Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 64 references

Spin-valley polarization control in WSe$_2$ monolayers using photochemical doping

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Photochemical doping with single UV pulses in chlorine gas moves monolayer WSe2 from n-type to p-type and sets the exciton's valley polarization, with the circular polarization dipping below $10\%$ at charge neutrality and tripling at a…

desk verdict A solid experimental demonstration that photochemical doping tunes exciton valley polarization in WSe2, with a non-monotonic Pc story that is qualitatively convincing but needs a better calibration of the neutrality point. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03049 v1 pith:GE6KPMAA submitted 2025-02-05 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

E. Katsipoulaki , K. Mourzidis , V. Jindal , D. Lagarde , T. Taniguchi , K. Watanabe , G. Kopidakis , X. Marie
show 4 more authors
M.M. Glazov E. Stratakis G. Kioseoglou I. Paradisanos
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords WSe2monolayervalleypolarizationphotochemicaldopingphotochlorinationexciton-carrierscatteringtrioncirculartransitionmetaldichalcogenides
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that a contact-free photochemical method can tune monolayer WSe2 continuously from an electron-rich to a hole-rich regime, and that this doping sweep strongly changes the spin-valley polarization of neutral excitons. At 78 K, the circular polarization of the $X_0$ emission is about $18\%$ for an initial electron density of $1.5\times 10^{11}\,\mathrm{cm^{-2}}$, falls below $10\%$ near the charge neutrality point, and rises to about $25\%$ when the hole density reaches $5\times 10^{11}\,\mathrm{cm^{-2}}$, a three-fold modulation. The authors argue that the dominant mechanism is exciton-carrier collisions: added carriers shorten the scattering time, which slows valley relaxation and raises $P_c$, while the exciton effective lifetime stays roughly constant. If correct, the result makes valley polarization adjustable without electrical gates and extends valley physics into the p-type regime.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is single-shot photochlorination: 20 ns pulses of 248 nm light in Cl2 gas adsorb chlorine at chalcogen vacancies, each pulse changing the carrier density without electrical contacts. The valley-polarization response is carried by the standard interplay $P_c = P_0/(1+\tau_r/\tau_v)$, in which valley relaxation is set by the long-range electron-hole exchange interaction through $1/\tau_v = \langle \Omega_{LT}^2 \tau_{sc}\rangle$, where $\Omega_{LT}$ is the longitudinal-transverse splitting that acts as an effective pseudospin field and $\tau_{sc}$ is the scattering time. The paper uses an analytical exciton-carrier scattering model for the homogeneous broadening $\mathrm{FWHM} = \hbar/\tau_{sc}$ to show that added holes shorten $\tau_{sc}$, thereby reducing the valley relaxation rate, and that the exciton effective lifetime remains near 1 ps across the sweep. The single fitting parameter is the root-mean-square exchange splitting, $\langle (\hbar\Omega_{LT})^2\rangle^{1/2} \approx 8$ meV.

What would settle it

In a gated WSe2 monolayer with independently calibrated densities under the same 78 K, 635 nm excitation, $P_c$ should follow the same non-monotonic curve: below $10\%$ near the neutrality point and about three times larger at a hole density of $5\times 10^{11}\,\mathrm{cm^{-2}}$. If the dip or the factor-of-three rise does not appear, or if time-resolved photoluminescence shows the exciton lifetime changing substantially across the doping sweep, the central claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the circular polarization of the neutral exciton in monolayer WSe2 is a non-monotonic function of carrier density, with a minimum near charge neutrality, and that this dependence is controlled by exciton-carrier collisions rather than by trion conversion or screening of the exchange interaction. The photochlorination sweep, calibrated against an electrostatically gated device, maps pristine WSe2 from a residual electron density of about $1.5\times 10^{11}\,\mathrm{cm^{-2}}$ through one-pulse neutrality to hole densities up to about $5\times 10^{11}\,\mathrm{cm^{-2}}$. Over this range $P_c$ changes from roughly $18\%$ to below $10\%$ to about $25\%$, and the model reproduces the curve using $P_c = P_0/(1+\tau_r/\tau_v)$ with $1/\tau_v = \langle \Omega_{LT}^2 \tau_{sc}\rangle$, a fixed $\tau_r \approx 1$ ps, and $P_0 = 100\%$. The extracted root-mean-square longitudinal-transverse splitting is about 8 meV, consistent with an independent estimate obtained from the measured FWHM and $P_c$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument leans on the assumption that a single photochlorination pulse places the sample at charge neutrality and that the initial polarization under 635 nm excitation is 100%, even though the carrier density is inferred only from the loss of the negative-trion peak and the initial polarization is likely lower under non-resonant pumping.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The same photochemical sweep can set any desired neutral-exciton polarization between the n-type and p-type extremes by choosing the number of photochlorination pulses.
  • Comparisons of valley polarization between WSe2 samples become meaningful only when the doping level is specified, because $P_c$ is minimal near charge neutrality and rises with carrier density on both sides.
  • Because exciton-carrier collisions dominate, the doping dependence of $P_c$ and the homogeneous linewidth share one physical origin, so linewidth measurements can be used to anticipate polarization changes.
  • The extracted root-mean-square exchange splitting of about 8 meV is a concrete parameter that can be tested by independent resonant-excitation or magnetic-field experiments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct Hall or transport measurement of carrier density after each photochlorination pulse would independently anchor the laser-pulse-to-density conversion and settle the small disagreement between the two optical calibrations at LP=3.
  • Because photochlorination can be spatially selective, patterned illumination could write alternating high- and low-valley-polarization regions into a single flake, offering an all-optical route to valleytronic devices.
  • If the initial polarization under non-resonant 635 nm excitation is actually below 100%, the absolute exchange splitting would be overestimated, but the relative non-monotonic trend and the factor-of-three modulation would survive; re-fitting with a measured $P_0$ would give the corrected splitting.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports photoluminescence and circular-polarization measurements on monolayer WSe2 on hBN as the carrier density is continuously tuned by photochemical chlorination. The authors observe a non-monotonic dependence of the neutral-exciton circular polarization Pc on doping: Pc falls from about 18% in the n-type regime to below 10% near the alleged charge-neutrality point (LP=1) and then rises to about 25% at a hole density of 5 x 10^11 cm^-2 (LP=7). They interpret the variation with a phenomenological model based on the long-range exchange interaction, assuming exciton-carrier collisions control the homogeneous broadening and the valley relaxation time, while the effective exciton lifetime stays near 1 ps. The central mechanistic claim is that exciton-carrier scattering is the dominant mechanism driving the Pc modulation, with an extracted root-mean-square longitudinal-transverse splitting of about 8 meV.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work would demonstrate a simple, substrate-flexible photochemical route to continuously tune the carrier density across charge neutrality without gating, and would extend valley-polarization studies into the p-type regime. The paper contains useful experimental controls: comparison with a calibrated gated device for p-type density, time-resolved PL showing a nearly density-independent exciton lifetime, and exclusion of biexciton contributions. However, the load-bearing quantitative conclusions depend on an uncalibrated density at LP=1 and on a model parameter that is fit to the same data used for its later 'confirmation.' The significance of the non-monotonic trend and the extracted microscopic parameter would be substantially higher if these points were secured by independent calibration or explicit sensitivity analysis.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results; Fig. 3(a)] The placement of the LP=1 point at charge neutrality is not directly calibrated. The text states only that the sample is 'approaching the carrier neutrality point after a single irradiation pulse (LP=1), not shown in Fig. 2a,' based on the disappearance of the X- trion peak. Since this point anchors the claimed minimum of Pc and thereby the non-monotonic dependence, I request a quantitative upper bound on the residual carrier density at LP=1 (for example, from transport measurements or a more sensitive optical calibration) or, failing that, a robustness analysis showing how the fitted minimum and the extracted Omega_LT change when the LP=1 density is shifted by reasonable values such as 0.5 x 10^11 cm^-2 or 1 x 10^11 cm^-2 in either direction.
  2. [Results, Eqs. (1)-(3) and Fig. 3(c)] The 'confirmation' of the longitudinal-transverse splitting is circular: the value sqrt(<(hbar Omega_LT)^2>) = 8 meV is obtained by fitting the experimental Pc curve in Fig. 3(a), and then the relation <(hbar Omega_LT)^2> = (hbar FWHM)/(tau_r Pc), using the same experimental Pc and FWHM data, is said to confirm it. This relation is algebraically equivalent to the model that generated the fit, so it provides no independent validation. In addition, the calculation assumes P0 = 100% for non-resonant 635 nm excitation, which is likely an upper bound because the excitation energy is far above the exciton resonance. The extracted Omega_LT and the inference that exciton-carrier collisions dominate both scale with the assumed P0. Please provide a sensitivity analysis with respect to P0 (e.g., P0 = 60-80%) and either an independent experimental constraint (resonant excitation, time-resolved Kerr rotation, or a gated-sample comparison) or language that explicitly identifies Omega_LT as a fit parameter rather than a confirmed value.
  3. [Carrier density calibration, Fig. 2] The two p-type calibration methods disagree substantially at LP=3: the X0/X+ intensity ratio gives about 4 x 10^11 cm^-2 while the X0-X+ energy splitting gives about 2.5 x 10^11 cm^-2. The model curves in Fig. 3(a) and (b) are evaluated along the full density axis, so this discrepancy is not a minor error bar; it propagates into the comparison between the experimental Pc values and the fitted model. I ask the authors to show how the fitted Omega_LT and the model curve change when the LP=3 density is assigned the higher or lower calibration value, and to state whether the non-monotonic trend and the factor-of-three increase survive under either choice.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption contains a typo: 'Three, green triangles' should read 'The three green triangles.'
  2. [Eq. (5) and surrounding text] The paper notes that Eq. (5) is derived for degenerate charge carriers and that the non-degenerate case differs by a logarithmic factor, but it does not state which case applies at the experimental densities and temperature (78 K, n up to 5 x 10^11 cm^-2). Please specify the degeneracy condition and cite the precise form used for the model curves if a non-degenerate expression was adopted.
  3. [Fig. 1(b)] The LP=1 spectrum is mentioned in the text as showing a strong reduction of X- but is not included in Fig. 1(b). Adding the LP=1 curve (or showing the full LP=0,1,3,5,7 series in the supporting information) would help the reader evaluate the progression of the trion peaks.
  4. [Abstract] The abstract says 'using controlled, single-shot photochlorination steps,' which could be misread as a single pulse per sample. Clarify that the photochlorination process is applied in a sequence of single UV pulses, with optical characterization between steps.
  5. [Temperature dependence, Fig. 4] The model curves in Fig. 4 use a temperature-independent tau_sc fixed to the 78 K FWHM value. The text acknowledges that phonon scattering should matter at higher temperatures, but a brief statement of how tau_sc(T) was modeled (or why it was kept constant) would prevent confusion.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Fitted Ω_LT = 8 meV is 'confirmed' by an algebraic rearrangement of the same model using the same Pc data, so the claimed independent check is circular.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Results, discussion of Fig. 3 (after Eq. (5))]
    "Using root mean square of the longitudinal-transverse splitting as a fitting parameter and taking τr = 1 ps, P0 = 100% we obtain the black dashed curve in Fig. 3(a) for ⟨(¯hΩLT)2⟩1/2 = 8 meV which is in agreement with experiment. Importantly, we can confirm this value without using any particular theoretical model for the scattering time: Indeed, taking into account the smallness of Pc and combining Eqs. (1) and (3), we obtain ⟨(¯hΩLT)2⟩ = (¯hFWHM)/(τrPc)."

    The 8 meV value is the fitting parameter used to make the model curve match Pc(n) in Fig. 3a. The 'confirmation' formula is derived from the same Eqs. (1) and (3) that generated the fitted curve, and it is evaluated at the same measured Pc values. Thus it is not an independent check; it is a rearrangement of the fit residual. The resulting 7–11 meV range simply reflects the scatter in Pc and FWHM around the fitted curve, so it cannot validate the fitted value or independently prove that exciton-carrier collisions dominate.

full rationale

The empirical non-monotonic Pc data are self-contained and do not reduce to the model. The density calibration against a gated WSe2 device [34] is external experimental support, and the LP=1 assignment near charge neutrality is a calibration uncertainty rather than a circular step. The only substantive circularity is the fit-then-confirm loop for the longitudinal-transverse splitting: the paper fits ⟨(¯hΩLT)2⟩1/2 = 8 meV to the Pc data using Eqs. (1) and (3), then presents a rearrangement of the same equations, evaluated with the same Pc values, as an independent confirmation. This overstates the evidence for the fitted parameter and for the claim that exciton-carrier collisions are the dominant mechanism. The central measurement of a threefold, non-monotonic Pc variation remains intact, so the paper is only partially circular rather than wholly reducible to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a standard phenomenological model of exciton valley relaxation with three effectively free parameters (Omega_LT, delta, P0). The model assumptions are standard for TMDs, but the neutrality calibration and the P0 choice are specific to this paper and are not independently verified.

free parameters (3)
  • root-mean-square longitudinal-transverse splitting sqrt(<(hbar*Omega_LT)^2>) = 8 meV
    Used as a fitting parameter in Eq. (1) with Eq. (3) to reproduce Pc versus carrier density in Fig. 3a; the 'confirmation' in Fig. 3c uses the same experimental Pc and FWHM through the same model equations, so it is a consistency check rather than an independent measurement.
  • homogeneous broadening offset delta = not specified
    Sets the FWHM floor in Eq. (5) at charge neutrality, effectively fitted to the minimum experimental FWHM.
  • initial polarization P0 = 100 percent
    Assumed to be 100 percent even though excitation is non-resonant (635 nm, detuned by about 0.24 eV from X0); directly scales the extracted Omega_LT through Pc = P0/(1+tau_r/tau_v).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The valley polarization degree follows Pc = P0/(1+tau_r/tau_v) with the valley relaxation rate 1/tau_v = <Omega_LT^2 tau_sc> (Eqs. (1) and (3)).
    Adopted from Maialle et al. and Glazov et al. (refs [15,51-54]); this is the standard bright-exciton valley relaxation model in TMDs.
  • domain assumption Carrier screening of the exchange interaction is negligible at the exciton resonance frequency, so Omega_LT is independent of carrier density.
    Based on the large ratio hbar*omega0 >> E_F (refs [56,57]); if screening were significant, the non-monotonic Pc would have a different explanation.
  • domain assumption The exciton linewidth is set by homogeneous scattering with FWHM = hbar/tau_sc, and the carrier-density-dependent broadening follows Eq. (5) from Wagner et al.
    Connects FWHM to the scattering time that enters tau_v; Eq. (5) is derived in the degenerate regime, while the holes at 5x10^11 cm^-2 are only weakly degenerate at 78 K.
  • domain assumption The effective exciton lifetime tau_r is independent of doping across the whole carrier-density range.
    Based on TRPL measurements at only two doping levels (LP=1 and LP=7) showing about 1 ps at both; intermediate doping levels are not directly measured.
  • ad hoc to paper The carrier density after one photochlorination pulse (LP=1) is near charge neutrality.
    Not directly calibrated; inferred from the disappearance of the X- trion peak. This point anchors the minimum of the non-monotonic Pc curve.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spin-valley polarization control in WSe$_2$ monolayers using photochemical doping." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GE6KPMAA

@misc{pith2026250203049,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spin-valley polarization control in WSe$_2$ monolayers using photochemical doping},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GE6KPMAA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03049}
}
abstract

We report on the influence of a photochemical doping method on the spin-valley polarization degree ($P_{c}$) of excitons in WSe$_2$ monolayers. By varying the carrier density and transitioning from an excess of electrons (n-type) to an excess of holes (p-type), we observe a non-monotonic dependence of $P_{c}$ on the doping level. Using controlled, single-shot photochlorination steps, we unveil this non-monotonic behavior, with $P_{c}$ reaching a minimum value of less than 10$\%$ at 78 K near the charge neutrality point, while increasing by a factor of three at a hole density of $5 \times 10^{11} \,\mathrm{cm^{-2}}$. The impact of the doping on $P_{c}$ is explained using a phenomenological model that accounts for various mechanisms influencing exciton polarization dynamics, including exciton-carrier scattering processes and exciton-to-trion conversion rates. Among these, exciton-carrier collisions emerge as the dominant mechanism driving the observed variations in $P_{c}$, while the exciton effective lifetime remains nearly independent of doping. These findings highlight the potential of photochemical methods for investigating valley physics and for effectively tuning the exciton polarization degree in transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.03049 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (a) Schematic illustration of the side view of the sample irradiated by a KrF (248 nm, UV) excimer laser. The metal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Carrier density calibration of the photochlorination process in the p-type regime. (a) Comparison of the PL intensity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: (a) Circular polarization of X [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Circular polarization of neutral excitons as a function of temperature for different carrier densities, using a 635 nm [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Schaibley, J. R. et al. Valleytronics in 2d materials. Na- ture Reviews Materials 1, 1–15 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Wolf, S. et al. Spintronics: a spin-based electronics vision for the future. science 294, 1488–1495 (2001)

    work page 2001

  3. [3]

    & Tsui, D

    Sham, L., Allen Jr, S., Kamgar, A. & Tsui, D. Valley- valley splitting in inversion layers on a high-index surface of silicon. Physical Review Letters 40, 472 (1978)

    work page 1978

  4. [4]

    Thompson, S. E. et al. A 90-nm logic technology fea- turing strained-silicon. IEEE Transactions on electron devices 51, 1790–1797 (2004)

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    & Shayegan, M

    Shkolnikov, Y., De Poortere, E., Tutuc, E. & Shayegan, M. Valley splitting of alas two-dimensional electrons in a perpendicular magnetic field. Physical review letters 89, 226805 (2002)

    work page 2002

  6. [6]

    & Yao, W

    Liu, G.-B., Xiao, D., Yao, Y., Xu, X. & Yao, W. Electronic structures and theoretical modelling of two- dimensional group-vib transition metal dichalcogenides. Chemical Society Reviews 44, 2643–2663 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    & Yao, W

    Xiao, D., Liu, G.-B., Feng, W., Xu, X. & Yao, W. Cou- pled spin and valley physics in monolayers of mos 2 and other group-vi dichalcogenides. Physical review letters 108, 196802 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Cao, T. et al. Valley-selective circular dichroism of mono- layer molybdenum disulphide. Nature communications 3, 887 (2012)

    work page 2012

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    F., He, K., Shan, J

    Mak, K. F., He, K., Shan, J. & Heinz, T. F. Control of valley polarization in monolayer mos2 by optical helicity. Nature nanotechnology 7, 494–498 (2012)

    2012

  2. [10]

    & Pereira, V

    Hipolito, F. & Pereira, V. M. Second harmonic spec- troscopy to optically detect valley polarization in 2d ma- terials. 2D Materials 4, 021027 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    Ho, Y. W. et al. Measuring valley polarization in two-dimensional materials with second-harmonic spec- troscopy. ACS Photonics 7, 925–931 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    Mouchliadis, L. et al. Probing valley population imbal- ance in transition metal dichalcogenides via temperature- dependent second harmonic generation imaging. npj 2D Materials and Applications 5, 6 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Herrmann, P. et al. Nonlinear all-optical coherent gener- ation and read-out of valleys in atomically thin semicon- ductors. Small 2301126 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Wang, G. et al. Colloquium: Excitons in atomically thin transition metal dichalcogenides. Reviews of Modern Physics 90, 021001 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Glazov, M. M. et al. Spin and valley dynamics of excitons in transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers. physica status solidi (b) 252, 2349–2362 (2015)

    2015

  8. [16]

    Glazov, M. M. & Ivchenko, E. L. Valley orientation of electrons and excitons in atomically thin transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers (brief review). JETP Letters 113, 7–17 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Kioseoglou, G. et al. Valley polarization and intervalley scattering in monolayer mos 2. Applied Physics Letters 101 (2012)

    2012

  10. [18]

    Wang, G. et al. Polarization and time-resolved photolu- minescence spectroscopy of excitons in mose 2 monolay- ers. Applied Physics Letters 106 (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    & Dery, H

    Song, Y. & Dery, H. Transport theory of mono- layer transition-metal dichalcogenides through symme- try. Physical review letters 111, 026601 (2013)

    2013

  12. [20]

    & Cui, X

    Zeng, H., Dai, J., Yao, W., Xiao, D. & Cui, X. Val- ley polarization in mos 2 monolayers by optical pumping. Nature nanotechnology 7, 490–493 (2012)

    2012

  13. [21]

    Wang, G. et al. Giant enhancement of the optical second- harmonic emission of wse 2 monolayers by laser excita- tion at exciton resonances. Physical review letters 114, 097403 (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    T., Currie, M., Friedman, A

    Kioseoglou, G., Hanbicki, A. T., Currie, M., Friedman, A. L. & Jonker, B. T. Optical polarization and intervalley scattering in single layers of mos 2 and mose 2. Scientific reports 6, 25041 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    Hanbicki, A. T. et al. Anomalous temperature-dependent spin-valley polarization in monolayer ws 2. Scientific re- ports 6, 18885 (2016)

    2016

  16. [24]

    Paradisanos, I. et al. Prominent room temperature valley polarization in ws 2/graphene heterostructures grown by chemical vapor deposition. Applied Physics Letters 116 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Zhu, C. et al. Strain tuning of optical emission energy and polarization in monolayer and bilayer mos2. Physical Review B 88, 121301 (2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    & Malic, E

    Feierabend, M., Morlet, A., Bergh¨ auser, G. & Malic, E. Impact of strain on the optical fingerprint of monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides. Physical Review B 96, 045425 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    Kourmoulakis, G. et al. Biaxial strain tuning of exci- ton energy and polarization in monolayer ws 2. Applied Physics Letters 123 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    An, Z. et al. Strain control of exciton and trion spin- valley dynamics in monolayer transition metal dichalco- genides. Physical Review B 108, L041404 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Zhang, Q. et al. Prolonging valley polarization life- time through gate-controlled exciton-to-trion conversion in monolayer molybdenum ditelluride. Nature Commu- nications 13, 4101 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Park, S. et al. Efficient valley polarization of charged excitons and resident carriers in molybdenum disul- fide monolayers by optical pumping. Communications Physics 5, 73 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Feng, S. et al. Engineering valley polarization of mono- layer ws 2: a physical doping approach. Small 15, 1805503 (2019)

    2019

  24. [32]

    Shinokita, K. et al. Continuous control and enhance- ment of excitonic valley polarization in monolayer wse 2 by electrostatic doping. Advanced Functional Materials 29, 1900260 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Katsipoulaki, E. et al. Electron density control in wse 2 monolayers via photochlorination. 2D Materials 10, 045008 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Robert, C. et al. Measurement of conduction and va- lence bands g-factors in a transition metal dichalcogenide monolayer. Physical Review Letters 126, 067403 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    & Ur- 8 baszek, B

    Shree, S., Paradisanos, I., Marie, X., Robert, C. & Ur- 8 baszek, B. Guide to optical spectroscopy of layered semi- conductors. Nature Reviews Physics 3, 39–54 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    Beret, D. et al. Exciton spectroscopy and unidirectional transport in mose 2-wse2 lateral heterostructures encap- sulated in hexagonal boron nitride. npj 2D Materials and Applications 6, 84 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    Paradisanos, I. et al. Controlling interlayer excitons in mos2 layers grown by chemical vapor deposition. Nature communications 11, 2391 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Ren, L. et al. Control of the bright-dark exciton splitting using the lamb shift in a two-dimensional semiconductor. Physical Review Letters 131, 116901 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Demeridou, I. et al. Spatially selective reversible charge carrier density tuning in ws 2 monolayers via photochlo- rination. 2D Materials 6, 015003 (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    Sahin, H. et al. Anomalous raman spectra and thickness- dependent electronic properties of wse 2. Physical Review B 87, 165409 (2013)

    2013

  33. [41]

    & Jonker, B

    Hanbicki, A., Currie, M., Kioseoglou, G., Friedman, A. & Jonker, B. Measurement of high exciton binding en- ergy in the monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides ws2 and wse 2. Solid State Communications 203, 16–20 (2015)

    2015

  34. [42]

    Del Corro, E. et al. Excited excitonic states in 1l, 2l, 3l, and bulk wse2 observed by resonant raman spectroscopy. Acs Nano 8, 9629–9635 (2014)

    2014

  35. [43]

    Yang, M. et al. Relaxation and darkening of excitonic complexes in electrostatically doped monolayer wse 2: Roles of exciton-electron and trion-electron interactions. Physical Review B 105, 085302 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    Courtade, E. et al. Charged excitons in monolayer wse 2: Experiment and theory. Physical Review B 96, 085302 (2017)

    2017

  37. [45]

    He, M. et al. Valley phonons and exciton complexes in a monolayer semiconductor. Nature communications 11, 618 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    Ye, Z. et al. Probing excitonic dark states in single-layer tungsten disulphide. Nature 513, 214–218 (2014)

    2014

  39. [47]

    & Wolfe, J

    Kim, J., Wake, D. & Wolfe, J. Thermodynamics of biex- citons in a gaas quantum well. Physical Review B 50, 15099 (1994)

    1994

  40. [48]

    Barbone, M. et al. Charge-tuneable biexciton complexes in monolayer wse 2. Nature communications 9, 3721 (2018)

    2018

  41. [49]

    Paradisanos, I. et al. Room temperature observation of biexcitons in exfoliated ws 2 monolayers. Applied Physics Letters 110 (2017)

    2017

  42. [50]

    Glazov, M. M. Optical properties of charged excitons in two-dimensional semiconductors. The Journal of Chem- ical Physics 153 (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    & Sham, L

    Maialle, M., de Andrada e Silva, E. & Sham, L. Exciton spin dynamics in quantum wells. Phys. Rev. B 47, 15776 (1993). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.47. 15776

    1993 doi

  44. [52]

    Ivchenko, E. L. Optical spectroscopy of semiconductor nanostructures (Alpha Science, Harrow UK, 2005)

    2005

  45. [53]

    Glazov, M. M. et al. Exciton fine structure and spin decoherence in monolayers of transition metal dichalco- genides. Physical Review B 89, 201302 (2014)

    2014

  46. [54]

    & Perel, V

    D’yakonov, M. & Perel, V. Spin orientation of electrons associated with the interband absorption of light in semi- conductors. Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoret- ical Physics 33, 1053 (1971)

    1971

  47. [55]

    Screening effects due to carrier doping on val- ley relaxation in transition metal dichalcogenide mono- layers

    Konabe, S. Screening effects due to carrier doping on val- ley relaxation in transition metal dichalcogenide mono- layers. Applied Physics Letters 109 (2016)

    2016

  48. [56]

    Kiselev, V. A. & Zhilich, A. G. Effective screening of the short-range exchange interaction in excitons. Phys. Solid. State 15, 1351 (1974)

    1974

  49. [57]

    Glazov, M. M. & Chernikov, A. Breakdown of the static approximation for free carrier screening of excitons in monolayer semiconductors. physica status solidi (b) 255, 1800216 (2018)

    2018

  50. [58]

    & Bastard, G

    Ayari, S., Jaziri, S., Ferreira, R. & Bastard, G. Phonon-assisted exciton/trion conversion efficiency in transition metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 102, 125410 (2020). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.102.125410

    2020

  51. [59]

    Beret, D. et al. Nonlinear diffusion of negatively charged excitons in monolayer wse 2. Physical Review B 107, 045420 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    Astakhov, G. V. et al. Oscillator strength of trion states in ZnSe-based quantum wells. Phys. Rev. B 62, 10345 (2000)

    2000

  53. [61]

    Efimkin, D. K. & MacDonald, A. H. Many-body theory of trion absorption features in two-dimensional semicon- ductors. Physical Review B 95, 035417 (2017)

    2017

  54. [62]

    Wagner, K. et al. Diffusion of excitons in a two- dimensional fermi sea of free charges. Nano Letters 23, 4708–4715 (2023)

    2023

  55. [63]

    Zhu, C. et al. Exciton valley dynamics probed by kerr ro- tation in wse2 monolayers. Physical Review B 90, 161302 (2014)

    2014

  56. [64]

    Prazdnichnykh, A. I. et al. Control of the exci- ton valley dynamics in atomically thin semiconduc- tors by tailoring the environment. Phys. Rev. B 103, 085302 (2021). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.103.085302

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.