Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Suppressing Extra-Dimensional Axion Isocurvature Dynamically

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A temporary boost of the extra-dimensional axion decay constant during inflation can suppress isocurvature enough to allow higher inflationary scales.

desk verdict Clean 5D realization of dynamical f_a that reopens high-scale inflation for extra-dimensional axions, with the usual engineered UV operator as the main soft spot. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.09969 v1 pith:GDRY43ZT submitted 2026-07-10 hep-ph astro-ph.COhep-th

Gongjun Choi , Tony Gherghetta This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.COhep-th
keywords extra-dimensionalaxionisocurvatureperturbationswarpedextradimensionsradiondynamicsGoldberger-WisestabilizationQCDinflation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Extra-dimensional QCD axions are attractive because higher-form symmetries protect them against quality-violating effects, yet if they exist during inflation their quantum fluctuations produce isocurvature perturbations that force the inflationary Hubble scale uncomfortably low. This paper shows that, in a warped five-dimensional model, a coupling between the inflaton and the Goldberger-Wise bulk scalar can shift the radion minimum so that the inter-brane separation is temporarily small. The resulting larger warp factor raises the effective four-dimensional axion decay constant during inflation, suppressing the angular fluctuations that source isocurvature. After inflation the radion relaxes to its ordinary late-time minimum, restoring a decay constant inside the standard QCD window. In a concrete warped orbifold GUT the mechanism satisfies present CMB bounds while permitting inflationary scales well above the conventional pre-inflationary limit, without requiring entropy dilution or a finely tuned initial misalignment angle.

What carries the argument

The inflation-induced shift of the radion minimum: an inflaton-dependent UV boundary value for the Goldberger-Wise scalar temporarily moves the radion to a smaller inter-brane separation, which exponentially enhances the four-dimensional axion decay constant via the warp factor.

What would settle it

If explicit computation of the radion mass and the slow-roll parameters for the operators of Eq. (28) shows that either m_sigma,eff remains below H_inf or the corrections to epsilon and eta exceed the observed n_s window for every parameter choice that produces f_inf >> f_a, the proposed dynamical enhancement fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In a warped orbifold GUT with Goldberger-Wise stabilization, a radion-inflaton coupling that sets a smaller inter-brane separation during inflation can raise the effective axion decay constant to O(10^16) GeV, allowing Hubble scales up to about 10^12 GeV (and higher with mild dilution) while keeping the late-time decay constant inside the QCD window and satisfying the CMB isocurvature bound beta_iso < 0.036.

Load-bearing premise

The whole effect rests on the assumption that a particular UV-brane operator couples the inflaton potential to the Goldberger-Wise scalar strongly enough to raise its boundary value throughout inflation and keep that value nearly constant.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a dynamical mechanism to suppress pre-inflationary isocurvature perturbations of an extra-dimensional QCD axion in a warped 5D orbifold GUT. A UV-brane operator couples the inflaton potential to the Goldberger-Wise scalar, shifting its UV boundary value during inflation so that the radion minimum sits at smaller inter-brane separation. This temporarily enhances the effective 4D axion decay constant f_inf relative to its late-time value f_a. After inflation the radion relaxes to the standard Goldberger-Wise minimum, restoring the QCD axion window. Consistency conditions C1 (radion mass ≳ H_inf) and C2 (small slow-roll corrections) are imposed; numerical scans for benchmark α = −0.3, c_V = 1, ξ = 0.99 show f_inf reaching O(10^16) GeV and allow H_inf ∼ 10^12 GeV (higher with mild dilution or small heta_a,i) while satisfying eta_iso < 0.036 for f_a in the canonical window. Small-scale fluctuations during the f_inf o f_a transition are argued not to produce domain walls provided T_RH ≳ O(10^5) GeV.

Significance. If the construction holds, it reopens a substantial region of high-scale inflation for extra-dimensional axions that is otherwise excluded by CMB isocurvature bounds, without requiring entropy dilution or a tuned initial misalignment. The mechanism is concrete: it is embedded in an existing warped-orbifold-GUT axion model, uses standard Goldberger-Wise stabilization plus de-Sitter brane detunings, and supplies explicit consistency conditions and numerical benchmarks (Figs. 2–3). The dual CFT interpretation (temporary raise of the confinement scale) and the domain-wall avoidance estimate further strengthen the result. The work therefore constitutes a useful, falsifiable extension of dynamical-decay-constant solutions to the axion isocurvature problem in a higher-dimensional setting.

major comments (2)
  1. Sec. III A, Eq. (28) and the paragraph following Eq. (34): the entire enhancement of f_inf rests on the assumption that the UV-brane operator induces Φ(y_UV) ≃ c_V V_inf^{3/8} that remains approximately constant throughout the ∼50–60 e-folds relevant for CMB modes. Residual χ-dependence is asserted to be negligible for both m_σ,eff (C1) and the slow-roll shifts (C2), and the Coleman-Weinberg correction (44) is claimed to be only an overall height renormalization. No explicit estimate of δΦ/Φ or of the resulting drift in σ_min across the CMB window is provided. If V_inf(χ) varies appreciably, f_inf becomes time-dependent and the H_inf/f_inf ratios of Fig. 2 (and therefore the eta_iso contours of Fig. 3) are no longer reliable. A short calculation quantifying the residual variation for a representative slow-roll potential is needed to close this load-bearing gap.
  2. Sec. III B, Eqs. (48)–(55): the reported moderate shifts ε_inf = (0.8–0.9)ε_χ,0 and η_inf = (0.9–0.95)η_χ,0 are obtained after imposing C1 and scanning only over c_IR for fixed (α, c_V, ξ). Because the multi-field η_inf depends on the polar angle heta determined by V_eff,σχ / V_eff,σσ, a more systematic exploration of the residual χ-dependence of the UV boundary value (or an analytic bound on | heta|) is required before one can claim that a broad class of inflationary models remains compatible with the observed n_s.
minor comments (4)
  1. Fig. 2 caption and surrounding text: the observational upper bound H_inf ≤ 5 imes 10^13 GeV is quoted from the tensor power spectrum; a brief citation to the precise Planck/BICEP constraint used would help the reader.
  2. Eq. (7) and the dual-CFT paragraph in Sec. III A: the relation 8π^{2}/(g_5C^{2} k) ≃ N_CFT is used without a reference or short derivation; a pointer to the earlier warped-orbifold-GUT paper would improve readability.
  3. Sec. V, Eq. (67): the estimate n ≃ 9/(8|α|) assumes a quadratic inflaton potential after the end of inflation; a sentence noting the sensitivity to the post-inflationary equation of state would clarify the domain of validity of the domain-wall bound (70).
  4. Typographical: the arXiv identifier in the header is 2607.09969 while the abstract date is July 14, 2026; consistency checks on numbering of equations after (43) would also be useful.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Minor self-citation of authors' prior warped-orbifold axion model supplies the late-time fa formula and GUT setup; the dynamical radion shift, Veff, and beta_iso results are independently derived and do not reduce by construction.

  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. I, paragraph containing Eq. (7) and citation [33]]
    "we explore a resolution of the isocurvature problem for extra-dimensional axions by considering a 1-form axion embedded within a five-dimensional (5D) warped orbifold GUT framework, as proposed in [33] ... the 4D effective axion decay constant takes the form fa = sqrt(k/(4 g_5C^2)) 1/(e^{2 pi k rc}-1) ..."

    The concrete late-time fa expression and the claim that the QCD window is compatible with GUT-scale unification without entropy dilution are imported from the authors' own prior paper rather than re-derived. While this supplies the background model in which the new dynamical mechanism is embedded, it is not used to force the isocurvature suppression result itself; the latter follows from the independent radion-inflaton analysis of Secs. II-IV.

full rationale

The paper is a model-building proposal that introduces a new UV-brane operator (Eq. 28) coupling the inflaton to the Goldberger-Wise scalar, derives the resulting time-dependent radion potential Veff (Eq. 39), obtains the transient minimum (Eq. 41), and computes the consequent enhancement of finf together with the isocurvature fraction beta_iso. These steps follow from the 5D action and standard Goldberger-Wise/RS techniques; they are not tautological rearrangements of the inputs. The only self-citation of note is Ref. [33] (same authors), which supplies the concrete 5D warped-orbifold-GUT axion realization and the explicit fa formula (Eq. 7). That reference is used as a geometric framework, not as a uniqueness theorem or as a fitted result that forces the present isocurvature claims. No parameters are fitted to data and then re-presented as predictions; no ansatz is smuggled in via citation; and the numerical scans over cIR simply map the region where the consistency conditions C1-C2 hold. The central mechanism therefore stands on its own derivation. A score of 2 registers the mild, non-load-bearing self-citation while recognizing that the paper is otherwise self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard RS + Goldberger-Wise framework plus one new UV-brane operator that couples the inflaton to the bulk scalar. Free parameters are the usual dimensionless GW and brane-tension coefficients, scanned numerically; no data fitting occurs. The only invented ingredient is the specific form of that operator, introduced to generate the desired time-dependent boundary value.

free parameters (2)
  • alpha = m_Phi^2/(4k^2) = -0.3 (benchmark)
    Bulk mass parameter of the Goldberger-Wise scalar; benchmark alpha = -0.3 chosen by hand to obtain a stable minimum for alpha < 0 and to control the scaling exponent n ~ 9/(8|alpha|).
  • c_IR, c_V, c_inf, xi, b_CFT = c_V=1, xi=0.99, b_CFT=5 or 10; c_IR scanned ~10^{-4}–10^{-2}
    Dimensionless coefficients controlling IR VEV, inflaton-induced UV VEV, inflationary vacuum energy, residual vacuum-energy fraction, and dual CFT degrees of freedom. Scanned or fixed by hand to satisfy the stationary-minimum conditions (38) and C1–C2.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption 5D Einstein equations with detuned brane tensions admit a warped de-Sitter slicing with Hubble parameter H(y) given by Eq. (23).
    Standard result for RS geometry with positive UV and negative IR detunings (cited Refs. 64–67); used throughout Sec. II B.
  • domain assumption Back-reaction of the Goldberger-Wise scalar on the 5D geometry is negligible when v_UV,IR^2 << M_5^3.
    Standard GW assumption stated after Eq. (11); required for the metric to remain pure AdS_5.
  • ad hoc to paper The inflaton couples to the GW scalar only through the UV-brane operator of Eq. (28) (or an equivalent operator that yields the same VEV scaling), and this operator preserves the symmetries of the inflaton sector.
    Introduced in Sec. III A to generate the time-dependent UV boundary value; not derived from a more fundamental principle.
  • domain assumption Quadratic divergences in the Coleman-Weinberg correction to V_inf are canceled (e.g., by supersymmetry), leaving only a negligible logarithmic piece.
    Stated in footnote 6; needed so that the radion loop does not spoil slow-roll.
invented entities (1)
  • Inflaton-dependent UV boundary condition for the Goldberger-Wise scalar (Eq. 28)
    purpose: Shifts the radion minimum to smaller inter-brane separation during inflation, thereby enhancing f_inf.
    The specific operator is postulated; no independent experimental handle is given beyond the cosmological consequences derived in the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Suppressing Extra-Dimensional Axion Isocurvature Dynamically." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GDRY43ZT

@misc{pith2026260709969,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Suppressing Extra-Dimensional Axion Isocurvature Dynamically},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GDRY43ZT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.09969}
}
read the original abstract

Extra-dimensional QCD axion is well motivated by string compactifications and enjoys enhanced protection against quality-violating effects. If present during inflation, however, its quantum fluctuations generate isocurvature perturbations that strongly constrain the inflationary scale. We propose a dynamical suppression mechanism in warped five-dimensional models, where a radion-inflaton coupling sets the radion minimum at small inter-brane separation during inflation, temporarily enhancing the effective four-dimensional axion decay constant. After inflation, the radion minimum shifts to larger separation, restoring the standard QCD axion window. In a warped orbifold GUT with Goldberger-Wise stabilization, this mechanism can satisfy CMB isocurvature bounds while allowing substantially higher inflationary scales than in conventional pre-inflationary axion cosmology.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.09969 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic plot showing the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The inflationary Hubble scale [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Why 4D? Spontaneous Dimensional Selection from Gauge Criticality

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Gauge criticality of Yang–Mills, via racetrack confinement and 3D dynamical SUSY breaking, can stabilize radii so that a macroscopic 4D spacetime emerges without being put in by hand.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 61 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Throughout this work, we assumev 2 UV,IR ≪M 3 5 to ensure that the backreaction of Φ on the 5D geometry is negligible

    The parametersv UV andv IR are the brane- localized VEVs, which in the largeλi limit, fix the bound- ary values Φ(yIR) =v IR ≡c IRk 3 2 ,Φ(y UV) =v UV ≡c UVk 3 2 , (11) wherec IR,UV are dimensionless constants. Throughout this work, we assumev 2 UV,IR ≪M 3 5 to ensure that the backreaction of Φ on the 5D geometry is negligible. For|α| ≪1, whereα≡m 2 Φ/(4k...

  2. [2]

    For 2See also [68–72] for other time dependent solutions for the bulk geometry

    be satisfied at both the UV and IR boundaries: TUV,c +T (0) UV +δT dS UV = 6M 3 5 kcoth(ky c) +T (0) UV , TIR,c +δT dS IR =−6M 3 5 kcoth[k(y c −y IR)](21) whereT UV,c =−T IR,c = 6M 3 5 kare the critically tuned tensions of the static RS solution (9) in the absence of detunings andT (0) UV represents additional tuning needed to obtain the observed 4D cosmo...

  3. [3]

    C. A. Baker et al.,An Improved experimental limit on the electric dipole moment of the neutron,Phys. Rev. Lett.97(2006) 131801, [hep-ex/0602020]

    arXiv 2006

  4. [4]

    Preskill, M

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek,Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 127–132

    1983

  5. [5]

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie,A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 133–136

    1983

  6. [6]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler,The Not So Harmless Axion, Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 137–141

    1983

  7. [7]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.38(1977) 1440–1443

    1977

  8. [8]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 1791–1797

    1977

Show all 83 references
  1. [9]

    Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys

    S. Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys. Rev. Lett.40 (1978) 223–226

    1978

  2. [10]

    Wilczek,Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys

    F. Wilczek,Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 279–282, [none]

    1978

  3. [11]

    Vafa and E

    C. Vafa and E. Witten,Parity Conservation in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.53(1984) 535

    1984

  4. [12]

    Kamionkowski and J

    M. Kamionkowski and J. March-Russell,Planck scale physics and the Peccei-Quinn mechanism,Phys. Lett. B 282(1992) 137–141, [hep-th/9202003]

    1992 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Holman, S

    R. Holman, S. D. H. Hsu, T. W. Kephart, E. W. Kolb, R. Watkins, and L. M. Widrow,Solutions to the strong CP problem in a world with gravity,Phys. Lett. B282 (1992) 132–136, [hep-ph/9203206]

    1992 arXiv

  6. [14]

    S. M. Barr and D. Seckel,Planck scale corrections to axion models,Phys. Rev. D46(1992) 539–549

    1992

  7. [15]

    Ghigna, M

    S. Ghigna, M. Lusignoli, and M. Roncadelli,Instability of the invisible axion,Phys. Lett. B283(1992) 278–281

    1992

  8. [16]

    Witten,Some Properties of O(32) Superstrings, Phys

    E. Witten,Some Properties of O(32) Superstrings, Phys. Lett. B149(1984) 351–356

    1984

  9. [17]

    Choi and J

    K. Choi and J. E. Kim,Harmful Axions in Superstring Models,Phys. Lett. B154(1985) 393. [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 156, 452 (1985)]

    1985

  10. [18]

    S. M. Barr,Harmless Axions in Superstring Theories, Phys. Lett. B158(1985) 397–400

    1985

  11. [19]

    Choi,A QCD axion from higher dimensional gauge field,Phys

    K.-w. Choi,A QCD axion from higher dimensional gauge field,Phys. Rev. Lett.92(2004) 101602, [hep-ph/0308024]

    2004 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Dvali,Three-form gauging of axion symmetries and gravity,hep-th/0507215

    G. Dvali,Three-form gauging of axion symmetries and gravity,hep-th/0507215

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    Flacke, B

    T. Flacke, B. Gripaios, J. March-Russell, and D. Maybury,Warped axions,JHEP01(2007) 061, [hep-ph/0611278]

    2007 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Arvanitaki, S

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell,String Axiverse, Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 123530, [arXiv:0905.4720]

    2010 arXiv

  15. [23]

    P. Cox, T. Gherghetta, and M. D. Nguyen,A Holographic Perspective on the Axion Quality Problem, JHEP01(2020) 188, [arXiv:1911.09385]

    2020 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Bonnefoy, P

    Q. Bonnefoy, P. Cox, E. Dudas, T. Gherghetta, and M. D. Nguyen,Flavoured Warped Axion,JHEP04 (2021) 084, [arXiv:2012.09728]

    2021 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Gherghetta, V

    T. Gherghetta, V. V. Khoze, A. Pomarol, and Y. Shirman,The Axion Mass from 5D Small Instantons,JHEP03(2020) 063, [arXiv:2001.05610]

    2020 arXiv

  18. [26]

    S. J. Lee, Y. Nakai, and M. Suzuki,High quality axion via a doubly composite dynamics,JHEP03(2022) 038, [arXiv:2112.08083]

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Reece,TASI Lectures: (No) Global Symmetries to Axion Physics,PoSTASI2022(2024) 008, [arXiv:2304.08512]

    M. Reece,TASI Lectures: (No) Global Symmetries to Axion Physics,PoSTASI2022(2024) 008, [arXiv:2304.08512]

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    C. P. Burgess, G. Choi, and F. Quevedo,UV and IR effects in axion quality control,JHEP03(2024) 051, [arXiv:2301.00549]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Choi and J

    G. Choi and J. Leedom,Implications of protecting the QCD axion in the dual description,JHEP09(2023) 175, [arXiv:2307.08733]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Craig and M

    N. Craig and M. Kongsore,High-quality axions from higher-form symmetries in extra dimensions,Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 1 015047, [arXiv:2408.10295]

    2025 arXiv

  23. [31]

    de Giorgi and M

    A. de Giorgi and M. Ramos,Extra-dimensional axion patterns,Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 7 075006, [arXiv:2412.00179]

    2025 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Reece,Extra-dimensional axion expectations,JHEP 07(2025) 130, [arXiv:2406.08543]

    M. Reece,Extra-dimensional axion expectations,JHEP 07(2025) 130, [arXiv:2406.08543]

    2025 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Petrossian-Byrne and G

    R. Petrossian-Byrne and G. Villadoro,Open string axiverse,JHEP07(2025) 049, [arXiv:2503.16387]

    2025 arXiv

  26. [34]

    J. N. Benabou, K. Fraser, M. Reig, and B. R. Safdi, String theory and grand unification suggest a submicroelectronvolt QCD axion,Phys. Rev. D112 (2025), no. 6 066003, [arXiv:2505.15884]

    2025 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Choi and T

    G. Choi and T. Gherghetta,An extra-dimensional axion in a 5D warped orbifold GUT,JHEP03(2026) 169, [arXiv:2512.15666]

    2026

  28. [36]

    Loladze, A

    V. Loladze, A. Platschorre, and M. Reig,Higher axion strings,JHEP08(2025) 182, [arXiv:2503.18707]

    2025 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Agrawal, M

    P. Agrawal, M. Nee, and M. Reig,Axion couplings in Orbifold GUTs,arXiv:2511.21830

  30. [38]

    Chakraborty, J

    P. Chakraborty, J. Cheng, M. Reece, and Z. Wang,A step in flux to suppress axion isocurvature,JHEP03 (2026) 046, [arXiv:2507.12519]

    2026

  31. [39]

    Cs´ aki, E

    C. Cs´ aki, E. Kuflik, W. Xue, and T. Youn,The Holographic QCD Axion in Five Dimensions, arXiv:2604.02411

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    K. Choi, C. H. Lee, and C. S. Shin,Axion Quality in Warped Extra-Dimension,arXiv:2604.08700

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    S. Hor, Y. Nakai, M. Suzuki, and J. Xu,Deconstructing the Extra-Dimensional Axion,arXiv:2606.02728

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Planck Collaboration,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A10, [arXiv:1807.06211]

    2018 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum,A Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension,Phys. Rev. Lett.83 (1999) 3370–3373, [hep-ph/9905221]

    1999 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum,An Alternative to Compactification,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 4690–4693, [hep-th/9906064]

    1999 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Kawasaki, M

    M. Kawasaki, M. Yamada, and T. T. Yanagida, Cosmologically safe QCD axion as a present from extra dimension,Phys. Lett. B750(2015) 12–16, [arXiv:1506.05214]

    2015 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Kitano, M

    R. Kitano, M. Suzuki, and W. Yin,Role of QCD in moduli stabilization during inflation and axion dark matter,JHEP11(2023) 103, [arXiv:2307.15059]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [47]

    W. D. Goldberger and M. B. Wise,Modulus Stabilization with Bulk Fields,Phys. Rev. Lett.83 (1999) 4922–4925, [hep-ph/9907447]. 13

    1999 arXiv

  40. [48]

    W. D. Goldberger and M. B. Wise,Phenomenology of a Stabilized Modulus,Phys. Lett. B475(2000) 275–279, [hep-ph/9911457]

    2000 arXiv

  41. [49]

    A. D. Linde,Axions in inflationary cosmology,Phys. Lett. B259(1991) 38–47

    1991

  42. [50]

    A. D. Linde and D. H. Lyth,Axionic domain wall production during inflation,Phys. Lett. B246(1990) 353–358

    1990

  43. [51]

    Kasuya, M

    S. Kasuya, M. Kawasaki, and T. Yanagida,Cosmological axion problem in chaotic inflationary universe,Phys. Lett. B409(1997) 94–100, [hep-ph/9608405]

    1997 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Kasuya, M

    S. Kasuya, M. Kawasaki, and T. Yanagida,Domain wall problem of axion and isocurvature fluctuations in chaotic inflation models,Phys. Lett. B415(1997) 117–121, [hep-ph/9709202]

    1997 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Folkerts, C

    S. Folkerts, C. Germani, and J. Redondo,Axion Dark Matter and Planck favor non-minimal couplings to gravity,Phys. Lett. B728(2014) 532–536, [arXiv:1304.7270]

    2014 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Kawasaki, T

    M. Kawasaki, T. T. Yanagida, and K. Yoshino,Domain wall and isocurvature perturbation problems in axion models,JCAP11(2013) 030, [arXiv:1305.5338]

    2013 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Higaki, K

    T. Higaki, K. S. Jeong, and F. Takahashi,Solving the Tension between High-Scale Inflation and Axion Isocurvature Perturbations,Phys. Lett. B734(2014) 21–26, [arXiv:1403.4186]

    2014 arXiv

  48. [56]

    E. J. Chun,Axion Dark Matter with High-Scale Inflation,Phys. Lett. B735(2014) 164–167, [arXiv:1404.4284]

    2014 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Fairbairn, R

    M. Fairbairn, R. Hogan, and D. J. E. Marsh,Unifying inflation and dark matter with the Peccei-Quinn field: observable axions and observable tensors,Phys. Rev. D 91(2015), no. 2 023509, [arXiv:1410.1752]

    2015 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Nakayama and M

    K. Nakayama and M. Takimoto,Higgs inflation and suppression of axion isocurvature perturbation,Phys. Lett. B748(2015) 108–112, [arXiv:1505.02119]

    2015 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Harigaya, M

    K. Harigaya, M. Ibe, M. Kawasaki, and T. T. Yanagida, Dynamics of Peccei-Quinn Breaking Field after Inflation and Axion Isocurvature Perturbations,JCAP 11(2015) 003, [arXiv:1507.00119]

    2015 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Kearney, N

    J. Kearney, N. Orlofsky, and A. Pierce,High-Scale Axions without Isocurvature from Inflationary Dynamics,Phys. Rev. D93(2016), no. 9 095026, [arXiv:1601.03049]

    2016 arXiv

  53. [61]

    I. J. Allali, M. P. Hertzberg, and Y. Lyu,Altered axion abundance from a dynamical Peccei-Quinn scale,Phys. Rev. D105(2022), no. 12 123517, [arXiv:2203.15817]

    2022 arXiv

  54. [62]

    J. P. Conlon and F. Revello,Catch-me-if-you-can: the overshoot problem and the weak/inflation hierarchy, JHEP11(2022) 155, [arXiv:2207.00567]

    2022 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Arkani-Hamed, M

    N. Arkani-Hamed, M. Porrati, and L. Randall, Holography and phenomenology,JHEP08(2001) 017, [hep-th/0012148]

    2001 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Rattazzi and A

    R. Rattazzi and A. Zaffaroni,Comments on the holographic picture of the Randall-Sundrum model, JHEP04(2001) 021, [hep-th/0012248]

    2001 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Creminelli, A

    P. Creminelli, A. Nicolis, and R. Rattazzi,Holography and the electroweak phase transition,JHEP03(2002) 051, [hep-th/0107141]

    2002 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Kaloper,Bent domain walls as brane worlds,Phys

    N. Kaloper,Bent domain walls as brane worlds,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 123506, [hep-th/9905210]

    1999 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Nihei,Inflation in the five-dimensional universe with an orbifold extra dimension,Phys

    T. Nihei,Inflation in the five-dimensional universe with an orbifold extra dimension,Phys. Lett. B465(1999) 81–85, [hep-ph/9905487]

    1999 arXiv

  60. [68]

    H. B. Kim and H. D. Kim,Inflation and gauge hierarchy in Randall-Sundrum compactification,Phys. Rev. D61(2000) 064003, [hep-th/9909053]

    2000 arXiv

  61. [69]

    DeWolfe, D

    O. DeWolfe, D. Z. Freedman, S. S. Gubser, and A. Karch,Modeling the fifth-dimension with scalars and gravity,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 046008, [hep-th/9909134]

    2000 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Csaki, M

    C. Csaki, M. Graesser, C. F. Kolda, and J. Terning, Cosmology of one extra dimension with localized gravity, Phys. Lett. B462(1999) 34–40, [hep-ph/9906513]

    1999 arXiv

  63. [71]

    J. M. Cline, C. Grojean, and G. Servant,Cosmological expansion in the presence of extra dimensions,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 4245, [hep-ph/9906523]

    1999 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Kanti, I

    P. Kanti, I. I. Kogan, K. A. Olive, and M. Pospelov, Cosmological three-brane solutions,Phys. Lett. B468 (1999) 31–39, [hep-ph/9909481]

    1999 arXiv

  65. [73]

    J. M. Cline, C. Grojean, and G. Servant,Inflating intersecting branes and remarks on the hierarchy problem,Phys. Lett. B472(2000) 302–308, [hep-ph/9909496]

    2000 arXiv

  66. [74]

    R. K. Mishra, M. Nee, and L. Randall,Inflation with a growing fifth dimension,JHEP05(2026) 169, [arXiv:2512.04177]

    2026 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Israel,Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity,Nuovo Cim

    W. Israel,Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity,Nuovo Cim. B44S10(1966) 1. [Erratum: Nuovo Cim.B 48, 463 (1967)]

    1966

  68. [76]

    S. R. Coleman and E. J. Weinberg,Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 1888–1910

    1973

  69. [77]

    Csaki, M

    C. Csaki, M. L. Graesser, and G. D. Kribs,Radion dynamics and electroweak physics,Phys. Rev. D63 (2001) 065002, [hep-th/0008151]

    2001 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Csaki, J

    C. Csaki, J. Hubisz, and S. J. Lee,Radion phenomenology in realistic warped space models,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 125015, [arXiv:0705.3844]

    2007 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Balkenhol et al.,Inflation at the End of 2025: Constraints onrandn s Using the Latest CMB and BAO Data,arXiv:2512.10613

    L. Balkenhol et al.,Inflation at the End of 2025: Constraints onrandn s Using the Latest CMB and BAO Data,arXiv:2512.10613. [78]Particle Data Group, S. Navas et al.,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 3 030001

    2025 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Kobayashi and F

    T. Kobayashi and F. Takahashi,Cosmological Perturbations of Axion with a Dynamical Decay Constant,JCAP08(2016) 056, [arXiv:1607.04294]

    2016 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Moroi,Effects of the gravitino on the inflationary universe,Prog

    T. Moroi,Effects of the gravitino on the inflationary universe,Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.117(1995) 65–82, [hep-ph/9503210]

    1995 arXiv

  74. [82]

    M. Bolz, A. Brandenburg, and W. Buchmuller,Thermal Production of Gravitinos,Nucl. Phys. B606(2001) 518–544, [hep-ph/0012052]

    2001 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Pradler and F

    J. Pradler and F. D. Steffen,Thermal Gravitino Production and Collider Tests of Leptogenesis,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 023509, [hep-ph/0608344]

    2007 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.