Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Anisotropy of dark matter annihilation with respect to the Galactic plane

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0612733 v2 pith:NU7O3UKM submitted 2006-12-26 astro-ph

Anisotropy of dark matter annihilation with respect to the Galactic plane

classification astro-ph
keywords anisotropyannihilationclumpsdarkdiskgalacticmatterdestruction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We describe the anisotropy of dark matter clump distribution caused by tidal destruction of clumps in the Galactic disk. A tidal destruction of clumps with orbit planes near the disk plane occurs more efficiently as compared with destruction of clumps at near-polar orbits. A corresponding annihilation of dark matter particles in small-scale clumps produces the anisotropic gamma-ray signal with respect to the Galactic disk. This anisotropy is rather small, 9%, and superimposed on that due to off-centering position of the Sun in the Galaxy. The anisotropy of annihilation signal with respect to the Galactic disk provides a possibility to discriminate dark matter annihilation from the diffuse gamma-ray backgrounds of other origin.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Prompt cusps in hierarchical dark matter halos: Implications for annihilation boost

    astro-ph.GA 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    Prompt cusps in hierarchical substructure raise the Milky-Way annihilation boost to B≈50, roughly four times lower than universal-average predictions because fewer cusps survive in this merger-tree treatment.