REVIEW 2 cited by
AVeriTeC: A Dataset for Real-world Claim Verification with Evidence from the Web
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Existing datasets for automated fact-checking have substantial limitations, such as relying on artificial claims, lacking annotations for evidence and intermediate reasoning, or including evidence published after the claim. In this paper we introduce AVeriTeC, a new dataset of 4,568 real-world claims covering fact-checks by 50 different organizations. Each claim is annotated with question-answer pairs supported by evidence available online, as well as textual justifications explaining how the evidence combines to produce a verdict. Through a multi-round annotation process, we avoid common pitfalls including context dependence, evidence insufficiency, and temporal leakage, and reach a substantial inter-annotator agreement of $\kappa=0.619$ on verdicts. We develop a baseline as well as an evaluation scheme for verifying claims through several question-answering steps against the open web.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
MEDIAREF: A Public Knowledge Store for Media Background Checks
MEDIAREF is a public, updatable web-document store that lets LLMs generate media background checks more reproducibly and with higher fact recall than zero-shot generation alone.
-
Evidence-Ledger Adjudication for Claim-Evidence Traceability
An evidence-ledger workflow labels claim-evidence pairs as supported/contradicted/missing/mixed and routes unsupported claims back to authors, reporting 0.676 accuracy over TF-IDF's 0.383 on a 2,335-row benchmark.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.