Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Is Writing Prompts Really Making Art?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.13049 v2 pith:GDWZ4T5Z submitted 2023-01-26 cs.CY cs.AIcs.NE

classification cs.CYcs.AIcs.NE
keywords systemsanalysisgenerativepromptsadvancedanyoneareasartistic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent years Generative Machine Learning systems have advanced significantly. A current wave of generative systems use text prompts to create complex imagery, video, even 3D datasets. The creators of these systems claim a revolution in bringing creativity and art to anyone who can type a prompt. In this position paper, we question the basis for these claims, dividing our analysis into three areas: the limitations of linguistic descriptions, implications of the dataset, and lastly, matters of materiality and embodiment. We conclude with an analysis of the creative possibilities enabled by prompt-based systems, asking if they can be considered a new artistic medium.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Prompting to Describing: A Cross-Cultural Study of Language for AI-Generated Music

    cs.SD 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Prompts for AI music are dominated by genre and story terms, but genre words survive into perception while story-heavy prompts produce the largest semantic mismatch.

Pith tools