a function times the Gaussian bell distribution, including the Error and the Owen $T$ functions. Such models do not propagate quantum perturbations around the respective vacuums, so zero-point renormalization does not take place. However, Riemann$-\zeta$ function regularization allows us to achieve finite one-loop quantum corrections to the classical mass.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.20440 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left panel: Plot of the Error kink and some perturbation modes. Here we use the perturbation parameter α = 0.5 to exaggerate the effect of the deformation. Right panel: Plots of the potential V (ϕ). At this point is it worth to mention that for ϕ ∼ 0, this potential takes the form of the potential for the ϕ 4 theory V (ϕ) ≈ 6 4  1 − ϕ 2 6 2 + O(ϕ 6 ). (58) where we have added an unessential shift. Accordingly with… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The Schr¨odinger potential U1,2 with its spectrum (dashed straight lines). By replacing the ground state ψ (1,2) 0 on formulas (18) we get V (x) = e − x 2 2 2x 2 + 1 , φ(1,2)(x) = 2πe 1 4 T  1 √ 2 , √ 2x  , M = √ πν2 λ = 1 2 M0 , (69) where M0 is the mass of the Error kink (52), and the Owen kink φ (1,2)(x) is given in terms of the Owen−T function [32], T(a, x) = 1 2π Z x 0 e − a 2 2 (1+t 2 ) 1 + t 2 dt . (70) To … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left panel: the potential of the scalar theory. Right pane: the Owen kink solution and perturbations. The quantization of a scalar theory with potential (74) is done by constructing the related spectral-ζ function, which yields ζωn (s) = 1 2 s 2 X∞ n=1 1 (n + 2) s 2 = 1 2 s 2  − 1 1 s 2 − 1 2 s 2 + ζ s 2  , (75) where according to Dashen-Hasslacher-Neveu prescription [33, 34] the zero mode has been given up to t… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Plots of the deformed harmonic oscillator potential (78) for different values of J. In the first line we have only the cases J = 2, 4, while in the second line we have the cases J = 3, 5. The Gaussian factor in the states confirms that they are bounded, so the situatio…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Plots of the potential V (x), as a function of x. In the left panel, we plot the resulting potentials for odd J. In the right panel the form of the potentials for even J are shown. It is noteworthy that in the even cases J = 2k, the center of the potential is a local m…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Plots of the stationary solutions of the form (18) for different values of J. In the first line we have only the cases J = 2, 4, while in the second line we have the cases J = 3, 5. The evaluation of our kink-like solution at x → ∞ gives us the position of the vacuum f…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Plots of the potential as a function of ϕ for some values of J. In the first line we have only the cases J = 2, 4, while in the second line we have the cases J = 3, 5. To finish the construction at the classical level, we employ the last relation in (18) to compute the…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum Lifts of Noninteger Power Law Field Theories

    hep-th 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    β-shifted normal ordering yields quantum lifts for noninteger power-law potentials with α>2, and tames the divergent Stokes amplitude in the σ=4 Pöschl-Teller model into an O(g^{3/4}) scaling.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    T. H. R. Skyrme. A nonlinear field theory. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A , 260:127–138, 1961

    work page 1961

  2. [2]

    Kormos, M

    M. Kormos, M. Collura, G. Tak´ acs, and P. Calabrese. Real-time confinement follow- ing a quantum quench to a non-integrable model. Nature Physics , 13(3):246–249,

    work page

  3. [3]

    V. A. Rubakov. Classical theory of gauge fields . Princeton University Press, Prince- ton, New Jersey, May 2002

    work page 2002

  4. [4]

    Osman and S

    E. Osman and S. Rida. Dynamics of φ4 kinks under various perturbations. Appl. Math. Lett., 11(2):115–123, 1998. issn: 0893-9659. url: https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0893965998000214

    work page 1998

  5. [5]

    Hartmann, G

    B. Hartmann, G. Luchini, C. P. Constantinidis, and C. F. S. Pereira. Real scalar field kinks and antikinks and their perturbation spectra in a closed universe. Phys. Rev. D, 101:076004, 7, 2020. url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD. 101.076004

    doi:10.1103/physrevd 2020

  6. [6]

    Exact mapping from the $(3+1)$-dimensional Skyrme model to the $(1+1)$-dimensional sine-Gordon theory and some applications

    F. Canfora, M. Lagos, P. Pais, and A. Vera. Exact mapping from the (3+1)-dimensional Skyrme model to the (1+1)-dimensional sine-Gordon theory and some applications. Phys. Rev. D , 108(11):114027, 2023. arXiv: 2304.09137 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Cooper, A

    F. Cooper, A. Khare, and U. Sukhatme. Supersymmetry in quantum mechanics . World Scientific Publishing Company, 2001. url: https://books.google.com.br/ books?id=gPPUCgAAQBAJ

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    Matveev and M

    V. Matveev and M. Salle. Darboux transformations and solitons . Springer Series in Nonlinear Dynamics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1992. url: https://books. google.cl/books?id=pJDjvwEACAAJ

    work page 1992

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    C. Quesne. Exceptional orthogonal polynomials, exactly solvable potentials and su- persymmetry. J. Phys. A. , 41(39):392001, 2008

    2008

  2. [10]

    Quesne et al

    C. Quesne et al. Solvable rational potentials and exceptional orthogonal polyno- mials in supersymmetric quantum mechanics. SIGMA. Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications , 5:084, 2009

    2009

  3. [11]

    G´ omez-Ullate and R

    D. G´ omez-Ullate and R. Milson. Lectures on exceptional orthogonal polynomials and rational solutions to painlev´ e equations, 2019. eprint:1912.07597 (math-ph)

    2019 arXiv

  4. [12]

    J. F. Cari˜ nena and M. S. Plyushchay. Ground-state isolation and discrete flows in a rationally extended quantum harmonic oscillator. Phys. Rev. D , 94(10):105022,

  5. [13]

    J. F. Cari˜ nena and M. S. Plyushchay. ABC of ladder operators for rationally ex- tended quantum harmonic oscillator systems.J. Phys. A, 50(27):275202, 2017. arXiv: 1701.08657 [math-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  6. [14]

    arXiv: 1611.08051 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    Bordag, U

    M. Bordag, U. Mohideen, and V. M. Mostepanenko. New developments in the Casimir effect. Phys. Rept., 353:1–205, 2001. arXiv: quant-ph/0106045 [quant-ph]

    2001 arXiv

  8. [16]

    J. F. Cari˜ nena, L. Inzunza, and M. S. Plyushchay. Rational deformations of confor- mal mechanics. Phys. Rev. D , 98(2):026017, 2018. arXiv: 1707.07357 [math-ph]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 106, 089901 (2022)]

    2022 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Alonso-Izquierdo and J

    A. Alonso-Izquierdo and J. Mateos Guilarte. One-loop kink mass shifts: a computa- tional approach. Nucl. Phys. B , 852:696–735, 2011. arXiv: 1107.2216 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Alonso-Izquierdo and J

    A. Alonso-Izquierdo and J. Mateos Guilarte. On a family of (1+1)-dimensional scalar field theory models: kinks, stability, one-loop mass shifts. Annals Phys. , 327:2251– 2274, 2012. arXiv: 1205.3069 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  11. [19]

    S. E. Trullinger and R. J. Flesch. Parent potentials for an infinite class of reflection- less kinks. J. Math. Phys. , 28:1683–1690, 1987

    1987

  12. [20]

    Alonso-Izquierdo, J

    A. Alonso-Izquierdo, J. Mateos Guilarte, and M. S. Plyushchay. Kink mass quan- tum shifts from SUSY quantum mechanics. Annals Phys., 331:269–298, 2013. arXiv: 1212.0818 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Elizalde, S

    E. Elizalde, S. D. Odintsov, A. Romeo, A. A. Bytsenko, and S. Zerbini. Zeta regular- ization techniques with applications . World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 1994

    1994

  14. [22]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz. Quantum mechanics: non-relativistic theory , vol- ume 3. Elsevier, 2013. 19

    2013

  15. [23]

    Inzunza and M

    L. Inzunza and M. S. Plyushchay. Hidden symmetries of rationally deformed su- perconformal mechanics. Phys. Rev. D , 99(2):025001, 2019. arXiv: 1809 . 08527 [hep-th]

    2019

  16. [24]

    O. Chalykh. Algebro-geometric Schr¨ odinger operators in many dimensions. en. Phi- los. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. , 366(1867):947–971, Mar. 2008

    2008

  17. [25]

    Fl¨ ugge

    S. Fl¨ ugge. Practical Quantum Mechanics. Classics in Mathematics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999. isbn: 9783540650355. url: https://books.google.cl/books? id=VpggN9qIFUcC

    1999

  18. [26]

    Inzunza and M

    L. Inzunza and M. S. Plyushchay. Klein four-group and Darboux duality in confor- mal mechanics. Phys. Rev. D , 99(12):125016, 2019. arXiv: 1902.00538 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    M. A. Reyes and R. Arcos-Olalla. Supersymmetric features of the Error and Daw- son’s functions. Rev. Mex. Fis. , 61(6):475, 2015. arXiv: 1510.03735 [math-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  20. [28]

    B. Bassett. R e−x2 dx And the kink soliton. Comput. Math. Appl. , 36(4):37–45, 1998. issn: 0898-1221. url: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0898122198001394

    1998

  21. [29]

    ´E Adler

    V. ´E Adler. A modification of crum’s method. Theor. Math. Phys. , 101(3):1381– 1386, 1994. issn: 1573-9333. url: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01035458

    1994 doi

  22. [30]

    M. G. Krein. On a continuous analogue of a christoffel formula from the theory of orthogonal polynomials. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR

  23. [31]

    de Boer, F

    J. de Boer, F. Harmsze, and T. Tjin. Non-linear finite w-symmetries and applica- tions in elementary systems. Phys. Rep., 272(4):139–214, 1996. issn: 0370-1573. url: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0370157395000755

    1996

  24. [32]

    On realizations of ‘nonlinear’ lie algebras by differential operators

    J Beckers, Y Brihaye, and N Debergh. On realizations of ‘nonlinear’ lie algebras by differential operators. Phys. A Math. Gen. , 32(15):2791, 1999. url: https://dx. doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/32/15/008

    1999 doi

  25. [33]

    R. F. Dashen, B. Hasslacher, and A. Neveu. Particle spectrum in model field theories from semiclassical functional integral techniques. Phys. Rev. D , 11(12):3424, 1975

    1975

  26. [34]

    D. B. O. and. A table of normal integrals. Commun. Stat. - Theory Methods, 9(4):389– 419, 1980. eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918008812164 . url: https: //doi.org/10.1080/03610918008812164

    1980 doi

  27. [35]

    Vilenkin and E

    A. Vilenkin and E. P. S. Shellard. Cosmic strings and other topological defects . Cambridge University Press, July 2000

    2000

  28. [36]

    R. F. Dashen, B. Hasslacher, and A. Neveu. Semiclassical bound states in an asymp- totically free theory. Phys. Rev. D , 12(8):2443, 1975

    1975

  29. [37]

    Jackiw and C

    R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi. Solitons with fermion number 1 /2. Phys. Rev. D, 13(12):3398, 1976

    1976

  30. [38]

    G. W. Semenoff, V Semenoff, and F. Zhou. Domain walls in gapped graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett., 101(8):087204, 2008

    2008

  31. [39]

    Nieto, A

    L. Nieto, A. Pecheritsin, and B. F. Samsonov. Intertwining technique for the one- dimensional stationary dirac equation.Ann. Phys., 305(2):151–189, 2003. url: https: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000349160300071X

    2003

  32. [40]

    A. A. Izquierdo, W. G. Fuertes, M. d. l. T. Mayado, and J. M. Guilarte. Quantum corrections to the mass of self-dual vortices. Phys. Rev. D , 70(6):061702, 2004

    2004

  33. [41]

    Asorey, J

    M. Asorey, J. Clemente-Gallardo, and J. M. Munoz-Castaneda. Boundary condi- tions: The path integral approach. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. , 87:012004, 2007. M. Asorey, J. Clemente-Gallardo, and G. Marmo, editors. arXiv: 0712.4353 [quant-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  34. [42]

    A. A. Pecheritsyn, E. O. Pozdeeva, and B. F. Samsonov. Darboux transformation of the nonstationary dirac equation. en. Russ. Phys. J. , 48(4):365–374, Apr. 2005. 20

    2005

  35. [43]

    V. Gribov. Quantization of non-abelian gauge theories. Nucl. Phys. B. , 139(1):1–19,

  36. [44]

    Merdaci, A

    A. Merdaci, A. Jellal, and L. Chetouani. Path integral for confined Dirac fermions in a constant magnetic field. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A , 30(27):1550174, 2015. arXiv: 1404.4593 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Dudal, J

    D. Dudal, J. A. Gracey, S. P. Sorella, N. Vandersickel, and H. Verschelde. A refine- ment of the Gribov-Zwanziger approach in the Landau gauge: Infrared propagators in harmony with the lattice results. Phys. Rev. D, D78:065047, 2008. arXiv: 0806.4348 [hep-th]. 21

    2008 arXiv

  38. [47]

    R. F. Sobreiro and S. P. Sorella. Introduction to the Gribov ambiguities in Euclidean Yang-Mills theories. In 13th Jorge Andre Swieca Summer School on Particle and Fields, Apr. 2005. arXiv: hep-th/0504095

    2005 arXiv

  39. [1978]

    url: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/055032137890175X

    issn: 0550-3213. url: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/055032137890175X

  40. [2016]

    url: https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fnphys3934. 18

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.