Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Distribution of quantum Fisher information in asymmetric cloning machines

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1409.2199 v1 pith:GEWO333K submitted 2014-09-08 quant-ph

Distribution of quantum Fisher information in asymmetric cloning machines

classification quant-ph
keywords cloningasymmetricinformationfidelityquantumdistributionmachinesresults
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

An unknown quantum state cannot be copied on demand and broadcast freely due to the famous no-cloning theorem. Approximate cloning schemes have been proposed to achieve the optimal cloning characterized by the maximal fidelity between the original and its copies. Here, from the perspective of quantum Fisher information (QFI), we investigate the distribution of QFI in asymmetric cloning machines which produce two nonidentical copies. As one might expect, improving the QFI of one copy results in decreasing the QFI of the other copy, roughly the same as that of fidelity. It is perhaps also unsurprising that asymmetric phase-covariant cloning machine outperforms universal cloning machine in distributing QFI since a priori information of the input state has been utilized. However, interesting results appear when we compare the distributabilities of fidelity (which quantifies the full information of quantum states), and QFI (which only captures the information of relevant parameters) in asymmetric cloning machines. In contrast to the results of fidelity, where the distributability of symmetric cloning is always optimal for any d-dimensional cloning, we find that asymmetric cloning performs always better than symmetric cloning on the distribution of QFI for $d\leq18$, but this conclusion becomes invalid when $d>18$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.