pith. sign in

arxiv: 1211.2290 · v1 · pith:GIGOWSZYnew · submitted 2012-11-10 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI

Dating Texts without Explicit Temporal Cues

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AI
keywords temporaldateswhenbiographiescuestechniquestexttexts
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This paper tackles temporal resolution of documents, such as determining when a document is about or when it was written, based only on its text. We apply techniques from information retrieval that predict dates via language models over a discretized timeline. Unlike most previous works, we rely {\it solely} on temporal cues implicit in the text. We consider both document-likelihood and divergence based techniques and several smoothing methods for both of them. Our best model predicts the mid-point of individuals' lives with a median of 22 and mean error of 36 years for Wikipedia biographies from 3800 B.C. to the present day. We also show that this approach works well when training on such biographies and predicting dates both for non-biographical Wikipedia pages about specific years (500 B.C. to 2010 A.D.) and for publication dates of short stories (1798 to 2008). Together, our work shows that, even in absence of temporal extraction resources, it is possible to achieve remarkable temporal locality across a diverse set of texts.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. It's High Time: A Survey of Temporal Question Answering

    cs.CL 2025-05 accept novelty 5.0

    A survey that organizes temporal question answering research via a unified view of corpus temporality, question temporality, and model capabilities while reviewing neural, transformer, and LLM advances plus benchmarks.