Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

On Charged Black Holes in Einstein-Weyl-Maxwell Theory

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Treating the Weyl-squared term as a classical part of gravity lowers the extremal charge-to-mass ratio of charged black holes below the Reissner-Nordström value.

desk verdict A mostly sensible numerical study whose branch-structure reinterpretation is new, but the central Q/M<1 near-extremal claim needs controlled T→0 data before it can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.02340 v1 pith:GH52FZOE submitted 2025-05-05 gr-qc hep-th

Ze Li , Hai-Shan Liu This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th PACS 04.70.-s04.50.Kd
keywords Einstein-Weyl-Maxwelltheoryhigher-derivativegravitychargedblackholesReissner-Nordströmnear-extremallimitcharge-to-massratioWeakConjecturebranchstructureofholesolutions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that in Einstein-Weyl-Maxwell gravity the two families of charged black holes are not simple charged versions of the Schwarzschild and non-Schwarzschild solutions, as earlier work assumed. Instead, charge breaks the intersection point of the two neutral branches into two disconnected charged branches. One of the charged branches, called RN-like, tracks the Reissner-Nordström family and converges to it for large charge; the other, called non-RN, never reaches a zero-temperature extremal limit. In the near-extremal limit of the RN-like branch, the authors find numerically that the charge-to-mass ratio $Q/M$ is always below 1, the extremal Reissner-Nordström value, and approaches 1 as the charge grows. Because the Weyl-squared term is treated as part of the classical theory rather than a small quantum correction, they read this as lowering the Weak-Gravity-Conjecture bound on the charge-to-mass ratio below 1.

What carries the argument

The mechanism that carries the argument is branch-breaking at a bifurcation point. At $Q=0$ the Schwarzschild and non-Schwarzschild families cross at a single horizon radius; adding charge opens that crossing into two disconnected solution branches, one RN-like and one non-RN. The numerical construction uses a static spherical ansatz $ds^2 = -h\,dt^2 + f^{-1}\,dr^2 + r^2\,d\Omega^2$ with electric potential $a$, a near-horizon Taylor expansion whose coefficients are fixed by $\{r_0, f_1, Q\}$, and a shooting method to spatial infinity. Thermodynamic quantities—temperature $T=\sqrt{h_1 f_1}/(4\pi)$, Wald entropy $S=\pi r_0^2 - 4\pi\alpha r_0 f_1$, and mass read from the asymptotic $1/r$ falloff—let the authors identify the two branches and evaluate $Q/M$ in the near-extremal regime.

What would settle it

Compute the exact $T=0$ extremal RN-like solution by imposing near-horizon $AdS_2 \times S^2$ boundary conditions, or push the shooting procedure to temperatures several orders of magnitude below $10^{-4}$ and check whether $Q/M$ extrapolates to 1 or above; a single $Q/M \ge 1$ at zero temperature would refute the claimed lower bound.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is the relation between charged and neutral black hole families. In the uncharged Einstein-Weyl theory, the Schwarzschild and non-Schwarzschild branches intersect at one point; adding the Maxwell charge makes that intersection break into two disconnected branches, each combining half of the neutral Schwarzschild and half of the non-Schwarzschild curve. Comparing temperature-horizon-radius curves for fixed charge shows that one branch is close to the Reissner-Nordström black hole while the other is not, so the authors name them RN-like and non-RN. The RN-like branch approaches RN as the charge increases. For that branch, they construct near-extremal solutions with temperature of order $10^{-4}$, extract their mass from the asymptotic metric, and find $Q/M < 1$ for all studied charges and couplings $\alpha$, consistent with the perturbative formula $Q/M = 1 - 2\alpha/(5 Q^2)$ at small $\alpha$. The paper concludes that a classical Weyl-squared term lowers the extremal charge-to-mass bound below the Reissner-Nordström value and thereby sets a lower bound on the charge-to-mass ratio in the Weak Gravity Conjecture.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that $Q/M$ stays below 1 at extremality rests on trusting numerical solutions with temperature of order $10^{-4}$ to represent the true $T=0$ limit, with no exact extremal solution or convergence study to confirm it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim holds, Einstein-Weyl-Maxwell theory admits asymptotically flat, RN-like charged black holes whose extremal charge-to-mass ratio lies strictly below 1.
  • The non-RN branch has temperature bounded away from zero, so only the RN-like branch can support a genuine extremal limit; the $Q/M$ bound is therefore a property of that branch.
  • At large charge the RN-like solutions and their $Q/M$ ratio approach the Reissner-Nordström family, so the Weyl-squared correction to the extremal ratio dies off as the charge grows.
  • The first law $dM = T\,dS + \Phi\,dQ$ holds on both branches, so the thermodynamic identification of mass and charge used to form $Q/M$ is self-consistent.
  • At the sampled parameters, scalar quasinormal modes have negative imaginary frequencies on both branches, so the lower-$Q/M$ branch is not showing up as a perturbative instability.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • In our reading, if the numerically sampled $T\sim 10^{-4}$ solutions faithfully represent the $T=0$ limit, there should exist an exact near-horizon $AdS_2 \times S^2$ extremal solution with $Q/M<1$; constructing it would remove the finite-temperature extrapolation.
  • We would also expect the branch-breaking pattern at the neutral intersection to be a general feature of higher-derivative extensions whose neutral branches cross at a point, making the RN-like/non-RN distinction a possible signature of quadratic-curvature corrections beyond this specific theory.
  • Read as an effective-field-theory statement, the result suggests the extremality bound used in the Weak Gravity Conjecture is not universally 1 but depends on classical higher-curvature couplings, so WGC arguments calibrated on Reissner-Nordström extremality should be re-examined in such theories.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies static, spherically symmetric, asymptotically flat black holes in Einstein-Weyl-Maxwell theory (2.7). Using a horizon Taylor expansion and numerical shooting, it identifies two charged branches, shows how they arise from the intersection of the Schwarzschild and non-Schwarzschild branches of the neutral theory, and classifies them as 'RN-like' and 'non-RN'. It verifies the first law via Maxwell relations using polynomial fits, computes scalar quasinormal modes, and reports that the near-extremal RN-like branch has Q/M < 1, approaching 1 for large Q, in qualitative agreement with a perturbative formula from [24]. The abstract and Section 7 interpret this as lowering the Weak Gravity Conjecture bound for a classical higher-derivative theory.

Significance. If the numerical results are correct, the paper provides an interesting map of the solution space and a concrete example in which a classical Weyl-squared term changes the extremal charge-to-mass ratio from the RN value, with potential implications for the Weak Gravity Conjecture. The first-law consistency check and the comparison between Prony and WKB quasinormal frequencies are useful supporting analyses. The principal limitation is that the central near-extremal result is read off at finite temperature without a controlled extremal limit, so the headline claim should be treated as conditional until that limit is quantified. I also note that no code, data, convergence details, or error bars are provided, which limits reproducibility of the numerical claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 6, Figs. 22-23] The near-extremal values of Q/M are extracted from solutions with temperature of order 10^-4, as stated in Section 6, with no T->0 extrapolation, no convergence study, and no error estimate. The exact extremal solution is acknowledged to be hard to obtain numerically. Because the ratio approaches 1 at large Q, the margin on which the 'always smaller than 1' conclusion rests is comparable to uncontrolled finite-T or discretization effects. Please provide, for at least several fixed charges, Q/M as a function of T down to smaller T, an extrapolation to T=0 with residuals, and a statement of numerical accuracy.
  2. [Section 6, Eqs. (6.3)-(6.4)] The mapping between the action (2.7) and the perturbatively analyzed action (6.1) is asserted without derivation, and the two actions have different normalizations for the Einstein-Hilbert and Maxwell terms (R vs R/(2 kappa^2), -F^2 vs -1/4 F^2). Since the agreement claimed in Fig. 23 is used as support for the numerical result, the coefficient identification should be derived explicitly and the charge normalization checked, so that the sign and magnitude of the perturbative comparison are meaningful.
  3. [Abstract and Section 7] The statement that the results 'set a lower bound on the charge-to-mass ratio in the context of the Weak Gravity Conjecture' is not derived. The WGC is a statement about the particle spectrum, and the standard argument connecting black hole extremality to WGC requires an explicit decay or charge-loss argument. Please either supply that reasoning or phrase the conclusion as a statement about black hole extremality rather than about the WGC bound.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 5.1] The polynomial fits for M(S) and M(Q) are not described; please state the fit order, the fitted ranges, and the residuals so the Maxwell-relation check can be assessed.
  2. [Section 5.2] The stability conclusion is based only on a massless scalar probe; this should be stated as scalar-field stability, not full black hole stability, especially in a higher-derivative theory with potential ghost modes.
  3. [Tables 1 and 2] No numerical resolution or convergence information is given for the Prony/WKB frequencies; a short statement of the numerical setup would increase confidence in the reported values.
  4. [Throughout] There are many typographical and grammatical errors (e.g., 'Einstein-Hibbert', 'theroy', 'Whist', 'respectfully' in figure captions); a careful proofread is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the central Q/M<1 claim is a direct numerical computation cross-checked against an external perturbative formula.

full rationale

I find no load-bearing circularity. The central claim that the RN-like branch has Q/M below the extremal RN value is obtained by numerically integrating the Einstein-Weyl-Maxwell field equations (2.10) from the horizon, with Q read from the conserved charge in (2.9) and M read from the asymptotic 1/r falloff in (2.12); neither quantity is fitted to the target ratio. Section 6 compares the resulting Q/M curve with the external perturbative formula (6.2) of [24] via the coefficient mapping (6.3), and the agreement is presented as a cross-check rather than as the source of the numerical values. The first-law verification in Section 5 fits M(S) and M(Q) to numerical data and compares derivatives with independently computed T and Phi; this is a consistency check, not a prediction forced by construction. Prior work [15,16,17] is used only for existence of the branch structure, and the only self-citation ([14]) appears in a non-load-bearing introductory remark about generalizations of critical gravity. The acknowledged limitation that the exact extremal limit is hard to obtain numerically and that T~1e-4 solutions are used is a numerical-convergence/correctness concern, not a circularity; it does not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a chain of numerical and modeling assumptions rather than on closed-form solutions: the ansatz, the R=0 reduction, asymptotic boundary conditions, convergence of shooting, Wald entropy, and the near-extremal proxy. Because none of the numerics is shipped or error-bounded, these assumptions carry the load.

free parameters (4)
  • Weyl coupling alpha = alpha = 1/2 for branch and stability sections; alpha = 0.1, 0.5, 1.0 for Q/M curves
    Not fitted to data, but all structural claims about branch splitting are demonstrated only at alpha=1/2; the WGC-bound claim assumes the pattern persists for the scanned alpha values.
  • Electric charge Q = 0.03, 0.1, 1.0 for branch plots; 0.5 to 3.0 for near-extremal Q/M
    Input parameter scanned by hand; the central Q/M less than 1 claim is reported as a function of Q, not as a single fitted value.
  • Near-extremal temperature cutoff = Order 10^-4
    The paper stops shooting at T ~ 10^-4 and treats this as the extremal limit; no extrapolation to T=0 is provided.
  • Polynomial fitting coefficients for M(S) and M(Q) = Not reported
    Used in Section 5.1 to compare derivatives against temperature and electric potential; the fitted coefficients are free parameters but do not enter the Q/M bound.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Static, spherically symmetric ansatz (2.8) for h, f, and A = -a(r) dt.
    The entire numerical construction assumes this symmetry and the electric potential form.
  • domain assumption The trace argument implies R = 0 for static spherical black holes, so the R^2 coupling beta is set to zero.
    The integral identity (2.6) requires vanishing boundary terms and positivity; the authors rely on it to justify dropping the beta term and studying the Weyl-squared theory.
  • domain assumption Asymptotic flatness and deletion of the growing massive mode e^(+r/sqrt(2 alpha)) in (2.12).
    The numerical solutions are selected by requiring the coefficient of the divergent Yukawa mode to vanish at infinity.
  • domain assumption Numerical shooting from horizon to infinity converges to smooth black hole solutions.
    No convergence criteria, grid sizes, or resolution studies are shown; the branch plots depend on the reliability of this shooting.
  • domain assumption Wald entropy formula (3.2) applies to these numerical solutions.
    The first law verification uses S = pi r0^2 - 4 pi alpha r0 f1, which assumes the Wald Noether-charge definition is valid here.
  • ad hoc to paper Near-extremal solutions with T ~ 10^-4 represent the extremal limit.
    Section 6 treats finite but very small temperature as a proxy for extremality without an extrapolation or error estimate.
  • domain assumption The perturbative formula (6.4) from [24] is valid as a comparison benchmark.
    The paper compares numerical Q/M to the small-coupling perturbative result and uses the agreement as support, assuming the perturbative formula applies in the overlapping regime.
  • ad hoc to paper The Weak Gravity Conjecture can be discussed through black hole charge-to-mass ratios.
    WGC is normally a statement about particles, not black holes; the paper does not derive the particle version from its black hole results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On Charged Black Holes in Einstein-Weyl-Maxwell Theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GH52FZOE

@misc{pith2026250502340,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On Charged Black Holes in Einstein-Weyl-Maxwell Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GH52FZOE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.02340}
}
read the original abstract

There exist two branches of static and spherically symmetric black hole solutions in Einstein-Weyl theory: one is the Schwarzschild black hole, and the other is a numerically constructed black hole that bifurcates from the Schwarzschild solution. Similarly, there are two branches of charged black holes in Einstein-Weyl-Maxwell theory. We have uncovered the relationships between the charged black holes and the neutral ones. The two charged black holes branch out from the bifurcation point of the neutral ones once charge is added. We found that one of the charged black holes is entirely different from the Reissner-Nordstr\"om (RN) black hole, while the other is similar to the RN black hole. In particular, the RN-like black hole approaches the RN black hole as the charge increases. We calculated the charge-to-mass ratio of the RN-like charged black hole in the near-extremal limit, and the value is less than that of the extremal RN black hole. Since we consider the higher-derivative Weyl square term as part of the classical gravity theory, rather than as a quantum effect, our result sets a lower bound on the charge-to-mass ratio in the context of the Weak Gravity Conjecture.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Scalarization of Charged Black Hole in Gauss-Bonnet Extended Starobinsky-Maxwell Gravity

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In Gauss-Bonnet-extended Starobinsky gravity, scalarized black holes form two smoothly joined branches at fixed coupling; adding a Maxwell field can split the family into disconnected branches, and the first law is ch...

  2. Charged Taub-NUT type Black Holes in Einstein-Weyl-Maxwell Theory

    gr-qc 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Charged Taub-NUT black holes in Einstein-Weyl-Maxwell theory are numerically built and show three disconnected solution branches, unlike their intersecting neutral counterparts.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [24]

    Iyer and C

    S. Iyer and C. M. Will,Black Hole Normal Modes: A WKB Approach. 1. Foundations and Application of a Higher Order WKB Analysis of Potential Barrier Scattering, Phys. Rev. D 35 (1987) 3621

    work page 1987

  2. [1]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al.,GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (2017) 161101, [1710.05832]

    arXiv 2017

  3. [2]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi-GBM, INTEGRAL collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A, Astrophys. J. Lett.848 (2017) L13, [1710.05834]

    arXiv 2017

  4. [3]

    Akiyama et al.,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope collaboration, K. Akiyama et al.,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.875 (2019) L1, [1906.11238]

    arXiv 2019

  5. [4]

    Akiyama et al.,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope collaboration, K. Akiyama et al.,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. II. Array and Instrumentation, Astrophys. J. Lett.875 (2019) L2, [1906.11239]

    arXiv 2019

  6. [5]

    Akiyama et al.,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope collaboration, K. Akiyama et al.,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. III. Data Processing and Calibration, Astrophys. J. Lett.875 (2019) L3, [1906.11240]

    arXiv 2019

  7. [6]

    Akiyama et al.,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope collaboration, K. Akiyama et al.,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Central Supermassive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.875 (2019) L4, [1906.11241]

    arXiv 2019

  8. [7]

    Akiyama et al.,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope collaboration, K. Akiyama et al.,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring, Astrophys. J. Lett.875 (2019) L5, [1906.11242]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 25 references
  1. [8]

    Akiyama et al.,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Event Horizon Telescope collaboration, K. Akiyama et al.,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 (2019) L6, [1906.11243]

    2019 arXiv

  2. [9]

    K. S. Stelle,Renormalization of Higher Derivative Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. D16 (1977) 953–969

    1977

  3. [10]

    W. Li, W. Song and A. Strominger,Chiral Gravity in Three Dimensions, JHEP 04 (2008) 082, [0801.4566]

    2008 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Deser, R

    S. Deser, R. Jackiw and S. Templeton,Topologically Massive Gauge Theories, Annals Phys. 140 (1982) 372–411

    1982

  5. [12]

    E. A. Bergshoeff, O. Hohm and P. K. Townsend,More on Massive 3D Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 124042, [0905.1259]

    2009 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Lu and C

    H. Lu and C. N. Pope,Critical Gravity in Four Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.106 (2011) 181302, [1101.1971]

    2011 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Deser, H

    S. Deser, H. Liu, H. Lu, C. N. Pope, T. C. Sisman and B. Tekin,Critical Points of D-Dimensional Extended Gravities, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 061502, [1101.4009]

    2011 arXiv

  8. [15]

    H. Lu, A. Perkins, C. N. Pope and K. S. Stelle,Black Holes in Higher-Derivative Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.114 (2015) 171601, [1502.01028]

    2015 arXiv

  9. [16]

    K. Lin, A. B. Pavan, G. Flores-Hidalgo and E. Abdalla,New Electrically Charged Black Hole in Higher Derivative Gravity, Braz. J. Phys.47 (2017) 419–425, [1605.04562]. – 26 –

    2017 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Wu, D.-C

    C. Wu, D.-C. Zou and M. Zhang,Charged black holes in the Einstein-Maxwell-Weyl gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 952 (2020) 114942, [1904.10193]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [18]

    A. V. Smilga,Supersymmetric field theory with benign ghosts, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical47 (Jan., 2014) 052001

    2014

  12. [19]

    H. Lü, A. Perkins, C. Pope and K. Stelle,Lichnerowicz modes and black hole families in ricci quadratic gravity, Physical Review D96 (Aug., 2017)

    2017

  13. [20]

    R. M. Wald,The thermodynamics of black holes, Communications in Mathematical Physics 87 (1983) 259–276

    1983

  14. [21]

    Iyer and R

    V. Iyer and R. M. Wald,Some properties of noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy, Physical Review D50 (1994) 846–864

    1994

  15. [22]

    Gundlach, R

    C. Gundlach, R. H. Price and J. Pullin,Late time behavior of stellar collapse and explosions:

  16. [23]

    Linearized perturbations, Phys. Rev. D49 (1994) 883–889, [gr-qc/9307009]

    1994 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Y. Kats, L. Motl and M. Padi,Higher-order corrections to mass-charge relation of extremal black holes, JHEP 12 (2007) 068, [hep-th/0606100]. – 27 –

    2007 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.