Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 57 references

The Choi echo — the purity of a single spin's quantum channel — measures local decoherence but not spectral chaos; coherent transport can produce false positives for chaos.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 16:56 UTC pith:GIJAICMN

load-bearing objection Useful framing and a plausible cautionary result, but the central false-positive claim needs the same-size spectral benchmark before it lands. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2512.11030 v2 pith:GIJAICMN submitted 2025-12-11 quant-ph

Dynamical irreversibility and local decoherence in quantum many-body chaos

Jose Alfredo de Leon , Miguel Gonzalez , Carlos Diaz-Mejia This is my paper
classification quant-ph MSC 81Q5081P45 PACS 03.65.Yz05.45.Mt75.10.Jm
keywords Choi echoChoi state purityquantum channeldecoherencemany-body quantum chaoslevel spacing ratiointegrable-to-chaos transitionXXZ spin chain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces the Choi echo, defined as the purity of the Choi state of the quantum channel describing a single spin's reduced dynamics. It shows this quantity is operationally an echo protocol: forward evolution, complete depolarization of the probe spin, backward evolution, and the environment's recovery fidelity. Through three spin-chain models, the paper argues that the Choi echo is a state-independent measure of local decoherence that tracks spectral chaos in some regimes but does not uniquely correspond to it. In the integrable XXZ chain with a weak local defect and strong XY coupling, the spectrum remains Poisson while the Choi echo decays as strongly as in chaotic regimes, producing false positives. The conclusion is that local decoherence primarily reflects the efficiency of information propagation and dynamical coupling, not fine-grained spectral correlations.

Core claim

The paper establishes that the purity of the Choi state of a single-spin channel, reinterpreted as the Choi echo, is a rigorous, state-independent quantifier of dynamical irreversibility of a subsystem's reduced dynamics. It demonstrates, via an analytical Haar average and numerical comparison across three spin chains, that the Choi echo captures decoherence and even resolves decoupling transitions more sharply than state purity. Crucially, it reports that local decoherence does not imply spectral chaos: in the XXZ model with Jxy/Jz > 1 and epsilon approaching zero, the mean level spacing ratio remains Poisson while the Choi echo decays strongly, so a strictly local probe cannot distinguish

What carries the argument

The Choi-Jamiolkowski isomorphism maps a quantum channel to a state on a doubled Hilbert space; the purity of this Choi state (the Choi echo) is the central object. Operationally, the echo is the fidelity with which the environment returns to its initial state after a forward evolution, a completely depolarizing operation on the probe, and a backward evolution. An analytical Haar average over environment product states yields a closed formula (Eq. 7), and Eq. 4 relates the average output purity to the Choi purity plus a unitality term, explaining why state purity can mask irreversibility.

Load-bearing premise

The false-positive conclusion assumes that the mean level spacing ratio computed on an 18-site chain is the correct ground truth for chaos, while the Choi echo is evaluated on a 7-site chain; if the 7-site spectral statistic were closer to GOE in the same parameter region, the apparent false positive would become a finite-size mismatch.

What would settle it

Compute the mean level spacing ratio for the same 7-site chain with the defect at site 3 in the N_up=7 sector, at Jxy/Jz > 1 and epsilon near 0. If it is Poisson (~0.38), the false-positive interpretation holds; if it approaches GOE (~0.53), the discrepancy is a finite-size artifact of comparing L=7 dynamics to L=18 spectra.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If correct, no single-spin purity or Choi-echo measurement can by itself certify many-body spectral chaos.
  • The Choi echo provides a state-independent, operational way to quantify dynamical irreversibility of a reduced map, with better resolution than state-based metrics near decoupling.
  • The reported false positives imply that integrable systems with efficient coherent transport can mimic scrambling, so transport properties must be considered when interpreting local decoherence data.
  • The Haar-averaged formula gives a parameter-free prediction for the echo's equilibration value, directly comparable across models.
  • Future channel-based probes involving multi-site or multi-time correlations are needed to connect local irreversibility to spectral complexity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same false-positive mechanism likely appears in other integrable systems with local defects or strong transport; a direct test would scan defect position and anisotropy while monitoring both the echo and the level-spacing ratio.
  • If this holds, experiments that infer thermalization from single-site relaxation may systematically overestimate chaos in integrable transport regimes.
  • The Choi echo could be repurposed as a quantitative probe of transport efficiency in its own right, independent of its (limited) role as a chaos diagnostic.
  • The paper's partition suggests a general principle: local dynamical probes measure information propagation speed, while spectral statistics measure ergodicity; bridging them requires composite probes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the 'Choi echo'—the purity of the Choi state of the single-spin reduced quantum channel—as a state-independent probe of local decoherence in many-body spin chains. It derives an operational echo interpretation, computes a Haar average over environment product states, and benchmarks the resulting quantity against the mean level spacing ratio and the average subsystem purity in three spin-1/2 models: the mixed-field Ising chain, the random-field Heisenberg chain, and the XXZ chain with a local defect. The central claim is that local decoherence does not uniquely correspond to spectral chaos; in particular, the authors report a 'false positive' region in the defected XXZ model where the Choi echo decays strongly while the spectral level spacing ratio is Poissonian.

Significance. If the conclusion is correct, the paper provides a valuable cautionary result for the widespread practice of using local dynamical probes as proxies for spectral chaos. The analytical framework is clean and largely correct: the Choi-state purity is given a physically appealing echo interpretation, and the Haar-averaged expression in Appendix A is a useful and nontrivial tool. The paper is also commendable for its systematic numerical comparison across three models and for making explicit the distinction between state purity and channel purity. The main weakness is that the headline 'false positive' conclusion is supported by a comparison between L=7 dynamics and L=18 spectral statistics without a same-size spectral benchmark. This is a load-bearing gap that must be addressed before the central claim can be considered established.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. V.B.3, Fig. 4] The central claim of a 'false positive for chaos' rests entirely on comparing local dynamical probes computed for L=7 (defect at d=3) with the mean level spacing ratio <r> computed for L=18 in the N_up=7 sector (defect at d=9). The text acknowledges the size mismatch and asserts the maps are 'qualitatively comparable,' but no spectral statistic is provided for the L=7 system whose dynamics are actually computed. For a small integrable chain, finite-size effects can move <r> substantially away from the Poisson value; if the L=7 level spacing ratio in the Jxy/Jz>1, epsilon/Jz->0 region is closer to the GOE value, then the low Choi echo is not a false positive but a faithful finite-size spectral signal. Please provide the missing L=7 spectral benchmark (with the same defect position and the same symmetry sectors as the dynamics) or otherwise demonstrate that the L=18 spectral statistics are
  2. [Sec. V.B, Fig. 4] A related but distinct issue: the dynamical probes are computed with L=7 and the Haar average in Eq. (7) samples the full Hilbert space (all environment product states), whereas the spectral benchmark <r> is computed in a single magnetization sector N_up=7 for L=18. The paper does not state the symmetry sector(s) used for the L=7 dynamics. Comparing a multi-sector dynamical quantity to a single-sector spectral quantity can produce apparent discrepancies that are an artifact of the protocol rather than a physical failure of the local probe. The authors should either specify the sector(s) of the L=7 dynamics, restrict the evolution to a fixed sector, or compute a sector-resolved (or sector-averaged) <r> for L=7. As written, the existence of a 'false positive' versus a finite-size/sector mismatch is not established.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (7) and Appendix A (A6)] The display of Eq. (7) appears to have the factor 3^{w(alpha)} in the numerator, whereas the derivation in Appendix A, Eq. (A6), gives 1/3^{w(alpha)}. Please check the exponent and reconcile the two expressions; this may be a typographical error, but it should be corrected for consistency.
  2. [Sec. V.B.3] The phrase 'epsilon -> 0' is used; it would be clearer to write 'epsilon/J_z -> 0' so the limit is expressed in the same dimensionless units as the figure axes.
  3. [Sec. V.B.3, Fig. 4] The figure caption and text say the defect is 'away from the reflection axis,' but for L=7 with d=3 the defect is actually at a distance 3 from the left boundary and 3 from the right boundary (site 3 of 7, with open boundaries) and is therefore not on the reflection-symmetric axis; this is fine, but the phrasing 'near the center' in Sec. V.A.3 could be made more precise.
  4. [Sec. VI] The conclusions state that 'local decoherence is primarily a signature of the strength of dynamical coupling and the efficiency of information propagation.' This is a reasonable interpretation, but the evidence is limited to a single-spin probe in three models; the wording could be softened to reflect the scope of the numerical evidence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the Choi echo is derived independently and benchmarked against separately computed spectral statistics.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The Choi echo is defined mathematically from the channel (Eq. 2), rewritten operationally as an echo fidelity (Eq. 5), and Haar-averaged analytically to Eq. (7) in Appendix A; no parameter is fitted and no term in Eq. (7) is defined via the spectral statistic <r> or via the paper's conclusions. The spectral benchmark <r> is computed independently by exact diagonalization at L=16/18, while the dynamical probes are computed from the same Hamiltonian at L=7, so the comparison is between two separately evaluated quantities. The paper explicitly acknowledges the size mismatch in Sec. V.B and interprets the discrepancy as a 'false positive'; that is a finite-size/robustness judgment, not a circular reduction, because the L=7 spectral statistic is never inserted into the echo computation and the L=18 <r> is not derived from the echo. There are no load-bearing self-citations: Ref. [13] is used only to motivate the known correlation between state purity and spectral chaos, and its authors are not the present authors. Thus no circular step is exhibited; the main empirical claim is an independent comparison, and any concern about the size mismatch belongs to correctness risk rather than circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or entities. It only introduces a new quantity (the Choi echo), which is a function of the channel and not a new physical object. No free parameters. The assumptions are standard for the many-body chaos field, with one ad-hoc choice (L-mismatch).

free parameters (1)
  • none (no fitted parameters)
    The paper does not fit any parameters to data. All calculations are from first principles (Haar averages, numerical integration of Schrödinger dynamics). The choices of L=7, T=100, N=50 are numerical settings, not free parameters in the physical model.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The reduced dynamics of the probe spin is correctly described by a quantum channel of dimension 2, obtained by tracing out the environment, with the global initial state a product state (Sec. II.A, Eq. 1).
    Standard setup for reduced dynamics; assumes no initial correlations between probe and environment.
  • domain assumption The mean level spacing ratio <r> computed in a single symmetry sector of an L=16/18 chain is the ground-truth indicator of spectral chaos.
    Relies on standard RMT classification. The paper does not provide error bars or finite-size checks for <r>, which is a strong assumption for small chains.
  • ad hoc to paper The system sizes L=7 (dynamics) and L=16/18 (spectrum) are comparable enough to compare the chaos transition.
    Central methodological choice; not justified by tests. The paper does not compute the spectral statistic for L=7 in the same parameter region.
  • domain assumption The Haar average over environmental product states represents typical or mean behavior of the channel.
    Standard in many-body physics, but actual experimental initial states may not be Haar-random.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 4263 in / 4092 out tokens · 65627 ms · 2026-08-03T16:56:01.276127+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Typical dynamical quantum chaos probes are initial-state dependent (e.g., local observables or purities) and thus may fail to capture typical decoherent behavior one expects of a subsystem. Quantum channels fully capture the reduced dynamics of a subsystem. Here, we investigate the purity of the Choi state of a single spin in a chain, which acts as the state representation of the channel encoding the reduced dynamics. Operationally, we show this quantity functions as an echo protocol, termed the \textit{Choi echo}. It measures the environment's recovery fidelity when subjected to a forward evolution, a completely depolarizing operation on the local subsystem, and a subsequent backward evolution. We investigate the equilibration value of the Choi echo across the integrability-to-chaos transition in three paradigmatic spin-$1/2$ chains. We show that average single-spin decoherence does not uniquely correspond to spectral chaos. Specifically, coherent transport in integrable systems can mimic the mean relaxation of a single spin typically induced by chaotic scrambling, generating false positives for spectral chaos. This work offers a perspective bridging quantum information tools with many-body quantum chaos.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.11030 by Carlos Diaz-Mejia, Jose Alfredo de Leon, Miguel Gonzalez.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Spectral and single-spin dynamical behavior in regular and chaotic regimes of the mixed-field Ising model [Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison of short-range spectral statistics and local dynamical probes for the mixed-field Ising model [Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of spectral statistics and local dy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of spectral statistics and local dynamical probes for the XXZ model with a local defect [Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    A forward evolution underU, starting from a prod- uct state in whichScarries no information,

  2. [2]

    perturbation

    A local “perturbation” is applied via a completely depolarizing channelΛS, on the systemSonly, that breaks all entanglement betweenSandEacquired during the forward evolution

  3. [3]

    The Choi purity therefore quantifies the recoverability of the environment following the loss of subsystem informa- tion and plays the role of anecho

    A backward evolution underU†. The Choi purity therefore quantifies the recoverability of the environment following the loss of subsystem informa- tion and plays the role of anecho. In consequence, we refer to this quantity as theChoi echo. Since the Choi state provides a basis-independent rep- resentation of the channel, the Choi echo quantifies re- versi...

  4. [4]

    This model possesses a global spatial reflection symmetry R(i↔L−i+1), decomposingtheHilbertspaceintoeven and odd parity sectors

    Mixed-field Ising model We first consider the mixed-field Ising model with open boundary conditions, described by the Hamiltonian: H= LX i=1 (hxσx i +h zσz i )−J L−1X i=1 σz i σz i+1 ,(9) whereσ α i (α∈ {x, y, z}) are Pauli operators,Lis the chain length,Jis the nearest-neighbor Ising interaction, andh x, hz are transverse and longitudinal field strengths...

  5. [5]

    This model conserves the total magnetiza- tionM z = P i σz i

    Heisenberg model with random fields Next, we examine the Heisenberg model with random fields: H= 1 4 L−1X i=1 (⃗ σi ·⃗ σi+1) + 1 2 LX i=1 hiσz i ,(10) whereh i are independent random variables drawn uni- formly from the interval[−h, h], andhdenotes the disor- der strength. This model conserves the total magnetiza- tionM z = P i σz i. ThisU(1)symmetry is e...

  6. [6]

    (11) Here,J xy andJ z are anisotropic interaction strengths, andεis the field strength at a defect sited

    XXZ model with a local defect Finally, we study the XXZ model with a single local defect: H= 1 4 L−1X i=1 Jxy(σx i σx i+1 +σ y i σy i+1) +J zσz i σz i+1 + 1 2 εσz d . (11) Here,J xy andJ z are anisotropic interaction strengths, andεis the field strength at a defect sited. Like the Heisenberg model, this system conservesMz. The defect is placed near the ce...

  7. [7]

    with the probe at site1, the spectral statistics are evaluated via exact diagonalization on significantly larger systems (L= 16orL= 18). This mismatch in sys- tem sizes imposes a stringent requirement: a reliable lo- cal dynamical probe must be robust to finite-size effects and must recover the chaotic transition inferred from the spectral benchmark

  8. [8]

    2 compares the three quantities across the (J/hx, hz/hx)plane

    Resolving chaos and decoupling in the mixed-field Ising model Fig. 2 compares the three quantities across the (J/hx, hz/hx)plane. The mean level spacing ratio is computed forL= 16within the even sector (dimension 32,898). As shown in Fig. 2(a), it exhibits a well-defined chaotic dome where⟨˜r⟩ ≈0.53. Despite the reduced system size, bothPand⟨Tr[D(t) 2]⟩Ha...

  9. [9]

    Tracking the thermal-to-MBL transition in the Heisenberg model with random fields In the Heisenberg model with random fields, we ex- amine the transition from thermal to the MBL phase. Fig. 3 displays the spectral and dynamical metrics as a 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 h 7 ↑ 13 ↑ 6 ↑ 5 ↑ 4 ↑ ⟨˜r⟩ ⟨˜r⟩GOE ⟨˜r⟩Poisson 1 − ...

  10. [10]

    local decoherence–spectral chaos in the en- tire system correspondence

    Transport-induced false positives for chaos in the XXZ model with a local defect Finally, the results for the XXZ model with a local de- fect reveal a second fundamental limitation of local dy- namical probes when contrasted with spectral statistics of the full chain. Fig. 4 shows intensity maps of⟨˜r⟩, P, and⟨Tr[D(t) 2]⟩Haar,t as functions of the anisotr...

    2025

  11. [11]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition (Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    2010

  12. [12]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford Uni- versity Press, 2002)

    2002

  13. [13]

    Peres, Stability of quantum motion in chaotic and regular systems, Physical Review A30, 1610 (1984)

    A. Peres, Stability of quantum motion in chaotic and regular systems, Physical Review A30, 1610 (1984)

    1984

  14. [14]

    Gorin, T

    T. Gorin, T. Prosen, T. H. Seligman, and M. Žnidarič, Dynamics of Loschmidt echoes and fidelity decay, Physics Reports435, 33 (2006)

    2006

  15. [15]

    Construc- tive interference at the edge of quantum ergodic dynam- ics

    D. A. Abanin, R. Acharya, L. Aghababaie-Beni, G. Aigeldinger, and e. a. Ashok Ajoy, Observation of con- structive interference at the edge of quantum ergodicity, Nature646, 825 (2025), preprint at arXiv as “Construc- tive interference at the edge of quantum ergodic dynam- ics”, arXiv:2506.10191

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Jamiołkowski, Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators, Reports on Mathematical Physics3, 275 (1972)

    A. Jamiołkowski, Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators, Reports on Mathematical Physics3, 275 (1972)

    1972

  17. [17]

    M. D. Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices, Linear Algebra and its Applications10, 285 (1975)

    1975

  18. [18]

    J. M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system, Physical Review A43, 2046 (1991)

    2046

  19. [19]

    D’Alessio, Y

    L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, Advances in Physics65, 239 (2016)

    2016

  20. [20]

    Bohigas, M

    O. Bohigas, M. J. Giannoni, and C. Schmit, Character- ization of Chaotic Quantum Spectra and Universality of Level Fluctuation Laws, Physical Review Letters52, 1 (1984)

    1984

  21. [21]

    G. F. Scialchi, A. J. Roncaglia, and D. A. Wisniacki, Integrability-to-chaos transition through the Krylov ap- proach for state evolution, Physical Review E109, 054209 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    Borgonovi, F

    F. Borgonovi, F. M. Izrailev, and L. F. Santos, Timescales of quantum and classical chaotic spin mod- els evolving toward equilibrium, Physical Review E111, 044210 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    Mirkin and D

    N. Mirkin and D. Wisniacki, Quantum chaos, equilibra- tion, and control in extremely short spin chains, Physical Review E103, L020201 (2021)

    2021

  24. [24]

    Bengtsson and K

    I. Bengtsson and K. Zyczkowski, Geometry of Quantum States: An Introduction to Quantum Entanglement (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006)

    2006

  25. [25]

    A. A. Mele, Introduction to Haar Measure Tools in Quan- tum Information: A Beginner’s Tutorial, Quantum8, 1340 (2024), arXiv:2307.08956 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    J. H. Bardarson, F. Pollmann, and J. E. Moore, Un- boundedgrowthofentanglementinmodelsofmany-body localization, Physical review letters109, 017202 (2012)

    2012

  27. [27]

    L. F. Santos and M. Rigol, Onset of quantum chaos in one-dimensional bosonic and fermionic systems and its relation to thermalization, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics81, 036206 (2010)

    2010

  28. [28]

    Alba and P

    V. Alba and P. Calabrese, Entanglement and thermody- namics after a quantum quench in integrable systems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114, 7947 (2017)

    2017

  29. [29]

    Smith, A

    J. Smith, A. Lee, P. Richerme, B. Neyenhuis, P. W. Hess, P. Hauke, M. Heyl, D. A. Huse, and C. Mon- roe, Many-body localization in a quantum simulator with programmable random disorder, Nature Physics12, 907 11 (2016)

    2016

  30. [30]

    M. V. Berry and M. Tabor, Level Clustering in the Reg- ular Spectrum, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences356, 375 (1977), 79349

    1977

  31. [31]

    Oganesyan and D

    V. Oganesyan and D. A. Huse, Localization of interact- ing fermions at high temperature, Physical Review B75, 155111 (2007)

    2007

  32. [32]

    Y. Y. Atas, E. Bogomolny, O. Giraud, and G. Roux, Distribution of the Ratio of Consecutive Level Spacings in Random Matrix Ensembles, Physical Review Letters 110, 084101 (2013)

    2013

  33. [33]

    S. H. Tekur and M. S. Santhanam, Symmetry deduction from spectral fluctuations in complex quantum systems, Physical Review Research2, 032063 (2020)

    2020

  34. [34]

    Bernien, S

    H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Om- ran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, et al., Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature551, 579 (2017)

    2017

  35. [35]

    Huang, R

    H.-Y. Huang, R. Kueng, and J. Preskill, Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measure- ments, Nature Physics16, 1050 (2020)

    2020

  36. [36]

    Brydges, A

    T. Brydges, A. Elben, P. Jurcevic, B. Vermersch, C. Maier, B. P. Lanyon, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Probing rényi entanglement entropy via random- ized measurements, Science364, 260 (2019)

    2019

  37. [37]

    Goldstein, J

    S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, R. Tumulka, and N. Zanghì, CanonicalTypicality,PhysicalReviewLetters96,050403 (2006)

    2006

  38. [38]

    Rigol, V

    M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, and M. Olshanii, Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems, Nature452, 854 (2008)

    2008

  39. [39]

    The full environment stateρ E, being a tensor product ofL−1 such states, thus averages to⟨ρE⟩=I E/2L−1, which is the state of infinite-temperature equilibrium

    When averaged over the Haar measure, a single spin state |ψj⟩ ⟨ψj|becomes the maximally mixed stateI/2. The full environment stateρ E, being a tensor product ofL−1 such states, thus averages to⟨ρE⟩=I E/2L−1, which is the state of infinite-temperature equilibrium

  40. [40]

    Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed

    S. Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed. (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)

    2011

  41. [41]

    R.J.Baxter, Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics (Courier Corporation, 2007)

    2007

  42. [42]

    H. Kim, T. N. Ikeda, and D. A. Huse, Testing whether all eigenstates obey the eigenstate thermalization hypothe- sis, Physical Review E90, 052105 (2014)

    2014

  43. [43]

    J. R. Garrison and T. Grover, Does a Single Eigenstate Encode the Full Hamiltonian?, Physical Review X8, 021026 (2018)

    2018

  44. [44]

    Borgonovi, F

    F. Borgonovi, F. M. Izrailev, L. F. Santos, and V. G. Zelevinsky, Quantum chaos and thermalization in iso- lated systems of interacting particles, Physics Reports Quantum Chaos and Thermalization in Isolated Systems of Interacting Particles,626, 1 (2016)

    2016

  45. [45]

    Chiba, Proof of absence of local conserved quantities in the mixed-field Ising chain, Physical Review B109, 035123 (2024)

    Y. Chiba, Proof of absence of local conserved quantities in the mixed-field Ising chain, Physical Review B109, 035123 (2024)

    2024

  46. [46]

    Karthik, A

    J. Karthik, A. Sharma, and A. Lakshminarayan, Entan- glement, avoided crossings, and quantum chaos in an Ising model with a tilted magnetic field, Physical Review A75, 022304 (2007)

    2007

  47. [47]

    Y. Y. Atas and E. Bogomolny, Quantum Ising model in transverse and longitudinal fields: Chaotic wave func- tions, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoret- ical50, 385102 (2017)

    2017

  48. [48]

    H. A. Camargo, K.-B. Huh, V. Jahnke, H.-S. Jeong, K.- Y. Kim, and M. Nishida, Spread and spectral complex- ity in quantum spin chains: From integrability to chaos, Journal of High Energy Physics2024, 241 (2024)

    2024

  49. [49]

    Bethe, Zur Theorie der Metalle, Zeitschrift für Physik 71, 205 (1931)

    H. Bethe, Zur Theorie der Metalle, Zeitschrift für Physik 71, 205 (1931)

    1931

  50. [50]

    D.J.Luitz, N.Laflorencie,andF.Alet,Many-bodylocal- ization edge in the random-field Heisenberg chain, Phys- ical Review B91, 081103 (2015)

    2015

  51. [51]

    D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Col- loquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Reviews of Modern Physics91, 021001 (2019)

    2019

  52. [52]

    L. F. Santos, Integrability of a disordered Heisenberg spin-1/2 chain, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General37, 4723 (2004)

    2004

  53. [53]

    Brenes, E

    M. Brenes, E. Mascarenhas, M. Rigol, and J. Goold, High-temperature coherent transport in the XXZ chain in the presence of an impurity, Physical Review B98, 235128 (2018)

    2018

  54. [54]

    Pandey, P

    M. Pandey, P. W. Claeys, D. K. Campbell, A. Polkovnikov, and D. Sels, Adiabatic Eigenstate Deformations as a Sensitive Probe for Quantum Chaos, Physical Review X10, 041017 (2020)

    2020

  55. [55]

    L. F. Santos, F. Pérez-Bernal, and E. J. Torres-Herrera, Speck of chaos, Physical Review Research2, 043034 (2020)

    2020

  56. [56]

    Odavić, M

    J. Odavić, M. Viscardi, and A. Hamma, Stabilizer en- tropy in nonintegrable quantum evolutions, Phys. Rev. B112, 104301 (2025)

    2025

  57. [57]

    Collins, S

    B. Collins, S. Matsumoto, and J. Novak, The Weingarten Calculus, Notices of the American Mathematical Society 69, 1 (2022)

    2022