Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 52 references

Superfluid helium

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that the sharp transition between normal liquid helium-4 and its superfluid phase can be reproduced by a mathematically solvable toy model of random graphs, with the two phases distinguished by a symmetry-based order…

desk verdict Rigorous graphon toy model, but the helium analogy leans on a false claim that the He I/He II transition is discontinuous. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05354 v1 pith:GDCXEVK4 submitted 2026-08-05 cond-mat.stat-mech math-phmath.MP

Charles Radin This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MP MSC 82B2605C8060F10
keywords superfluidhelium-4edge/trianglerandomgraphmodelgraphonsphasetransitionsorderparameterHeI/HeIItransitionentropymaximizationlargedeviations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the normal-to-superfluid transition of helium-4 can be reproduced by a toy model made of random graphs with two constrained densities. The model assigns each possible graph a volume of edges and a triangle energy, and asks which graph structures maximize entropy at fixed edge density $\varepsilon$ and triangle density $\tau$. In the infinite-size limit, three proven phase regions are identified with helium gas, normal liquid He I, and superfluid He II. The paper's central result is that the He I and He II regions are distinguished by a symmetry difference in the entropy-maximizing graph structure, giving a rigorous order parameter for the transition. The author presents the model as a mathematical tool for superfluidity analogous to what the Ising model provided for gas/liquid condensation.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the graphon limit of the edge/triangle model: large graphs on $n$ vertices are represented by symmetric measurable functions $g(x,y)$ on the unit square, with edge density $\varepsilon=\int g$ and triangle density $\tau=\int g(x,y)g(x,z)g(y,z)\,dx\,dy\,dz$, and the entropy per pair of vertices is the logarithm of the number of graphs with those densities. The relevant phases are bipodal graphons built from two constant blocks, whose structure is determined by optimizing this entropy. The decisive mechanism is the proven difference in symmetry between the bipodal optimizer in $B(1,1)$ and the symmetric bipodal optimizer in $A(2,0)$: because the two families cannot be analytically continued into one another, the symmetry itself serves as the order parameter. The scallop regions at the bottom of the phase diagram play a supporting role, illustrating graphon phases of increasingly complex symmetry that the paper suggests as an analogy to the degeneracy that makes crystallinity unsuitable as a melting order parameter.

What would settle it

Compute the entropy-maximizing graphons numerically on a fine grid of $(\varepsilon,\tau)$ in the regions labelled $A(2,0)$ and $B(1,1)$: if any interior point in $A(2,0)$ has a nonsymmetric optimizer, or any point in $B(1,1)$ has a symmetric optimizer, the order-parameter claim as stated would be refuted. For the physical identification, a second check is to endow $\varepsilon$ and $\tau$ with a quantitative relation to helium's pressure and temperature; the analogy fails if the model's $B(1,1)$/$A(2,0)$ boundary does not track the measured He I/He II transition line under that mapping.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a sharp phase transition between normal liquid He I and superfluid He II emerges in the edge/triangle graph model, with no critical point, and that the two phases are separated by an order parameter based on symmetry rather than on local structure. For fixed edge density $\varepsilon$ and triangle density $\tau$, the equilibrium state is the graphon maximizing the entropy per pair of vertices. In the region labelled $A(2,0)$, the maximizing graphon is symmetric under the interchange of the two graphon blocks; in the adjacent region $B(1,1)$, it is nonsymmetric. The paper cites the proof that these two graphons cannot be analytic continuations of one another, so the symmetry difference is an essential, nonlocal order parameter. The paper then identifies $F(1,1)$ with helium gas, $B(1,1)$ with He I, and $A(2,0)$ with He II, and argues this gives the mathematical structure needed to analyze the superfluid transition.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a uniform random choice among all graphs with fixed edge and triangle counts behaves enough like a dense liquid of helium atoms that its high-entropy limit phases can be labelled helium gas, He I, and He II; the paper does not supply a helium-specific Hamiltonian, a length scale, or a quantitative map from the graph parameters to temperature and pressure.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The He I/He II transition can be modeled as a sharp transition without a critical point, governed by a symmetry order parameter rather than by a local density.
  • The order parameter is global: it is the symmetry class of the limiting graphon, so it distinguishes phases even when local correlations look similar.
  • The same infinite-size formalism provides a rigorous, solvable benchmark for discontinuous transitions in systems with long-range, mean-field interactions.
  • The comparison with the scallop hierarchy explains why crystallinity has not yielded an order parameter for melting: translation symmetry is degenerate under arbitrarily large unit cells.
  • The model suggests how a symmetry-based order parameter could be obtained for superfluid helium-4, paralleling the role the Ising model played for continuous transitions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, a finite-$n$ prediction can be extracted: if the graphon symmetry difference is the right order parameter, then in large finite graphs the fraction of entropy-maximizing configurations with the wrong symmetry should vanish at a rate controlled by the entropy curvature; computing that rate would connect the toy model to finite helium samples.
  • A natural extension the paper does not pursue is a quantum graphon ensemble in which edges carry complex amplitudes rather than occupation bits; a phase in the optimizer would more literally realize the complex order parameter of superfluidity. This is an editorial inference, not a claim of the paper.
  • The scallop hierarchy suggests a classification principle the paper only gestures at: more complex podal structures correspond to more complicated unit cells in the analogous crystal problem, which could be developed into a quantitative measure of structural complexity for first-order transitions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a toy model for the superfluid transition of 4He based on the edge/triangle random graph model. It recalls the graphon limit theory of Lovász and Chatterjee–Varadhan and cites prior results on the phase regions A(2,0), B(1,1), and F(1,1) in the (ε, τ) phase diagram. The paper then asserts correspondences: F(1,1) is helium gas, B(1,1) is He I, and A(2,0) is He II. It further claims that the proved non-analytic continuation between the B(1,1) and A(2,0) graphons provides an order parameter for the helium superfluid transition, and it contrasts this with the melting transition. The intended contribution is a mathematically solvable analogue of the Ising model in which a symmetry-based order parameter emerges for a sharp phase transition.

Significance. The underlying graphon mathematics is rigorous and nontrivial, and the paper usefully presents a mean-field-style statistical mechanics problem in which the equilibrium states have a rich bipodal structure. The order-parameter idea based on symmetry difference between graphons is attractive and could interest the graph-limits community. However, the physical identification with helium is asserted rather than derived from a helium Hamiltonian or from helium data, and the characterization of the He I/He II transition as discontinuous is factually incorrect. Since the paper's central claim is that this is a model of superfluid helium, the physical interpretation is currently unsupported. The strengths are the published rigorous theorems [43, 46, 47, 48] and the clear pedagogical framing of the graphon entropy formalism.

major comments (3)
  1. [p.4, paragraph beginning 'For the condensation transition...'; p.9, paragraph beginning 'This is a convenient place...'] The paper repeatedly calls the He I/He II transition 'discontinuous' and groups it with melting. This is factually incorrect: in 4He the normal-to-superfluid transition is a continuous (second-order) lambda transition, with no latent heat, a diverging specific heat, and a continuously vanishing superfluid order parameter. This is not a cosmetic terminology issue: the proposed physical mapping rests on grouping the helium transition with the melting transition. Because the paper never determines whether the graphon B(1,1)-A(2,0) transition is first-order, continuous, or lambda-like, the identification of A(2,0) with He II is unsupported. At minimum, the author must derive the order of the graphon transition and reconcile it with the known lambda transition, or withdraw the helium identification.
  2. [p.6-8, model definition and mapping paragraph] The correspondence between graphon phases and helium phases is an unexplained postulate. The graph model has no helium-specific Hamiltonian, no interparticle potential, no length scale, no quantum dynamics, and no quantitative map from the edge and triangle densities (ε, τ) to physical variables such as temperature and pressure. The statement that the uniform measure over graphs with fixed energies is 'analogous to a microcanonical ensemble' does not establish relevance to a dense quantum liquid. Consequently, the central claim that the model describes superfluid helium is an act of labeling rather than a derived consequence; the paper should either provide a concrete derivation of the mapping or explicitly state that the helium application is purely illustrative.
  3. [p.9, paragraph 'It has also been proven...'] The inference from non-analytic continuation of graphons to an order parameter for a sharp phase transition is too quick. The cited result [46] establishes a difference in the structure of the optimizing graphons on the two sides of the phase boundary, but it does not by itself show that the limiting entropy as a function of (ε, τ) is nonanalytic at the boundary. A thermodynamic phase transition requires a nonanalyticity in an appropriate thermodynamic potential; the paper needs to identify that nonanalyticity and characterize its order. Without this, the phrase 'phase transition' is not justified by the mathematics presented.
minor comments (4)
  1. [p.8, mapping paragraph] The text 'B(1,1) the role of H I, and A(2,0) the role of H II' should read 'He I' and 'He II'; the current notation could be misread as atomic hydrogen.
  2. [Figure 1 and surrounding text] The phase diagram of 4He should cite a standard experimental source (for example, Wilks or Donnelly) and should label the lambda line; the current schematic caption is too vague to support the textual claims about the transition.
  3. [References] Reference [49] is given only as an arXiv identifier; please update it with a journal reference or DOI if it has been published.
  4. [Overall structure] The paper has no numbered sections or equations, which makes it difficult to refer to specific arguments; adding numbered sections would improve the presentation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the graphon-phase mathematics is independent of the helium labeling, and the cited order-parameter proof is a rigorous standalone result.

full rationale

The paper's chain is: define a uniform random graph ensemble constrained by edge and triangle densities, invoke the graphon large-deviation formalism, cite prior rigorous results characterizing entropy-optimizing graphons in the regions called A(2,0), B(1,1), and F(1,1), and then assign those regions the interpretive roles of He II, He I, and helium gas. The central order-parameter claim rests on the cited proof in [46] that the nonsymmetric B(1,1) graphon and the symmetric A(2,0) graphon cannot be analytic continuations of one another. That cited work is a parameter-free mathematical proof whose assumptions do not include the helium identification being made here, so under the review rules it counts as independent evidence rather than load-bearing self-citation. The helium assignment is explicitly a role-playing analogy ("In this toy model F(1,1) plays the role of the helium gas..."), not a fitted or predicted quantity, so no input is renamed as a prediction and no equation reduces to an input by construction. The paper's repeated description of the He I/He II transition as 'discontinuous' is a physics correctness concern, not a circularity concern, and does not affect the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central helium claim rests on the model definition itself, standard graphon large-deviation mathematics, the author's prior phase proofs, and an unvalidated assignment of graphon phases to helium phases. The first three are cited or standard; the fourth is an ad hoc mapping, and the fifth physical assumption is asserted without reference.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Uniform distribution over graphs with fixed edge and triangle densities defines the equilibrium ensemble.
    Model definition: 'We make the possible graphs G into random graphs by using the uniform distribution for given values of the energies, analogous to a microcanonical ensemble but with a long range interaction.'
  • standard math The large-deviation principle and graphon variational formulas determine infinite-size equilibrium states.
    Invoked via Lovasz [42] and Chatterjee/Varadhan [43]; the paper takes the mathematics as given.
  • standard math The phase structure of the edge/triangle model, including the A(2,0), B(1,1), and F(1,1) phases and bipodal optimizers, is correct.
    Rests on proofs in [46,47,48], which are cited but not reproduced in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper The graphon phases F(1,1), B(1,1), and A(2,0) correspond respectively to helium gas, He I, and He II.
    Assigned without derivation: 'In this toy model F(1,1) plays the role of the helium gas, B(1,1) the role of H I, and A(2,0) the role of H II.'
  • domain assumption The He I/He II transition is discontinuous and has no critical point.
    Stated in the paragraph on 'phase transitions without a critical point, discontinuous transitions, such as the liquid/solid, or He I/He II transition'; no experimental reference is given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Superfluid helium." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GDCXEVK4

@misc{pith2026260805354,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Superfluid helium},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GDCXEVK4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05354}
}
read the original abstract

We are interested in modelling superfluid helium-4, the common isotope of helium, of atomic number 4. We present a mathematically solvable toy model of the phase transition between the normal liquid and superfluid phases and use it to show how an order parameter might be obtained for the superfluid.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05354 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Highly simplified Pressure-Temperature phase diagram of 4He, showing the normal fluid (He I), the superfluid (He II), and the critical point within the fluid He I. Motivated by the experimental condensation of carbon dioxide gas by Andrews in the 1860’s [1], in particular the discovery of its critical point (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Highly simplified Pressure-Temperature phase diagram of carbon dioxide, emphasizing gas-liquid coexistence between the triple point and criti￾cal point. It also shows the solid/fluid transition, the other curve going through the triple point. V P point critical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. One isotherm (dark curve) of the highly simplified Pressure￾Volume-Temperature equation of state of carbon dioxide, the range of co￾existence indicated by the dashed curve. (Van der Waals’ equation of state incorrectly described gas-liquid coexistence, which is cor￾rectly represented by the horizontal line in a typical isotherm in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Razborov triangle, showing the possible values of edge and triangle densities. τ ε A(6, 0) A(5, 0) A(4, 0) A(3, 0) A(2, 0) B(1, 1) B(2, 1) B(3, 1) B(4, 1) C(4, 2) C(3, 2) C(2, 2) C(1, 2) F(1, 1) τ = ε 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Conjectured phases (2017) in the edge/triangle model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Structure of a bipodal graphon. x y 1/2 1/2 e − (e 3 − t)1/3 e + (e 3 − t)1/3 e − (e 3 − t)1/3 e + (e 3 − t)1/3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The symmetric A(2,0) graphon. There are three subregions of interest in this paper, open subsets of the regions labelled A(2,0), B(1,1) and F(1,1) in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [46]

    Neeman, C

    J. Neeman, C. Radin and L. Sadun, Existence of a symmetric bipodal phase in the edge-triangle model, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 57 (2024) 095003

    work page 2024

  2. [48]

    Kenyon, C

    R. Kenyon, C. Radin, K. Ren and L. Sadun, Bipodal structure in oversaturated random graphs, Int. Math. Res. Notices 2018(2016) 1009-1044

    work page 2016

  3. [1]

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London

    Thomas Andrews, The Bakerian Lecture: On the Continuity of the Gaseous and Liquid States of Matter. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 159: 575-590. (1869)

    work page

  4. [2]

    PhD thesis, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Van der Waals, JD (1873) Over de Continuiteit van den Gas- en Vloeistoftoestand (on the continuity of the gas and liquid state). PhD thesis, Leiden, The Netherlands

    work page

  5. [3]

    Nature 11 (279)

    Maxwell, James Clerk (1875) On the Dynamical Evidence of the Molecular Constitution of Bodies. Nature 11 (279). 357–359

    work page

  6. [4]

    pp 275–370

    Boltzmann (1872) Weitere Studien ¨ uber das W¨ armegleichgewicht unter Gasmolek¨ ulen, in Sitzungs- berichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien, volume 66. pp 275–370

    work page

  7. [5]

    Maxwell, James Clerk (1867) On the Dynamical Theory of Gases, Philosophical Trans of Royal Soc of London 157 49-88

    work page

  8. [6]

    Josiah Willard Gibbs (1902) Elementary Principles in Statistical Mechanics: Developed with Especial Reference to the Rational Foundation of Thermodynamics, 1902, New York by Charles Scribner’s Sons

    work page 1902

Show all 52 references
  1. [7]

    The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, Oxford Univ Press, London, Fourth edition, 1958

    Dirac, P.A.M. The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, Oxford Univ Press, London, Fourth edition, 1958

    1958

  2. [8]

    Beyer, Princeton Univ Press, Princeton

    von Neumann, John (1955) Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, trans Robert T. Beyer, Princeton Univ Press, Princeton

    1955

  3. [9]

    Uhlenbeck, An outline of statistical mechanics, in Fundamental Problems in Statistical Mechan- ics II, edited by E

    G.E. Uhlenbeck, An outline of statistical mechanics, in Fundamental Problems in Statistical Mechan- ics II, edited by E. G. D. Cohen, Wiley, New York, 1968, pp 1-29

    1968

  4. [10]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, second edition, 1952

    Schr¨ odinger, Erwin (1952) Statistical thermodynamics: a course of seminar lectures delivered in January–March 1944, at the School of Theoretical Physics, Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, second edition, 1952. pp. 1-14

    1952

  5. [11]

    Kahn and G.E

    B. Kahn and G.E. Uhlenbeck, On the Theory of Condensation, Physica 5 (1938) 399-416

    1938

  6. [12]

    J de Boer 1949 Rep. Prog. Phys. 12 305-374

    1949

  7. [13]

    Ziff, George E

    Robert M. Ziff, George E. Uhlenbeck and Mark Kac, The Ideal Bose-Einstein Gas, Revisited, Physics Reports 32, No.4(1977)169–248

    1977

  8. [14]

    Thompson, Classical Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1988

    Colin J. Thompson, Classical Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1988

    1988

  9. [15]

    Einstein, Berl

    A. Einstein, Berl. Ber. Akad. 22 (1924) 261; Ben. Ber. Akad. 23 (1925) 3; Ben. Ber. Akad. 23 (1925) 18

    1924

  10. [16]

    Lieb, Robert Seiringer, Jan Philip Solovej and Jakob Yngvason, The Mathematics of the Bose Gas and its Condensation, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, 2005

    Elliott H. Lieb, Robert Seiringer, Jan Philip Solovej and Jakob Yngvason, The Mathematics of the Bose Gas and its Condensation, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, 2005

    2005

  11. [17]

    London, On the Bose-Einstein Condensation, Phys

    F. London, On the Bose-Einstein Condensation, Phys. Rev. 54 (1938) 947-954

    1938

  12. [18]

    Nigel Goldenfeld, Lectures on Phase Transitions and the Renormalization Group, Westview Press, 1992

    1992

  13. [19]

    Salinas (2001) Introduction to Statistical Physics, Springer-Verlag, New York

    Silvio R.A. Salinas (2001) Introduction to Statistical Physics, Springer-Verlag, New York

    2001

  14. [20]

    Ruelle, Statistical Mechanics; Rigorous Results (Benjamin, New York, 1969)

    D. Ruelle, Statistical Mechanics; Rigorous Results (Benjamin, New York, 1969)

    1969

  15. [21]

    Carmen-Gabriela Stefanita, Magnetism: Basics and Applications, Springer, Berlin (2012)

    2012

  16. [22]

    Mathias Getzlaff, Fundamentals of Magnetism, Springer, Berlin (2008)

    2008

  17. [23]

    Anderson, Basic Notions of Condensed Matter Physics (Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, 1984)

    P.W. Anderson, Basic Notions of Condensed Matter Physics (Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, 1984). pp. 1-30

    1984

  18. [24]

    Landau and E.M

    L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics, (Pergamon Press, London, 1958), trans. E. Peierls and R.F. Peierls, Chapter XIV

    1958

  19. [25]

    Wood, A Brief History of the Use of the Metropolis Method at LANL in the 1950s, in Gubernatis, J

    William W. Wood, A Brief History of the Use of the Metropolis Method at LANL in the 1950s, in Gubernatis, J. E., ed. 2003. The Monte Carlo Method in the Physical Sciences: Celebrating the 50th Anniversary of the Metropolis Algorithm. AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 690. Melvi...

    2003

  20. [26]

    L¨ owen, Fun with hard spheres

    H. L¨ owen, Fun with hard spheres. In: Mecke, K.R., Stoyen, D. (eds.) Statistical Physics and Spatial Statistics: The Art of Analyzing and Modeling Spatial Structures and Pattern Formation. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 554, pp. 295–331. Springer, Berlin (2000)

    2000

  21. [27]

    Temperley, Introduction, in Physics of Simple Liquids, ed HNV Temperley, JS Rowlinson and GS Rushbrooke, 1968, North Holland Pub Co, Amsterdam, pp

    H.N.V. Temperley, Introduction, in Physics of Simple Liquids, ed HNV Temperley, JS Rowlinson and GS Rushbrooke, 1968, North Holland Pub Co, Amsterdam, pp. 1-23

    1968

  22. [28]

    G., Crystallization as a Cooperative Phenomenon, in Phase Transformations in Solids, edited by R

    Kirkwood, J. G., Crystallization as a Cooperative Phenomenon, in Phase Transformations in Solids, edited by R. Smoluchowski, J. E. Mayer and W. A. Weyl (Wiley, New York, 1951), pp. 67-76. 12 CHARLES RADIN

    1951

  23. [29]

    Nature 183, 141-157 (1959)

    Bernal, J.D.: A geometrical approach to the structure of liquids. Nature 183, 141-157 (1959)

    1959

  24. [30]

    Nature 188, 908-909 (1960)

    Scott, G.D.: Packing of spheres. Nature 188, 908-909 (1960)

    1960

  25. [31]

    Bridgwater, Self-Diffusion of Spherical Particles in a Simple Shear Apparatus, Powder Technology 14 (1976) 177-183

    A.M Scott and J. Bridgwater, Self-Diffusion of Spherical Particles in a Simple Shear Apparatus, Powder Technology 14 (1976) 177-183

    1976

  26. [32]

    Nicolas, M., Duru, P., Pouliquen, O.: Compaction of a granular material under cyclic shear. Euro. Phys. J. E 3, 309-314 (2000)

    2000

  27. [33]

    Rietz, F., Radin, C., Swinney, H.L., Schr¨ oter, M.: Nucleation in sheared granular matter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 055701 (2018)

    2018

  28. [34]

    S. Su, J. Zhang, C. Radin and H.L. Swinney, Emergence of orientational order in periodically sheared 2-dimensional disks, Granular Matter 28 (2026) article 82

    2026

  29. [35]

    W. Jin, C. O’Hern, C. Radin, M. Shattuck and H.L. Swinney, Homogeneous crystallization in cycli- cally sheared frictionless grains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 258003

    2020

  30. [36]

    Radin and H

    C. Radin and H. Swinney, Phases of granular matter, J. Stat. Phys. 175(2019) 542-553

    2019

  31. [37]

    Engel, M., Anderson, J.A., Glotzer, S.C., Isobe, M., Bernard, E.P., Krauth, W.: Hard-disk equation of state: first-order liquid-hexatic transition in two dimensions with three simulation methods. Phys. Rev. E 87, 042134 (2013)

    2013

  32. [38]

    Lee and C.N

    T.D. Lee and C.N. Yang, Statistical theory of equations of state and phase transitions. II. Lattice gas and Ising model, Phys Rev 87 (1952) 410-419

    1952

  33. [39]

    Ginibre, On some recent work of Dobrushin, Syst` emes ` a un nombre infini de degr´ es de libert´ e, CNRS, Paris, 1969, pp

    J. Ginibre, On some recent work of Dobrushin, Syst` emes ` a un nombre infini de degr´ es de libert´ e, CNRS, Paris, 1969, pp. 163-175

    1969

  34. [40]

    Onsager, L.: Crystal statistics. I. A two-dimensional model with an order-disorder transition, Phys. Rev. 65, 117-149 (1944)

    1944

  35. [41]

    Radin, C. and L. Sadun (2013). Phase transitions in a complex network. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 46 305002

    2013

  36. [42]

    Lov´ asz, L. (2012). Large Networks and Graph Limits, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence

    2012

  37. [43]

    Chatterjee and S

    S. Chatterjee and S. R. S. Varadhan (2011). The large deviation principle for the Erd˝ os–R´ enyi random graph. European J. Combin. 32 1000–1017

    2011

  38. [44]

    Asymptotic structure of graphs with the minimum number of triangles

    Pikhurko, O and Razborov, A 2017. Asymptotic structure of graphs with the minimum number of triangles. Combin. Probab. Comput. 26 138–60

    2017

  39. [45]

    Kenyon, C

    R. Kenyon, C. Radin, K. Ren and L. Sadun, The phases of large networks with edge and triangle constraints, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50 (2017) 435001

    2017

  40. [47]

    Neeman, C

    J. Neeman, C. Radin and L. Sadun, Typical large graphs with given edge and triangle densities, Probab. Theory Relat. Fields (2023), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-023-01187-8

    2023 doi

  41. [49]

    Radin and L

    C. Radin and L. Sadun, Emergence in graphs with near-extreme constraints, arxiv:2411.14556v3

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    Aristoff and C

    D. Aristoff and C. Radin, Rigidity in solids, J. Stat. Phys. 144(2011) 1247-1255

    2011

  43. [51]

    G.: Statistical physics and the atomic theory of matter From Boyle and Newton to Landau and Onsager, Princeton Uni- versity Press, 1983

    Brush, S. G.: Statistical physics and the atomic theory of matter From Boyle and Newton to Landau and Onsager, Princeton Uni- versity Press, 1983. Chapter VIII

    1983

  44. [52]

    Radin and L

    C. Radin and L. Sadun, Singularities in the entropy of asymptotically large simple graphs, J. Stat. Phys. 158(2015) 853-865. Charles Radin, Department of Mathematics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712 Email address:radin@math.utexas.edu

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.