Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 81 references

Attractive and repulsive angulons in superfluid environments

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A rotating molecule in a superfluid creates a density defect that binds a new class of rotor-bath states, the attractive angulon, while dilute baths host long-lived repulsive angulons.

desk verdict The attractive angulon and the density-defect mechanism are a real step beyond earlier angulon work, but the claimed B*<B resolution is not backed by the paper's own spectroscopy. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.15840 v1 pith:GGWRG4CB submitted 2025-04-22 cond-mat.quant-gas physics.atom-phphysics.chem-phquant-ph

Wei Zhang , Zhongda Zeng , Tao Shi This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gasphysics.atom-phphysics.chem-phquant-ph
keywords angulonsuperfluiddensitydefectrotationalspectroscopyquantumimpurityLee-Low-PinestransformationmultireferencevariationalansatzBogoliubovexcitationsboundstates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the backaction of a rotating molecule on a superfluid bath is not a perturbative detail: in the ground state the molecule depletes the condensate and creates a density defect, and this defect is the trap that holds a new class of bound rotor-bath states. Two such states are identified. At intermediate and high densities, the ground state of a fixed-angular-momentum sector is an attractive angulon, a rotor entangled with a Bogoliubov excitation localized inside the defect and lying below the excitation continuum. In dilute environments, the long-lived excited state is instead a repulsive angulon, a quasibound state immersed in the continuum. Rotational spectroscopy of molecules in superfluids should then show a density-driven crossover between the two states, and the effective rotational constant satisfies $B^*_J < B$ at all densities, resolving the earlier anomalous renormalization.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is a Lee-Low-Pines-like body-fixed frame transformation that decouples the rotor's total angular momentum, combined with a multireference variational ansatz for each sector: $|\psi_J\rangle = \sum_M c_M |J,M\rangle|f_M\rangle$, one coherent bath state $|f_M\rangle$ per rotor projection $M$. Imaginary-time evolution of these parameters self-consistently determines the deformed condensate $|\Phi_0\rangle$ with its density defect. On top of that deformed background, the paper builds a Bogoliubov-excitation subspace and diagonalizes an effective Hamiltonian, so the density defect acts as a trapping potential for finite-angular-momentum excitations; when the defect is deep enough, it binds one such excitation around the rotor, producing the attractive angulon below the continuum.

What would settle it

Compute the $J=1$ spectral function with a larger variational manifold (two or more Bogoliubov excitations, or a quantum Monte Carlo treatment): the claim stands if a bound state below the Bogoliubov continuum survives at intermediate and high densities and the spectrum shows the predicted sequence — one narrow line at low density, a broad line plus a sharp below-continuum line with satellites at intermediate density, and only the red-shifted line at high density. If the bound state disappears or the sharp attractive line is absent, the central claim is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the ground state of a sector with nonzero total angular momentum $J$ is not a bare rotor dressed by delocalized bath excitations, but a rotor bound to a localized density wave. The molecule's repulsive interaction with the bosons depletes the condensate over a region of the order of the healing length; once the bath density is high enough that this defect deepens past a scattering resonance, a Bogoliubov excitation with angular momentum $l=1$ localizes inside the defect. The resulting attractive angulon has energy $E_{att} < 2B$ (equivalently $B^*_1 < B$) and a quasiparticle residue $Z_{att}$ that grows with density. In the dilute regime the rotor instead sits inside the Bogoliubov continuum, hybridizing weakly and leaving a sharp, long-lived repulsive angulon close to the bare rotor energy. Real-time rotational spectroscopy computed from the variational equations shows the crossover: a single narrow line at low density, a broadened repulsive line plus a sharp attractive-angulon peak with emission satellites at intermediate density, and only the red-shifted attractive line at high density.

Load-bearing premise

The variational space is truncated to one coherent state per rotor projection together with at most one Bogoliubov excitation on the deformed condensate; if multi-excitation correlations or quantum depletion soften or fill the density defect, the claimed attractive angulon bound state may not survive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In dilute superfluids, the narrow line seen in rotational spectroscopy is a long-lived repulsive angulon, not the true ground state of the $J=1$ sector.
  • At intermediate densities the spectrum should show both a broadened repulsive peak and a sharp attractive-angulon line below $2B$, with satellite peaks from sequential emission of Bogoliubov excitations.
  • At high densities the repulsive angulon disappears and only the red-shifted attractive-angulon line remains.
  • The effective rotational constant obeys $B^*_J < B$ in all regimes, removing the nonphysical $B^*_1 > B$ found by the single-excitation ansatz.
  • The attractive angulon is the $J>0$ analogue of an attractive polaron: an impurity bound to a localized bath excitation below the Bogoliubov continuum.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the defect really binds attractive angulons, tuning the bath density or the molecule-boson scattering length should continuously tune the bound-state depth and localization length, making the crossover a dialable spectroscopic feature in ultracold molecular gases.
  • The same defect-binding mechanism should apply to other angular-momentum-carrying impurities and to anisotropic or microwave-dressed molecular gases, where the rotor-bath interaction can be engineered.
  • The satellite peaks between the attractive-angulon line and $2B$ encode interactions among multiple Bogoliubov excitations; fitting their spacing could give a direct measure of angulon-cloud interactions, something the paper does not extract.
  • A natural stress test is whether the bound state survives in a two-excitation or Monte Carlo treatment; if depletion fills the defect, the predicted crossover would shift or disappear.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a linear rotor immersed in a bosonic superfluid, using a Lee-Low-Pines-like transformation followed by a multireference variational ansatz in which each rotor projection state is entangled with a coherent bath state; excited states are obtained by diagonalizing an effective Hamiltonian in a single-Bogoliubov-excitation subspace built on the self-consistently deformed condensate. The central claims are: (i) the rotor's backaction creates a superfluid density defect; (ii) at intermediate and high densities this defect supports a bound 'attractive angulon' below the Bogoliubov continuum, while dilute systems exhibit a long-lived 'repulsive angulon'; (iii) rotational spectral functions show a density-driven crossover between these states; and (iv) the effective rotational constant B*_1, defined through the attractive angulon energy, is always below the bare rotor value, thereby 'resolving' the anomalous moment-of-inertia problem in earlier Chevy-ansatz treatments. Appendices A and B provide the variational equations of motion and the Bogoliubov effective Hamiltonian used in the numerics.

Significance. If established, the attractive angulon would be a qualitatively new quasiparticle: a rotor bound to a localized superfluid density wave, with useful analogies to photonic bound states and YSR states. The combination of the LLP transformation with a deformed, nonuniform condensate background goes beyond the uniform-background Chevy ansatz of Ref. [50] and yields explicit dynamical predictions (spectral peak positions, linewidths, and density evolution) that are in principle falsifiable in ultracold-gas experiments. A clear strength is the level of detail in Appendices A and B, which makes the variational computation reproducible. The main caveats are that the conclusions rest on a restricted variational manifold with no reported convergence checks, and the B*_1 < B resolution uses an energy from a smaller Hilbert space than the spectroscopic peak to which it is compared. These gaps are load-bearing for the paper's central claims, but they are addressable in a revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. VI, Eq. (16); Sec. V] The proof that B*_1 < B is not established. Equation (16) defines B*_J through the lowest energy in the J sector, but the argument in Sec. VI uses E_att from the single-Bogoliubov-excitation effective Hamiltonian of Eq. (12), while Sec. V explicitly states that the AA peak in the multireference rotational spectrum lies at a higher frequency than that E_att, attributing the difference to interactions among multiple Bogoliubov excitations. Because E_GS and E_att are separately variational upper bounds, their difference is not an upper bound on the exact E_1 - E_0, and the paper never shows that the observable AA peak or a correlation-corrected J=1 ground-state energy remains below 2B. Additionally, in the dilute regime the manuscript evaluates B*_1 using the metastable repulsive angulon energy E_rep, which is not the lowest J=1 eigenstate; using a resonance energy in a ground-state definition of the rotational constant requires justification. The authors should compute E_1 - E_0 within the multireference ansatz (or an extended manifold) and show that it remains below 2B, or redefine B* through the observed spectroscopic peak and discuss the finite-lifetime caveat.
  2. [Sec. IV, Fig. 2(d); Sec. VI] The admitted boundary artifact undermines the dilute-regime part of the claims. The text states that in the dilute regime the density distribution rho_1m(r) is localized at the hard-wall edge and 'is merely a boundary effect.' Nevertheless, Fig. 2(c) reports E_att and Z_att in this regime as physical, and Sec. VI uses E_att - E_GS < 2B 'for all densities' to conclude B*_1 < B. Thus the low-density attractive angulon is not established as a state localized within the density defect, and its use in the crossover scenario or in the all-density B* statement is unsupported. A finite-size study (varying R and the boundary condition) and a clear separation of physical bound states from edge-localized states are needed before the dilute-regime spectroscopy can be interpreted as repulsive-angulon physics with an attractive angulon present but dark.
  3. [Sec. III; Sec. IV; Appendix B, Eqs. (7), (12)] No convergence checks are provided for the variational truncations, and the central existence of the attractive angulon depends on this truncation. The ground state is represented by one coherent state per rotor projection M (Eq. (7)), and the J>0 states are obtained in a subspace with a single Bogoliubov excitation on top of that coherent state (Eq. (12)); the explicit Bogoliubov matrices in Appendix B are written for angular-momentum cutoff l_c = 1. The manuscript does not report tests against larger l_c, higher momentum cutoffs k_c, larger system radii R, or multi-phonon sectors, nor any benchmark against Monte Carlo data. Since the density defect and the claimed shape-resonance bound state are consequences of this truncated manifold, the authors should show that E_att, Z_att, and the spectral features are stable when the variational space is enlarged; otherwise the attractive angulon may be an artifact of the ansatz.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (15)] Equation (15) contains an unbalanced parenthesis: rho_lm(r,t) is defined with a trailing ')' after |psi_J(t)> that has no matching opening parenthesis.
  2. [Sec. V, Fig. 4 discussion] The phrase 'the healing timethealing~1/(rho abb)' is missing a space and the quantity is not defined elsewhere; please define the healing time and use consistent notation.
  3. [Eq. (13) and Appendix B] The notation in Eq. (13) is opaque: k0 = alpha_1^(1)/R uses the spherical-Bessel zero introduced later in Appendix B, but the equation does not define the normalization of the state or the integral measure over the rotor Euler angles; please clarify.
  4. [Sec. II, after Eq. (6)] The sentence 'It is important to note that ˆJ 2 = ˆJ2' is typographically confusing; the intended identity should be typeset clearly (e.g., hat J^2 = hat J^2 or a comment on the body-fixed vs laboratory frame) to avoid ambiguity.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

B*<B is a definitional consequence of taking the lowest variational branch, but the main angulon results are self-consistent fixed-Hamiltonian computations.

  1. self definitional [Sec. VI, Eq. (16); Sec. IV and Appendix B, Eq. (B14)]
    "B∗J is defined as: B∗J = (EJ−E0)/(J(J+1)), J=1,2,..., where EJ denotes the lowest energy in the J sector. ... Since Eatt−EGS<2B for all densities, it follows that B∗1<B."

    The claimed resolution of the anomalous rotational constant is guaranteed by the variational construction rather than derived from the physics. In Eq. (B14), Heff has the bare-rotor state |Ξ1⟩ as a diagonal entry 2B (relative to the condensate energy), and Eatt is defined as the lowest eigenvalue of this matrix. Any Hermitian matrix's lowest eigenvalue is no larger than its smallest diagonal element, so Eatt−EGS≤2B automatically whenever the off-diagonal rotor-continuum coupling is nonzero. Thus B∗1<B follows from the definition of B∗ via the lowest-energy branch and from placing a 2B bare-rotor level in the variational basis; it is not an independent physical prediction.

full rationale

The main derivation is self-contained. The system Hamiltonian has fixed parameters; the ground-state coherent-state wavefunction is obtained by solving the variational imaginary-time EOM; the Bogoliubov modes are built from that computed ground state; and the J=1 effective Hamiltonian is diagonalized with fixed matrix elements. The attractive and repulsive angulon energies, residues, density profiles, and the repulsive-to-attractive crossover in rotational spectroscopy all follow from these computations, with no fitted physical parameters being renamed as predictions. Citations to earlier work, including the authors' own Chevy-ansatz study [50], serve as context or comparison and are not load-bearing for the derivation. The only circular piece is the Section VI claim that B∗<B resolves the anomalous moment-of-inertia problem: because B∗ is defined through the lowest energy in the sector and the variational Heff already contains a 2B bare-rotor diagonal, the inequality is a construction-level consequence. The paper's own spectroscopy shows the observable AA peak above the single-excitation Eatt, which is a correctness/benchmark concern rather than a circularity, and the absence of a convergence check is likewise a robustness issue. Central claims therefore retain independent content, and the overall circularity is mild.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on a truncated variational manifold, a mean-field treatment of the superfluid, and a specific set of potential parameters; none of these is benchmarked against an independent calculation or experiment.

free parameters (6)
  • bath scattering length abb = 3.3 (m_b B)^(-1/2)
    Set once to mimic superfluid He4 sound speed; all density scales and the depth of the density defect depend on it.
  • rotor-bath potential strength u0 = 218 B
    Chosen as a typical atom-molecule interaction; controls whether the density defect is deep enough to bind the attractive angulon.
  • rotor-bath potential strength u1 = 124.57 B (u0/1.75)
    Relative strength of the anisotropic channel; no sensitivity study is given.
  • rotor-bath potential range r0=r1 = 1.5 (m_b B)^(-1/2)
    Gaussian potential width; sets the spatial extent of the defect and the bound state.
  • angular momentum cutoff lc = 1
    Bath angular momentum channels truncated at l=1 in the numerics (Appendix B); no convergence study.
  • system radius R and momentum cutoff kc = R=60 (m_b B)^(-1/2); kc from nc zeros
    Hard-wall box and momentum cutoff; low-density states are visibly affected by the wall, admitted in Fig. 2(d).
assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper The variational state Eq. (7) plus single Bogoliubov excitation subspace Eq. (12) captures the low-energy physics.
    The attractive angulon and the claimed B*<B result are computed within this truncated manifold; no convergence or robustness test is presented.
  • domain assumption Bogoliubov mean-field theory around the nonuniform condensate is valid in all density regimes considered.
    Quantum depletion and multi-excitation interactions beyond the Gaussian approximation are neglected (Appendix B).
  • domain assumption The Gaussian channel potentials with the chosen u_l, r_l represent helium nanodroplet or ultracold molecule environments.
    The crossover location and existence of bound states depend on these interaction parameters; no experimental or ab initio validation is given.
  • domain assumption Finite system size R=60 and cutoffs provide a faithful representation of an infinite homogeneous bath.
    The paper itself notes a boundary artifact in dilute states (Fig. 2(d)), so the assumption is partially violated.
invented entities (1)
  • attractive angulon state independent evidence
    purpose: A rotor excited state bound to a localized Bogoliubov density wave inside the self-consistent density defect; it provides the low-energy quasiparticle that makes B*<B.
    The paper predicts a distinct low-frequency spectral peak (AA) that is not used to set any parameter, giving a falsifiable handle in rotational spectroscopy.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Attractive and repulsive angulons in superfluid environments." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GGWRG4CB

@misc{pith2026250415840,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Attractive and repulsive angulons in superfluid environments},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GGWRG4CB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.15840}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the in- and out-of-equilibrium phenomena of a rotational impurity -- specifically, a linear molecule -- coupled to a nonconventional environment, a helium nanodroplet. By employing a Lee-Low-Pines-like transformation combined with a multireference configuration approach, we self-consistently account for the molecule's backaction on the superfluid bath and accurately capture the complex entanglement between the molecule's rotational degrees of freedom and the bath excitations. Our findings reveal that, in the ground state, the impurity induces a density defect in the superfluid bath, giving rise to two novel types of excited states: (a) attractive angulon states, analogous to bound states in photonic crystals and Yu-Shiba-Rusinov bound states in superconductors, localized within the density defect region; and (b) long-lived repulsive angulon states in dilute environments. Rotational spectroscopy demonstrates a crossover from repulsive to attractive angulon states as the bath density increases. This work paves the way for exploring novel nonequilibrium phenomena of quantum impurities in interacting environments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.15840 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematics of the impurity-bath system and the rotational [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Condensate wavefunction in the ground state, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Rotational spectroscopy obtained using the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Left and right panels correspond to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [50]

    Variational theory of angulons and their rotational spectroscopy,

    Zhongda Zeng, Enderalp Yakaboylu, Mikhail Lemeshko, Tao Shi, and Richard Schmidt, “Variational theory of angulons and their rotational spectroscopy,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 158, 134301 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [1]

    Quantum emitters in two-dimensional structured reservoirs in the nonperturbative regime,

    A. Gonz ´alez-Tudela and J. I. Cirac, “Quantum emitters in two-dimensional structured reservoirs in the nonperturbative regime,” Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 143602 (2017)

    2017

  3. [2]

    Non-Markovian Quantum Optics with Three-Dimensional State-Dependent Optical Lattices,

    A. Gonz ´alez-Tudela and J. I. Cirac, “Non-Markovian Quantum Optics with Three-Dimensional State-Dependent Optical Lattices,” Quantum 2, 97 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [3]

    Non-markovian dynamics in chiral quantum networks with spins and photons,

    Tom ´as Ramos, Beno ˆıt Vermersch, Philipp Hauke, Hannes Pichler, and Peter Zoller, “Non-markovian dynamics in chiral quantum networks with spins and photons,” Phys. Rev. A 93, 062104 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [4]

    Quantum impurity models coupled to markovian and non-markovian baths,

    Marco Schiro and Orazio Scarlatella, “Quantum impurity models coupled to markovian and non-markovian baths,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 151, 044102 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [5]

    Resistance minimum in dilute magnetic alloys,

    Jun Kondo, “Resistance minimum in dilute magnetic alloys,” Progress of Theoretical Physics 32, 37–49 (1964)

    1964

  7. [6]

    Exact solution of the s-d exchange model (kondo problem),

    P B Wiegmann, “Exact solution of the s-d exchange model (kondo problem),” Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 14, 1463 (1981)

    work page 1981

  8. [7]

    Diagonalization of the kondo hamiltonian,

    N. Andrei, “Diagonalization of the kondo hamiltonian,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 379–382 (1980)

    work page 1980

Show all 81 references
  1. [8]

    Solving quantum impurity problems in and out of equilibrium with the variational approach,

    Yuto Ashida, Tao Shi, Mari Carmen Ba ˜nuls, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Eugene Demler, “Solving quantum impurity problems in and out of equilibrium with the variational approach,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 026805 (2018)

    2018

  2. [9]

    Variational principle for quantum impurity systems in and out of equilibrium: Application to kondo problems,

    Yuto Ashida, Tao Shi, Mari Carmen Ba ˜nuls, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Eugene Demler, “Variational principle for quantum impurity systems in and out of equilibrium: Application to kondo problems,” Phys. Rev. B98, 024103 (2018)

    2018

  3. [10]

    Dynamics of the dissipative two-state system,

    A. J. Leggett, S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorsey, Matthew P. A. Fisher, Anupam Garg, and W. Zwerger, “Dynamics of the dissipative two-state system,” Rev. Mod. Phys.59, 1–85 (1987)

    1987

  4. [11]

    Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction,

    P. Forn-D ´ıaz, L. Lamata, E. Rico, J. Kono, and E. Solano, “Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 025005 (2019)

    2019

  5. [12]

    Ultrastrong coupling few-photon scattering theory,

    Tao Shi, Yue Chang, and Juan Jos´e Garc´ıa-Ripoll, “Ultrastrong coupling few-photon scattering theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 153602 (2018)

    2018

  6. [13]

    Classical spins in superconductors,

    Hiroyuki Shiba, “Classical spins in superconductors,” Progress of Theoretical Physics 40, 435–451 (1968)

    1968

  7. [14]

    Numerical renormalization group study of magnetic impurities in superconductors,

    Koji Satori, Hiroyuki Shiba, Osamu Sakai, and Yukihiro Shimizu, “Numerical renormalization group study of magnetic impurities in superconductors,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 61, 3239–3254 (1992)

    1992

  8. [15]

    Numerical renormalization group study of magnetic impurities in superconductors. ii. dynamical excitation spectra and spatial variation of the order parameter,

    Osamu Sakai, Yukihiro Shimizu, Hiroyuki Shiba, and Koji Satori, “Numerical renormalization group study of magnetic impurities in superconductors. ii. dynamical excitation spectra and spatial variation of the order parameter,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 62, 3181–3...

    1993

  9. [16]

    ¨Uber Die Bewegung der Elektronen in Kristallgitter,

    L. D. Landau, “ ¨Uber Die Bewegung der Elektronen in Kristallgitter,” Phys. Z. Sowjetunion3, 644–645 (1933)

    1933

  10. [17]

    S. I. Pekar, J. Phys. USSR 10, 341 (1946)

    1946

  11. [18]

    Electrons in lattice fields,

    H. Fr ¨ohlich, “Electrons in lattice fields,” Advances in Physics 3, 325–361 (1954)

    1954

  12. [19]

    Fr ¨ohlich polarons. lecture course including detailed theoretical derivations,

    J. T. Devreese, “Fr ¨ohlich polarons. lecture course including detailed theoretical derivations,” arXiv:1012.4576

    arXiv

  13. [20]

    The motion of slow electrons in a polar crystal,

    T. D. Lee, F. E. Low, and D. Pines, “The motion of slow electrons in a polar crystal,” Phys. Rev.90, 297–302 (1953)

    1953

  14. [21]

    Nature of the polaron-molecule transition in fermi polarons,

    Cheng Peng, Ruijin Liu, Wei Zhang, and Xiaoling Cui, “Nature of the polaron-molecule transition in fermi polarons,” Phys. Rev. A 103, 063312 (2021)

    2021

  15. [22]

    Emergence of a sharp quantum collective mode in a one-dimensional fermi polaron,

    Pavel E. Dolgirev, Yi-Fan Qu, Mikhail B. Zvonarev, Tao Shi, and Eugene Demler, “Emergence of a sharp quantum collective mode in a one-dimensional fermi polaron,” Phys. Rev. X 11, 041015 (2021)

    2021

  16. [23]

    Variational study of fermionic and bosonic systems with non-gaussian states: Theory and applications,

    Tao Shi, Eugene Demler, and J. Ignacio Cirac, “Variational study of fermionic and bosonic systems with non-gaussian states: Theory and applications,” Annals of Physics 390, 245–302 (2018)

    2018

  17. [24]

    On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,

    Julian Schwinger, “On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,” Phys. Rev.82, 664–679 (1951)

    1951

  18. [25]

    Hamiltonian formulation of wilson’s lattice gauge theories,

    John Kogut and Leonard Susskind, “Hamiltonian formulation of wilson’s lattice gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. D 11, 395–408 (1975)

    1975

  19. [26]

    Real-time dynamics in U(1) lattice gauge theories with tensor networks,

    T. Pichler, M. Dalmonte, E. Rico, P. Zoller, and S. Montangero, “Real-time dynamics in U(1) lattice gauge theories with tensor networks,” Phys. Rev. X6, 011023 (2016)

    2016

  20. [27]

    Variational study of u(1) and su(2) lattice gauge theories with gaussian states in 1 + 1 dimensions,

    P. Sala, T. Shi, S. K ¨uhn, M. C. Ba ˜nuls, E. Demler, and J. I. Cirac, “Variational study of u(1) and su(2) lattice gauge theories with gaussian states in 1 + 1 dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D 98, 034505 (2018)

    2018

  21. [28]

    Quantum spin dimers from chiral dissipation in cold- atom chains,

    Tom ´as Ramos, Hannes Pichler, Andrew J. Daley, and Peter Zoller, “Quantum spin dimers from chiral dissipation in cold- atom chains,” Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 237203 (2014)

    2014

  22. [29]

    Subwavelength vacuum lattices and atom–atom interactions in two-dimensional photonic crystals,

    A. Gonz ´alez-Tudela, C.-L. Hung, D. E. Chang, J. I. Cirac, and H. J. Kimble, “Subwavelength vacuum lattices and atom–atom interactions in two-dimensional photonic crystals,” Nature Photonics 9, 320–325 (2015)

    2015

  23. [30]

    Effective many-body hamiltonians of qubit-photon bound states,

    T Shi, Y-H Wu, A Gonz ´alez-Tudela, and J I Cirac, “Effective many-body hamiltonians of qubit-photon bound states,” New Journal of Physics 20, 105005 (2018)

    2018

  24. [31]

    Unconventional quantum optics in topological waveguide QED,

    M. Bello, G. Platero, J. I. Cirac, and A. Gonz ´alez-Tudela, “Unconventional quantum optics in topological waveguide QED,” Science Advances 5 (2019), 10.1126/sciadv.aaw0297

    2019 doi

  25. [32]

    Superfluid helium droplets: A uniquely cold nanomatrix for molecules and molecular complexes,

    J. Peter Toennies and Andrey F. Vilesov, “Superfluid helium droplets: A uniquely cold nanomatrix for molecules and molecular complexes,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 43, 2622–2648 (2004). 8

    2004

  26. [33]

    Helium droplets: a chemistry perspective,

    Shengfu Yang and Andrew M. Ellis, “Helium droplets: a chemistry perspective,” Chem. Soc. Rev.42, 472–484 (2013)

    2013

  27. [34]

    Interplay between theory and experiment in investigations of molecules embedded in superfluid helium nanodroplets,

    Krzysztof Szalewicz, “Interplay between theory and experiment in investigations of molecules embedded in superfluid helium nanodroplets,” International Reviews in Physical Chemistry 27, 273–316 (2008)

    2008

  28. [35]

    Spectroscopy of atoms and molecules in liquid helium,

    J. Peter Toennies and Andrei F. Vilesov, “Spectroscopy of atoms and molecules in liquid helium,” Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 49, 1–41 (1998)

    1998

  29. [36]

    Helium nanodroplet isolation rovibrational spectroscopy: Methods and recent results,

    Carlo Callegari, Kevin K. Lehmann, Roman Schmied, and Giacinto Scoles, “Helium nanodroplet isolation rovibrational spectroscopy: Methods and recent results,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 115, 10090–10110 (2001)

    2001

  30. [37]

    Infrared spectroscopy of helium nanodroplets: novel methods for physics and chemistry,

    MY Choi, GE Douberly, TM Falconer, WK Lewis, CM Lindsay, JM Merritt, PL Stiles, and RE Miller, “Infrared spectroscopy of helium nanodroplets: novel methods for physics and chemistry,” International Reviews in Physical Chemistry 25, 15–75 (2006)

    2006

  31. [38]

    Spectroscopy and dynamics in helium nanodroplets,

    Frank Stienkemeier and Kevin K Lehmann, “Spectroscopy and dynamics in helium nanodroplets,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 39, R127 (2006)

    2006

  32. [39]

    Photoionisaton of pure and doped helium nanodroplets,

    M. Mudrich and F. Stienkemeier, “Photoionisaton of pure and doped helium nanodroplets,” International Reviews in Physical Chemistry 33, 301–339 (2014)

    2014

  33. [40]

    Free radicals in superfluid liquid helium nanodroplets: A pyrolysis source for the production of propargyl radical,

    Jochen K ¨upper, Jeremy M. Merritt, and Roger E. Miller, “Free radicals in superfluid liquid helium nanodroplets: A pyrolysis source for the production of propargyl radical,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 117, 647–652 (2002)

    2002

  34. [41]

    Molecular impurities interacting with a many-particle environment: From ultracold gases to helium nanodroplets,

    Mikhail Lemeshko and Richard Schmidt, “Molecular impurities interacting with a many-particle environment: From ultracold gases to helium nanodroplets,” in Cold Chemistry: Molecular Scattering and Reactivity Near Absolute Zero (The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2017)

    2017

  35. [42]

    Quantum dynamics of ultracold bose polarons,

    Yulia E. Shchadilova, Richard Schmidt, Fabian Grusdt, and Eugene Demler, “Quantum dynamics of ultracold bose polarons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 113002 (2016)

    2016

  36. [43]

    Bound state in superconductors with paramagnetic impurities,

    Yu Luh, “Bound state in superconductors with paramagnetic impurities,” Acta Physica Sinica 21, 75–91 (1965)

    1965

  37. [44]

    Theory of gapless superconductivity in alloys containing paramagnetic impurities,

    AI Rusinov, “Theory of gapless superconductivity in alloys containing paramagnetic impurities,” Sov. Phys. JETP 29, 1101–1106 (1969)

    1969

  38. [45]

    Rotational dynamics of the methyl radical in superfluid 4he nanodroplets,

    Alexander M. Morrison, Paul L. Raston, and Gary E. Douberly, “Rotational dynamics of the methyl radical in superfluid 4he nanodroplets,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 117, 11640–11647 (2013)

    2013

  39. [46]

    Strongly aligned molecules inside helium droplets in the near-adiabatic regime,

    Benjamin Shepperson, Adam S. Chatterley, Anders A. Søndergaard, Lars Christiansen, Mikhail Lemeshko, and Henrik Stapelfeldt, “Strongly aligned molecules inside helium droplets in the near-adiabatic regime,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 147, 013946 (2017)

    2017

  40. [47]

    Spectra of nh3 in he droplets in the 3 µm range,

    Mikhail N. Slipchenko and Andrey F. Vilesov, “Spectra of nh3 in he droplets in the 3 µm range,” Chemical Physics Letters 412, 176–183 (2005)

    2005

  41. [48]

    Rotation of quantum impurities in the presence of a many-body environment,

    Richard Schmidt and Mikhail Lemeshko, “Rotation of quantum impurities in the presence of a many-body environment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 203001 (2015)

    2015

  42. [49]

    Deformation of a quantum many-particle system by a rotating impurity,

    Richard Schmidt and Mikhail Lemeshko, “Deformation of a quantum many-particle system by a rotating impurity,” Phys. Rev. X 6, 011012 (2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    Roton-rotation coupling of acetylene in 4He,

    R. E. Zillich, Y . Kwon, and K. B. Whaley, “Roton-rotation coupling of acetylene in 4He,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 250401 (2004)

    2004

  44. [52]

    Quantum rotation of hcn and dcn in 4He,

    R. E. Zillich and K. B. Whaley, “Quantum rotation of hcn and dcn in 4He,” Phys. Rev. B69, 104517 (2004)

    2004

  45. [53]

    Rotational spectra of methane and deuterated methane in helium,

    R. E. Zillich and K. B. Whaley, “Rotational spectra of methane and deuterated methane in helium,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 132, 174501 (2010)

    2010

  46. [54]

    Quantum electrodynamics near a photonic band gap: Photon bound states and dressed atoms,

    Sajeev John and Jian Wang, “Quantum electrodynamics near a photonic band gap: Photon bound states and dressed atoms,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2418–2421 (1990)

    1990

  47. [55]

    Lehmann-symanzik-zimmermann reduction approach to multiphoton scattering in coupled- resonator arrays,

    T. Shi and C. P. Sun, “Lehmann-symanzik-zimmermann reduction approach to multiphoton scattering in coupled- resonator arrays,” Phys. Rev. B79, 205111 (2009)

    2009

  48. [56]

    Bound states in boson impurity models,

    Tao Shi, Ying-Hai Wu, A. Gonz ´alez-Tudela, and J. I. Cirac, “Bound states in boson impurity models,” Phys. Rev. X 6, 021027 (2016)

    2016

  49. [57]

    3 (Elsevier, 2013)

    Lev Davidovich Landau and Evgenii Mikhailovich Lifshitz, Quantum mechanics: non-relativistic theory , V ol. 3 (Elsevier, 2013)

    2013

  50. [58]

    D A Varshalovich, A N Moskalev, and V K Khersonskii, Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum (WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 1988)

    1988

  51. [59]

    A complete active space scf method (casscf) using a density matrix formulated super-ci approach,

    Bj ¨orn O. Roos, Peter R. Taylor, and Per E.M. Sigbahn, “A complete active space scf method (casscf) using a density matrix formulated super-ci approach,” Chemical Physics 48, 157–173 (1980)

    1980

  52. [60]

    Determinant based configuration interaction algorithms for complete and restricted configuration interaction spaces,

    Jeppe Olsen, Bj ¨orn O. Roos, Poul Jo/rgensen, and Hans Jo/rgen Aa. Jensen, “Determinant based configuration interaction algorithms for complete and restricted configuration interaction spaces,” The Journal of Chemical Physics89, 2185– 2192 (1988)

    1988

  53. [61]

    The restricted active space self-consistent-field method, implemented with a split graph unitary group approach,

    Per Aake. Malmqvist, Alistair. Rendell, and Bjoern O. Roos, “The restricted active space self-consistent-field method, implemented with a split graph unitary group approach,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry 94, 5477–5482 (1990)

    1990

  54. [62]

    Variational approach for many-body systems at finite temperature,

    Tao Shi, Eugene Demler, and J. Ignacio Cirac, “Variational approach for many-body systems at finite temperature,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 180602 (2020)

    2020

  55. [63]

    Bogoliubov modes of a dipolar condensate in a cylindrical trap,

    Shai Ronen, Daniele C. E. Bortolotti, and John L. Bohn, “Bogoliubov modes of a dipolar condensate in a cylindrical trap,” Phys. Rev. A74, 013623 (2006)

    2006

  56. [64]

    Theory for self- bound states of dipolar bose-einstein condensates,

    Yuqi Wang, Longfei Guo, Su Yi, and Tao Shi, “Theory for self- bound states of dipolar bose-einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043074 (2020)

    2020

  57. [65]

    Quantum phases of self- bound droplets of bose-bose mixtures,

    Junqiao Pan, Su Yi, and Tao Shi, “Quantum phases of self- bound droplets of bose-bose mixtures,” Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043018 (2022)

    2022

  58. [66]

    Fluctuation assisted collapses of bose–einstein condensates,

    Junqiao Pan, Yuqi Wang, Tao Shi, and Su Yi, “Fluctuation assisted collapses of bose–einstein condensates,” Communications in Theoretical Physics 74, 095701 (2022)

    2022

  59. [67]

    Anthony Stone, The Theory of Intermolecular F orces (Oxford University Press, 2013)

    2013

  60. [68]

    The observed properties of liquid helium at the saturated vapor pressure,

    Russell J. Donnelly and Carlo F. Barenghi, “The observed properties of liquid helium at the saturated vapor pressure,” Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 27, 1217– 1274 (1998)

    1998

  61. [69]

    Scattering in the ultrastrong regime: Nonlinear optics with one photon,

    E. Sanchez-Burillo, D. Zueco, J. J. Garcia-Ripoll, and L. Martin-Moreno, “Scattering in the ultrastrong regime: Nonlinear optics with one photon,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 263604 (2014)

    2014

  62. [70]

    Markovian and non- Markovian dynamics of quantum emitters coupled to two- dimensional structured reservoirs,

    A Gonz ´alez-Tudela and J I Cirac, “Markovian and non- Markovian dynamics of quantum emitters coupled to two- dimensional structured reservoirs,” Phys. Rev. A 96, 43811 9 (2017)

    2017

  63. [71]

    Universal phase diagram of a strongly interacting fermi gas with unbalanced spin populations,

    F. Chevy, “Universal phase diagram of a strongly interacting fermi gas with unbalanced spin populations,” Phys. Rev. A 74, 063628 (2006)

    2006

  64. [72]

    Observation of attractive and repulsive polarons in a bose-einstein condensate,

    Nils B. Jørgensen, Lars Wacker, Kristoffer T. Skalmstang, Meera M. Parish, Jesper Levinsen, Rasmus S. Christensen, Georg M. Bruun, and Jan J. Arlt, “Observation of attractive and repulsive polarons in a bose-einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 055302 (2016)

    2016

  65. [73]

    Low-energy resonances and bound states of aligned bosonic and fermionic dipoles,

    K. Kanjilal and D. Blume, “Low-energy resonances and bound states of aligned bosonic and fermionic dipoles,” Phys. Rev. A 78, 040703 (2008)

    2008

  66. [74]

    Superfluidity within a small helium-4 cluster: The microscopic andronikashvili experiment,

    Slava Grebenev, J. Peter Toennies, and Andrei F. Vilesov, “Superfluidity within a small helium-4 cluster: The microscopic andronikashvili experiment,” Science 279, 2083– 2086 (1998)

    1998

  67. [75]

    Direct spectroscopic observation of elementary excitations in superfluid he droplets,

    M. Hartmann, F. Mielke, J. P. Toennies, A. F. Vilesov, and G. Benedek, “Direct spectroscopic observation of elementary excitations in superfluid he droplets,” Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 4560– 4563 (1996)

    1996

  68. [76]

    Quasiparticle approach to molecules interacting with quantum solvents,

    Mikhail Lemeshko, “Quasiparticle approach to molecules interacting with quantum solvents,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 095301 (2017)

    2017

  69. [77]

    Observation of bose–einstein condensation of dipolar molecules,

    Niccol `o Bigagli, Weijun Yuan, Siwei Zhang, Boris Bulatovic, Tijs Karman, Ian Stevenson, and Sebastian Will, “Observation of bose–einstein condensation of dipolar molecules,” Nature 631, 289–293 (2024)

    2024

  70. [78]

    Bose-einstein condensates of microwave-shielded polar molecules,

    Wei-Jian Jin, Fulin Deng, Su Yi, and Tao Shi, “Bose-einstein condensates of microwave-shielded polar molecules,” (2024), arXiv:2406.06412

    2024 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Dipolar droplets of strongly interacting molecules,

    Tim Langen, Jordi Boronat, Juan S ´anchez-Baena, Ra ´ul Bomb´ın, Tijs Karman, and Ferran Mazzanti, “Dipolar droplets of strongly interacting molecules,” Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 053001 (2025)

    2025

  72. [80]

    Two- and many-body physics of ultracold molecules dressed by dual microwave fields,

    Fulin Deng, Xinyuan Hu, Wei-Jian Jin, Su Yi, and Tao Shi, “Two- and many-body physics of ultracold molecules dressed by dual microwave fields,” (2025), arXiv:2501.05210

    2025 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Quantum phases for finite-temperature gases of bosonic polar molecules shielded by dual microwaves,

    Wei Zhang, Kun Chen, Su Yi, and Tao Shi, “Quantum phases for finite-temperature gases of bosonic polar molecules shielded by dual microwaves,” (2025), arXiv:2503.02644. 10 Appendix A: Equations of motion of variational parameters In this Appendix, we derive the EOM of variatio...

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.