pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.09698 · v1 · pith:GH7YTD2Pnew · submitted 2019-07-23 · 🧮 math.PR · math.OC· math.ST· stat.TH

Stochastic Tverberg theorems and their applications in multi-class logistic regression, data separability, and centerpoints of data

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 17:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.PR math.OCmath.STstat.TH
keywords stochastic geometryTverberg theoremconvex hullslogistic regressionmaximum likelihood estimationdata separabilitycenterpoints
0
0 comments X

The pith

New stochastic Tverberg theorems bound the probability that m random data classes have convex hulls sharing a common point, and apply the bounds to existence of maximum likelihood estimators in multinomial logistic regression.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes stochastic geometry results that lower-bound the chance that m independently sampled point sets in Euclidean space have convex hulls with nonempty common intersection. These results translate directly into lower bounds on the probability that maximum likelihood estimators exist for multi-class logistic regression. The same framework yields connections to condition-number analysis for gradient methods and to algorithms that locate centerpoints inside data clouds. A reader would care because the theorems supply explicit probabilistic guarantees on data configurations that permit reliable model fitting and optimization.

Core claim

Stochastic Tverberg theorems assert that when points are drawn independently from continuous distributions in general position, the probability that the convex hulls of m labeled classes intersect in a common point admits a positive lower bound depending only on the number of points per class, the number of classes, and the ambient dimension; the same probability bound lower-bounds the chance that multinomial logistic regression admits a finite maximum-likelihood estimator.

What carries the argument

The stochastic Tverberg theorem, which converts the classical combinatorial statement about partitions and convex hulls into a probability statement under independent continuous sampling.

If this is right

  • Explicit lower bounds exist on the probability that maximum-likelihood estimators exist for multinomial logistic regression with m classes.
  • The same intersection probabilities control the condition numbers that govern convergence of steepest-descent algorithms for logistic regression.
  • Centerpoints of finite point clouds can be located by searching for points that realize the guaranteed intersection property with positive probability.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The bounds could guide the minimum number of labeled examples needed per class to make non-existence of the estimator unlikely.
  • The same sampling model might be reused to obtain probabilistic guarantees for other convex-separability problems in statistical learning.

Load-bearing premise

The data points are drawn independently from continuous distributions and lie in general position in Euclidean space.

What would settle it

Generate thousands of independent samples of m labeled point sets from a continuous distribution such as the standard Gaussian in fixed dimension, compute the empirical frequency of common convex-hull intersection, and check whether this frequency lies below the explicit lower bound given by the theorem for those parameters.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.09698 by Jes\'us A. De Loera, Thomas A. Hogan.

Figure 1.1
Figure 1.1. Figure 1.1: A partition in three data classes with tolerance one. All three convex hulls intersect even after any one point is removed. The parameter of tolerance is also significant in studying MLE existence. A natural observation is that t tolerant partitions correspond to robust MLE existence. Any t points, possibly corrupted or outlier data, can be removed and still the convex hulls of the data with each label i… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present new stochastic geometry theorems that give bounds on the probability that $m$ random data classes all contain a point in common in their convex hulls. We apply these stochastic separation theorems to obtain bounds on the probability of existence of maximum likelihood estimators in multinomial logistic regression. We also discuss connections to condition numbers for analysis of steepest descent algorithms in logistic regression and to the computation of centerpoints of data clouds.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents new stochastic Tverberg theorems that bound the probability that m random data classes, consisting of points drawn independently from continuous distributions in general position in Euclidean space, have a nonempty common intersection of their convex hulls. These geometric results are applied to derive bounds on the probability that the maximum likelihood estimator exists in multinomial logistic regression, with additional discussion of connections to condition numbers for steepest descent algorithms and to centerpoint computations for data clouds.

Significance. If the central theorems hold, the work supplies explicit, parameter-free probabilistic guarantees for data separability that transfer directly to statistical estimation problems in multi-class logistic regression. This constitutes a concrete bridge between stochastic combinatorial geometry and machine-learning theory, with potential utility for analyzing when MLEs are well-defined and for related algorithmic analyses. The absence of free parameters or ad-hoc entities in the derivations is a positive feature.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction would benefit from an explicit statement of the dimension dependence (or lack thereof) in the probability bounds derived from the stochastic Tverberg theorems.
  2. [Introduction] A short remark clarifying how the general-position assumption is maintained under the continuous-distribution hypothesis would improve readability for readers outside combinatorial geometry.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper introduces new stochastic Tverberg-type theorems on the probability that m random point sets in general position have intersecting convex hulls, derived from standard combinatorial geometry and probabilistic arguments on continuous distributions. These theorems are then applied externally to bound the probability of MLE existence in multinomial logistic regression via data separability. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the geometric results stand independently and transfer to the regression setting under the stated assumptions without tautology. This is the normal case of a self-contained mathematical derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard assumptions from convex and stochastic geometry; no free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are visible in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Data points drawn independently from continuous distributions in general position
    Invoked to ensure Tverberg-type intersection results apply to the random classes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5605 in / 993 out tokens · 28355 ms · 2026-05-24T17:31:12.386414+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Albert and J

    A. Albert and J. A. Anderson , On the existence of maximum likelihood estimates in logistic regression models, Biometrika, 71 (1984), pp. 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/71.1.1, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ biomet/71.1.1, https://arxiv.org/abs//oup/backfile/content public/journal/biomet/71/1/10.1093/biomet/ 71.1.1/2/71-1-1.pdf

  2. [2]

    B´ar´any and P

    I. B´ar´any and P. Sober´on, Tverberg’s theorem is 50 years old: A survey , Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 55 (2018), pp. 459–492, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1090/bull/1634. 11

  3. [3]

    E. J. Cand `es and P. Sur , The phase transition for the existence of the maximum likelihood estimate in high-dimensional logistic regression, 2019. to appear Annals of Statistics

  4. [4]

    T. M. Chan , An optimal randomized algorithm for maximum Tukey depth , in Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, ACM, New York, 2004, pp. 430–436

  5. [5]

    K. L. Clarkson, D. Eppstein, G. Miller, C. Sturtivant, and S. Teng , Approximating center points with iterative Radon points , International Journal of Computational Geometry & Applications, 6 (1996), pp. 357–377

  6. [6]

    T. M. Cover, Geometrical and statistical properties of systems of linear inequalities with applications in pattern recognition, Electronic Computers, IEEE Transactions on, EC-14 (1965), pp. 326 – 334, https://doi.org/10. 1109/PGEC.1965.264137

  7. [7]

    J. A. De Loera, X. Goaoc, F. Meunier, and N. H. Mustafa , The discrete yet ubiquitous theorems of Carath´ eodory, Helly, Sperner, Tucker, and Tverberg, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.), 56 (2019), pp. 415– 511, https://doi.org/10.1090/bull/1653, https://doi.org/10.1090/bull/1653

  8. [8]

    Erd˝os and A

    P. Erd˝os and A. R ´enyi, On a classical problem of probability theory , Magyar Tud. Akad. Mat. Kutat´ o Int. K¨ ozl., 6 (1961), pp. 215–220

  9. [9]

    R. M. Freund, P. Grigas, and R. Mazumder , Condition Number Analysis of Logistic Regression, and its Implications for Standard First-Order Solution Methods , arXiv e-prints, (2018), arXiv:1810.08727, p. arXiv:1810.08727, https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.08727

  10. [10]

    James, D

    G. James, D. Witten, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani , An introduction to statistical learning , vol. 103 of Springer Texts in Statistics, Springer, New York, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7, https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7. With applications in R

  11. [11]

    D. G. Larman , On sets projectively equivalent to the vertices of a convex polytope , Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 4 (1972), pp. 6–12

  12. [12]

    McCullagh and J

    P. McCullagh and J. A. Nelder , Generalized linear models, Monographs on Statistics and Applied Prob- ability, Chapman & Hall, London, 1989, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6, https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-1-4899-3242-6. Second edition [of MR0727836]

  13. [13]

    G. L. Miller and D. R. Sheehy , Approximate centerpoints with proofs, Comput. Geom., 43 (2010), pp. 647– 654, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comgeo.2010.04.006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comgeo.2010.04.006

  14. [14]

    Mulzer and D

    W. Mulzer and D. Werner , Approximating Tverberg points in linear time for any fixed dimension , Discrete & Computational Geometry, 50 (2013), pp. 520–535

  15. [15]

    Algorithms for Tverberg's theorem via centerpoint theorems

    D. Rolnick and P. Sober ´on, Algorithmic aspects of Tverberg’s theorem , CoRR, abs/1601.03083 (2016), http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.03083, https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.03083

  16. [16]

    P. J. Rousseeuw and A. Struyf , Computing location depth and regression depth in higher dimensions , Statistics and Computing, 8 (1998), pp. 193–203, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008945009397, https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1008945009397

  17. [17]

    Schl¨afli, Gesammelte mathematische Abhandlungen

    L. Schl¨afli, Gesammelte mathematische Abhandlungen. Band I , Verlag Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 1950

  18. [18]

    M. J. Silvapulle, On the existence of maximum likelihood estimators for the binomial response models , Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 43 (1981), pp. 310–313, http://www.jstor.org/ stable/2984941

  19. [19]

    Sober´on, Robust Tverberg and colourful Carath´ eodory results via random choice, Combinatorics, Probability and Computing, 27 (2018), p

    P. Sober´on, Robust Tverberg and colourful Carath´ eodory results via random choice, Combinatorics, Probability and Computing, 27 (2018), p. 427–440, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963548317000591

  20. [20]

    Sober ´on and R

    P. Sober ´on and R. Strausz , A generalisation of Tverberg’s theorem , Discrete Comput. Geom., 47 (2012), pp. 455–460, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00454-011-9379-z, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00454-011-9379-z

  21. [21]

    J. W. Tukey, Mathematics and the picturing of data , Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathemati- cians, Vancouver, 1975, 2 (1975), pp. 523–531, https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10029477185/en/

  22. [22]

    Tverberg, A generalization of Radon’s theorem , J

    H. Tverberg, A generalization of Radon’s theorem , J. London Math. Soc., 41 (1966), pp. 123–128

  23. [23]

    Wagner and E

    U. Wagner and E. Welzl, A continuous analogue of the upper bound theorem , Discrete Comput. Geom., 26 (2001), pp. 205–219, https://doi.org/10.1145/336154.336176, https://doi.org/10.1145/336154.336176. ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry (Hong Kong, 2000)

  24. [24]

    J. G. Wendel , A problem in geometric probability. , Mathematica Scandinavia, 11 (1962), pp. 109–112, https: //doi.org/10.7146/math.scand.a-10655, https://www.mscand.dk/article/view/10655. 12