REVIEW 4 cited by
Explainable Recommendation: A Survey and New Perspectives
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Explainable recommendation attempts to develop models that generate not only high-quality recommendations but also intuitive explanations. The explanations may either be post-hoc or directly come from an explainable model (also called interpretable or transparent model in some contexts). Explainable recommendation tries to address the problem of why: by providing explanations to users or system designers, it helps humans to understand why certain items are recommended by the algorithm, where the human can either be users or system designers. Explainable recommendation helps to improve the transparency, persuasiveness, effectiveness, trustworthiness, and satisfaction of recommendation systems. It also facilitates system designers for better system debugging. In recent years, a large number of explainable recommendation approaches -- especially model-based methods -- have been proposed and applied in real-world systems. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive review for the explainable recommendation research. We first highlight the position of explainable recommendation in recommender system research by categorizing recommendation problems into the 5W, i.e., what, when, who, where, and why. We then conduct a comprehensive survey of explainable recommendation on three perspectives: 1) We provide a chronological research timeline of explainable recommendation. 2) We provide a two-dimensional taxonomy to classify existing explainable recommendation research. 3) We summarize how explainable recommendation applies to different recommendation tasks. We also devote a chapter to discuss the explanation perspectives in broader IR and AI/ML research. We end the survey by discussing potential future directions to promote the explainable recommendation research area and beyond.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Towards Knowledge-Based Recommender Dialog System
KBRD links dialog content to a movie knowledge graph and feeds recommendation signals into the chat decoder, improving both recommendation recall and dialog diversity on the REDIAL benchmark.
-
Recommendation with Attribute-aware Product Networks: A Representation Learning Model
A new model, eRAN, decomposes co-purchase networks into attribute-specific subgraphs and uses an autoencoder plus attention to produce explainable, cold-start-capable recommendations.
-
Personalization of Deep Learning
On a handwriting recognition task, fitting the model to one user's data via curriculum schedules or similar-sample augmentation slightly improves that user's accuracy but typically weakens general accuracy.
-
Disjunctive and Conjunctive Normal Form Explanations of Clusters Using Auxiliary Information
The paper introduces a two-clause CNF variant of tag-based cluster descriptors, computed by applying a minimum hitting set solver twice, and demonstrates on four datasets that it can add explanatory tags beyond the di...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.