Sharing and Caring: Creating a Culture of Constructive Criticism in Computational Legal Studies
read the original abstract
We introduce seven foundational principles for creating a culture of constructive criticism in computational legal studies. Beginning by challenging the current perception of papers as the primary scholarly output, we call for a more comprehensive interpretation of publications. We then suggest to make these publications computationally reproducible, releasing all of the data and all of the code all of the time, on time, and in the most functioning form possible. Subsequently, we invite constructive criticism in all phases of the publication life cycle. We posit that our proposals will help form our field, and float the idea of marking this maturity by the creation of a modern flagship publication outlet for computational legal studies.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Natural Language Processing in the Legal Domain
A survey of nearly 1000 NLP & Law papers from 2013-2024 documenting increases in publication volume, scope, methodological sophistication, and data/code availability.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.