Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 48 references

Early dark-matter cusps can raise the annihilation boost to about 50.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 07:30 UTC pith:HNOFXLTU

load-bearing objection Useful hierarchical treatment of prompt-cusp boosts, but the headline B~50 hinges on an uncalibrated alpha that moves the answer by ~5x. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2601.19863 v3 pith:HNOFXLTU submitted 2026-01-27 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.COastro-ph.HEhep-ph

Prompt cusps in hierarchical dark matter halos: Implications for annihilation boost

Shin'ichiro Ando , Mart\'in Mor\'o Gonz\'alez , Youyou Li This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA astro-ph.COastro-ph.HEhep-ph
keywords dark matterprompt cuspsannihilation boostmicrohalossubstructurehierarchical structure formationWIMPindirect detection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that 'prompt cusps'—the steep, compact remnants of the first dark-matter peaks to collapse—can dominate the annihilation luminosity of cold dark matter halos. Embedding one such cusp in every first-generation microhalo and tracking its survival through nested merger histories, the authors find total annihilation boosts of order 50 for Milky-Way-sized halos at z=0, compared with a few from subhalos alone. The boost converges after including a few levels of substructure, and the cusp contribution mainly raises the overall normalization without changing the mass and redshift trends. The authors also find that earlier universal-average, peak-based estimates overpredict the boost by about a factor of four, because they infer roughly twice as many surviving cusps per host.

Core claim

The central discovery is that prompt cusps, with inner density profile ρ∝r^-3/2, survive hierarchical assembly in sufficient numbers to dominate the dark-matter annihilation signal of host halos. Using a semi-analytic merger-tree model that assigns a cusp to each first-generation microhalo, propagates it through subhalo and sub-subhalo levels, and treats tidal stripping explicitly, the calculation yields a total boost B≈50 for a 10^12 solar-mass host at z=0 with fiducial assumptions (all collapsed halos host an annihilation-relevant cusp, and stripped cusps survive). This is about four times lower than the universal-average peak-based estimate, with the difference traced to a roughly factor-

What carries the argument

The central object is the prompt cusp: a self-similar ρ=Ar^-3/2 density profile formed by nearly radial collapse of low-ellipticity primordial density peaks, truncated at an inner core radius set by the maximum coarse-grained phase-space density of the dark matter. Its annihilation luminosity J_cusp = ∫_{r_core}^{r_cusp} 4πr²ρ² dr = 4πA²(0.531 + ln(r_cusp/r_core)) provides a fixed brightness per cusp. The argument's engine is a hierarchical subhalo census that assigns one cusp to every first-generation microhalo, counts nested subhalos recursively, splits bound versus tidally stripped substructure, and scales the total by a cusp-occupation fraction f_cusp and a stripped-cusp survival fractio

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that essentially every collapsed first-generation microhalo harbors a prompt cusp that remains annihilation-relevant (f_cusp = 1), and that the extrapolated sharp-k filter calibration correctly predicts microhalo abundances at Earth-mass scales; if either is off, the predicted boost scales accordingly.

What would settle it

Run a cosmological simulation that resolves Earth-mass microhalos in a Milky-Way-sized volume and count the surviving ρ∝r^-3/2 cusps. If the cusp number per 10^12 solar-mass host is not within roughly a factor of two of 10^16, the fiducial boost B≈50 is ruled out: a fivefold lower count would drop the boost to ~10, while a fivefold higher count would raise it to ~250.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The annihilation luminosity of a CDM halo in WIMP models is dominated by prompt cusps rather than by the smooth halo or NFW subhalos, for fiducial cusp occupation.
  • The substructure hierarchy converges rapidly: including sub-subhalos to level 3 or 4 is enough for a stable boost prediction.
  • Boost factors across host masses and redshifts are raised in normalization but keep the same mass and redshift trends as the no-cusp baseline, so the boost function's shape remains predictable.
  • Universal-average, peak-based cusp counts overestimate the boost by roughly a factor of four; a merger-tree-based, environment-dependent census is needed for accurate predictions.
  • The predicted boost is sensitive to the mapping between the small-scale power cutoff and microhalo mass: changing the sharp-k filter calibration parameter from 1 to 2.5 shifts the cusp abundance by factors of about 5 to 0.4, so calibrating this mapping at Earth-mass scales is a priority.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If prompt cusps dominate the boost, gamma-ray and cluster constraints on WIMP annihilation are likely to be somewhat relaxed compared to universal-average cusp estimates, since the predicted signal is about four times lower—but the factor-of-several uncertainty in cusp abundance keeps this tentative.
  • The same machinery can be adapted to other dark matter models, such as warm dark matter or self-interacting dark matter, by replacing the microhalo mass function and survival rates.
  • A direct prediction to test in ultra-high-resolution simulations: a Milky-Way-sized environment should contain roughly 10^16 surviving prompt cusps; counting Earth-mass cusps in such simulations would confirm or refute the boost normalization.
  • Environmental anti-bias of microhalos, if real, would reduce cusp counts in massive hosts further, pushing boosts below the fiducial value and sharpening the difference from universal-average estimates.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper embeds prompt cusps into the SASHIMI semi-analytic subhalo framework. Each first-generation subhalo is assigned one prompt cusp; the cusp population is propagated through hierarchical merging and tidal stripping, with parameters f_cusp (cusp occupation) and f_surv,stripped (survival of cusps from stripped substructure). The resulting annihilation boost is computed as B = B_sh + B_cusp. For a 10^12 Msun host at z=0 with fiducial parameters, the hierarchy converges by sub4-subhalos and B ~ 50, versus a no-cusp baseline of B_sh ~ a few. The fiducial boost is a factor of ~4 lower than the universal-average estimate of Delos & White (2023), attributed to a factor ~2 smaller inferred cusp abundance. The paper also reports B(M,z) across host masses/redshifts and releases an updated SASHIMI package.

Significance. If correct, the paper establishes a hierarchical, environment-dependent calculation of prompt-cusp boosts, replacing universal-average estimates and showing that prompt cusps dominate the annihilation luminosity. The public code release, explicit free parameters, convergence check, and comparison to Delos & White are strengths. However, the headline value B~50 is set by an uncalibrated sharp-k filter parameter alpha at microhalo scales and by an optimistic f_surv,stripped=1; the acknowledged alpha sensitivity alone brackets B by roughly a factor of 5 in either direction, larger than the factor-of-4 difference from Delos & White that the paper interprets. The quantitative central claim therefore needs additional calibration or a re-framing as a conditional prediction.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 5.2; Eq. (4.2); Fig. 2] The central result B~50 is proportional to N_cusp (Eq. 4.2), and Sec. 5.2 reports that varying alpha from 1 to 2.5 changes the cusp abundance by factors of ~5 and ~0.4 relative to the fiducial. Applied to Fig. 2, this brackets B for a Milky-Way host between roughly ~20 and ~250, straddling and reordering the Delos-White estimate (~200). The factor-of-four discrepancy and the conclusion that universal-average estimates overpredict are therefore not robust to the alpha mapping. The paper acknowledges this in Sec. 5.2, but the abstract and conclusions state B~50 as a fiducial result. A dedicated microhalo-scale calibration of alpha, or an explicit presentation of all headline numbers as functions of alpha with a defensible prior, is required before the quantitative claims can be accepted.
  2. [Secs. 2.4 and 3.2; Eqs. (2.14) and (3.8)] The role of f_coll is contradictory. In Sec. 2.4, f_coll=0.48 is defined as the fraction of peaks satisfying the cusp-formation condition e^2 - p|p| < 0.26, i.e., a cusp-formation efficiency. In Sec. 3.2, however, the same number is used to argue that only ~48% of peaks form bound halos, and then f_cusp=1 is adopted so that every collapsed halo contains a cusp. If f_coll is a cusp-formation fraction, then N_cusp in Eq. (3.8) overcounts cusps by roughly 1/f_coll ~ 2; if it is a halo-collapse fraction, the terminology conflicts with Sec. 2.4. This ambiguity propagates directly into N_cusp and B via Eq. (4.2) and must be resolved.
  3. [Fig. 4; Eq. (3.8)] With f_surv,stripped=0 and f_cusp=1, the cusp term is reduced to the 'in' component (Table 1), lowering B for a 10^12 Msun host by roughly a factor of three relative to the fiducial f_surv,stripped=1 case. Thus the headline B~50 is an upper edge of the survival band, not a central value. Combined with the alpha sensitivity, the model's own parameter ranges span more than an order of magnitude in B, so the abstract and conclusions need to state B~50 within an explicit range or as a fiducial point estimate with the full uncertainty.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.1] The phrase 'sub n-subhalos' is awkward; suggest 'sub_n-subhalos' or clearer notation throughout.
  2. [Sec. 2.2] The sentence 'A fraction f_coll of all the peaks will collapse to form a cusps in them' contains a typo and should be rewritten; also, f_coll should be defined exactly once with a single consistent meaning.
  3. [Sec. 5.2] The cited support from Zheng et al. (2024) concerns EPS accuracy in void environments; its applicability to massive hosts is less direct. Consider acknowledging this limitation.
  4. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption says bands correspond to different f_cusp choices, but the text does not clearly specify line styles or colors for f_surv,stripped edges; please clarify.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the boost calculation is an explicit, parameter-controlled model evaluation rather than a self-referential derivation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The central quantity B_cusp is defined as N_cusp * <J_cusp> / J_host, with N_cusp constructed from the SASHIMI subhalo census via Eq. (3.8) and explicit parameters f_cusp and f_surv,stripped. The headline B~50 is a consequence of those adopted inputs, not an input itself; Fig. 4 varies the cusp-occupation parameters, and Sec. 5.2 openly reports the sensitivity of the cusp abundance to the sharp-k calibration parameter alpha. The alpha=1.8 choice is calibrated only in the large-mass regime and extrapolated to microhalo masses; this is an uncalibrated mapping and a genuine robustness limitation, but it is not circular because the target abundance or boost is not used to set alpha. Self-citations to SASHIMI [17,18] supply the underlying semi-analytic framework and the no-cusp baseline, but SASHIMI is a public, code-based tool and the prompt-cusp implementation is a new extension; no load-bearing argument reduces to an unverified self-citation. The comparison with Delos & White is an external benchmark, and the factor-of-four difference is explained by a difference in N_cusp rather than used as an input. No equation is equivalent to its own output by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central prediction inherits three unmeasured numbers (f_cusp, f_surv,stripped, α) and two unvalidated extrapolations (EPS to microhalo scale and the σ(M) mapping at the free-streaming cutoff). No new particles, forces, or entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • f_cusp = 1.0 (fiducial); 0.25, 0.5 explored
    Fraction of collapsed halos whose central prompt cusp contributes to annihilation; scales B_cusp linearly via Eq. (4.2) and Eq. (3.8).
  • f_surv,stripped = 1.0 (fiducial); [0,1] explored
    Fraction of cusps associated with stripped subhalos that contribute independently; controls the width of the bands in Fig. 4.
  • alpha = 1.8
    Coefficient mapping the sharp-k cutoff to halo mass in σ(M); chosen to match real-space top-hat in the large-mass regime and not calibrated at microhalo scale. Varying 1→2.5 changes N_cusp by factors ~5 down to 0.4.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Every collapsed primordial halo contains a central prompt cusp relevant for annihilation (f_cusp=1 fiducial).
    Adopted in Sec. 3.2; physically motivated but not derived, and centrally sets N_cusp.
  • domain assumption Sub-subhalos are spatially distributed within their parent according to the cored profile n(r) ∝ [r^2 + (r_s^{(n-1)})^2]^{-3/2}.
    Eq. (3.7) determines the split into 'in' vs 'stripped' cusps; no simulation calibration is shown for this profile.
  • domain assumption Cusps associated with tidally stripped substructure survive and contribute independently (f_surv,stripped=1).
    Sec. 3.3; authors motivate it physically but treat it as a bracketed parameter.
  • domain assumption EPS-based SASHIMI mass functions remain accurate when extrapolated to microhalo masses near the free-streaming scale.
    Sec. 5.2; supported by one void-environment simulation [44], but not calibrated for massive hosts.
  • domain assumption Prompt-cusp formation and structural relations from Delos & White peak statistics are assumed correct.
    Sec. 2: ρ=Ar^{-3/2}, f_coll≈0.48, r_core from the phase-space bound are taken from Refs. [24,27,34].
  • ad hoc to paper The sharp-k cutoff mapping with α=1.8 calibrated at large masses remains valid at Earth-mass scales.
    Sec. 3.1 and Sec. 5.2; α is fit to large-mass σ(M) and then applied at k_fs; authors explicitly flag missing microhalo calibration.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 13621 in / 9896 out tokens · 106577 ms · 2026-08-03T07:30:27.732656+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent simulations have identified long-lived ``prompt cusps'' -- compact remnants of early density peaks with inner profiles $\rho\propto r^{-3/2}$. They can survive hierarchical assembly and potentially enhance signals of dark matter annihilation. In this work, we incorporate prompt cusps into the semi-analytic substructure framework SASHIMI, enabling a fully hierarchical, environment-dependent calculation of the annihilation luminosity that consistently tracks subhalos, sub-subhalos, and tidal stripping. We assign prompt cusps to first-generation microhalos and propagate their survival through the merger history, including an explicit treatment of cusps associated with stripped substructure. We find that the substructure hierarchy converges rapidly once a few levels are included, and that prompt cusps can raise the total annihilation boost of Milky-Way--size hosts at $z=0$ to $B\sim 50$ for fiducial cusp-occupation assumptions, compared to a subhalo-only baseline of $B_{\rm sh}\sim\mathrm{few}$. Across a wide range of host masses and redshifts, prompt cusps increase the normalization of $B(M_{\rm host},z)$ while largely preserving its mass and redshift trends. Compared to universal-average, peak-based estimates, our fiducial boosts are lower by about a factor of a few, primarily reflecting a correspondingly smaller inferred cusp abundance in host halos, highlighting the importance of unifying peak-based cusp formation with merger-tree evolution and environmental dependence.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 31 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Hofmann, D.J

    S. Hofmann, D.J. Schwarz and H. St¨ ocker,Damping scales of neutralino cold dark matter, Physical Review D64(2001)

    2001

  2. [2]

    Profumo, K

    S. Profumo, K. Sigurdson and M. Kamionkowski,What mass are the smallest protohalos?, Phys. Rev. Lett.97(2006) 031301

    2006

  3. [3]

    Bertschinger,The Effects of Cold Dark Matter Decoupling and Pair Annihilation on Cosmological Perturbations,Phys

    E. Bertschinger,The Effects of Cold Dark Matter Decoupling and Pair Annihilation on Cosmological Perturbations,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 063509 [astro-ph/0607319]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  4. [4]

    Green, S

    A.M. Green, S. Hofmann and D.J. Schwarz,The power spectrum of susy-cdm on subgalactic scales: Cdm power spectrum on subgalactic scales,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society353(2004) L23–L27

    2004

  5. [5]

    Loeb and M

    A. Loeb and M. Zaldarriaga,The Small-scale power spectrum of cold dark matter,Phys. Rev. D 71(2005) 103520 [astro-ph/0504112]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  6. [6]

    Diamanti, M.E.C

    R. Diamanti, M.E.C. Catalan and S. Ando,Dark matter protohalos in a nine parameter MSSM and implications for direct and indirect detection,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 065029 [1506.01529]. – 14 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    Silk and A

    J. Silk and A. Stebbins,Clumpy cold dark matter,Astrophys. J.411(1993) 439

    1993

  8. [8]

    Bergstrom, J

    L. Bergstrom, J. Edsjo, P. Gondolo and P. Ullio,Clumpy neutralino dark matter,Phys. Rev. D 59(1999) 043506 [astro-ph/9806072]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  9. [9]

    Bergstrom, J

    L. Bergstrom, J. Edsjo and P. Ullio,Possible indications of a clumpy dark matter halo,Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 083507 [astro-ph/9804050]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  10. [10]

    Ando,Can dark matter annihilation dominate the extragalactic gamma-ray background?, Phys

    S. Ando,Can dark matter annihilation dominate the extragalactic gamma-ray background?, Phys. Rev. Lett.94(2005) 171303 [astro-ph/0503006]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  11. [11]

    Pieri, G

    L. Pieri, G. Bertone and E. Branchini,Dark Matter Annihilation in Substructures Revised, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.384(2008) 1627 [0706.2101]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  12. [12]

    Koushiappas, A.R

    S.M. Koushiappas, A.R. Zentner and T.P. Walker,The observability of gamma-rays from neutralino annihilations in Milky Way substructure,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 043501 [astro-ph/0309464]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  13. [13]

    Stoehr, S.D.M

    F. Stoehr, S.D.M. White, V. Springel, G. Tormen and N. Yoshida,Dark matter annihilation in the halo of the Milky Way,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.345(2003) 1313 [astro-ph/0307026]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  14. [14]

    Berezinsky, V

    V. Berezinsky, V. Dokuchaev and Y. Eroshenko,Anisotropy of dark matter annihilation with respect to the Galactic plane,JCAP07(2007) 011 [astro-ph/0612733]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  15. [15]

    Lavalle, Q

    J. Lavalle, Q. Yuan, D. Maurin and X.J. Bi,Full Calculation of Clumpiness Boost factors for Antimatter Cosmic Rays in the light of Lambda-CDM N-body simulation results. Abandoning hope in clumpiness enhancement?,Astron. Astrophys.479(2008) 427 [0709.3634]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  16. [16]

    Bartels and S

    R. Bartels and S. Ando,Boosting the annihilation boost: Tidal effects on dark matter subhalos and consistent luminosity modeling,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 123508 [1507.08656]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  17. [17]

    Hiroshima, S

    N. Hiroshima, S. Ando and T. Ishiyama,Modeling evolution of dark matter substructure and annihilation boost,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 123002 [1803.07691]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    S. Ando, T. Ishiyama and N. Hiroshima,Halo substructure boosts to the signatures of dark matter annihilation,Galaxies7(2019) 68

    2019

  19. [19]

    Ishiyama and S

    T. Ishiyama and S. Ando,The Abundance and Structure of Subhaloes near the Free Streaming Scale and Their Impact on Indirect Dark Matter Searches,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.492 (2020) 3662 [1907.03642]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Navarro, C.S

    J.F. Navarro, C.S. Frenk and S.D.M. White,A universal density profile from hierarchical clustering,The Astrophysical Journal490(1997) 493

    1997

  21. [21]

    Ishiyama, J

    T. Ishiyama, J. Makino and T. Ebisuzaki,Gamma-ray Signal from Earth-mass Dark Matter Microhalos,Astrophys. J. Lett.723(2010) L195 [1006.3392]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  22. [22]

    Anderhalden and J

    D. Anderhalden and J. Diemand,Density Profiles of CDM Microhalos and their Implications for Annihilation Boost Factors,JCAP04(2013) 009 [1302.0003]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  23. [23]

    Ishiyama,Hierarchical Formation of Dark Matter Halos and the Free Streaming Scale, Astrophys

    T. Ishiyama,Hierarchical Formation of Dark Matter Halos and the Free Streaming Scale, Astrophys. J.788(2014) 27 [1404.1650]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  24. [24]

    Delos and S.D.M

    M.S. Delos and S.D.M. White,Inner cusps of the first dark matter haloes: formation and survival in a cosmological context,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society518 (2022) 3509 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/518/3/3509/47466116/stac3373.pdf]

    2022

  25. [25]

    Ondaro-Mallea, R.E

    L. Ondaro-Mallea, R.E. Angulo, J. St¨ ucker, O. Hahn and S.D.M. White,Phase-space simulations of prompt cusps: simulating the formation of the first haloes without artificial fragmentation,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.527(2023) 10802 [2309.05707]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Delos, M

    M.S. Delos, M. Korsmeier, A. Widmark, C. Blanco, T. Linden and S.D.M. White,Limits on dark matter annihilation in prompt cusps from the isotropic gamma-ray background, 2024. – 15 –

    2024

  27. [27]

    Delos and S.D.M

    M.S. Delos and S.D.M. White,Prompt cusps and the dark matter annihilation signal,JCAP 10(2023) 008 [2209.11237]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Ginat, M.L

    Y.B. Ginat, M.L. Nastac, R.J. Ewart, S. Konrad, M. Bartelmann and A.A. Schekochihin, Gravitational turbulence: The small-scale limit of the cold-dark-matter power spectrum,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 063501 [2501.01524]

    arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    St¨ ucker, G

    J. St¨ ucker, G. Ogiya, S.D.M. White and R.E. Angulo,The effect of stellar encounters on the dark matter annihilation signal from prompt cusps,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.523(2023) 1067 [2301.04670]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Crnogorˇ cevi´ c, M.S

    M. Crnogorˇ cevi´ c, M.S. Delos, N. Kuritz´ en and T. Linden,Gamma-ray observations of galaxy clusters strongly constrain dark matter annihilation in prompt cusps,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 103001 [2501.14865]

    arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Olea-Romacho, M

    M.O. Olea-Romacho, M. Fairbairn and P. Ralegankar,Can WIMPs Survive the Legacy of a Magnetised Early Universe?,2507.18692

    arXiv

  32. [32]

    Dekker, S

    A. Dekker, S. Ando, C.A. Correa and K.C.Y. Ng,Warm dark matter constraints using Milky Way satellite observations and subhalo evolution modeling,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 123026 [2111.13137]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    S. Ando, S. Horigome, E.O. Nadler, D. Yang and H.-B. Yu,SASHIMI-SIDM: semi-analytical subhalo modelling for self-interacting dark matter at sub-galactic scales,JCAP02(2025) 053 [2403.16633]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Delos, M

    M.S. Delos, M. Bruff and A.L. Erickcek,Predicting the density profiles of the first halos,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 023523

    2019

  35. [35]

    et al.,Planck 2018 results - vi

    Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C. et al.,Planck 2018 results - vi. cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6

    2018

  36. [36]

    Bardeen, J.R

    J.M. Bardeen, J.R. Bond, N. Kaiser and A.S. Szalay,The Statistics of Peaks of Gaussian Random Fields,Astrophys. J.304(1986) 15

    1986

  37. [37]

    Eisenstein and W

    D.J. Eisenstein and W. Hu,Baryonic features in the matter transfer function,Astrophys. J. 496(1998) 605 [astro-ph/9709112]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  38. [38]

    Green, S

    A.M. Green, S. Hofmann and D.J. Schwarz,The power spectrum of SUSY - CDM on sub-galactic scales,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.353(2004) L23 [astro-ph/0309621]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  39. [39]

    Sheth, H.J

    R.K. Sheth, H.J. Mo and G. Tormen,Ellipsoidal collapse and an improved model for the number and spatial distribution of dark matter haloes,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.323(2001) 1 [astro-ph/9907024]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  40. [40]

    Tremaine and J.E

    S. Tremaine and J.E. Gunn,Dynamical Role of Light Neutral Leptons in Cosmology,Phys. Rev. Lett.42(1979) 407

    1979

  41. [41]

    Schneider, R.E

    A. Schneider, R.E. Smith and D. Reed,Halo Mass Function and the Free Streaming Scale, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.433(2013) 1573 [1303.0839]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  42. [42]

    Bond and S.T

    J.R. Bond and S.T. Myers,The Hierarchical peak patch picture of cosmic catalogs. 1. Algorithms,Astrophys. J. Suppl.103(1996) 1

    1996

  43. [43]

    Bond and S.T

    J.R. Bond and S.T. Myers,The Hierarchical peak patch picture of cosmic catalogs. 2. Validation and application to clusters,Astrophys. J. Suppl.103(1996) 41

    1996

  44. [44]

    Zheng, S

    H. Zheng, S. Bose, C.S. Frenk, L. Gao, A. Jenkins, S. Liao et al.,The abundance of dark matter haloes down to Earth mass,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.528(2024) 7300 [2310.16093]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Paranjape and R.K

    A. Paranjape and R.K. Sheth,Peaks theory and the excursion set approach,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.426(2012) 2789 [1206.3506]. – 16 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  46. [46]

    Paranjape, R.K

    A. Paranjape, R.K. Sheth and V. Desjacques,Excursion set peaks: a self-consistent model of dark halo abundances and clustering,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.431(2013) 1503 [1210.1483]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  47. [47]

    Monaco, T

    P. Monaco, T. Theuns and G. Taffoni,Pinocchio: pinpointing orbit-crossing collapsed hierarchical objects in a linear density field,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.331(2002) 587 [astro-ph/0109323]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  48. [48]

    Taffoni, P

    G. Taffoni, P. Monaco and T. Theuns,Pinocchio and the hierarchical build-up of dark matter haloes,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.333(2002) 623 [astro-ph/0109324]. – 17 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002