Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Statistical Consequences of Dueling Bandits

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.00870 v1 pith:GCSALMGW submitted 2021-10-16 cs.LG math.STstat.TH

classification cs.LGmath.STstat.TH
keywords duelingbanditalgorithmsbanditsframeworkstatisticalunderadaptive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multi-Armed-Bandit frameworks have often been used by researchers to assess educational interventions, however, recent work has shown that it is more beneficial for a student to provide qualitative feedback through preference elicitation between different alternatives, making a dueling bandits framework more appropriate. In this paper, we explore the statistical quality of data under this framework by comparing traditional uniform sampling to a dueling bandit algorithm and find that dueling bandit algorithms perform well at cumulative regret minimisation, but lead to inflated Type-I error rates and reduced power under certain circumstances. Through these results we provide insight into the challenges and opportunities in using dueling bandit algorithms to run adaptive experiments.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools