Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 58 references

Permutationally Invariant Quantum State Tomography for Fermions

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-30 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Any permutation-invariant fermionic state with particle-number symmetry is fully fixed by the particle-number histogram and one collective-mode occupation per sector.

desk verdict Clean fermionic PIQT formula from O(N) band-mapping data; the Schur argument holds, including at half filling, and the scope is honestly limited to Π(ρ). read the letter →

arxiv 2607.23579 v1 pith:G72IHR42 submitted 2026-07-26 cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph

Shion Yamashika , Daisuke Yamamoto This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph
keywords quantumstatetomographypermutationinvariancefermionsU(1)particle-numbersymmetryultracoldatomsSachdev-Ye-KitaevmodelLifshitztransitionbandmapping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Full quantum state tomography usually needs exponentially many measurements, and fermionic simulators cannot freely rotate every local basis. This paper shows that if the state is invariant under permuting the modes and conserves total particle number, those barriers drop away: the entire density matrix is fixed by the probabilities of each total particle number and, inside each number sector, the occupation of a single uniform collective mode. Both quantities are already readable from band-mapping shots in ultracold-atom experiments, and their number grows only linearly with system size. Even when the true state is not permutation-invariant, the same data reconstruct the symmetrized component, which still carries many-body structure beyond ordinary few-body correlators. The authors demonstrate the reconstruction on interacting SYK states and on free-fermion chains across a Lifshitz transition, arguing that information-theoretic diagnostics become realistic for itinerant fermionic matter.

What carries the argument

The reconstruction identity (Eq. 4): after decomposing each q-particle sector into uniform-mode-empty and uniform-mode-occupied subspaces, permutation symmetrization collapses every block by Schur’s lemma to a scalar multiple of the corresponding projector, leaving only the two numbers p_q and ν_q per sector.

What would settle it

Exhibit a U(1)-symmetric fermionic state for which two different permutation-symmetrized density matrices share the same {p_q, ν_q}, or show that the characters of the two exterior-power representations of a transposition agree for some half-filled N=2q, contradicting the End Matter calculation that underpins Schur’s lemma.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For every fermionic density matrix that respects U(1) particle-number symmetry, the permutation-symmetrized state is completely determined by the sector probabilities p_q and the conditional uniform-mode occupations ν_q. Explicitly, Π(ρ) is a classical mixture, over particle number q, of the two projectors onto the subspaces in which the uniform mode is empty or occupied, with weights fixed solely by p_q and ν_q. When the original state is already permutation-invariant, this is exact tomography from linearly many observables.

Load-bearing premise

The empty-uniform-mode and occupied-uniform-mode pieces of each fixed-particle-number sector must transform as two inequivalent irreducible representations of the permutation group; if either representation split or they became equivalent, extra free parameters would survive and the two measured numbers per sector would no longer fix the symmetrized state.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Permutation-invariant fermionic states can be tomographed with O(N) band-mapping observables already available in optical-lattice experiments.
  • Expectation values of every permutation-invariant observable equal those of the reconstructed Π(ρ), even when the true state is not symmetric.
  • Disorder-averaged SYK Gibbs states can be approximated to high fidelity from only tens of samples by feeding empirical {p_q, ν_q} into the reconstruction formula.
  • Nonanalyticities of entanglement entropy at Lifshitz transitions remain visible in the permutation-symmetrized reduced state of a spatial interval.
  • The same linear data set yields a concrete density matrix on which state-level diagnostics (entropy, fidelity, etc.) can be evaluated without measuring high-order correlators.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the representation-theoretic collapse is the only obstruction, analogous linear protocols should exist for other mode groups (e.g., lattice translations or point-group symmetries) once the corresponding irreps are classified.
  • The fact that a Lifshitz nonanalyticity survives full symmetrization suggests that topology-sensitive entanglement features may often live in the totally symmetric sector and therefore be experimentally cheaper than expected.
  • Combining the reconstruction with randomized global unitaries that preserve particle number could enlarge the set of extractable diagnostics while still avoiding site-resolved control.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a fermionic analog of permutationally invariant quantum tomography (PIQT) for states with U(1) particle-number symmetry. The central result, Eq. (4), states that the permutation-symmetrized density matrix Π(ρ) of any U(1)-symmetric N-mode fermionic state is completely determined by the particle-number distribution {p_q} and the conditional uniform-mode occupations {ν_q}, taking the block-scalar form Π(ρ) = Σ_q p_q[(1−ν_q)/C(N−1,q) P_{q,0} + ν_q/C(N−1,q−1) P_{q,1}]. The proof decomposes each q-particle sector into the uniform-mode-empty and uniform-mode-occupied subspaces, which carry the exterior powers ∧^q W and ∧^{q−1} W of the standard (N−1)-dimensional S_N irrep; Schur's lemma kills cross blocks and scalarizes diagonal blocks, and the trace conditions fix the coefficients. For permutation-invariant states this constitutes full tomography from O(N) observables. Two applications are presented: a few-sample construction of the disorder-averaged Gibbs state of the complex SYK model (Fig. 1), and the von Neumann entropy of the symmetrized reduced state across a Lifshitz transition, with the asymptotic formula Eq. (17) derived in the Supplemental Material via full counting statistics and Fisher–Hartwig asymptotics.

Significance. If the result holds — and I believe it does — this is a clean and useful contribution. The central formula (Eq. 4) is a parameter-free, exactly derived identity valid for arbitrary (including interacting, non-Gaussian) U(1)-symmetric fermionic states, not an ansatz or fit. The one genuinely delicate representation-theoretic step — the inequivalence of ∧^q W and ∧^{q−1} W in the equal-dimension case N = 2q — is handled correctly and explicitly in the End Matter via a transposition character computation (Eq. 21), which I verified independently. The required measurements (number-resolved zero-momentum occupation via band mapping) are realistic for current ultracold-atom fermion platforms, which makes the protocol more than a formal curiosity. The Supplemental Material's derivation of Eq. (17) (Toeplitz determinants, Fisher–Hartwig, controlled O(1) bookkeeping) is careful and reproducible in principle. The work extends the PIQT idea of Tóth et al. [33] into a genuinely new setting (itinerant fermions with number conservation), and the SYK example demonstrates a non-obvious use — permutation-orbit amplification of finite disorder samples (Eq. 15) — that is an algebraic identity rather()

major comments (2)
  1. [Example 2: Lifshitz transition, Eq. (17)] The second application rests on Eq. (17), S(Π_A(ρ_A)) = N_A h(ϱ) − (1/2)ln N_A + O(ln ln N_A), whose nonanalyticity at the Lifshitz point is inherited entirely from the filling fraction ϱ = ∫(dk/2π)Θ(−ε_k). But ϱ itself is directly measurable from the momentum distribution — indeed it is a simpler observable than the symmetrized entropy. As written, the manuscript does not establish what state-level information S(Π_A(ρ_A)) contains beyond a nonlinear reparametrization of ϱ. Since this example is one of only two demonstrations and underwrites the abstract's claim that the symmetrized state 'can still encode nontrivial many-body and state-level structure beyond conventional few-body observables,' the authors should clarify what, if anything, the entropy (or other diagnostics of Π(ρ)) reveals that is not already visible in the number statistics {p_q} and the occupations {ν_q} themselves. A
  2. [Experimental Implementation / Applications] The protocol's scalability claim ('number of required observables scales only linearly') concerns observable count, but no analysis is given of the statistical cost: how the reconstruction error in Π(ρ) scales with the number of experimental shots used to estimate p_q and ν_q. The SYK example (Fig. 1) demonstrates robustness to few disorder realizations, but that is sample averaging, not shot noise; ν_q is a conditional average whose estimator variance grows when p_q is small (sectors near q=0 and q=N). Since experimental feasibility is a headline claim of the Letter, at least a brief error-propagation discussion (e.g., fidelity vs. shot number, behavior of rare sectors) is needed for the reader to assess practical cost.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 1(c)] The x-axis of Fig. 1(c) is labeled β with tick labels spanning 10^-3 to 10^6, which is inconsistent with panels (a,b) at fixed β=10 and implausible as a physical temperature range; presumably the axis is mislabeled or mis-scaled in the extracted figure. Please check and correct the axis label and range.
  2. [Example 1, below Eq. (15)] The fidelity is defined as F(ρ,σ) = Tr√(√ρ σ √ρ), the root (unsquared) convention; many references (including some cited) use the squared convention. Stating the convention explicitly in the caption or text would avoid ambiguity.
  3. [Proof of Eq. (4), Eq. (12)] In the proof of Eq. (4), the coefficients in Eq. (12) follow from Tr P_{q,0} = C(N−1,q) and Tr P_{q,1} = C(N−1,q−1); one line making these dimensions explicit would make the normalization step fully self-contained (the dimensions appear only later, in the End Matter, Eq. (20)).
  4. [Preliminaries, Eq. (2)] The CAR automorphism defined by U_π c_i U_π† = c_{π(i)} (Eq. 2) exists and acts on the q-particle sector as ∧^q of the permutation matrix on H_1; a brief remark that no additional fermionic sign twists arise (so that Eq. (8) holds as a representation identity, not just a vector-space decomposition) would preempt a natural reader question.
  5. [Experimental Implementation] When {p_q, ν_q} are estimated from noisy data, the reconstructed operator from Eq. (4) remains positive provided p_q ≥ 0 and 0 ≤ ν_q ≤ 1; a one-sentence remark on enforcing these constraints (or a simple projection) in practice would be helpful.
  6. [Supplemental Material] Reference [53] to the Supplemental Material cites Refs. [54–58]; the Toeplitz/Fisher–Hartwig inputs are standard, but it would help the reader if the SM stated explicitly which step uses [57] (double-scaling Fisher–Hartwig) versus [56].

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eq. (4) is a self-contained Schur-lemma reconstruction from representation theory and two trace constraints, not a fit or self-referential definition.

full rationale

The load-bearing claim is Eq. (4): the permutation-symmetrized U(1)-symmetric fermionic state Π(ρ) is completely fixed by the sector probabilities {p_q} and the conditional uniform-mode occupations {ν_q}. The proof decomposes each q-particle sector into the two S_N-subspaces V_{q,0}=∧^q W and V_{q,1}=∧^{q-1} W (Eqs. 7–8), invokes irreducibility of exterior powers of the standard representation (Fulton–Harris [41]) and mutual inequivalence (End Matter character of a transposition, Eqs. 21–23), applies Schur’s lemma to kill off-diagonal blocks and scalarize diagonal blocks (Eqs. 9–11), and fixes the two scalars by Tr[Π_q(ρ_q)]=1 and Tr[Π_q(ρ_q)n_0]=ν_q (Eq. 12). None of these steps defines the output in terms of itself, fits free parameters to the target, or imports a uniqueness theorem from the present authors. The SYK construction (Eq. 15) is an algebraic identity that the permutation average of finite samples equals the orbit-expanded average; fidelity to a large-sample reference is an external numerical check, not a fitted prediction. The Lifshitz entropy formula (Eq. 17 / SM) is an asymptotic evaluation of the spectrum of the already-reconstructed Π_A(ρ_A), benchmarked against exact numerics. The derivation is therefore self-contained against its stated assumptions; score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard finite-group representation theory applied to fermionic Fock space, the physical U(1) particle-number superselection rule, and the definition of permutation symmetrization. No fitted scales enter Eq. 4. The only paper-specific modeling choices are the focus on the uniform collective mode (forced by the trivial action of S_N on that mode) and the experimental identification of that mode with zero quasimomentum under band mapping.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption U(1) particle-number symmetry: ρ = ⊕_q p_q ρ_q with no coherences between different total-N sectors.
    Stated in Preliminaries; natural for cold-atom fermions but required for the block-diagonal starting point of Eq. 1.
  • standard math Schur’s lemma: intertwiners between inequivalent irreps vanish; endomorphisms of an irrep are scalars.
    Invoked explicitly in the proof of Eq. 4 after the decomposition H_q = V_{q,0} ⊕ V_{q,1}.
  • standard math The S_N-representations on ∧^q W and ∧^{q−1} W are irreducible (Fulton–Harris) and mutually inequivalent for 1≤q≤N−1.
    Irreducibility cited to Fulton–Harris; inequivalence proved in End Matter via dimensions and a transposition character. Load-bearing for uniqueness of the two-coefficient form.
  • standard math Permutations of mode labels act unitarily by U_π c_i U_π† = c_{π(i)} and preserve both total N and uniform-mode occupation n_0.
    Definition (2) and the decomposition (7)–(8); used to split each sector into two invariant subspaces.
  • domain assumption Band-mapping measurements simultaneously yield total particle number and zero-momentum (uniform-mode) occupation in ultracold-atom optical lattices.
    Experimental Implementation section; required only for the claim of near-term experimental accessibility, not for the mathematical reconstruction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Permutationally Invariant Quantum State Tomography for Fermions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/G72IHR42

@misc{pith2026260723579,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Permutationally Invariant Quantum State Tomography for Fermions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/G72IHR42}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.23579}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum state tomography provides complete information about a quantum state, but its measurement cost generally grows exponentially with system size. In many-particle quantum simulators, this challenge is further compounded by the limited accessibility of local measurements and controls. Here we develop a tomography protocol for permutation-invariant fermionic many-body states with U(1) particle-number symmetry. We show that any such state is completely determined by the distribution of the total particle number and the occupation of a single collective mode within each particle-number sector, both of which are accessible in current ultracold-atom experiments. The number of required observables scales only linearly with the system size. More generally, the protocol reconstructs the permutation-symmetrized component of arbitrary U(1)-symmetric fermionic states, which can still encode nontrivial many-body and state-level structure beyond conventional few-body observables. We demonstrate this protocol in interacting non-Gaussian states of the complex Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model and in free-fermion chains across a Lifshitz transition. This framework opens a route toward information-theoretic characterization of strongly correlated itinerant quantum matter in experimentally realistic fermionic quantum simulators.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.23579 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Few-sample construction of a permutation-invariant disorder-averaged state in the complex SYK model. (a,b) Con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) The energy dispersion relation of the Hamilto [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [33]

    T´ oth, W

    G. T´ oth, W. Wieczorek, D. Gross, R. Krischek, C. Schwemmer, and H. Weinfurter, Permutationally In- variant Quantum Tomography, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 250403 (2010)

    2010

  2. [1]

    Clarke and F

    J. Clarke and F. K. Wilhelm, Superconducting quantum bits, Nature453, 1031 (2008)

    2008

  3. [2]

    DiCarlo, J

    L. DiCarlo, J. M. Chow, J. M. Gambetta, L. S. Bishop, B. R. Johnson, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, L. Frun- zio, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Demonstration of two-qubit algorithms with a superconducting quantum processor, Nature460, 240 (2009)

    2009

  4. [3]

    Huang, D

    H.-L. Huang, D. Wu, D. Fan, and X. Zhu, Supercon- ducting quantum computing: a review, Science China Information Sciences63(2020)

    2020

  5. [4]

    Wu, W.-S

    Y. Wu, W.-S. Bao, S. Cao, F. Chen, M.-C. Chen, X. Chen, T.-H. Chung, H. Deng, Y. Du, D. Fan, M. Gong, C. Guo, C. Guo, S. Guo, L. Han, L. Hong, H.-L. Huang, Y.-H. Huo, L. Li, N. Li, S. Li, Y. Li, F. Liang, C. Lin, J. Lin, H. Qian, D. Qiao, H. Rong, H. Su, L. Sun, L. Wang, S. Wang, D. Wu, Y. Xu, K. Yan, W. Yang, Y. Yang, Y. Ye, J. Yin, C. Ying, J. Yu, C. Zh...

    2021

  6. [5]

    Bravyi, O

    S. Bravyi, O. Dial, J. M. Gambetta, D. Gil, and Z. Nazario, The future of quantum computing with su- perconducting qubits, Journal of Applied Physics132 (2022)

    2022

  7. [6]

    Johanning, A

    M. Johanning, A. F. Var´ on, and C. Wunderlich, Quan- tum simulations with cold trapped ions, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics42, 154009 (2009)

    2009

  8. [7]

    B. P. Lanyon, C. Hempel, D. Nigg, M. M¨ uller, R. Ger- ritsma, F. Z¨ ahringer, P. Schindler, J. T. Barreiro, M. Rambach, G. Kirchmair, M. Hennrich, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Universal Digital Quantum Simulation with Trapped Ions, Science334, 57 (2011)

    2011

Show all 58 references
  1. [8]

    Blatt and C

    R. Blatt and C. F. Roos, Quantum simulations with trapped ions, Nature Physics8, 277 (2012)

    2012

  2. [9]

    Schneider, D

    C. Schneider, D. Porras, and T. Schaetz, Experimental quantum simulations of many-body physics with trapped ions, Reports on Progress in Physics75, 024401 (2012)

    2012

  3. [10]

    Monroe and J

    C. Monroe and J. Kim, Scaling the Ion Trap Quantum Processor, Science339, 1164 (2013)

    2013

  4. [11]

    Foss-Feig, G

    M. Foss-Feig, G. Pagano, A. C. Potter, and N. Y. Yao, Progress in Trapped-Ion Quantum Simulation, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics16, 145 (2025)

    2025

  5. [12]

    Bloch, Ultracold quantum gases in optical lattices, Na- ture Physics1, 23 (2005)

    I. Bloch, Ultracold quantum gases in optical lattices, Na- ture Physics1, 23 (2005)

    2005

  6. [13]

    Bloch, Quantum coherence and entanglement with ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Nature453, 1016 (2008)

    I. Bloch, Quantum coherence and entanglement with ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Nature453, 1016 (2008)

    2008

  7. [14]

    Lewenstein, A

    M. Lewenstein, A. Sanpera, and V. Ahufinger,Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices: Simulating quantum many- body systems(Oxford University Press, 2012)

    2012

  8. [15]

    Zohar, J

    E. Zohar, J. I. Cirac, and B. Reznik, Quantum simula- tions of lattice gauge theories using ultracold atoms in op- tical lattices, Reports on Progress in Physics79, 014401 (2015)

    2015

  9. [16]

    Goldman, J

    N. Goldman, J. C. Budich, and P. Zoller, Topological quantum matter with ultracold gases in optical lattices, Nature Physics12, 639 (2016)

    2016

  10. [17]

    Gross and I

    C. Gross and I. Bloch, Quantum simulations with ultra- cold atoms in optical lattices, Science357, 995 (2017)

    2017

  11. [18]

    Sch¨ afer, T

    F. Sch¨ afer, T. Fukuhara, S. Sugawa, Y. Takasu, and Y. Takahashi, Tools for quantum simulation with ultra- cold atoms in optical lattices, Nature Reviews Physics2, 411 (2020)

    2020

  12. [19]

    Vogel and H

    K. Vogel and H. Risken, Determination of quasiprobabil- ity distributions in terms of probability distributions for the rotated quadrature phase, Phys. Rev. A40, 2847(R) (1989)

    1989

  13. [20]

    Leonhardt, Quantum-State Tomography and Discrete Wigner Function, Phys

    U. Leonhardt, Quantum-State Tomography and Discrete Wigner Function, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 4101 (1995)

    1995

  14. [21]

    A. G. White, D. F. V. James, P. H. Eberhard, and P. G. Kwiat, Nonmaximally Entangled States: Produc- tion, Characterization, and Utilization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3103 (1999)

    1999

  15. [22]

    Paris and J

    M. Paris and J. ˇReh´ aˇ cek,Quantum State Estimation (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004)

    2004

  16. [23]

    G. M. D Ariano, L. Maccone, and M. Paini, Spin tomog- 6 raphy, Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics5, 77 (2003)

    2003

  17. [24]

    Dodonov and V

    V. Dodonov and V. Man’ko, Positive distribution descrip- tion for spin states, Physics Letters A229, 335 (1997)

    1997

  18. [25]

    Amiet and S

    J.-P. Amiet and S. Weigert, Reconstructing a pure state of a spinsthrough three Stern-Gerlach measurements, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General32, 2777 (1999)

    1999

  19. [26]

    Gross, Y.-K

    D. Gross, Y.-K. Liu, S. T. Flammia, S. Becker, and J. Eis- ert, Quantum State Tomography via Compressed Sens- ing, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 150401 (2010)

    2010

  20. [27]

    Gross, Recovering Low-Rank Matrices From Few Co- efficients in Any Basis, IEEE Transactions on Informa- tion Theory57, 1548 (2011)

    D. Gross, Recovering Low-Rank Matrices From Few Co- efficients in Any Basis, IEEE Transactions on Informa- tion Theory57, 1548 (2011)

    2011

  21. [28]

    Schwemmer, G

    C. Schwemmer, G. T´ oth, A. Niggebaum, T. Moroder, D. Gross, O. G¨ uhne, and H. Weinfurter, Experimental Comparison of Efficient Tomography Schemes for a Six- Qubit State, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 040503 (2014)

    2014

  22. [29]

    Kalev, R

    A. Kalev, R. L. Kosut, and I. H. Deutsch, Quan- tum tomography protocols with positivity are com- pressed sensing protocols, npj Quantum Information1, 10.1038/npjqi.2015.18 (2015)

    2015 doi

  23. [30]

    Krishnan Vijayan, A

    M. Krishnan Vijayan, A. Paler, J. Gavriel, C. R. Myers, P. P. Rohde, and S. J. Devitt, Compilation of algorithm- specific graph states for quantum circuits, Quantum Sci- ence and Technology9, 025005 (2024)

    2024

  24. [31]

    Liu, Universal low-rank matrix recovery from Pauli measurements, inAdvances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems, Vol

    Y.-k. Liu, Universal low-rank matrix recovery from Pauli measurements, inAdvances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems, Vol. 24, edited by J. Shawe-Taylor, R. Zemel, P. Bartlett, F. Pereira, and K. Weinberger (Curran Associates, Inc., 2011)

    2011

  25. [32]

    Marmorini, T

    G. Marmorini, T. Fukuhara, and D. Yamamoto, Measur- ing Entanglement Without Local Addressing in Quan- tum Many-Body Simulators via Spiral Quantum State Tomography, PRX Quantum7, 010355 (2026)

    2026

  26. [34]

    Moroder, P

    T. Moroder, P. Hyllus, G. T´ oth, C. Schwemmer, A. Niggebaum, S. Gaile, O. G¨ uhne, and H. Wein- furter, Permutationally invariant state reconstruction, New Journal of Physics14, 105001 (2012)

    2012

  27. [35]

    T. Gao, F. Yan, and S. J. van Enk, Permutationally In- variant Part of a Density Matrix and Nonseparability of N-Qubit States, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 180501 (2014)

    2014

  28. [36]

    S. Aaronson, Shadow tomography of quantum states, in Proceedings of the 50th Annual ACM SIGACT Sympo- sium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2018 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2018) p. 325–338

    2018

  29. [37]

    Huang, R

    H.-Y. Huang, R. Kueng, and J. Preskill, Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measure- ments, Nature Physics16, 1050 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Elben, S

    A. Elben, S. T. Flammia, H.-Y. Huang, R. Kueng, J. Preskill, B. Vermersch, and P. Zoller, The random- ized measurement toolbox, Nature Reviews Physics5, 9 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Islam, R

    R. Islam, R. Ma, P. M. Preiss, M. E. Tai, A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, and M. Greiner, Measuring entanglement en- tropy in a quantum many-body system, Nature528, 77 (2015)

    2015

  32. [40]

    A. M. Kaufman, M. E. Tai, A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, R. Schittko, P. M. Preiss, and M. Greiner, Quantum ther- malization through entanglement in an isolated many- body system, Science353, 794 (2016)

    2016

  33. [41]

    Fulton and J

    W. Fulton and J. Harris,Representation Theory (Springer New York, 2004)

    2004

  34. [42]

    Sachdev, Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy and Strange Metals, Phys

    S. Sachdev, Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy and Strange Metals, Phys. Rev. X5, 041025 (2015)

    2015

  35. [43]

    Y. Gu, A. Kitaev, S. Sachdev, and G. Tarnopolsky, Notes on the complex Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Journal of High Energy Physics2020(2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    Danshita, M

    I. Danshita, M. Hanada, and M. Tezuka, Creating and probing the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model with ultracold gases: Towards experimental studies of quantum gravity, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics2017, 10.1093/ptep/ptx108 (2017)

    2017 doi

  37. [45]

    Wei and T

    C. Wei and T. A. Sedrakyan, Optical lattice platform for the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. A103, 013323 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    Creffield, F

    C. Creffield, F. Sols, M. Schir` o, and N. Goldman, Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Physics from the Hubbard Model: A Floquet-Engineering Approach, Phys. Rev. Lett.137, 046302 (2026)

    2026

  39. [47]

    Uhlmann, Transition Probability (Fidelity) and Its Relatives, Foundations of Physics41, 288 (2010)

    A. Uhlmann, Transition Probability (Fidelity) and Its Relatives, Foundations of Physics41, 288 (2010)

    2010

  40. [48]

    Jozsa, Fidelity for Mixed Quantum States, Journal of Modern Optics41, 2315 (1994)

    R. Jozsa, Fidelity for Mixed Quantum States, Journal of Modern Optics41, 2315 (1994)

    1994

  41. [49]

    Lifshitz, Anomalies of electron characteristics of a metal in the high pressure region, Sov

    I. Lifshitz, Anomalies of electron characteristics of a metal in the high pressure region, Sov. Phys. JETP11, 1130 (1960)

    1960

  42. [50]

    Blanter, M

    Y. Blanter, M. Kaganov, A. Pantsulaya, and A. Var- lamov, The theory of electronic topological transitions, Physics Reports245, 159 (1994)

    1994

  43. [51]

    Rodney, H

    M. Rodney, H. F. Song, S.-S. Lee, K. Le Hur, and E. S. Sørensen, Scaling of entanglement entropy across Lifshitz transitions, Physical Review B87, 115132 (2013)

    2013

  44. [52]

    Peschel and V

    I. Peschel and V. Eisler, Reduced density matrices and entanglement entropy in free lattice models, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical42, 504003 (2009)

    2009

  45. [53]

    See Supplemental Material for details of numerical and analytical calculations, which includes Refs. [54–58]

  46. [54]

    L. S. Levitov and G. B. Lesovik, Charge distribution in quantum shot noise, JETP Letters58, 230 (1993)

    1993

  47. [55]

    Klich, Full Counting Statistics: An elementary derivation of Levitov’s formula (2002), arXiv:cond- mat/0209642

    I. Klich, Full Counting Statistics: An elementary derivation of Levitov’s formula (2002), arXiv:cond- mat/0209642

    2002

  48. [56]

    M. E. Fisher and R. E. Hartwig, Toeplitz Determinants: Some Applications, Theorems, and Conjectures, inAd- vances in Chemical Physics(John Wiley & Sons, Ltd,

  49. [57]

    D. A. Ivanov, A. G. Abanov, and V. V. Cheianov, Count- ing free fermions on a line: a Fisher-Hartwig asymptotic expansion for the Toeplitz determinant in the double- scaling limit, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical46, 085003 (2013)

    2013

  50. [58]

    Peschel, Calculation of reduced density matrices from correlation functions, Journal of Physics A: Mathemati- cal and General36, L205 (2003)

    I. Peschel, Calculation of reduced density matrices from correlation functions, Journal of Physics A: Mathemati- cal and General36, L205 (2003). End Matter Here we verify the claim that the two nonzero irreducible representations carried byV q,0 andV q,1 are inequivalent for 1...

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed July 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.