REVIEW 1 cited by
PINOCCHIO and the hierarchical build-up of dark matter haloes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
PINOCCHIO and the hierarchical build-up of dark matter haloes
read the original abstract
We study the ability of PINOCCHIO (PINpointing Orbit-Crossing Collapsed HIerarchical Objects) to predict the merging histories of dark matter (DM) haloes, comparing the PINOCCHIO predictions with the results of two large N-body simulations run from the same set of initial conditions. We focus our attention on quantities most relevant to galaxy formation and large-scale structure studies. PINOCCHIO is able to predict the statistics of merger trees with a typical accuracy of 20 per cent. Its validity extends to higher-order moments of the distribution of progenitors. The agreement is valid also at the object-by-object level, with 70-90 per cent of the progenitors cleanly recognised when the parent halo is cleanly recognised itself. Predictions are presented also for quantities that are usually not reproduced by semi-analytic codes, such as the two-point correlation function of the progenitors of massive haloes and the distribution of initial orbital parameters of merging haloes. For the accuracy of the prediction and for the facility with which merger histories are produced, PINOCCHIO provides a means to generate catalogues of DM haloes which is extremely competitive to large-scale N-body simulations, making it a suitable tool for galaxy formation and large-scale structure studies.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Prompt cusps in hierarchical dark matter halos: Implications for annihilation boost
Prompt cusps in hierarchical substructure raise the Milky-Way annihilation boost to B≈50, roughly four times lower than universal-average predictions because fewer cusps survive in this merger-tree treatment.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.