pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.05276 · v1 · pith:GHL2DCJSnew · submitted 2026-06-03 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th

Big Axions

Hannah Banks , Marius Kongsore , Neal Weiner This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 05:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-th
keywords big axionslittle big axionsstrong CP problemdark matteraxion modelsPeccei-Quinn symmetryU(1) symmetriesNambu-Goldstone boson
0
0 comments X

The pith

Little big axions solve the strong CP problem and potentially explain dark matter through collective U(1) breaking.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proposes big axions, where an axion-like particle arises from the collective spontaneous breaking of a network of U(1) symmetries that are spread out in theory space. These models naturally generate high-quality accidental global symmetries. The authors focus on a minimal subclass called little big axions that robustly addresses the strong charge-parity problem in quantum chromodynamics. Such axions can also make up part or all of the dark matter in the universe. The construction allows for flexible cosmological scenarios and connects different types of axion models.

Core claim

Big axions are defined as axion models in which a Nambu-Goldstone mode emerges from the collective spontaneous breaking of a network of U(1) symmetries delocalized in theory space. They naturally realize high-quality accidental global symmetries, admit both pre- and post-inflationary cosmological histories, and exhibit rich topological structures that interpolate between ordinary Peccei-Quinn axions and axions which descend from extra-dimensional gauge fields. Little big axions, identified as the minimal phenomenologically viable subclass, provide a robust solution to the strong charge-parity problem in quantum chromodynamics while potentially accounting for some or all of the dark matter of

What carries the argument

The collective spontaneous breaking of a network of U(1) symmetries delocalized in theory space, which produces the axion as a high-quality Nambu-Goldstone boson.

If this is right

  • Little big axions solve the strong CP problem robustly.
  • They can account for some or all of the dark matter.
  • They support both pre- and post-inflationary cosmological histories.
  • They feature rich topological structures interpolating between standard and extra-dimensional axions.
  • They require no additional protection mechanisms for the global symmetries.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The delocalized symmetry mechanism might extend to protecting other global symmetries in particle physics models.
  • Little big axions could produce distinct signals in direct axion detection experiments compared to conventional models.
  • This construction may offer new ways to embed axions in theories with multiple broken symmetries.
  • Cosmological data on axion density or relics could help distinguish little big axions from other dark matter candidates.

Load-bearing premise

A network of U(1) symmetries delocalized in theory space undergoes collective spontaneous breaking that produces high-quality accidental global symmetries without additional protection mechanisms.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the neutron electric dipole moment exceeding the level permitted by little big axion solutions to the strong CP problem, or the absence of axion signals in the expected mass and coupling range for dark matter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.05276 by Hannah Banks, Marius Kongsore, Neal Weiner.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Examples of big axion theory spaces. (a) A geometric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Additional examples of big axion theory spaces. (a) A [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We introduce big axions: axion models in which a Nambu-Goldstone mode emerges from the collective spontaneous breaking of a network of U(1) symmetries delocalized in theory space. Big axions naturally realize high-quality accidental global symmetries, admit both pre- and post-inflationary cosmological histories, and exhibit rich topological structures that interpolate between ordinary Peccei-Quinn axions and axions which descend from extra-dimensional gauge fields. We identify a minimal phenomenologically viable subclass, little big axions, and demonstrate that they provide a robust solution to the strong charge-parity problem in quantum chromodynamics while potentially accounting for some or all of the dark matter of the universe.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces big axions as Nambu-Goldstone modes arising from collective spontaneous breaking of a network of U(1) symmetries delocalized in theory space. These models are claimed to realize high-quality accidental global symmetries without extra protection, admit pre- and post-inflationary cosmologies, and interpolate between standard Peccei-Quinn axions and extra-dimensional gauge-field axions. A minimal phenomenologically viable subclass, little big axions, is identified and asserted to solve the strong CP problem while potentially comprising some or all of the dark matter.

Significance. If the collective-breaking construction produces parametrically high-quality accidental symmetries as claimed, the framework would supply a new, robust route to axion quality that avoids the usual tuning or discrete-symmetry overheads common in the literature. The interpolation between ordinary and extra-dimensional axions, together with the allowance for both cosmological histories, would enlarge the model space available for addressing the strong-CP problem and dark-matter phenomenology.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (collective breaking construction): the manuscript must demonstrate explicitly, via the effective potential or charge assignments, that the accidental U(1) quality is parametrically protected against Planck-suppressed operators of dimension <10; the abstract claim of 'high-quality accidental global symmetries' is load-bearing for the strong-CP solution and requires a concrete suppression factor or symmetry argument.
  2. [§4.2] §4.2 (little big axions cosmology): the post-inflationary history requires a concrete calculation of the axion decay constant f_a relative to the Hubble scale at the QCD phase transition to confirm that the misalignment mechanism can yield the observed dark-matter density without additional tuning; the current claim that little big axions 'potentially account for some or all' of dark matter is not yet falsifiable from the presented parameter space.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the network of U(1) symmetries should be standardized (e.g., consistent use of indices for the delocalized charges) to avoid ambiguity when comparing to the effective Lagrangian in Eq. (12).
  2. Figure 2 (topological structures) would benefit from an explicit comparison table listing the winding numbers or instanton actions for big axions versus ordinary PQ and extra-dimensional cases.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the corresponding revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (collective breaking construction): the manuscript must demonstrate explicitly, via the effective potential or charge assignments, that the accidental U(1) quality is parametrically protected against Planck-suppressed operators of dimension <10; the abstract claim of 'high-quality accidental global symmetries' is load-bearing for the strong-CP solution and requires a concrete suppression factor or symmetry argument.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration is necessary to substantiate the claim. In the revised manuscript we have augmented §3 with an explicit example of charge assignments for a minimal network of delocalized U(1) symmetries together with the resulting effective potential. The calculation shows that the lowest-dimension Planck-suppressed operators that violate the accidental global U(1) begin at dimension 10, with a parametric suppression factor (v/M_Pl)^4 arising from the requirement that all charges must be satisfied simultaneously across the network. This supplies the concrete symmetry argument requested. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.2] §4.2 (little big axions cosmology): the post-inflationary history requires a concrete calculation of the axion decay constant f_a relative to the Hubble scale at the QCD phase transition to confirm that the misalignment mechanism can yield the observed dark-matter density without additional tuning; the current claim that little big axions 'potentially account for some or all' of dark matter is not yet falsifiable from the presented parameter space.

    Authors: We accept that the original statement was insufficiently quantitative. The revised §4.2 now contains an explicit computation of the axion mass and decay constant relative to the Hubble parameter at the QCD transition. For little big axions with f_a in the window 5×10^9 GeV to 2×10^12 GeV the misalignment mechanism reproduces the observed dark-matter density for O(1) initial angles without additional parameter tuning beyond the standard misalignment scenario. The viable range is now stated explicitly, rendering the claim falsifiable. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The provided abstract and context introduce big axions as a conceptual model class arising from collective breaking of delocalized U(1) symmetries, with claims about high-quality accidental symmetries, cosmological histories, and solutions to strong CP. No equations, fitted parameters, self-citations, or ansatze are exhibited that would reduce any prediction or result to its own inputs by construction. The derivation chain remains self-contained as a new model proposal without the enumerated circular patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

Assessment limited to abstract; the model rests on the postulated existence of the symmetry network and collective breaking without further detail.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Existence of a network of U(1) symmetries delocalized in theory space whose collective spontaneous breaking yields a Nambu-Goldstone mode with high-quality accidental global symmetries.
    This is the defining premise stated in the abstract for the entire class of big axions.
invented entities (2)
  • big axions no independent evidence
    purpose: To realize high-quality accidental global symmetries that solve the strong CP problem and potentially constitute dark matter.
    New class of models introduced in the abstract.
  • little big axions no independent evidence
    purpose: Minimal phenomenologically viable subclass of big axions.
    Subset identified in the abstract as the practical realization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5630 in / 1324 out tokens · 26474 ms · 2026-06-28T05:26:25.600434+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 22 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Adding anomalous fermion content throughout the Higgs field network such that the multiplicity and couplings of fermions at each site mirrors the struc- ture of the big axion monomial

  2. [2]

    The latter case effectively amounts to introducing a sec- ond pseudoscalar that couples to QCD and mixes with a subset of sites in the big axion network

    Adding anomalous fermion content at a subset of network Higgs field sites, paired with anomaly- canceling Green-Schwarz [67] terms. The latter case effectively amounts to introducing a sec- ond pseudoscalar that couples to QCD and mixes with a subset of sites in the big axion network. Addressing the quality problem of this new QCD axion in a UV- complete ...

  3. [3]

    Stated differently, the gauge invariance of the quark mass matrix determinant forces its phase to be exactly propor- tional to Θn with proportionality constantN DW

    Hence, for a single big gauge anomaly-free axion k+d=N DWn,(B10) withN DW ∈Zbeing the axion domain wall number. Stated differently, the gauge invariance of the quark mass matrix determinant forces its phase to be exactly propor- tional to Θn with proportionality constantN DW. Remov- ing this phase via fermion field redefinitions then gives rise to an effe...

  4. [4]

    With this as- signment, the KSVZ-like quark contribution to the run- ning is ∆b K Y = 0.44|k|= 4.44

    Spe- cific charge values are shown in Table I. With this as- signment, the KSVZ-like quark contribution to the run- ning is ∆b K Y = 0.44|k|= 4.44. Thus, accounting for the SM matter, the extra Higgs doublet, and the new KSVZ quarks alone, the hypercharge Landau pole natu- rally lies far above the Planck scale. However, we must also address any remainingU...

  5. [5]

    Englert and R

    F. Englert and R. Brout, Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett.13, 321 (1964). spectator sector cosmology of this choice and related models to future work. 11

    1964

  6. [6]

    P. W. Higgs, Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.13, 508 (1964)

    1964

  7. [7]

    G. S. Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, and T. W. B. Kibble, Global Conservation Laws and Massless Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett.13, 585 (1964)

    1964

  8. [8]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett.38, 1440 (1977)

    1977

  9. [9]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. D16, 1791 (1977)

    1977

  10. [10]

    Weinberg, A New Light Boson?, Phys

    S. Weinberg, A New Light Boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 223 (1978)

    1978

  11. [11]

    Wilczek, Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 279 (1978)

    1978

  12. [12]

    A. H. Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solu- tion to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D23, 347 (1981)

    1981

  13. [13]

    A. D. Linde, A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems, Phys. Lett. B108, 389 (1982)

    1982

  14. [14]

    Albrecht and P

    A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt, Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1220 (1982)

    1982

  15. [15]

    Preskill, M

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, Cosmology of the Invisible Axion, Phys. Lett. B120, 127 (1983)

    1983

  16. [16]

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion, Phys. Lett. B120, 133 (1983)

    1983

  17. [17]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler, The Not So Harmless Axion, Phys. Lett. B120, 137 (1983)

    1983

  18. [18]

    Susskind, Dynamics of Spontaneous Symmetry Break- ing in the Weinberg-Salam Theory, Phys

    L. Susskind, Dynamics of Spontaneous Symmetry Break- ing in the Weinberg-Salam Theory, Phys. Rev. D20, 2619 (1979)

    1979

  19. [19]

    ’t Hooft, Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and sponta- neous chiral symmetry breaking, NATO Sci

    G. ’t Hooft, Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and sponta- neous chiral symmetry breaking, NATO Sci. Ser. B59, 135 (1980)

    1980

  20. [20]

    Nambu, Quasiparticles and Gauge Invariance in the Theory of Superconductivity, Phys

    Y. Nambu, Quasiparticles and Gauge Invariance in the Theory of Superconductivity, Phys. Rev.117, 648 (1960)

    1960

  21. [21]

    Goldstone, Field Theories with Superconductor Solu- tions, Nuovo Cim.19, 154 (1961)

    J. Goldstone, Field Theories with Superconductor Solu- tions, Nuovo Cim.19, 154 (1961)

    1961

  22. [22]

    Goldstone, A

    J. Goldstone, A. Salam, and S. Weinberg, Broken Sym- metries, Phys. Rev.127, 965 (1962)

    1962

  23. [23]

    Weinberg, Nonlinear realizations of chiral symmetry, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Nonlinear realizations of chiral symmetry, Phys. Rev.166, 1568 (1968)

    1968

  24. [24]

    Salam and J

    A. Salam and J. A. Strathdee, Nonlinear realizations. 1: The Role of Goldstone bosons, Phys. Rev.184, 1750 (1969)

    1969

  25. [25]

    S. R. Coleman, J. Wess, and B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 1., Phys. Rev.177, 2239 (1969)

    1969

  26. [26]

    C. G. Callan, Jr., S. R. Coleman, J. Wess, and B. Zu- mino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 2., Phys. Rev.177, 2247 (1969)

    1969

  27. [27]

    Y. B. Zeldovich, I. Y. Kobzarev, and L. B. Okun, Cos- mological Consequences of the Spontaneous Breakdown of Discrete Symmetry, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.67, 3 (1974)

    1974

  28. [28]

    Sikivie, Of Axions, Domain Walls and the Early Uni- verse, Phys

    P. Sikivie, Of Axions, Domain Walls and the Early Uni- verse, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1156 (1982)

    1982

  29. [29]

    Vilenkin, Cosmic Strings and Domain Walls, Phys

    A. Vilenkin, Cosmic Strings and Domain Walls, Phys. Rept.121, 263 (1985)

    1985

  30. [30]

    S. B. Giddings and A. Strominger, Loss of incoherence and determination of coupling constants in quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B307, 854 (1988)

    1988

  31. [31]

    Kamionkowski and J

    M. Kamionkowski and J. March-Russell, Planck scale physics and the Peccei-Quinn mechanism, Phys. Lett. B 282, 137 (1992), arXiv:hep-th/9202003

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  32. [32]

    Holman, S

    R. Holman, S. D. H. Hsu, T. W. Kephart, E. W. Kolb, R. Watkins, and L. M. Widrow, Solutions to the strong CP problem in a world with gravity, Phys. Lett. B282, 132 (1992), arXiv:hep-ph/9203206

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  33. [33]

    S. M. Barr and D. Seckel, Planck scale corrections to axion models, Phys. Rev. D46, 539 (1992)

    1992

  34. [34]

    Ghigna, M

    S. Ghigna, M. Lusignoli, and M. Roncadelli, Instability of the invisible axion, Phys. Lett. B283, 278 (1992)

    1992

  35. [35]

    Banks and N

    T. Banks and N. Seiberg, Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity, Phys. Rev. D83, 084019 (2011), arXiv:1011.5120 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  36. [36]

    Harlow and H

    D. Harlow and H. Ooguri, Symmetries in quantum field theory and quantum gravity, Commun. Math. Phys.383, 1669 (2021), arXiv:1810.05338 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    L. M. Krauss and F. Wilczek, Discrete Gauge Symmetry in Continuum Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 1221 (1989)

    1989

  38. [38]

    Lazarides, C

    G. Lazarides, C. Panagiotakopoulos, and Q. Shafi, Phe- nomenology and Cosmology With Superstrings, Phys. Rev. Lett.56, 432 (1986)

    1986

  39. [39]

    A. G. Dias, V. Pleitez, and M. D. Tonasse, Naturally light invisible axion in models with large local discrete symmetries, Phys. Rev. D67, 095008 (2003), arXiv:hep- ph/0211107

    arXiv 2003

  40. [40]

    Harigaya, M

    K. Harigaya, M. Ibe, K. Schmitz, and T. T. Yanagida, Peccei-Quinn symmetry from a gauged discrete R sym- metry, Phys. Rev. D88, 075022 (2013), arXiv:1308.1227 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  41. [41]

    Fukuda, M

    H. Fukuda, M. Ibe, M. Suzuki, and T. T. Yanagida, A ”gauged”U(1) Peccei–Quinn symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 771, 327 (2017), arXiv:1703.01112 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  42. [42]

    Witten, Some Properties of O(32) Superstrings, Phys

    E. Witten, Some Properties of O(32) Superstrings, Phys. Lett. B149, 351 (1984)

    1984

  43. [43]

    Arkani-Hamed, H.-C

    N. Arkani-Hamed, H.-C. Cheng, P. Creminelli, and L. Randall, Extra natural inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 221302 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0301218

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  44. [44]

    Choi, A QCD axion from higher dimensional gauge field, Phys

    K.-w. Choi, A QCD axion from higher dimensional gauge field, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 101602 (2004), arXiv:hep- ph/0308024

    arXiv 2004

  45. [45]

    Svrcek and E

    P. Svrcek and E. Witten, Axions In String Theory, JHEP 06, 051, arXiv:hep-th/0605206

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    Reece, TASI Lectures: (No) Global Symme- tries to Axion Physics, PoST ASI2022, 008 (2024), arXiv:2304.08512 [hep-ph]

    M. Reece, TASI Lectures: (No) Global Symme- tries to Axion Physics, PoST ASI2022, 008 (2024), arXiv:2304.08512 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Reece, Extra-dimensional axion expectations, JHEP 07, 130, arXiv:2406.08543 [hep-ph]

    M. Reece, Extra-dimensional axion expectations, JHEP 07, 130, arXiv:2406.08543 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  48. [48]

    Craig and M

    N. Craig and M. Kongsore, High-quality axions from higher-form symmetries in extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D111, 015047 (2025), arXiv:2408.10295 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Arkani-Hamed, A

    N. Arkani-Hamed, A. G. Cohen, and H. Georgi, (De)constructing dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 4757 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0104005

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  50. [50]

    C. T. Hill, S. Pokorski, and J. Wang, Gauge Invariant Effective Lagrangian for Kaluza-Klein Modes, Phys. Rev. D64, 105005 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0104035

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  51. [51]

    Arkani-Hamed, A

    N. Arkani-Hamed, A. G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan, A. Karch, and L. Motl, Deconstructing (2,0) and little string theo- ries, JHEP01, 083, arXiv:hep-th/0110146

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    Georgi, A Tool Kit for Builders of Composite Models, Nucl

    H. Georgi, A Tool Kit for Builders of Composite Models, Nucl. Phys. B266, 274 (1986)

    1986

  53. [53]

    M. R. Douglas and G. W. Moore, D-branes, quivers, and ALE instantons, (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9603167

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  54. [54]

    Arkani-Hamed, A

    N. Arkani-Hamed, A. G. Cohen, and H. Georgi, Elec- 12 troweak symmetry breaking from dimensional decon- struction, Phys. Lett. B513, 232 (2001), arXiv:hep- ph/0105239

    arXiv 2001

  55. [55]

    Arkani-Hamed, A

    N. Arkani-Hamed, A. G. Cohen, E. Katz, and A. E. Nelson, The Littlest Higgs, JHEP07, 034, arXiv:hep- ph/0206021

    arXiv

  56. [56]

    J. E. Kim, Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP In- variance, Phys. Rev. Lett.43, 103 (1979)

    1979

  57. [57]

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong In- teractions?, Nucl. Phys. B166, 493 (1980)

    1980

  58. [58]

    M. Dine, W. Fischler, and M. Srednicki, A Simple Solu- tion to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion, Phys. Lett. B104, 199 (1981)

    1981

  59. [59]

    A. R. Zhitnitsky, On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian), Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31, 260 (1980)

    1980

  60. [60]

    Q. Lu, M. Reece, and Z. Sun, The quality/cosmology tension for a post-inflation QCD axion, JHEP07, 227, arXiv:2312.07650 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  61. [61]

    Petrossian-Byrne and G

    R. Petrossian-Byrne and G. Villadoro, Open string axi- verse, JHEP07, 049, arXiv:2503.16387 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  62. [62]

    Loladze, A

    V. Loladze, A. Platschorre, and M. Reig, Higher axion strings, JHEP08, 182, arXiv:2503.18707 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  63. [63]

    C. T. Hill and A. K. Leibovich, Natural Theories of Ul- tralow Mass PNGB’s: Axions and Quintessence, Phys. Rev. D66, 075010 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0205237

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  64. [64]

    S. Hor, Y. Nakai, M. Suzuki, and J. Xu, Deconstruct- ing the extra-dimensional axion (2026), arXiv:2606.02728 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  65. [65]

    D. E. Kaplan and R. Rattazzi, Large field excursions and approximate discrete symmetries from a clockwork axion, Phys. Rev. D93, 085007 (2016), arXiv:1511.01827 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  66. [66]

    Choi and S

    K. Choi and S. H. Im, Realizing the relaxion from multi- ple axions and its UV completion with high scale super- symmetry, JHEP01, 149, arXiv:1511.00132 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  67. [67]

    Ahmed and B

    A. Ahmed and B. M. Dillon, Clockwork Gold- stone Bosons, Phys. Rev. D96, 115031 (2017), arXiv:1612.04011 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  68. [68]

    R. Coy, M. Frigerio, and M. Ibe, Dynamical Clockwork Axions, JHEP10, 002, arXiv:1706.04529 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  69. [69]

    Bonnefoy, E

    Q. Bonnefoy, E. Dudas, and S. Pokorski, Axions in a highly protected gauge symmetry model, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 31 (2019), arXiv:1804.01112 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  70. [70]

    Banks, M

    H. Banks, M. Kongsore, and N. Weiner, Big Axions and the Topology of Theory Space, In prep (2026)

    2026

  71. [71]

    M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, Anomaly Cancellation in Supersymmetric D=10 Gauge Theory and Superstring Theory, Phys. Lett. B149, 117 (1984)

    1984

  72. [72]

    Huston, K

    J. Huston, K. Rabbertz, and G. Zanderighi, Quantum Chromodynamics, (2023), arXiv:2312.14015 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    Di Luzio, F

    L. Di Luzio, F. Mescia, and E. Nardi, Redefining the Axion Window, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 031801 (2017), arXiv:1610.07593 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  74. [74]

    Di Luzio, F

    L. Di Luzio, F. Mescia, and E. Nardi, Window for pre- ferred axion models, Phys. Rev. D96, 075003 (2017), arXiv:1705.05370 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  75. [75]

    Sikivie, Axion Cosmology, Lect

    P. Sikivie, Axion Cosmology, Lect. Notes Phys.741, 19 (2008), arXiv:astro-ph/0610440

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  76. [76]

    Hiramatsu, M

    T. Hiramatsu, M. Ibe, and M. Suzuki, New Type of String Solutions with Long Range Forces, JHEP02, 058, arXiv:1910.14321 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 1910

  77. [77]

    Hiramatsu, M

    T. Hiramatsu, M. Ibe, and M. Suzuki, Cosmic string in Abelian-Higgs model with enhanced symmetry — Impli- cation to the axion domain-wall problem, JHEP09, 054, arXiv:2005.10421 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2005

  78. [78]

    J. R. C. C. C. Correia and C. J. A. P. Martins, Multi- tension strings in high-resolution U(1)×U(1) simulations, Phys. Rev. D106, 043521 (2022), arXiv:2208.01525 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2022

  79. [79]

    X. Niu, W. Xue, and F. Yang, Gauged global strings, JHEP02, 093, arXiv:2311.07639 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  80. [80]

    J. Lee, K. Murai, F. Takahashi, and W. Yin, More is dif- ferent: multi-axion dynamics changes topological defect evolution, JCAP04, 002, arXiv:2409.09749 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

Showing first 80 references.