REVIEW 1 cited by
Nontrivial gapless electronic states at the stacking faults of weak topological insulators
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Lattice defects such as stacking faults may obscure electronic topological features of real materials. In fact, defects are a source of disorder that can enhance the density of states and conductivity of the bulk of the system and they break crystal symmetries that can protect the topological states. On the other hand, in recent years it has been shown that lattice defects can act as a source of nontrivial topology. Motivated by recent experiments on three-dimensional (3D) topological systems such as Bi$_2$TeI and Bi$_{14}$Rh$_3$I$_9$, we examine the effect of stacking faults on the electronic properties of weak topological insulators (WTIs). Working with a simple model consisting of a 3D WTI formed by weakly-coupled two-dimensional (2D) topological layers separated by trivial spacers, we find that 2D stacking faults can carry their own, topologically nontrivial gapless states. Depending on the WTI properties, as well as the way in which the stacking fault is realized, the latter can form a topologically protected 2D semimetal, but also a 2D topological insulator which is embedded in the higher-dimensional WTI bulk. This suggests the possibility of using stacking faults in real materials as a source of topologically nontrivial, symmetry-protected conducting states.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
One-dimensional Dirac modes in the core of a pentagonal topological crystalline insulator nanowire
Pentagonal SnTe-class nanowires with cationic twin planes are predicted to host two spatially separated helical Dirac modes, one at the core and one at the outer surface.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.