REVIEW 1 cited by
Is Writing Prompts Really Making Art?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In recent years Generative Machine Learning systems have advanced significantly. A current wave of generative systems use text prompts to create complex imagery, video, even 3D datasets. The creators of these systems claim a revolution in bringing creativity and art to anyone who can type a prompt. In this position paper, we question the basis for these claims, dividing our analysis into three areas: the limitations of linguistic descriptions, implications of the dataset, and lastly, matters of materiality and embodiment. We conclude with an analysis of the creative possibilities enabled by prompt-based systems, asking if they can be considered a new artistic medium.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
From Prompting to Describing: A Cross-Cultural Study of Language for AI-Generated Music
Prompts for AI music are dominated by genre and story terms, but genre words survive into perception while story-heavy prompts produce the largest semantic mismatch.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.