Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 89 references

On the consistency of Lorentz-Violating Yang-Mills theories: Gauge invariance and non-perturbative effects

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes a Lorentz-violating Yang-Mills theory with a gauge-invariant, BRST-invariant mass-like term built from the dressed gauge field, and argues the mass term previously found in the Landau gauge can be extended to any…

desk verdict Coherent classical construction with honest limits: the gauge-invariant mass term and LV-RGZ action are plausible, but the paper itself leaves the load-bearing renormalizability proof to future work, so the quantum consistency claim is not yet established. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.09398 v2 pith:GHBAYIMD submitted 2024-11-14 hep-th hep-ph

Antonio D. Pereira This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thhep-ph MSC 81T1381T1581T70 PACS 11.15.-q11.30.Cp11.15.Tk
keywords Lorentz-violatingYang-Millsgauge-invariantmasstermBRSTsymmetrydressedgaugefieldGribovcopiesGribov-Zwanzigeractiongluonpropagatorrenormalizability
topics Yang-Mills Mass Gap
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Earlier work on Lorentz-violating Yang-Mills (LVYM) theory in the Landau gauge found that renormalizability forces a mass-like term for the gauge fields, which would break BRST invariance and could make correlation functions gauge-dependent outside the Landau gauge. This paper constructs a massive LVYM action that keeps gauge/BRST symmetry exact, using the gauge-invariant dressed field $A^h_\mu$ to build the mass term. In the Landau gauge the new action reduces to the earlier one after a trivial change of variables, so the old BRST breaking is harmless for observables. The paper also argues that the mass term found earlier is an artifact of the Symanzik embedding method rather than a genuine dynamical requirement, and it builds a BRST-invariant Refined Gribov-Zwanziger version of LVYM with a tree-level gluon propagator that encodes non-perturbative infrared effects. If the construction holds up, Lorentz-violating Yang-Mills theory can be studied in arbitrary linear covariant gauges without losing gauge invariance.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the dressed gauge-invariant field $A^h_\mu = h^\dagger A_\mu h + (i/g) h^\dagger \partial_\mu h$ with $h=e^{ig\xi^a T^a}$, which turns a naively gauge-variant mass term into a gauge-invariant one. Its key property is that, after integrating out the auxiliary fields, $A^h_\mu$ equals $A_\mu$ plus terms containing $\partial\cdot A$, so in the Landau gauge it effectively collapses to the gauge field itself; this is why the new action reduces to the earlier BRST-broken one. The construction of the gauge-invariant mass term $S_M$ is accompanied by a BRST-exact generalized linear covariant gauge-fixing term with parameters $\alpha$, $\mu^2$, and a tensorial gauge parameter $\zeta_{\mu\nu}$, whose breaking is unphysical. In the non-perturbative part, the same dressed field is used to rewrite the Gribov-Zwanziger and Refined Gribov-Zwanziger actions in BRST-invariant form, and the Ward identity for the Nakanishi-Lautrup field fixes the longitudinal gluon propagator exactly.

What would settle it

Compute the gluon self-energy at second order in the Lorentz-violating tensors: if a mass-like counterterm appears and cannot be absorbed by a BRST-invariant term, the artifact claim fails. Alternatively, compute any gauge-invariant correlation function in the massive model in two different gauges; a nonzero difference would contradict the claimed gauge independence.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a mass-like term for non-Abelian gauge fields can be introduced in LVYM theories without sacrificing gauge invariance: define $S_M = \frac{1}{2}\int_x M_{\mu\nu}(A^h)^a_\mu (A^h)^a_\nu + \int_x \tau^a \partial_\mu (A^h)^a_\mu + \int_x \bar\eta^a \partial_\mu D^{ab}_\mu(A^h)\eta^b$, where $A^h$ is the gauge-invariant dressed field built from the gauge potential and a Stueckelberg-like field. The full action $S = S_{LVYM}+S_M+S_{FP}$ is BRST invariant, and in the Landau gauge the $A^h$-dependent terms collapse to the ordinary gauge field, reproducing the action of Ref. [20] after a trivial shift of the Nakanishi-Lautrup field. Hence correlation functions of gauge fields, ghosts, and BRST-closed operators computed with the old BRST-broken action coincide with those of the new BRST-invariant one. The paper further argues that the mass generation found in Ref. [20] is a direct consequence of applying Symanzik's method, since the Lorentz-violating terms there are not soft quadratic breakings, and predicts that an algebraic renormalization analysis without that method would find no mass term. Finally, it presents the BRST-invariant Refined Gribov-Zwanziger action for LVYM in linear covariant gauges and the resulting tree-level gluon propagator, with consistency checks against the YM, RGZ, and [20] limits.

Load-bearing premise

The construction rests on the assumption that adding the non-polynomial gauge-invariant mass term to the Lorentz-violating action still leaves a well-behaved quantum theory that can be renormalized order by order; the paper does not supply that proof.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A massive LVYM theory can be quantized in general linear covariant gauges with exact BRST invariance, so correlation functions of gauge-invariant observables are protected from gauge-parameter dependence.
  • In the Landau gauge the new action and the earlier BRST-broken action give identical correlation functions for gauge fields and Faddeev-Popov ghosts, validating previous computations performed with the broken action.
  • If the mass term is not genuinely required, then LVYM renormalizability should be provable without it; the paper's argument predicts an algebraic renormalization without Symanzik's method will not generate a gluon mass.
  • The BRST-invariant Refined Gribov-Zwanziger action yields a tree-level gluon propagator with exact longitudinal component $\alpha p_\nu/p^2$, and reduces to the standard YM and RGZ propagators when Lorentz-violating and mass parameters are switched off.
  • The effective massive model can serve as a perturbative window into the infrared regime of LVYM, in analogy with massive Yang-Mills models used to describe gluon and ghost propagators.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural test of the artifact claim is a two-loop computation of the gluon self-energy at second order in the Lorentz-violating tensors; the paper's reasoning predicts no mass-like counterterm, whereas the Symanzik-based analysis predicts one.
  • If renormalizability of the full dressed-field action is eventually established, the same $A^h$-mass construction could be applied to other non-Abelian theories with CPT-odd Chern-Simons-like terms, not just the specific LVYM action considered here.
  • The exact longitudinal Ward identity shown in Section IV suggests the tree-level longitudinal propagator $\alpha/p^2$ is non-renormalized even in the Lorentz-violating, Gribov-restricted theory; checking this at one loop would be a sharp, cheap test of the whole construction.
  • The pole structure of the new propagator, once analyzed, may reveal Lorentz-violating analogs of the complex-conjugate mass poles familiar from RGZ models, with possible signatures in correlation functions that lattice simulations of LVYM could in principle probe.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a massive extension of Lorentz-violating Yang-Mills (LVYM) theories that is compatible with BRST invariance. The mass term is built from the gauge-invariant dressed field A_h introduced in Eq. (7), so it does not break gauge symmetry. After BRST gauge-fixing with a generalized linear covariant gauge (Eq. (14)), the action S = S_LVYM + S_M + S_FP is claimed to be BRST invariant. In the Landau gauge, integrating out auxiliary fields and performing a shift of the Nakanishi-Lautrup field reduces S to the soft-BRST-broken action \tilde S of Santos and Sobreiro [20], establishing equivalence of correlation functions. The paper also argues that the mass generation observed in [20] is an artifact of Symanzik's method. In Section IV, the Gribov-Zwanziger and Refined Gribov-Zwanziger actions are generalized to LVYM in a BRST-invariant way using A_h, and the tree-level gauge-field propagator in linear covariant gauges is displayed with explicit form factors. The central claim is that a massive LVYM theory can be formulated in harmony with gauge invariance/BRST symmetry.

Significance. If the construction can be promoted to a renormalized quantum theory, it would resolve the long-standing question of gauge-parameter dependence of massive LVYM correlation functions, and it would provide an effective model for infrared LVYM dynamics analogous to the Curci-Ferrari or RGZ models in Lorentz-invariant Yang-Mills. The paper gives a clean classical construction with several nontrivial consistency checks: the propagator reduces to standard YM and RGZ forms in the appropriate limits, and the Landau-gauge limit matches [20]. The use of the dressed field A_h is well motivated, and the paper is honest about the limitations, explicitly stating that renormalizability of the massive model in general linear covariant gauges is left to future work. The strength of the claim is therefore conditional: the paper establishes a classical construction, not a fully proven quantum-consistent model.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sections III and V; Eqs. (18)-(27)] The central claim of the paper, namely that the massive LVYM action S is a consistent quantum field theory whose BRST-closed observables are gauge-parameter independent, is not established. The proof of renormalizability of S in the generalized linear covariant gauge (14) is explicitly left to future work (Section V). Without a proof that the Slavnov-Taylor identity S(Γ)=0 survives renormalization, Eq. (27) is an assertion rather than a theorem. In addition, the localization of A_h introduces a non-polynomial Stückelberg sector whose renormalization and potential anomalies are not controlled. Please either provide the renormalizability/anomaly analysis or substantially soften the conclusion in the abstract and Section V, e.g., stating that the model is a classical effective construction.
  2. [Section IV.C; Eqs. (48)-(55)] The tree-level gauge-field propagator form factors a(p,v), ..., e(p,v) are presented without any derivation. This is a central new result, since the propagator encodes the non-perturbative information of the RGZ framework, and the coefficients involve the non-trivial functions Λ^2, Ξ and Ω. The consistency checks in Eqs. (56)-(72) cannot be verified without the underlying computation. Please include the derivation in an appendix or provide a reference to a source where it is performed.
  3. [Section III; Eqs. (22)-(27)] The claimed equivalence between the BRST-invariant action S and the soft-BRST-broken action \tilde S in the Landau gauge uses formal manipulations: one integrates out the Stückelberg field ξ and the auxiliary fields (τ, η, \bar η), and shifts b by F(A). While the b-shift has unit Jacobian, the integration over the non-polynomial Stückelberg sector produces non-local field-dependent terms; the paper does not discuss the measure or possible Jacobian factors of these steps. Since this equivalence is used to justify the harmlessness of the BRST breaking in [20], it needs to be made precise, at least at the level of the path-integral measure.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section I] The phrase 'the non-renormalizability of the standard linear covariant gauge remains intact' is likely a typo; the standard linear covariant gauge is renormalizable in Yang-Mills, so the intended statement is probably about the renormalizability or about the propagator's longitudinal component. Please rephrase.
  2. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors, e.g., 'descritpion' in the abstract, 'renomalization' in Section II.B, 'the logitudinal component' in Section IV.C, and the grammatical construction 'which two gauge parameters' in Section II.B. A careful proofreading is recommended.
  3. [Section II.A; Eq. (6)] The tensor M_μν = δ_μν m^2 + a_μ a_ν is positive definite only for Euclidean signature; the paper uses Euclidean conventions, but this should be stated explicitly.
  4. [Section II.A; Eq. (5)] The field τ appears as a Lagrange multiplier enforcing ∂_μ (A^h)^a_μ = 0 in S_M; the paper should comment on the status of this constraint in the BRST-invariant formulation, since it is not a gauge choice but part of the mass-sector definition.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the BRST-invariant massive LVYM construction is explicit and self-contained; the main limitation is unproven quantum renormalizability, which the paper openly defers.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: define S0 = S_LVYM + S_M (eq. 13) with S_M built from the gauge-invariant dressed field A_h (eqs. 5-7); add the BRST-exact gauge fixing S_FP (eq. 14); then, in the Landau gauge, use A_h^2 = A^2 + F(A)(∂·A) (eq. 23) and the unit-Jacobian shift b -> b_h (eq. 24) to obtain the soft-BRST-broken action \tilde S of [20] (eq. 25). Each step is an explicit algebraic manipulation with the mass parameters m^2 and a_\mu as inputs, not as fitted or predicted quantities. The Landau-gauge equivalence (eqs. 26-27) therefore does not reduce to the input by construction; it is a derived identity inside the model. The paper explicitly flags the real gap: 'To the best of our knowledge, there is no systematic analysis of the renomalization properties of such a gauge condition... relegated to future work' (Sect. II.B) and 'it was not proved explicitly that it is renormalizable in a general linear covariant gauge, a task left to future work due to its complexity' (Sect. V). This makes Eq. (27) conditional on an unproven quantum Slavnov-Taylor identity, but that is an incompleteness/limitation, not a circularity. The propagator comparison with [20] uses the parameter identifications β = -1/4, Δ_SS v^2 = (6α-1)v^2 ≡ m^2, Ω_SS = 1 (eqs. 73-77); it is a consistency check by parameter mapping, not a prediction forced by a fit. The only self-citation of note is [45] (with the present author) for the A_h construction, but eq. (7) is stated in full and the dressed-field construction has an independent literature ([48-53]); the citation is not used to forbid alternatives or to import a uniqueness theorem. Hence: no load-bearing circular step; at most a minor, non-load-bearing self-citation, so score 2.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The new model introduces four mass parameters (m^2, a_mu, gamma^2, M^2) and relies on standard BRST quantization, the Gribov region restriction, and the Stueckelberg construction of the dressed field Ah from Refs. [45,47]. No new physical entities such as particles or forces are invented.

free parameters (4)
  • m^2 = not fitted
    Mass parameter introduced in Eq. (5) as part of the gauge-invariant mass term; it is an input, and the paper does not derive or fit it.
  • a_mu = not fitted
    Background vector in Eq. (6) that generalizes the mass term; the paper leaves open whether it must coincide with v_mu.
  • gamma^2 = not computed
    Gribov parameter introduced in Eq. (33) and fixed by the gap equation (35), but the gap equation is not solved in this paper.
  • M^2 = not fitted
    RGZ condensate parameter introduced in Eq. (41); it is an input to the refined action.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Standard BRST quantization and algebraic renormalization framework
    The paper relies on the BRST formalism and algebraic renormalization as background, citing [54].
  • domain assumption Validity of the Stueckelberg-like construction of Ah as a local gauge-invariant field
    The dressed field Ah from Refs. [45,47] is used to build the gauge-invariant mass term and the BRST-invariant GZ action; its localization and renormalizability are assumed to carry over to the LVYM context.
  • domain assumption Gribov region restriction and horizon function
    The GZ framework is taken as a valid non-perturbative gauge-fixing procedure, following [29,31].
  • domain assumption Correctness of the Landau-gauge renormalizability analysis in [20]
    The paper builds on the result of [20] that a mass term is generated in the Landau gauge; this is an input to the discussion.
  • domain assumption Lorentz-violating background structures are fixed and do not transform
    The tensors kappa and v_mu are treated as external spectator fields, which is standard in the SME framework.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the consistency of Lorentz-Violating Yang-Mills theories: Gauge invariance and non-perturbative effects." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GHBAYIMD

@misc{pith2026241109398,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the consistency of Lorentz-Violating Yang-Mills theories: Gauge invariance and non-perturbative effects},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GHBAYIMD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.09398}
}
read the original abstract

Previous investigations on the renormalizability properties of Lorentz-violating Yang-Mills (LVYM) theories in the Landau gauge have pointed out the necessity of the inclusion of a mass-like term for the gauge fields. If one aims at generalizing the theory to a more complicated gauge, such a mass-like term can bring severe issues regarding gauge-dependence of correlation functions of observables. We propose a Lorentz-violating Yang-Mills theory supplemented by a gauge-invariant mass term which generalizes the model in the Landau gauge. We discuss the foundational aspects of the model and highlight how it simplifies in the Landau gauge. Following the recent literature in pure Yang-Mills theories, we remark how the proposed massive extension of LVYM theories can be used as an effective model to access infrared properties within perturbation theory. Finally, we present a BRST-invariant formulation of the so-called Refined Gribov-Zwanziger action in the presence of Lorentz-violating terms in linear covariant gauges and the underlying tree-level gauge-field propagator which is enriched by the non-perturbative information carried by the elimination of Gribov copies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [20]

    Jovem Cientista do Nosso Estado

    which had massive terms arising due to the appli- cation of Symanzik’s method together with the algebraic renormalization procedure. The model introduced in [20] breaks BRST-invariance explicitly but we just showed in the present section that it can be made BRST-invariant by a suitable field redefinition. By letting the gauge pa- rameters free one can ana...

    2022

  2. [1]

    H. D. Politzer, Reliable Perturbative Results for Strong Interactions?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1346 (1973)

    1973

  3. [2]

    D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Ultraviolet Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1343 (1973)

    1973

  4. [3]

    Greensite, An introduction to the confinement problem, Vol

    J. Greensite, An introduction to the confinement problem, Vol. 821 (2011)

    2011

  5. [4]

    Brambilla et al

    N. Brambilla et al. , QCD and Strongly Coupled Gauge Theories: Challenges and Perspectives, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2981 (2014), arXiv:1404.3723 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2014

  6. [5]

    V. A. Kostelecky and S. Samuel, Spontaneous Breaking of Lorentz Symmetry in String Theory, Phys. Rev. D 39, 683 (1989)

    1989

  7. [6]

    S. M. Carroll, G. B. Field, and R. Jackiw, Limits on a Lorentz and Parity Violating Modification of Electrody- namics, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1231 (1990)

    1990

  8. [7]

    Colladay and V

    D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecky, CPT violation and the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 55, 6760 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9703464

    arXiv 1997

Show all 89 references
  1. [8]

    Colladay and V

    D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecky, Lorentz violating ex- tension of the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 58, 116002 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9809521

    1998 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Jackiw and V

    R. Jackiw and V. A. Kostelecky, Radiatively induced Lorentz and CPT violation in electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3572 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9901358

    1999 arXiv

  3. [10]

    V. A. Kostelecky, Gravity, Lorentz violation, and the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 69, 105009 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0312310

    2004 arXiv

  4. [11]

    V. A. Kostelecky and N. Russell, Data Tables for Lorentz and CPT Violation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 11 (2011), arXiv:0801.0287 [hep-ph]

    2011

  5. [12]

    J. S. Diaz, V. A. Kostelecky, and M. Mewes, Pertur- bative Lorentz and CPT violation for neutrino and an- tineutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D 80, 076007 (2009), arXiv:0908.1401 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Belich, L

    H. Belich, L. P. Colatto, T. Costa-Soares, J. A. Helayel- Neto, and M. T. D. Orlando, Magnetic Moment Gen- eration from non-minimal couplings in a scenario with Lorentz-Symmetry Violation, Eur. Phys. J. C 62, 425 (2009), arXiv:0806.1253 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  7. [14]

    de Paula Netto and I

    T. de Paula Netto and I. L. Shapiro, Vacuum con- tribution of photons in the theory with Lorentz and CPT-violating terms, Phys. Rev. D 89, 104037 (2014), arXiv:1403.3152 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  8. [15]

    de Paula Netto, One-loop renormalization of Lorentz and CPT -violating scalar field theory in curved space- time, Phys

    T. de Paula Netto, One-loop renormalization of Lorentz and CPT -violating scalar field theory in curved space- time, Phys. Rev. D 97, 055048 (2018), arXiv:1711.05193 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Mariz, J

    T. Mariz, J. R. Nascimento, and A. Petrov, Lorentz Symmetry Breaking—Classical and Quantum As- pects, SpringerBriefs in Physics (Springer, 2023) arXiv:2205.02594 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Colladay and P

    D. Colladay and P. McDonald, One-Loop Renormaliza- tion of Pure Yang-Mills with Lorentz Violation, Phys. Rev. D 75, 105002 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0609084

    2007 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Colladay and P

    D. Colladay and P. McDonald, One-Loop Renormaliza- tion of QCD with Lorentz Violation, Phys. Rev. D 77, 085006 (2008), arXiv:0712.2055 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Colladay and P

    D. Colladay and P. McDonald, One-Loop Renormaliza- tion of the Electroweak Sector with Lorentz Violation, Phys. Rev. D 79, 125019 (2009), arXiv:0904.1219 [hep- ph]

    2009 arXiv

  13. [21]

    T. R. S. Santos and R. F. Sobreiro, Renormalizabil- ity of Yang-Mills theory with Lorentz violation and gluon mass generation, Phys. Rev. D 91, 025008 (2015), arXiv:1404.4846 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  14. [22]

    T. R. S. Santos, R. F. Sobreiro, and A. A. Tomaz, Gauge field spectrum in massive Yang-Mills theory with Lorentz violation, Phys. Rev. D 94, 085027 (2016), arXiv:1607.05261 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Symanzik, Renormalizable models with simple sym- metry breaking

    K. Symanzik, Renormalizable models with simple sym- metry breaking. 1. Symmetry breaking by a source term, Commun. Math. Phys. 16, 48 (1970)

    1970

  16. [24]

    Tissier and N

    M. Tissier and N. Wschebor, Infrared propagators of Yang-Mills theory from perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 82, 101701 (2010), arXiv:1004.1607 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Tissier and N

    M. Tissier and N. Wschebor, An Infrared Safe pertur- bative approach to Yang-Mills correlators, Phys. Rev. D 84, 045018 (2011), arXiv:1105.2475 [hep-th]. 13

    2011 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Reinosa, J

    U. Reinosa, J. Serreau, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, How nonperturbative is the infrared regime of Landau gauge Yang-Mills correlators?, Phys. Rev. D 96, 014005 (2017), arXiv:1703.04041 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Barrios, P

    N. Barrios, P. De Fabritiis, and M. Pel´ aez, Four-gluon vertex from the Curci-Ferrari model at one-loop order, (2024), arXiv:2403.17056 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    J. A. Gracey, M. Pel´ aez, U. Reinosa, and M. Tissier, Two loop calculation of Yang-Mills propagators in the Curci-Ferrari model, Phys. Rev. D 100, 034023 (2019), arXiv:1905.07262 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Barrios, M

    N. Barrios, M. Pel´ aez, U. Reinosa, and N. Wschebor, The ghost-antighost-gluon vertex from the Curci-Ferrari model: Two-loop corrections, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114016 (2020), arXiv:2009.00875 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  22. [30]

    V. N. Gribov, Quantization of Nonabelian Gauge Theo- ries, Nucl. Phys. B139, 1 (1978), [1(1977)]

    1978

  23. [31]

    Faddeev and V

    L. Faddeev and V. Popov, Feynman Diagrams for the Yang-Mills Field, Phys. Lett. B 25, 29 (1967)

    1967

  24. [32]

    Zwanziger, Local and Renormalizable Action From the Gribov Horizon, Nucl

    D. Zwanziger, Local and Renormalizable Action From the Gribov Horizon, Nucl. Phys. B323, 513 (1989)

    1989

  25. [33]

    van Baal, More (thoughts on) Gribov copies, Nucl

    P. van Baal, More (thoughts on) Gribov copies, Nucl. Phys. B369, 259 (1992)

    1992

  26. [34]

    Sobreiro and S

    R. Sobreiro and S. Sorella, Introduction to the Gribov ambiguities in Euclidean Yang-Mills theories, in 13th Jorge Andre Swieca Summer School on Particle and Fields (2005) arXiv:hep-th/0504095

    2005 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Vandersickel and D

    N. Vandersickel and D. Zwanziger, The Gribov prob- lem and QCD dynamics, Phys. Rept. 520, 175 (2012), arXiv:1202.1491 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Dudal, S

    D. Dudal, S. P. Sorella, N. Vandersickel, and H. Ver- schelde, New features of the gluon and ghost propaga- tor in the infrared region from the Gribov-Zwanziger ap- proach, Phys. Rev. D77, 071501 (2008), arXiv:0711.4496 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Dudal, J

    D. Dudal, J. A. Gracey, S. P. Sorella, N. Vander- sickel, and H. Verschelde, A Refinement of the Gribov- Zwanziger approach in the Landau gauge: Infrared prop- agators in harmony with the lattice results, Phys. Rev. D78, 065047 (2008), arXiv:0806.4348 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Cucchieri and T

    A. Cucchieri and T. Mendes, Constraints on the IR be- havior of the gluon propagator in Yang-Mills theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 241601 (2008), arXiv:0712.3517 [hep-lat]

    2008 arXiv

  31. [39]

    A. G. Duarte, O. Oliveira, and P. J. Silva, Lattice Gluon and Ghost Propagators, and the Strong Coupling in Pure SU(3) Yang-Mills Theory: Finite Lattice Spacing and Volume Effects, Phys. Rev. D 94, 014502 (2016), arXiv:1605.00594 [hep-lat]

    2016 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Dudal, O

    D. Dudal, O. Oliveira, and N. Vandersickel, Indirect lat- tice evidence for the Refined Gribov-Zwanziger formal- ism and the gluon condensate ⟨A2⟩ in the Landau gauge, Phys. Rev. D 81, 074505 (2010), arXiv:1002.2374 [hep- lat]

    2010 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Cucchieri, D

    A. Cucchieri, D. Dudal, T. Mendes, and N. Van- dersickel, Modeling the Gluon Propagator in Landau Gauge: Lattice Estimates of Pole Masses and Dimension- Two Condensates, Phys. Rev. D 85, 094513 (2012), arXiv:1111.2327 [hep-lat]

    2012 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Dudal, O

    D. Dudal, O. Oliveira, and P. J. Silva, High precision sta- tistical Landau gauge lattice gluon propagator computa- tion vs. the Gribov–Zwanziger approach, Annals Phys. 397, 351 (2018), arXiv:1803.02281 [hep-lat]

    2018 arXiv

  35. [43]

    G. P. de Brito and A. D. Pereira, Infrared gluon propaga- tor in the Refined Gribov-Zwanziger scenario at one-loop order in the Landau gauge, (2024), arXiv:2405.07779 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    D. R. Granado, I. F. Justo, and A. Y. Petrov, Lorentz symmetry breaking in a Yang–Mills theory within the Gribov restriction, J. Phys. A 53, 065402 (2020), arXiv:1707.03694 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  37. [45]

    D. R. Granado, C. P. Felix, I. F. Justo, A. Y. Petrov, and D. Vercauteren, Non-Abelian extension of the aether term and the Gribov problem, Annals Phys. 422, 168324 (2020), arXiv:1802.07637 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  38. [46]

    M. A. L. Capri, D. Dudal, D. Fiorentini, M. S. Guimaraes, I. F. Justo, A. D. Pereira, B. W. Mintz, L. F. Palhares, R. F. Sobreiro, and S. P. Sorella, Ex- act nilpotent nonperturbative BRST symmetry for the Gribov-Zwanziger action in the linear covariant gauge, Phys. Rev. D 92,...

    2015 arXiv

  39. [47]

    M. A. L. Capri, D. Fiorentini, M. S. Guimaraes, B. W. Mintz, L. F. Palhares, and S. P. Sorella, Local and renormalizable framework for the gauge-invariant op- erator A2 min in Euclidean Yang-Mills theories in lin- ear covariant gauges, Phys. Rev. D 94, 065009 (2016), arXiv:160...

    2016 arXiv

  40. [48]

    M. A. L. Capri, D. Fiorentini, A. D. Pereira, and S. P. Sorella, Renormalizability of the refined Gribov- Zwanziger action in linear covariant gauges, Phys. Rev. D 96, 054022 (2017), arXiv:1708.01543 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Delbourgo and G

    R. Delbourgo and G. Thompson, MASSIVE, UNITARY, RENORMALIZABLE YANG-MILLS THEORY WITH- OUT HIGGS MESONS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2610 (1986)

    1986

  42. [50]

    Delbourgo, S

    R. Delbourgo, S. Twisk, and G. Thompson, MAS- SIVE YANG-MILLS THEORY: RENORMALIZABIL- ITY VERSUS UNITARITY, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 3, 435 (1988)

    1988

  43. [51]

    Zwanziger, Quantization of Gauge Fields, Classical Gauge Invariance and Gluon Confinement, Nucl

    D. Zwanziger, Quantization of Gauge Fields, Classical Gauge Invariance and Gluon Confinement, Nucl. Phys. B 345, 461 (1990)

    1990

  44. [52]

    Lavelle and D

    M. Lavelle and D. McMullan, Constituent quarks from QCD, Phys. Rept. 279, 1 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9509344

    1997 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Dragon, T

    N. Dragon, T. Hurth, and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Polyno- mial form of the Stuckelberg model, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 56, 318 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9703017

    1997 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Ruegg and M

    H. Ruegg and M. Ruiz-Altaba, The Stueckelberg field, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19, 3265 (2004), arXiv:hep- th/0304245

    2004

  47. [55]

    Piguet and S

    O. Piguet and S. P. Sorella, Algebraic renormalization: Perturbative renormalization, symmetries and anoma- lies, Vol. 28 (1995)

    1995

  48. [56]

    Altschul, L

    B. Altschul, L. C. T. Brito, J. C. C. Felipe, S. Karki, A. C. Lehum, and A. Y. Petrov, Perturbative aspects of CPT-even Lorentz-violating scalar chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 107, 115002 (2023), arXiv:2304.03025 [hep- th]

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    M. S. Guimaraes and S. P. Sorella, A Few remarks on the zero modes of the Faddeev-Popov operator in the Landau and maximal Abelian gauges, J. Math. Phys. 52, 092302 (2011), arXiv:1106.3944 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  50. [58]

    M. A. L. Capri, M. S. Guimaraes, S. P. Sorella, and D. G. Tedesco, A Study of the zero modes of the Faddeev- Popov operator in Euclidean Yang-Mills theories in the Landau gauge in d=2,3,4 dimensions, Eur. Phys. J. C72, 14 1939 (2012), arXiv:1201.2445 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Singer, Some Remarks on the Gribov Ambiguity, Com- mun

    I. Singer, Some Remarks on the Gribov Ambiguity, Com- mun. Math. Phys. 60, 7 (1978)

    1978

  52. [60]

    M. A. L. Capri, D. Dudal, M. S. Guimaraes, L. F. Palhares, and S. P. Sorella, An all-order proof of the equivalence between Gribov’s no-pole and Zwanziger’s horizon conditions, Phys. Lett. B719, 448 (2013), arXiv:1212.2419 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Dell’Antonio and D

    G. Dell’Antonio and D. Zwanziger, Every gauge orbit passes inside the Gribov horizon, Commun. Math. Phys. 138, 291 (1991)

    1991

  54. [62]

    Maggiore and M

    N. Maggiore and M. Schaden, Landau gauge within the Gribov horizon, Phys. Rev. D50, 6616 (1994), arXiv:hep- th/9310111

    1994

  55. [63]

    Baulieu and S

    L. Baulieu and S. P. Sorella, Soft breaking of BRST in- variance for introducing non-perturbative infrared effects in a local and renormalizable way, Phys. Lett. B671, 481 (2009), arXiv:0808.1356 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Dudal, S

    D. Dudal, S. P. Sorella, N. Vandersickel, and H. Ver- schelde, Gribov no-pole condition, Zwanziger horizon function, Kugo-Ojima confinement criterion, boundary conditions, BRST breaking and all that, Phys. Rev. D 79, 121701 (2009), arXiv:0904.0641 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  57. [65]

    S. P. Sorella, Gribov horizon and BRST symmetry: A Few remarks, Phys. Rev. D 80, 025013 (2009), arXiv:0905.1010 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  58. [66]

    S. P. Sorella, Gluon confinement, i-particles and BRST soft breaking, J. Phys. A 44, 135403 (2011), arXiv:1006.4500 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  59. [67]

    M. A. L. Capri, A. J. Gomez, M. S. Guimaraes, V. E. R. Lemes, S. P. Sorella, and D. G. Tedesco, A remark on the BRST symmetry in the Gribov-Zwanziger theory, Phys. Rev. D 82, 105019 (2010), arXiv:1009.4135 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Lavrov, O

    P. Lavrov, O. Lechtenfeld, and A. Reshetnyak, Is soft breaking of BRST symmetry consistent?, JHEP 10, 043, arXiv:1108.4820 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    Serreau and M

    J. Serreau and M. Tissier, Lifting the Gribov ambigu- ity in Yang-Mills theories, Phys. Lett. B 712, 97 (2012), arXiv:1202.3432 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Serreau, M

    J. Serreau, M. Tissier, and A. Tresmontant, Covariant gauges without Gribov ambiguities in Yang-Mills theo- ries, Phys. Rev. D 89, 125019 (2014), arXiv:1307.6019 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Dudal and S

    D. Dudal and S. P. Sorella, The Gribov horizon and spon- taneous BRST symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 86, 045005 (2012), arXiv:1205.3934 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  64. [72]

    A. D. Pereira and R. F. Sobreiro, On the elimina- tion of infinitesimal Gribov ambiguities in non-Abelian gauge theories, Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2584 (2013), arXiv:1308.4159 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  65. [73]

    A. D. Pereira, Jr. and R. F. Sobreiro, Gribov ambigui- ties at the Landau-maximal Abelian interpolating gauge, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2984 (2014), arXiv:1402.3477 [hep- th]

    2014 arXiv

  66. [74]

    P. M. Lavrov and O. Lechtenfeld, Gribov horizon be- yond the Landau gauge, Phys. Lett. B 725, 386 (2013), arXiv:1305.2931 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  67. [75]

    M. A. L. Capri, M. S. Guimaraes, I. F. Justo, L. F. Pal- hares, and S. P. Sorella, Properties of the Faddeev-Popov operator in the Landau gauge, matter confinement and soft BRST breaking, Phys. Rev. D 90, 085010 (2014), arXiv:1408.3597 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Cucchieri, D

    A. Cucchieri, D. Dudal, T. Mendes, and N. Vandersickel, BRST-Symmetry Breaking and Bose-Ghost Propagator in Lattice Minimal Landau Gauge, Phys. Rev. D 90, 051501 (2014), arXiv:1405.1547 [hep-lat]

    2014 arXiv

  69. [77]

    P. Y. Moshin and A. A. Reshetnyak, Field-dependent BRST–antiBRST transformations in Yang–Mills and Gribov–Zwanziger theories, Nucl. Phys. B 888, 92 (2014), arXiv:1405.0790 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Schaden and D

    M. Schaden and D. Zwanziger, Living with spontaneously broken BRST symmetry. I. Physical states and cohomol- ogy, Phys. Rev. D 92, 025001 (2015), arXiv:1412.4823 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Schaden and D

    M. Schaden and D. Zwanziger, Living with spontaneously broken BRST symmetry. II. Poincar´ e invariance, Phys. Rev. D 92, 025002 (2015), arXiv:1501.05974 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Cucchieri and T

    A. Cucchieri and T. Mendes, What’s up with IR gluon and ghost propagators in Landau gauge? A puzzling answer from huge lattices, PoS LA TTICE2007, 297 (2007), arXiv:0710.0412 [hep-lat]

    2007 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Sternbeck, L

    A. Sternbeck, L. von Smekal, D. B. Leinweber, and A. G. Williams, Comparing SU(2) to SU(3) gluodynam- ics on large lattices, PoS LA TTICE2007, 340 (2007), arXiv:0710.1982 [hep-lat]

    2007 arXiv

  74. [82]

    B. W. Mintz, L. F. Palhares, S. P. Sorella, and A. D. Pereira, Ghost-gluon vertex in the presence of the Gribov horizon, Phys. Rev. D 97, 034020 (2018), arXiv:1712.09633 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  75. [83]

    G. P. de Brito, P. De Fabritiis, and A. D. Pereira, Re- fined Gribov-Zwanziger theory coupled to scalar fields in the Landau gauge, Phys. Rev. D 107, 114006 (2023), arXiv:2302.04827 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Barrios, M

    N. Barrios, M. Pel´ aez, M. S. Guimaraes, B. W. Mintz, and L. F. Palhares, Ghost-gluon vertex in the presence of the Gribov horizon: General kinematics, Phys. Rev. D 109, 094039 (2024), arXiv:2402.17534 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  77. [85]

    M. A. L. Capri, D. Fiorentini, M. S. Guimaraes, B. W. Mintz, L. F. Palhares, S. P. Sorella, D. Dudal, I. F. Justo, A. D. Pereira, and R. F. Sobreiro, More on the nonperturbative Gribov-Zwanziger quantization of lin- ear covariant gauges, Phys. Rev. D 93, 065019 (2016), arXiv:1...

    2016 arXiv

  78. [86]

    M. A. L. Capri, D. Dudal, D. Fiorentini, M. S. Guimaraes, I. F. Justo, A. D. Pereira, B. W. Mintz, L. F. Palhares, R. F. Sobreiro, and S. P. Sorella, Local and BRST-invariant Yang-Mills theory within the Gribov horizon, Phys. Rev. D 94, 025035 (2016), arXiv:1605.02610 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  79. [87]

    M. A. L. Capri, D. Dudal, A. D. Pereira, D. Fiorentini, M. S. Guimaraes, B. W. Mintz, L. F. Palhares, and S. P. Sorella, Nonperturbative aspects of Euclidean Yang-Mills theories in linear covariant gauges: Nielsen identities and a BRST-invariant two-point correlation function,...

    2017 arXiv

  80. [88]

    A. D. Pereira, R. F. Sobreiro, and S. P. Sorella, Non-perturbative BRST quantization of Euclidean Yang–Mills theories in Curci–Ferrari gauges, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 528 (2016), arXiv:1605.09747 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  81. [89]

    M. A. L. Capri, D. Fiorentini, A. D. Pereira, and S. P. Sorella, A non-perturbative study of matter field propa- gators in Euclidean Yang–Mills theory in linear covariant, Curci–Ferrari and maximal Abelian gauges, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 546 (2017), arXiv:1703.03264 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.