Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 159 references

Current Event Horizon Telescope polarimetric observations constrain magnetic-field geometry, variability, source orientation, magnetic flux state, and the disk–jet connection more robustly than they constrain black hole spin magnitude or se

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 02:44 UTC pith:GCDBOBGR

load-bearing objection A fair, useful review from the EHT polarimetry group: current data constrain flow and field properties more than spin, but the claim is partly model-library-limited, as the authors themselves note.

arxiv 2607.14218 v1 pith:GCDBOBGR submitted 2026-07-15 astro-ph.HE

Signatures of Black Hole Spin in Horizon-Scale Polarimetry

George N. Wong , Daniel C. M. Palumbo , Zachary Gelles , Andrew Chael This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords black holesKerr black holespolarimetryaccretionmagnetic fieldsrelativistic jetsevent horizonsvery long baseline interferometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review asks whether horizon-scale polarimetric images of supermassive black holes can determine the dimensionless spin parameter a*. The authors argue that spin enters the observed polarization through three distinguishable routes—photon propagation in the Kerr spacetime, electromagnetic boundary conditions at the horizon, and spin-dependent magnetized plasma dynamics—and that once these routes are separated, no single polarimetric feature maps uniquely to spin. Surveying current Event Horizon Telescope results for M87* and Sgr A*, they conclude that the data constrain magnetic-field geometry, variability, source orientation, magnetic flux state, and elements of the disk–jet connection far more strongly than spin magnitude or sense. A sympathetic reader would care because this reframes spin inference as a consilience problem: robust spin claims require combining diagnostics with independent systematics rather than trusting any one observable, and future observing programs should be designed accordingly.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that current horizon-scale polarimetry does not yet provide reliable spin constraints. Spin information is encoded in polarization through three channels: the geometry of photon paths in the Kerr spacetime, the boundary conditions imposed by horizon-threading electromagnetic fields, and the magnetized plasma dynamics shaped by spin. The authors trace the full inference chain from VLBI correlations through Stokes images and compact summary statistics—such as the βm annular Fourier moments whose β2 mode captures the coherence and handedness of the ring-scale EVPA spiral—and show at each step how source assumptions and propagation effects can mimic or erase spin-dep

What carries the argument

The central object is the polarimetric image chain: VLBI correlations, Stokes I/Q/U/V images, compact descriptors, and the source model that connects them to spin. The key mechanism is the distinction between spin signatures arising from photon propagation in the Kerr spacetime and those mediated by horizon-threading magnetic fields and plasma dynamics. This distinction lets the paper decompose each candidate diagnostic—EVPA spiral handedness, β2 phase, near-horizon EVPA trends, photon-ring subimage polarization, jet light-cylinder structure—into a geometric part tied to the spacetime and a source part tied to the accretion flow. The βm coefficients, annular Fourier moments of the complex li

Load-bearing premise

The claim that spin is weakly constrained depends on the assumption that the GRMHD and semianalytic model libraries used for comparison adequately span the true source parameter space, including electron thermodynamics, Faraday treatment, magnetic flux state, and retrograde accretion; if those libraries are biased, the weak spin constraints could be an artifact of model coverage rather than of the data.

What would settle it

Concretely, re-run the M87* and Sgr A* model comparisons with a library that adds retrograde flows, varied electron thermodynamics, and self-consistent internal Faraday rotation; if the resulting posterior on a* is sharply peaked and shared by the β2 phase, the Q–U loop handedness, and the near-horizon EVPA trend, the central claim that spin is weakly constrained would collapse.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the paper's conclusion is correct, no current EHT polarimetric observable can be cited as a standalone spin measurement; published spin values must be understood as conditional on model assumptions such as Faraday screen location, electron thermodynamics, and emission geometry.
  • The data do robustly constrain magnetic flux state (MAD vs SANE), magnetic-field geometry, inclination, and variability, so these quantities—not spin—should anchor source-model comparisons and can be used to test accretion physics.
  • Robust spin inference becomes a consilience test: conflicting spin answers from different diagnostics (e.g., β2 phase vs Q–U loop handedness) identify missing physics, while agreement across complementary systematics would justify a spin claim.
  • Long-baseline and space-based polarimetric observations targeting the photon ring and near-horizon EVPA are the most promising route to cleaner geometric spin constraints, but only if source polarization models and Faraday treatment are developed alongside them.
  • For jet-resolved sources, light-cylinder EVPA swings and helical-field handedness can constrain field-line angular velocity and possibly spin sign, but require assumptions about disk–jet alignment and the Faraday screen.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the Sgr A* high-spin solution from the external-screen treatment should not be quoted as a spin measurement; if the internal-rotation interpretation is correct, that solution disappears entirely, and the spread between the high-spin and low-to-intermediate-spin analyses maps the assumptions still to be fixed.
  • An extension of the consilience criterion: a decisive test would be to require the same spin direction from the horizon-scale β2 handedness and from the independent Q–U loop handedness in Sgr A*; agreement would strengthen spin claims, disagreement would localize the missing physics to the Faraday or emission model.
  • A testable extension suggested by the paper's logic: multifrequency full-Stokes monitoring at 86, 230, and 345 GHz can directly measure the frequency dependence of the rotation measure; if the depolarization and RM scaling follow the internal-rotation prediction, the external-screen derotation used in current spin fits is invalid.
  • The paper's emphasis on population studies implies that horizon-scale spin demographics will be dominated by modeling priors until libraries span retrograde flows, varied electron thermodynamics, and self-consistent Faraday treatment; otherwise, apparent population-level spin trends may be artifacts of library coverage.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This review article examines how black-hole spin is encoded in horizon-scale radio polarimetric images, with emphasis on the Event Horizon Telescope observations of M87* and Sgr A*. It lays out a measurement hierarchy from VLBI correlations through Stokes images and compact descriptors (EVPA, β_m, polarization fractions) to source properties and finally spin. The paper distinguishes spin signatures from photon propagation in the Kerr spacetime, from horizon-threading electromagnetic fields, and from magnetized plasma dynamics, and it surveys resolved horizon-scale polarization, jet-base/light-cylinder diagnostics, near-horizon EVPA/inner-shadow structure, and photon-ring/long-baseline signatures. The central conclusion is that current EHT polarimetric data constrain magnetic-field geometry, variability, source orientation, magnetic flux state, and elements of the disk–jet connection more robustly than they constrain spin magnitude or sense, and that robust spin inference will require consilience across diagnostics with independent systematics.

Significance. If accepted, this review provides a valuable and timely synthesis of a rapidly evolving field. Its strengths are organizational clarity, an explicit separation of observables from model-dependent inference, and a balanced treatment of systematics: the paper repeatedly flags the prograde-only BHP II model family (§4.1), the external-screen requirement for the Sgr A* high-spin solution (§4.2), and the broader source-model priors (§5, item 3). It does not attempt a new derivation, but its contribution is synthetic and diagnostic. Table 1 and the Section 5 itemization give a concrete roadmap for future work. The paper also includes an original simulation figure (Figure 1) and reproduces key figures with permission. The central claim is carefully hedged in the body, though the abstract states it somewhat more tersely.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence 'Current Event Horizon Telescope observations constrain magnetic-field geometry, variability, source orientation, magnetic flux state, and aspects of the disk–jet connection more robustly than they constrain spin magnitude or sense' is stronger than the body's carefully conditioned discussion. Consider adding a qualifier such as 'within current modeling frameworks' or 'given present model libraries,' since Sections 4.1–4.2 and Section 5 item 3 show that these non-spin constraints are themselves model-dependent.
  2. [§4.2] The total-intensity paragraph says the data 'disfavor ... retrograde disks,' while later the only Paper VIII-passing model is described as a*=0.94 with inclination i=150°. The word 'retrograde' can be read either as counter-alignment between black-hole spin and disk angular momentum or as sky-projected clockwise motion. A sentence clarifying which sense is meant would prevent confusion, especially since the clockwise/retrograde distinction is central to the Sgr A* discussion.
  3. [Figure 8 caption] For the Sgr A* panel, the caption labels the EHT constraint as 'derotated.' Since the derotation assumes an external Faraday screen, the caption should state this assumption explicitly so the plotted band is not misread as a raw observable.
  4. [§3.1, Fig. 1 caption] The text notes that Figure 1 is imaged for 'M87*-like parameters' with a 15 µas Gaussian blur. Since the same angular scale would not apply to Sgr A*, adding a sentence in the caption noting that the physical linear scale differs for the two sources would improve accessibility.
  5. [§2, Eq. (5)] The notation for the affine parameter s and the invariant Stokes vector is standard, but the text could state explicitly that Equation (5) is written in geometric units with c=G=1. This is a minor clarity issue.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular derivation: the review's spin-weakness conclusion is conditional and flags model-library gaps; residual self-citation is not load-bearing.

full rationale

This is a review/synthesis article, not a derivation paper: it contains no new fit-to-data step, no new 'prediction' equation, and no claim that a quantity is derived from first principles within the paper. The central claim—that current EHT observations constrain field geometry, variability, orientation, flux state, and disk-jet connection more robustly than spin magnitude/sense—is an interpretation of external EHT analyses (e.g., EHT Papers VII/VIII) and of the authors' own published semianalytic/GRMHD programs. Where the paper makes a spin-sensitive statement, it explicitly conditions it on assumptions: BHP II 'restricts its model space to prograde accretion flows' and the arg(β2) comparison is made 'under assumptions about Faraday rotation and emission geometry' (Section 3.1, Fig. 8); Paper VIII's a*=0.94 solution requires 'at least 97% of the measured RM must be external' and the paper notes that if Faraday rotation is internal 'no sampled model passes all constraints' (Section 4.2). The authors list 'Source-model priors' as a named limitation (Section 5, item 3), so the model-coverage concern is flagged rather than hidden. No equation in the text equates a fitted parameter with a predicted observable by construction, and no load-bearing result is justified solely by a self-citation: the self-cited PWP/BHP/Gelles diagnostics are presented as model-dependent candidate signatures whose weakness is the paper's conclusion, not as external uniqueness theorems that force the conclusion. Thus the only caveat is citation-genetic (several spin diagnostics originate in the authors' own program), which is self-citation but not logical circularity. Score 2.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted in this review and no new entities are introduced. The load-bearing inputs are the standard GR and radiative-transfer framework plus the domain assumptions above, particularly the GRMHD library coverage and the Faraday-screen choice. The review explicitly flags these dependencies, so the ledger mainly records them rather than exposing hidden fits.

axioms (5)
  • standard math Kerr spacetime uniquely describes the external geometry of an isolated spinning black hole; photon geodesics and parallel transport determine image-plane EVPA structure.
    Used throughout Sections 1 and 3; the review's spin diagnostics rely on the Kerr metric and lensing/parallel-transport formalism, including photon-ring and near-horizon EVPA behavior.
  • domain assumption At 230 GHz, low-luminosity accretion flows emit synchrotron radiation with Faraday rotation and conversion described by the invariant polarized radiative-transfer equation.
    Section 2; all EHT polarimetric interpretation and GRMHD ray-tracing assume this emission and transfer model.
  • domain assumption GRMHD simulation libraries (MAD/SANE states, electron thermodynamics prescriptions, Faraday treatment) adequately represent the true accretion-flow parameter space for model comparison.
    Sections 4.1-4.2 and 5; the conclusion that spin is weakly constrained follows from the spread across these libraries.
  • domain assumption The BHP II stationary inflow model, which relates magnetic pitch to spin and arg(beta_2), is a valid interpretive tool and excludes retrograde configurations.
    Section 3.1 and Figure 8; this self-cited prior result carries much of the spin-pitch argument in the review.
  • domain assumption For Sgr A*, the observed EVPA handedness can be determined by treating most Faraday rotation as an external screen, as in EHT Paper VIII; lower-frequency ALMA data instead favor internal rotation.
    Section 4.2; the high-spin solution a*=0.94 depends on this screen choice, so the spin conclusion is conditional on it.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 35428 in / 13714 out tokens · 143544 ms · 2026-08-02T02:44:35.250842+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The angular momentum of a black hole, usually expressed in terms of a dimensionless "spin," both shapes the strong-field spacetime and provides a reservoir of rotational energy that can be exchanged with surrounding plasma. Very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) has now begun to resolve polarized emission on event-horizon scales. We distinguish polarimetric signatures of spin arising primarily from photon propagation in the Kerr spacetime from those mediated by horizon-threading electromagnetic fields and magnetized plasma dynamics. We trace the inference from VLBI correlations through Stokes images and compact summary statistics to constraints on the source and, ultimately, on spin. Within this framework, we review diagnostics linked to horizon regularity and magnetic-field winding, magnetically arrested accretion, electromagnetic energy extraction, jet-base and light-cylinder structure, and horizon and photon-ring polarization. Current Event Horizon Telescope observations constrain magnetic-field geometry, variability, source orientation, magnetic flux state, and aspects of the disk-jet connection more robustly than they constrain spin magnitude or sense. Future observing and modeling programs should prioritize combinations of polarimetric diagnostics with complementary systematics and test whether a common spin-dependent interpretation is supported across independent data products and plausible source models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.14218 by Andrew Chael, Daniel C. M. Palumbo, George N. Wong, Zachary Gelles.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Representative ray-traced GRMHD images of highly magnetized accretion flows for five different spins, blurred with a 15 µas Gaussian to simulate EHT resolution. The grayscale background encodes total intensity, tick directions denote the EVPA, and tick color gives the local linear-polarization fraction. The five models hint at a relationship between the polarimetric ob￾servables and the black hole spin and… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic path from near-horizon magnetic fields to an observed polarized image. The local synchrotron polarization is determined by the magnetic field geometry in the emitting plasma, but relativistic propagation, parallel transport, and Faraday effects can rotate or depolarize the signal, so the observed EVPA pattern is a processed signature of the source rather than a direct magnetic-field map. Here we … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Annular polarization modes used in the βm decomposition. The left panel shows pure azimuthal modes of P = Q + iU, and the right panel shows the special case m = 2 for several phases of β2. Radial, azimuthal, and handed spiral EVPA patterns are distinguished mainly by arg(β2) for a nearly face-on ring. Figure reproduced with permission from [55]. The βm coefficients are image-domain summaries rather than ra… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Radial evolution of EVPA morphology in nearly face-on jet models. The curves show arg(β2) measured as a function of impact parameter b in units of rg for low- and high-spin cases. Large swings occur where the counterjet fades, where the magnetic field becomes azimuthally dominated near the light cylinder, and where the flow approaches its terminal Lorentz factor; the light-cylinder swing is the feature mos… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Near-horizon EVPA pattern predicted by the horizon-limit formula. The color maps show χ/π on the observer screen for a rapidly spinning black hole viewed at θo = 60◦ , with curves marking image tracks for several emission latitudes. Reproduced with permission from [125]. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies1010000 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Time-averaged decomposition of a simulated polarized image into the direct image (n = 0), the first lensed subimage (n = 1), and the full image, together with the corresponding visibility￾domain spiral phase. The figure illustrates how long-baseline polarimetry can distinguish signal in the direct image from signal due to the photon subring contributions. Reproduced with permission from Palumbo et al. [80]… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Event Horizon Telescope polarimetric images of M87* and Sgr A* from the 2017 observations. The background grayscale maps show total intensity, line segments show EVPA, and segment color gives the resolved linear polarization fraction. Both sources show compact ring-like emission with organized linear polarization, but their polarization fractions, variability, and source-model interpretations differ [18,24… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison between EHT constraints on arg(β2) and semianalytic model predictions from Wong et al. [56]. The purple bands show the BHP II stationary inflow model as a function of prograde spin, the gray distributions show GRMHD image results at discrete spins, and the horizontal bands show EHT measurements for M87* and derotated Sgr A*. Within this model family and its assumptions about emission geometry an… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

159 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Gravitational Field of a Spinning Mass as an Example of Algebraically Special Metrics.Physical Review Letters1963, 11, 237–238

    Kerr, R.P . Gravitational Field of a Spinning Mass as an Example of Algebraically Special Metrics.Physical Review Letters1963, 11, 237–238. ADS Bibcode: 1963PhRvL..11..237K, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.11.237

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.11.237

  2. [2]

    Testing the No-hair Theorem with Observations in the Electromagnetic Spectrum

    Johannsen, T.; Psaltis, D. Testing the No-hair Theorem with Observations in the Electromagnetic Spectrum. II. Black Hole Images. The Astrophysical Journal2010,718, 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/718/1/446

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/718/1/446

  3. [3]

    Stationary Black Holes: Uniqueness and Beyond.Living Rev

    Chrusciel, P .T.; Lopes Costa, J.; Heusler, M. Stationary Black Holes: Uniqueness and Beyond.Living Rev. Rel.2012,15, 7. _eprint: 1205.6112, https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-2012-7

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  4. [4]

    Astrophysical processes near black holes.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics1975,13, 381–422

    Eardley, D.M.; Press, W.H. Astrophysical processes near black holes.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics1975,13, 381–422. ADS Bibcode: 1975ARA&A..13..381E, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.aa.13.090175.002121

    arXiv

  5. [5]

    Rotating Black Holes: Locally Nonrotating Frames, Energy Extraction, and Scalar Synchrotron Radiation.The Astrophysical Journal1972,178, 347–370

    Bardeen, J.M.; Press, W.H.; Teukolsky, S.A. Rotating Black Holes: Locally Nonrotating Frames, Energy Extraction, and Scalar Synchrotron Radiation.The Astrophysical Journal1972,178, 347–370. https://doi.org/10.1086/151796

    doi:10.1086/151796

  6. [6]

    Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society1977,179, 433–456

    Blandford, R.D.; Znajek, R.L. Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society1977,179, 433–456. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/179.3.433

    doi:10.1093/mnras/179.3.433

  7. [7]

    Black hole electrodynamics and the Carter tetrad.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society1977,179, 457–472

    Znajek, R.L. Black hole electrodynamics and the Carter tetrad.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society1977,179, 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/179.3.457

    doi:10.1093/mnras/179.3.457

  8. [8]

    A Measurement of the Electromagnetic Luminosity of a Kerr Black Hole.The Astrophysical Journal 2004,611, 977–995

    McKinney, J.C.; Gammie, C.F. A Measurement of the Electromagnetic Luminosity of a Kerr Black Hole.The Astrophysical Journal 2004,611, 977–995. ADS Bibcode: 2004ApJ...611..977M, https://doi.org/10.1086/422244

    doi:10.1086/422244 2004

  9. [9]

    McKinney, J.C. General relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the jet formation and large-scale propagation from black hole accretion systems.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2006,368, 1561–1582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.13 65-2966.2006.10256.x

    arXiv 2006

  10. [10]

    Efficient generation of jets from magnetically arrested accretion on a rapidly spinning black hole.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2011,418, L79–L83

    Tchekhovskoy, A.; Narayan, R.; McKinney, J.C. Efficient generation of jets from magnetically arrested accretion on a rapidly spinning black hole.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2011,418, L79–L83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.20 11.01147.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.20

  11. [11]

    Growing supermassive black holes by chaotic accretion.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2006,373, L90–L92

    King, A.R.; Pringle, J.E. Growing supermassive black holes by chaotic accretion.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2006,373, L90–L92. ADS Bibcode: 2006MNRAS.373L..90K, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2006.00249.x

    arXiv 2006

  12. [12]

    Formation of supermassive black holes.Astronomy and Astrophysics Review2010,18, 279–315

    Volonteri, M. Formation of supermassive black holes.Astronomy and Astrophysics Review2010,18, 279–315. ADS Bibcode: 2010A&ARv..18..279V , https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-010-0029-x

    doi:10.1007/s00159-010-0029-x

  13. [14]

    Insights into the astrophysics of supermassive black hole binaries from pulsar timing observations.Classical and Quantum Gravity2013,30, 224014

    Sesana, A. Insights into the astrophysics of supermassive black hole binaries from pulsar timing observations.Classical and Quantum Gravity2013,30, 224014. ADS Bibcode: 2013CQGra..30v4014S, https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/30/22/224014

    doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/22/224014

  14. [15]

    Observational Constraints on Black Hole Spin.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics2021,59, 117–154

    Reynolds, C.S. Observational Constraints on Black Hole Spin.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics2021,59, 117–154. ADS Bibcode: 2021ARA&A..59..117R, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-112420-035022

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-112420-035022

  15. [16]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Baczko, A.K.; Ball, D.; Balokovi´ c, M.; Barrett, J.; et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole.The Astrophysical Journal2019,875, L1. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 2041

  16. [17]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Baczko, A.K.; Ball, D.; Balokovi´ c, M.; Barrett, J.; et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring.The Astrophysical Journal2019,875, L5. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab0f43

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0f43 2041

  17. [18]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Algaba, J.C.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Anantua, R.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Baczko, A.K.; Ball, D.; et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VII. Polarization of the Ring.The Astrophysical Journal 2021,910, L12. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abe71d

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abe71d 2021

  18. [19]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Algaba, J.C.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Anantua, R.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Baczko, A.K.; Ball, D.; et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VIII. Magnetic Field Structure near The Event Horizon. The Astrophysical Journal2021,910, L13. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abe4de

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abe4de 2041

  19. [20]

    The persistent shadow of the supermassive black hole of M 87

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Algaba, J.C.; Anantua, R.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Bach, U.; Baczko, A.K.; et al. The persistent shadow of the supermassive black hole of M 87. I. Observations, calibration, imaging, and analysis.Astronomy and Astrophysics2024,681, A79. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347932

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347932

  20. [21]

    Horizon-scale variability of M87* from 2017–2021 EHT observations.Astronomy & Astrophysics2025

    The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Albentosa-Ruíz, E.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Carlos Algaba, J.; Anantua, R.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Bach, U.; et al. Horizon-scale variability of M87* from 2017–2021 EHT observations.Astronomy & Astrophysics2025. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202555855

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555855 2017

  21. [22]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Algaba, J.C.; Anantua, R.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Bach, U.; Baczko, A.K.; et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way.The Astrophysical Journal2022,930, L12. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8...

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674 2041

  22. [23]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Algaba, J.C.; Anantua, R.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Bach, U.; Baczko, A.K.; et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Testing Astrophysical Models of the Galactic Center Black Hole.The Astrophysical Journal2022,930, L16. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac6672

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6672 2041

  23. [24]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Algaba, J.C.; Anantua, R.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Bach, U.; Baczko, A.K.; et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VII. Polarization of the Ring.The Astrophysical Journal2024,964, L25. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad2df0

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad2df0 2041

  24. [25]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Algaba, J.C.; Anantua, R.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Bach, U.; Baczko, A.K.; et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VIII. Physical Interpretation of the Polarized Ring. The Astrophysical Journal2024,964, L26. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad2df1

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad2df1 2041

  25. [26]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

    Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adhikari, N.; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V .B.; Affeldt, C.; Agarwal, D.; et al. GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run. Physical Review X2023,13, 041039. ADS Bibcode: 2023PhRvX..13d1039A, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041039

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041039

  26. [27]

    Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3.Physical Review X2023, 13, 011048

    Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adhikari, N.; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V .B.; Affeldt, C.; Agarwal, D.; et al. Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3.Physical Review X2023, 13, 011048. ADS Bibcode: 2023PhRvX..13a1048A, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011048

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.011048

  27. [28]

    The first decade of gravitational-wave measurements of black hole spins, 2026

    Biscoveanu, S. The first decade of gravitational-wave measurements of black hole spins, 2026. ADS Bibcode: 2026arXiv260606209B, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.06209

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.06209 2026

  28. [29]

    The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Constraints on Supermassive Black Hole Binaries from the Gravitational-wave Background.The Astrophysical Journal2023,952, L37

    Agazie, G.; Anumarlapudi, A.; Archibald, A.M.; Baker, P .T.; Bécsy, B.; Blecha, L.; Bonilla, A.; Brazier, A.; Brook, P .R.; Burke-Spolaor, S.; et al. The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Constraints on Supermassive Black Hole Binaries from the Gravitational-wave Background.The Astrophysical Journal2023,952, L37. ADS Bibcode: 2023ApJ...952L..37A, https://doi.org/1...

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ 2041

  29. [30]

    The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background.The Astrophysical Journal 2023,951, L8

    Agazie, G.; Anumarlapudi, A.; Archibald, A.M.; Arzoumanian, Z.; Baker, P .T.; Bécsy, B.; Blecha, L.; Brazier, A.; Brook, P .R.; Burke-Spolaor, S.; et al. The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background.The Astrophysical Journal 2023,951, L8. ADS Bibcode: 2023ApJ...951L...8A, https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acdac6

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acdac6 2023

  30. [32]

    The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array

    EPTA Collaboration.; InPTA Collaboration.; Antoniadis, J.; Arumugam, P .; Arumugam, S.; Babak, S.; Bagchi, M.; Bak Nielsen, A.S.; Bassa, C.G.; Bathula, A.; et al. The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array. IV. Implications for massive black holes, dark matter, and the early Universe.Astronomy and Astrophysics2024,685, A94. ADS Bibcode:...

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347433

  31. [33]

    Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array.The Astrophysical Journal2023, 951, L6

    Reardon, D.J.; Zic, A.; Shannon, R.M.; Hobbs, G.B.; Bailes, M.; Di Marco, V .; Kapur, A.; Rogers, A.F.; Thrane, E.; Askew, J.; et al. Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array.The Astrophysical Journal2023, 951, L6. ADS Bibcode: 2023ApJ...951L...6R, https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acdd02

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acdd02 2041

  32. [34]

    Comparing Recent Pulsar Timing Array Results on the Nanohertz Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background

    Agazie, G.; Antoniadis, J.; Anumarlapudi, A.; Archibald, A.M.; Arumugam, P .; Arumugam, S.; Arzoumanian, Z.; Askew, J.; Babak, S.; Bagchi, M.; et al. Comparing Recent Pulsar Timing Array Results on the Nanohertz Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background. The Astrophysical Journal2024,966, 105. ADS Bibcode: 2024ApJ...966..105A, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-...

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad36be

  33. [35]

    Publication Title: Measuring the Angular Momentum of Supermassive Black Holes ADS Bibcode: 2013mams.book.....B, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7771-6

    Brenneman, L.Measuring the Angular Momentum of Supermassive Black Holes; 2013. Publication Title: Measuring the Angular Momentum of Supermassive Black Holes ADS Bibcode: 2013mams.book.....B, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7771-6

    doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7771-6 2013

  34. [36]

    Black Hole Spin via Continuum Fitting and the Role of Spin in Powering Transient Jets

    McClintock, J.E.; Narayan, R.; Steiner, J.F. Black Hole Spin via Continuum Fitting and the Role of Spin in Powering Transient Jets. Space Science Reviews2014,183, 295–322. ADS Bibcode: 2014SSRv..183..295M, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-013-0003-9

    doi:10.1007/s11214-013-0003-9

  35. [37]

    Stellar-Mass Black Hole Spin Constraints from Disk Reflection and Continuum Modeling.The Astrophysical Journal2009,697, 900–912

    Miller, J.M.; Reynolds, C.S.; Fabian, A.C.; Miniutti, G.; Gallo, L.C. Stellar-Mass Black Hole Spin Constraints from Disk Reflection and Continuum Modeling.The Astrophysical Journal2009,697, 900–912. ADS Bibcode: 2009ApJ...697..900M, https://doi.org/10.1 088/0004-637X/697/1/900

  36. [38]

    Towards Precision Measurements of Accreting Black Holes Using X-Ray Reflection Spectroscopy.Space Science Reviews2021, 217, 65

    Bambi, C.; Brenneman, L.W.; Dauser, T.; García, J.A.; Grinberg, V .; Ingram, A.; Jiang, J.; Liu, H.; Lohfink, A.M.; Marinucci, A.; et al. Towards Precision Measurements of Accreting Black Holes Using X-Ray Reflection Spectroscopy.Space Science Reviews2021, 217, 65. ADS Bibcode: 2021SSRv..217...65B, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-021-00841-8

    doi:10.1007/s11214-021-00841-8

  37. [39]

    Spin Demographics of Active Supermassive Black Holes: Updated Estimates from X-Ray Reflection and Future Opportunities.Galaxies 2026,14, 50

    Sisk-Reynés, J.M.; Reynolds, C.S.; Matthews, J.H.; Walton, D.J.; Piotrowska, J.M.; Steiner, J.F.; García, J.A.; Ricarte, A. Spin Demographics of Active Supermassive Black Holes: Updated Estimates from X-Ray Reflection and Future Opportunities.Galaxies 2026,14, 50. ADS Bibcode: 2026Galax..14...50S, https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies14030050

    work page doi:10.3390/galaxies14030050 2026

  38. [40]

    The Imaging X-Ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE): Pre-Launch.Journal of Astronomical T elescopes, Instruments, and Systems2022,8, 026002

    Weisskopf, M.C.; Soffitta, P .; Baldini, L.; Ramsey, B.D.; O’Dell, S.L.; Romani, R.W.; Matt, G.; Deininger, W.D.; Baumgartner, W.H.; Bellazzini, R.; et al. The Imaging X-Ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE): Pre-Launch.Journal of Astronomical T elescopes, Instruments, and Systems2022,8, 026002. ADS Bibcode: 2022JATIS...8b6002W, https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JATIS....

    doi:10.1117/1.jatis.8.2.026002

  39. [41]

    How Spatially Resolved Polarimetry Informs Black Hole Accretion Flow Models.Galaxies2023,11, 5

    Ricarte, A.; Johnson, M.D.; Kovalev, Y.Y.; Palumbo, D.C.M.; Emami, R. How Spatially Resolved Polarimetry Informs Black Hole Accretion Flow Models.Galaxies2023,11, 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies11010005

    doi:10.3390/galaxies11010005

  40. [42]

    Polarization Signatures from GRMHD Simulations of Black Hole Accretion

    Fragile, P .C.; Wielgus, M.; Prather, C. Polarization Signatures from GRMHD Simulations of Black Hole Accretion, 2026. ADS Bibcode: 2026arXiv260515166F, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.15166

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.15166 2026

  41. [43]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Algaba, J.C.; Anantua, R.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Bach, U.; Baczko, A.K.; et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. Testing the Black Hole Metric.The Astrophysical Journal2022,930, L17. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac6756

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6756 2041

  42. [44]

    The persistent shadow of the supermassive black hole of M87: II

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Albentosa-Ruíz, E.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Algaba, J.C.; Anantua, R.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Bach, U.; et al. The persistent shadow of the supermassive black hole of M87: II. Model comparisons and theoretical interpretations.Astronomy and Astrophysics2025,693, A265. ADS Bibcode: 2025A&A...693A.265E, htt...

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451296

  43. [45]

    PATOKA: Simulating Electromagnetic Observables of Black Hole Accretion.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series2022, 259, 64

    Wong, G.N.; Prather, C.; Dhruv, V .; Ryan, B.R.; Mo´ scibrodzka, M.; Chan, C.k.; Joshi, A.V .; Yarza, R.; Ricarte, A.; Shiokawa, H.; et al. PATOKA: Simulating Electromagnetic Observables of Black Hole Accretion.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series2022, 259, 64. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ac582e

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac582e

  44. [46]

    Chael, A. Survey of radiative, two-temperature magnetically arrested simulations of the black hole M87* I: turbulent electron heating.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2025,537, 2496–2515. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf200

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staf200

  45. [47]

    A Survey of General Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamic Models for Black Hole Accretion Systems.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series2025,277, 16

    Dhruv, V .; Prather, C.; Wong, G.N.; Gammie, C.F. A Survey of General Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamic Models for Black Hole Accretion Systems.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series2025,277, 16. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/adaea6

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/adaea6

  46. [48]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Algaba, J.C.; Anantua, R.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Bach, U.; Baczko, A.K.; et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IX. Detection of Near-horizon Circular Polarization.The Astrophysical Journal2023,957, L20. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acff70

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acff70 2041

  47. [49]

    AthenaK: A Performance-portable Version of the Athena++ Adaptive Mesh Refinement Framework.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series2026,283, 27

    Stone, J.M.; Mullen, P .D.; Fielding, D.; Grete, P .; Guo, M.; Kempski, P .; Most, E.R.; White, C.J.; Wong, G.N. AthenaK: A Performance-portable Version of the Athena++ Adaptive Mesh Refinement Framework.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series2026,283, 27. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ae3717

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae3717

  48. [50]

    Mass Transport, Turbulent Mixing, and Inflow in Black Hole Accretion.The Astrophysical Journal2025,995, 119

    Wong, G.N.; Medeiros, L.; Stone, J.M. Mass Transport, Turbulent Mixing, and Inflow in Black Hole Accretion.The Astrophysical Journal2025,995, 119. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae14fd

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae14fd

  49. [51]

    Magnetically Arrested Disk: an Energetically Efficient Accretion Flow

    Narayan, R.; Igumenshchev, I.V .; Abramowicz, M.A. Magnetically Arrested Disk: an Energetically Efficient Accretion Flow. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan2003,55, L69–L72. https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/55.6.L69

    doi:10.1093/pasj/55.6.l69

  50. [52]

    General relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations of magnetically choked accretion flows around black holes.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2012,423, 3083–3117

    McKinney, J.C.; Tchekhovskoy, A.; Blandford, R.D. General relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations of magnetically choked accretion flows around black holes.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2012,423, 3083–3117. https: //doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21074.x

    arXiv 2012

  51. [53]

    What really makes an accretion disc MAD.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2022,511, 2040–2051

    Begelman, M.C.; Scepi, N.; Dexter, J. What really makes an accretion disc MAD.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2022,511, 2040–2051. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3790

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3790 2022

  52. [54]

    Black Hole Polarimetry I

    Chael, A.; Lupsasca, A.; Wong, G.N.; Quataert, E. Black Hole Polarimetry I. A Signature of Electromagnetic Energy Extraction. The Astrophysical Journal2023,958, 65. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acf92d

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf92d

  53. [55]

    Discriminating Accretion States via Rotational Symmetry in Simulated Polarimetric Images of M87.The Astrophysical Journal2020,894, 156

    Palumbo, D.C.M.; Wong, G.N.; Prather, C. Discriminating Accretion States via Rotational Symmetry in Simulated Polarimetric Images of M87.The Astrophysical Journal2020,894, 156. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab86ac

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab86ac

  54. [56]

    Black Hole Polarimetry

    Wong, G.N.; Chael, A.; Lupsasca, A.; Quataert, E. Black Hole Polarimetry. II. The Connection between Spin and Polarization.The Astrophysical Journal2026,997, 113. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae20f3

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae20f3

  55. [57]

    Signatures of Black Hole Spin and Plasma Acceleration in Jet Polarimetry.The Astrophysical Journal2025,981, 204

    Gelles, Z.; Chael, A.; Quataert, E. Signatures of Black Hole Spin and Plasma Acceleration in Jet Polarimetry.The Astrophysical Journal2025,981, 204. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adb1aa

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb1aa

  56. [58]

    Signatures of Black Hole Spin and Plasma Acceleration in Jet Polarimetry

    Gelles, Z.; Chael, A.; Quataert, E. Signatures of Black Hole Spin and Plasma Acceleration in Jet Polarimetry. II. Off-axis Jets.The Astrophysical Journal2026,1001, 206. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae5223

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae5223

  57. [59]

    Universal polarimetric signatures of the black hole photon ring

    Himwich, E.; Johnson, M.D.; Lupsasca, A.; Strominger, A. Universal polarimetric signatures of the black hole photon ring. Physical Review D2020,101, 084020. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.084020

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.084020

  58. [60]

    Photon Ring Symmetries in Simulated Linear Polarization Images of Messier 87*.The Astrophysical Journal2022,929, 49

    Palumbo, D.C.M.; Wong, G.N. Photon Ring Symmetries in Simulated Linear Polarization Images of Messier 87*.The Astrophysical Journal2022,929, 49. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac59b4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac59b4

  59. [61]

    Hot Accretion Flows Around Black Holes.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics2014,52, 529–588

    Yuan, F.; Narayan, R. Hot Accretion Flows Around Black Holes.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics2014,52, 529–588. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141003

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141003

  60. [62]

    Numerical Calculation of Magnetobremsstrahlung Emission and Absorption Coefficients

    Leung, P .K.; Gammie, C.F.; Noble, S.C. Numerical Calculation of Magnetobremsstrahlung Emission and Absorption Coefficients. The Astrophysical Journal2011,737, 21. ADS Bibcode: 2011ApJ...737...21L, https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/737/1/21

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/737/1/21

  61. [63]

    Understanding radio polarimetry

    Hamaker, J.P .; Bregman, J.D. Understanding radio polarimetry. III. Interpreting the IAU/IEEE definitions of the Stokes parameters. Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series1996,117, 161–165. ADS Bibcode: 1996A&AS..117..161H

  62. [64]

    Publication Title: A Wiley-Interscience Publication ADS Bibcode: 1979rpa..book.....R

    Rybicki, G.B.; Lightman, A.P .Radiative processes in astrophysics; 1979. Publication Title: A Wiley-Interscience Publication ADS Bibcode: 1979rpa..book.....R. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies1010000 Galaxies2026,1, 0 29 of 33

    doi:10.3390/galaxies1010000 1979

  63. [65]

    Propagation Effects in Magnetized Transrelativistic Plasmas.The Astrophysical Journal2008,688, 695–700

    Shcherbakov, R.V . Propagation Effects in Magnetized Transrelativistic Plasmas.The Astrophysical Journal2008,688, 695–700. ADS Bibcode: 2008ApJ...688..695S, https://doi.org/10.1086/592326

    work page doi:10.1086/592326

  64. [66]

    General relativistic polarized radiative transfer: building a dynamics-observations interface

    Shcherbakov, R.V .; Huang, L. General relativistic polarized radiative transfer: building a dynamics-observations interface. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2011,410, 1052–1063. ADS Bibcode: 2011MNRAS.410.1052S, https://doi.org/10.1 111/j.1365-2966.2010.17502.x

    arXiv 2010

  65. [67]

    A public code for general relativistic, polarised radiative transfer around spinning black holes.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2016,462, 115–136

    Dexter, J. A public code for general relativistic, polarised radiative transfer around spinning black holes.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2016,462, 115–136. ADS Bibcode: 2016MNRAS.462..115D, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1526

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1526

  66. [68]

    Polarized Synchrotron Emissivities and Absorptivities for Relativistic Thermal, Power-law, and Kappa Distribution Functions.The Astrophysical Journal2016,822, 34

    Pandya, A.; Zhang, Z.; Chandra, M.; Gammie, C.F. Polarized Synchrotron Emissivities and Absorptivities for Relativistic Thermal, Power-law, and Kappa Distribution Functions.The Astrophysical Journal2016,822, 34. ADS Bibcode: 2016ApJ...822...34P , https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/822/1/34

    doi:10.3847/0004-637x/822/1/34

  67. [69]

    Updated Transfer Coefficients for Magnetized Plasmas.The Astrophysical Journal2021,921, 17

    Marszewski, A.; Prather, C.; Joshi, A.V .; Pandya, A.; Gammie, C.F. Updated Transfer Coefficients for Magnetized Plasmas.The Astrophysical Journal2021,921, 17. ADS Bibcode: 2021ApJ...921...17M, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac1b28

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1b28

  68. [70]

    Comparison of Polarized Radiative Transfer Codes Used by the EHT Collaboration.The Astrophysical Journal2023,950, 35

    Prather, C.; Dexter, J.; Moscibrodzka, M.; Pu, H.Y.; Bronzwaer, T.; Davelaar, J.; Younsi, Z.; Gammie, C.F.; Gold, R.; Wong, G.N.; et al. Comparison of Polarized Radiative Transfer Codes Used by the EHT Collaboration.The Astrophysical Journal2023,950, 35. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acc586

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc586

  69. [71]

    Black hole magnetic fields and their imprint on circular polarization images.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2021,505, 523–539

    Ricarte, A.; Qiu, R.; Narayan, R. Black hole magnetic fields and their imprint on circular polarization images.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2021,505, 523–539. ADS Bibcode: 2021MNRAS.505..523R, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1289

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1289

  70. [72]

    Circular Polarization of Simulated Images of Black Holes.The Astrophysical Journal2024,972, 135

    Joshi, A.V .; Prather, C.; Chan, C.k.; Wielgus, M.; Gammie, C.F. Circular Polarization of Simulated Images of Black Holes.The Astrophysical Journal2024,972, 135. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad5b51

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5b51

  71. [73]

    The internal Faraday screen of Sagittarius A*.Astronomy and Astrophysics2024,682, A97

    Wielgus, M.; Issaoun, S.; Martí-Vidal, I.; Emami, R.; Moscibrodzka, M.; Brinkerink, C.D.; Goddi, C.; Fomalont, E. The internal Faraday screen of Sagittarius A*.Astronomy and Astrophysics2024,682, A97. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347772

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347772

  72. [74]

    The Polarized Image of a Synchrotron-emitting Ring of Gas Orbiting a Black Hole.The Astrophysical Journal2021, 912, 35

    Narayan, R.; Palumbo, D.C.M.; Johnson, M.D.; Gelles, Z.; Himwich, E.; Chang, D.O.; Ricarte, A.; Dexter, J.; Gammie, C.F.; Chael, A.A.; et al. The Polarized Image of a Synchrotron-emitting Ring of Gas Orbiting a Black Hole.The Astrophysical Journal2021, 912, 35. ADS Bibcode: 2021ApJ...912...35N, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abf117

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf117

  73. [75]

    Polarized image of equatorial emission in the Kerr geometry.Physical Review D2021,104, 044060

    Gelles, Z.; Himwich, E.; Johnson, M.D.; Palumbo, D.C.M. Polarized image of equatorial emission in the Kerr geometry.Physical Review D2021,104, 044060. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.044060

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.044060

  74. [76]

    Unraveling Twisty Linear Polarization Morphologies in Black Hole Images.The Astrophysical Journal2023,950, 38

    Emami, R.; Ricarte, A.; Wong, G.N.; Palumbo, D.; Chang, D.; Doeleman, S.S.; Broderick, A.E.; Narayan, R.; Wielgus, M.; Blackburn, L.; et al. Unraveling Twisty Linear Polarization Morphologies in Black Hole Images.The Astrophysical Journal2023,950, 38. ADS Bibcode: 2023ApJ...950...38E, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acc8cd

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc8cd

  75. [77]

    Supermassive Black Hole Spin Constraints from Polarimetry in an Equatorial Disk Model.The Astrophysical Journal2025,978, L4

    Palumbo, D.C.M. Supermassive Black Hole Spin Constraints from Polarimetry in an Equatorial Disk Model.The Astrophysical Journal2025,978, L4. ADS Bibcode: 2025ApJ...978L...4P , https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad9bb4

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad9bb4 2041

  76. [78]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.; Akiyama, K.; Alberdi, A.; Alef, W.; Asada, K.; Azulay, R.; Baczko, A.K.; Ball, D.; Balokovi´ c, M.; Barrett, J.; et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. III. Data Processing and Calibration.The Astrophysical Journal2019,875, L3. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab0c57

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0c57 2041

  77. [79]

    Calibration of mixed-polarization interferometric observations

    Martí-Vidal, I.; Roy, A.; Conway, J.; Zensus, A.J. Calibration of mixed-polarization interferometric observations. Tools for the reduction of interferometric data from elements with linear and circular polarization receivers.Astronomy and Astrophysics2016, 587, A143. ADS Bibcode: 2016A&A...587A.143M, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526063

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526063

  78. [80]

    Demonstrating Photon Ring Existence with Single-baseline Polarimetry

    Palumbo, D.C.M.; Wong, G.N.; Chael, A.; Johnson, M.D. Demonstrating Photon Ring Existence with Single-baseline Polarimetry. The Astrophysical Journal2023,952, L31. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ace630

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ace630 2041

  79. [81]

    Polarization features of X-ray radiation emitted near black holes.The Astrophysical Journal 1980,235, 224–244

    Connors, P .A.; Piran, T.; Stark, R.F. Polarization features of X-ray radiation emitted near black holes.The Astrophysical Journal 1980,235, 224–244. ADS Bibcode: 1980ApJ...235..224C, https://doi.org/10.1086/157627

    work page doi:10.1086/157627 1980

  80. [82]

    The Accretion of Matter by a Collapsing Star in the Presence of a Magnetic Field

    Bisnovatyi-Kogan, G.S.; Ruzmaikin, A.A. The Accretion of Matter by a Collapsing Star in the Presence of a Magnetic Field. Astrophysics and Space Science1974,28, 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00642237

    doi:10.1007/bf00642237

Showing first 80 references.