Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

UniRestorer: Universal Image Restoration via Adaptively Estimating Image Degradation at Proper Granularity

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read UniRestorer claims an all-in-one restorer can get degradation-specific precision and robustness to estimation error at once by routing at a granularity matched to estimation confidence.

desk verdict UniRestorer is a serious empirical advance in all-in-one restoration, but the multi-granularity cluster semantics need direct validation before the mechanism is fully credited. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.20157 v3 pith:GIRIZ66J submitted 2024-12-28 cs.CV

Jingbo Lin , Zhilu Zhang , Wenbo Li , Renjing Pei , Hang Xu , Hongzhi Zhang , Wangmeng Zuo This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords all-in-oneimagerestorationmixtureofexpertsdegradationrepresentationgranularityestimationhierarchicalclusteringexpertroutinggeneralization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that an all-in-one image restoration system can have both strengths at once: the precision of degradation-specific models and the resilience of degradation-agnostic ones. Its solution is to represent image degradation at several granularities, train separate restoration experts for each cluster in that hierarchy, and add a granularity estimator that measures how much the degradation estimate can be trusted. Confident estimates are routed to fine-grained specialists; uncertain ones are routed to coarser, more general experts. If the claims hold, universal restoration would largely close the performance gap to dedicated single-task models across rain, haze, noise, blur, low light, snow, and compression artifacts, while also generalizing to mixed and unseen corruptions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the multi-granularity degradation set: a hierarchy of non-overlapping clusters obtained by K-means on degradation embeddings extracted by a DA-CLIP-trained encoder, with the number of groups growing from 1 to 7 to 19 in the single-degradation setup, and from 1 to 4 to 8 in the mixed-degradation setup. Each group trains its own full-network expert, so the same corrupted image can be restored by a specialist or by a generalist depending on routing. The router that carries the argument is the pair of estimators $H_d$ and $H_g$ trained with the data-uncertainty loss $L_{\mathrm{dg}} = \frac{1}{2 e_{\mathrm{gran}}}(u_{y_i} - e_{\mathrm{deg}})^2 + \frac{1}{2}\ln e_{\mathrm{gran}}$, where $e_{\mathrm{gran}}$ plays the role of a learned error estimate for $e_{\mathrm{deg}}$; a second router then picks the coarsest expert whose breadth matches that uncertainty. A load-balance loss prevents the routing from collapsing onto the finest-grained experts. The mechanism turns a single point estimate of degradation into a confidence-aware routing decision.

What would settle it

Train the same multi-granularity MoE pipeline after replacing the learned degradation embeddings with random features or with features from an encoder never exposed to degradations; if the gains persist, the claimed benefit does not come from degradation structure. A complementary test is to evaluate routing accuracy on degradation parameters drawn from outside the hand-set strength bins used to train the extractor — the paper reports 92% routing accuracy in-distribution and 82% out-of-distribution, so a large drop under shifted parameters would show the granularity estimator only interpolates the training bins.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that degradation estimation error need not be a fatal flaw of degradation-aware restoration: it can be modeled and exploited. UniRestorer first trains a fine-grained degradation-representation extractor based on DA-CLIP, then runs hierarchical K-means on the extracted embeddings to build a three-level degradation set — 1, 7, and 19 groups in the single-degradation setup, 1, 4, and 8 in mixed-degradation — and trains a full restoration network for every group. Two routers then decide the expert: one estimates the finest-level degradation group, and the other estimates a granularity that, through a data-uncertainty loss, encodes how wrong the first estimate is likely to be. In the authors' experiments the automatic mode reaches 41.68 dB PSNR on Rain100L deraining and 36.44 dB on SOTS dehazing versus 38.57 and 31.34 dB for the strongest compared all-in-one method, and the instruction mode matches or beats dedicated single-task models on most tasks. The paper itself notes that its training data come from public datasets and its degradation space is synthetic; it lists larger-scale data and real-world degradation alignment as future work.

Load-bearing premise

The entire pipeline rests on the premise that the degradation extractor's feature clusters correspond to degradation types and severities that are genuinely useful for restoration; if the clusters are arbitrary, the finer experts receive inconsistent training data and the routers can only learn an arbitrary mapping.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On the seven single-degradation tasks, automatic routing lifts the five-task average PSNR to 33.38 dB from 30.58 dB for the best compared all-in-one method, and the seven-task average to 31.34 dB; expert specialization, not a bigger shared backbone, drives the gain.
  • Instruction mode, where the user supplies the degradation type as a pruning mask, puts UniRestorer at parity with or above single-task models on most tasks, showing the all-in-one versus single-task performance gap is largely a routing problem rather than a capacity problem.
  • Mixed-degradation results improve from 22.06 to 24.46 dB in-distribution and from 17.23 to 19.45 dB out-of-distribution over the shared backbone, and the multi-granularity ablation shows coarse levels are what buy out-of-distribution robustness.
  • The system generalizes to real-world and unseen datasets (LHP, LOLv2, RealSnow, raindrop, under-display camera, underwater) without retraining, consistent with the claim that coarse experts provide a fallback when the degradation is outside the training distribution.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the confidence-conditioned routing recipe is transferable: any model that conditions on a noisy predictor could use a similar uncertainty estimate to fall back to a broader hypothesis class, such as blind super-resolution or restoration agents managing a zoo of specialist models.
  • Because the authors freeze experts before training routers and show gains over scaled-up monolithic models, an economical extension would replace full experts with LoRA or adapter specialists and test whether granularity routing still delivers most of the gain at a fraction of the training cost.
  • A natural next step the paper leaves implicit is an online variant that updates cluster centers as new degradation types arrive, turning the fixed multi-granularity partition into a growing taxonomy of corruptions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes UniRestorer, an all-in-one image restoration framework built around a multi-granularity mixture-of-experts design. A DA-CLIP-based degradation extractor is trained on fine-grained synthetic degradations; its features are hierarchically K-means clustered into three granularity levels (e.g., 1/7/19 clusters for single-degradation and 1/4/8 for mixed-degradation). Separate full-network experts are trained on each cluster's data, and routing is performed by two learned heads: a degradation head that selects a finest-level cluster and a granularity head that chooses an appropriate granularity level, intended to be robust to degradation estimation errors. Experiments cover seven single-degradation tasks and seven mixed-degradation scenarios, plus real-world and unseen-degradation generalization. The reported results substantially outperform prior all-in-one methods in auto mode and approach or exceed single-task models in an instruction mode where the task name is provided.

Significance. If the main empirical claims hold, UniRestorer is a significant advance for all-in-one restoration: the auto-mode gains in Table 1 (e.g., Rain100L 41.68 dB vs. 38.57 dB and SOTS 36.44 dB vs. 31.34 dB for the best prior methods) and in Table 2 are large, and the real-world and unseen-degradation results in Tables 4-5 are encouraging. The paper also includes useful ablations (Tables 6-8), a router-component study (Table E), scaled-up baseline comparisons (Table B), and lightweight expert variants (Table A), which help separate the contribution of the proposed mechanism from raw capacity. The authors commit to releasing code and models. The central weakness is that the semantic validity of the learned degradation clusters—the load-bearing premise of the whole mechanism—is not quantitatively established, and the comparison to single-task models in instruction mode is not fully fair as presented.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (4), and Sec. B] The load-bearing premise that K-means clusters in the DA-CLIP DR space are semantically coherent—corresponding to degradation types and severities—is never quantitatively established. The paper provides only qualitative t-SNE (Fig. B) and a deraining-only DR-extractor ablation (Table 6); neither measures agreement between cluster assignments and the known synthetic degradation labels (type and degree ranges in Sec. A/B). Because the degradation and granularity heads Hd/Hg and the routers Gd/Gg are trained against these same cluster centers in Eqs. (6)-(7), the routing results cannot independently validate the partition. I request cluster purity or adjusted mutual information against the known degradation parameters, plus a control in which experts are trained on random partitions of the same cardinality. Without this, the reported gains could come from the large set of full-size experts and sparse routing rather than from degradation-aware specialization.
  2. [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (7), and Table C] The robustness claim—that granularity estimation routes to coarser experts when degradation estimation is unreliable—is not directly tested. egran is trained from the distance between edeg and the finest-level center, but no experiment verifies that egran tracks actual degradation estimation error or that coarser routing is selected in high-error cases. Table C reports expert usage statistics and routing accuracy (92%/82%), but not error-conditional behavior. Please add a controlled analysis, e.g., degrade inputs with known parameters, measure edeg error against ground truth, and show that Gg selects coarser experts as error increases; or perturb edeg and show that UniRestorer degrades less than a finest-only router. This is needed to support the abstract's central claim of robustness to degradation estimation error.
  3. [Sec. 4.2, Table 3, and Sec. A.1] The instruction-mode comparison with single-task models is not on equal footing. For deraining, the authors retrain experts on Rain200H/Rain200L/DID/DDN, which is a larger and more diverse set than the Rain100L used in the all-in-one comparison, while the single-task baselines are trained on their own standard data. Also, Ours† receives the task name as a pruning signal during inference. To support the 'closing the gap' claim, either train the single-task baselines on the same enlarged deraining data, or report Ours† without the extra deraining data, and state clearly in the main text what training data each entry uses.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 3.1, Eq. (2)] Equation (2) appears to add Gaussian noise after the Softmax; the standard noisy top-k gating from Shazeer et al. applies the noise to the logits before the Softmax. Please correct or clarify, since the current equation does not implement the cited mechanism.
  2. [Tables 7-8] The abbreviation 'MiO' is not defined in the main text, and the ablation tables report small differences (e.g., 24.46 vs. 24.41 in-dist for 3 vs. 4 granularity levels) without error bars or multiple seeds, so the claimed plateau and optimal-configuration conclusions are not statistically supported.
  3. [References and citations] The reference list contains placeholder entries ([5]-[8], [35], [36]) and missing citations such as 'DesnowNet [? ]' in Sec. 1 and Sec. 2. Please clean up the bibliography and all in-text citations before publication.
  4. [Table 2] The PromptIR row is cited as [82], which is TransWeather; the PromptIR reference is [67]. Please check the citation and also define 'CAR' and 'MiO' at first use.
  5. [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (6)] The notation in Eq. (6) is under-specified: the candidate set {F0,0,...,Fn−1,k} and the TopK operation need precise definitions, and the sentence 'Gd is conducted in the finest-grained level' is inconsistent with Gg selecting the granularity. Please clarify the two-stage routing procedure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central restoration claims are held-out empirical evaluations, not derivations from fitted values; only a minor, non-load-bearing self-citation to co-authored RestoreAgent appears.

full rationale

UniRestorer's central claim is not a mathematical derivation from first principles but an empirical system evaluated on held-out restoration benchmarks. The multi-granularity degradation set is built by unsupervised K-means on the DR extractor's feature space (Eq. 4), and the routers are trained with a data-uncertainty loss (Eq. 7) whose target is the K-means center from that same feature space. This creates a self-referential label-generation process: both the expert grouping and the routing target come from the same degradation extractor D. However, the paper's actual claims concern end-to-end restoration PSNR/SSIM on held-out test sets (Tables 1-5), not the recovery of the cluster labels themselves, and routing is evaluated on images not used to fit the routers. Therefore the central result does not reduce to a fitted value by construction. The only self-citation to co-authored prior work is RestoreAgent [14] for the design choice of using full restoration networks as experts (Sec. 3.2); that choice is not load-bearing for the core derivation and is compared against external baselines. The absence of a cluster-purity or random-cluster control is a validity concern about whether the gains come from degradation semantics rather than added capacity, but it is not a circularity of the derivation. Overall score 2 reflects one minor non-load-bearing self-citation and the self-referential clustering design, with no circular derivation. Honest non-finding is appropriate: the paper is empirically self-contained against held-out benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method introduces no new physical entities. It rests on three domain assumptions about the usefulness of learned degradation features, the validity of K-means clusters, and the learnability of granularity uncertainty. The main tunable quantities are the cluster hierarchy and routing-loss weights.

free parameters (3)
  • Number of clusters per granularity = Single-degradation: {1, 7, 19}; mixed-degradation: {1, 4, 8}
    Set empirically; ablation (Table 8) explores alternatives but the final choice is tuned on validation performance.
  • Routing loss weights alpha and beta = alpha=0.1, beta=0.01
    Given in Sec. 4.1 Training Details; chosen by hand without a sensitivity study.
  • Degree thresholds for DR extractor training labels = e.g., rain strength 0-50/50-100/100-150; noise sigma 0-15/15-35/35-50; haze beta >0.1 thick
    Defined in Sec. B; these thresholds define the fine-grained degradation categories that the extractor learns, and they are set ad hoc per degradation type.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption DA-CLIP image encoder features, after contrastive training on synthetic degradations, provide a degradation representation that separates degradation types and degrees.
    Invoked in Sec. 3.2 and used to build all clusters; the claim that restoration benefits from routing on this space depends on it.
  • domain assumption K-means clustering of the DR features yields groups that correspond to useful training subsets for restoration experts.
    Equation (4) and the whole multi-granularity set rely on this; no external validation that clusters match degradation semantics.
  • domain assumption An uncertainty scalar egran can be learned from Eq. (7) and used to choose between fine and coarse experts.
    The routing in Sec. 3.3 assumes the learned egran reliably indicates degradation estimation error and that coarser experts are more robust under high error.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of UniRestorer: Universal Image Restoration via Adaptively Estimating Image Degradation at Proper Granularity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GIRIZ66J

@misc{pith2026241220157,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: UniRestorer: Universal Image Restoration via Adaptively Estimating Image Degradation at Proper Granularity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GIRIZ66J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.20157}
}
read the original abstract

Recently, considerable progress has been made in all-in-one image restoration. Generally, existing methods can be degradation-agnostic or degradation-aware. However, the former are limited in leveraging degradation-specific restoration, and the latter suffer from the inevitable error in degradation estimation. Consequently, the performance of existing methods has a large gap compared to specific single-task models. In this work, we make a step forward in this topic, and present our UniRestorer with improved restoration performance. Specifically, we perform hierarchical clustering on degradation space, and train a multi-granularity mixture-of-experts (MoE) restoration model. Then, UniRestorer adopts both degradation and granularity estimation to adaptively select an appropriate expert for image restoration. In contrast to existing degradation-agnostic and -aware methods, UniRestorer can leverage degradation estimation to benefit degradation specific restoration, and use granularity estimation to make the model robust to degradation estimation error. Experimental results show that our UniRestorer outperforms state-of-the-art all-in-one methods by a large margin, and is promising in closing the performance gap to specific single task models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.20157 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of representative all-in-one image restoration frameworks. (a) Degradation-agnostic methods [85, 105] train a shared backbone using data from all tasks and are limited in leveraging degradation￾specific restoration. (b) PEFT-based methods [40, 102, 67, 82, 24, 91, 4] apply learnable prompts or adapters to the backbone to adapt various tasks. (c) Expert-based methods [95, 14, 12, 87, 47, 66, 11, 19, 48, … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparisons with task-agnostic methods, all-in-one methods, and single-task models. Ours and Ours†denote auto and instruction modes, which are respectively used for a fair comparison with all-in-one and specific single-task models. (a) Comparisons on single-degradation all-in-one setting. (b) Comparisons with specific single-task models. (c) Comparisons on mixed-degradation all-in-one (in-of-distribution) setting. (… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustration of our proposed UniRestorer. We develop a multi-granularity degradation set by hierarchical clustering on extracted DRs at different granularities. Based on the multi-granularity degradation set, we train a multi-granularity MoE restoration model. Besides vanilla degradation estimation, we introduce granularity estimation to indicate the degree of degradation estimation error. Adopting both degradation … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visual comparison of results on All-in-One image restoration (single-degradation). Our method can effectively remove the degradation pattern (i.e., rainstreak, haze, and noise), restore clearer texture (i.e., ‘branches’ and ‘eyes’ pointed by red arrows) and closer colo…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. M2Restore: Mixture-of-Experts-based Mamba-CNN Fusion Framework for All-in-One Image Restoration

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    M2Restore is a CLIP-guided Mixture-of-Experts Mamba-CNN model that reports state-of-the-art results on the All-weather all-in-one image restoration benchmark.

  2. ClusIR: Towards Cluster-Guided All-in-One Image Restoration

    cs.CV 2025-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A cluster-guided mixture-of-experts network with frequency modulation reports competitive all-in-one image restoration results, with uneven gains and no public code.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

115 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Abdelrahman Abdelhamed, Stephen Lin, and Michael S. Brown. A high-quality denoising dataset for smartphone cameras. In CVPR, 2018

    2018

  2. [2]

    Ntire 2017 challenge on single image super-resolution: Dataset and study

    Eirikur Agustsson and Radu Timofte. Ntire 2017 challenge on single image super-resolution: Dataset and study. In CVPRW, July 2017

    2017

  3. [3]

    Lora-ir: Taming low-rank experts for efficient all-in-one image restoration

    Yuang Ai, Huaibo Huang, and Ran He. Lora-ir: Taming low-rank experts for efficient all-in-one image restoration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15385, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Multimodal prompt perceiver: Empower adaptiveness, generalizability and fidelity for all-in-one image restoration

    Yuang Ai, Huaibo Huang, Xiaoqiang Zhou, Jiexiang Wang, and Ran He. Multimodal prompt perceiver: Empower adaptiveness, generalizability and fidelity for all-in-one image restoration. In CVPR, 2024

    2024

  5. [5]

    Frobnication

    FirstName Alpher. Frobnication. IEEE TPAMI, 12(1):234–778, 2002

    2002

  6. [6]

    Frobnication revisited

    FirstName Alpher and FirstName Fotheringham-Smythe. Frobnication revisited. Journal of F oo, 13(1): 234–778, 2003

    2003

  7. [7]

    Can a computer frobnicate? In CVPR, pages 234–778, 2005

    FirstName Alpher and FirstName Gamow. Can a computer frobnicate? In CVPR, pages 234–778, 2005

    2005

  8. [8]

    Can a machine frobnicate? Journal of F oo, 14(1):234–778, 2004

    FirstName Alpher, FirstName Fotheringham-Smythe, and FirstName Gamow. Can a machine frobnicate? Journal of F oo, 14(1):234–778, 2004

    2004

Show all 115 references
  1. [9]

    The power of scale for parameter-efficient prompt tuning

    Lester Brian, Al-Rfou Rami, and Constant Noah. The power of scale for parameter-efficient prompt tuning. In EMNLP, November 2021

    2021

  2. [10]

    Retinexformer: One-stage retinex-based transformer for low-light image enhancement

    Yuanhao Cai, Hao Bian, Jing Lin, Haoqian Wang, Radu Timofte, and Yulun Zhang. Retinexformer: One-stage retinex-based transformer for low-light image enhancement. In ICCV, 2023

    2023

  3. [11]

    Hair: Hypernetworks-based all-in-one image restoration

    Jin Cao, Yi Cao, Li Pang, Deyu Meng, and Xiaoyong Cao. Hair: Hypernetworks-based all-in-one image restoration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.08091, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Grids: Grouped multiple-degradation restoration with image degradation similarity

    Shuo Cao, Yihao Liu, Wenlong Zhang, Yu Qiao, and Chao Dong. Grids: Grouped multiple-degradation restoration with image degradation similarity. In ECCV, 2024

    2024

  5. [13]

    Data uncertainty learning in face recognition

    Jie Chang, Zhonghao Lan, Changmao Cheng, and Yichen Wei. Data uncertainty learning in face recognition. In CVPR, 2020

    2020

  6. [14]

    Restoreagent: Autonomous image restoration agent via multimodal large language models

    Haoyu Chen, Wenbo Li, Jinjin Gu, Jingjing Ren, Sixiang Chen, Tian Ye, Renjing Pei, Kaiwen Zhou, Fenglong Song, and Lei Zhu. Restoreagent: Autonomous image restoration agent via multimodal large language models. In NeurIPS, 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    Simple baselines for image restoration

    Liangyu Chen, Xiaojie Chu, Xiangyu Zhang, and Jian Sun. Simple baselines for image restoration. In ECCV, 2022

    2022

  8. [16]

    An efficient general-purpose modular vision model via multi-task heterogeneous training

    Zitian Chen, Mingyu Ding, Yikang Shen, Wei Zhan, Masayoshi Tomizuka, Erik Learned-Miller, and Chuang Gan. An efficient general-purpose modular vision model via multi-task heterogeneous training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.17165, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Mod-squad: Designing mixtures of experts as modular multi-task learners

    Zitian Chen, Yikang Shen, Mingyu Ding, Zhenfang Chen, Hengshuang Zhao, Erik Learned-Miller, and Chuang Gan. Mod-squad: Designing mixtures of experts as modular multi-task learners. CVPR, 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Unified scaling laws for routed language models

    Aidan Clark, Diego de las Casas, Aurelia Guy, Arthur Mensch, Michela Paganini, Jordan Hoffmann, Bogdan Damoc, Blake Hechtman, Trevor Cai, Sebastian Borgeaud, George van den Driessche, Eliza Rutherford, Tom Hennigan, Matthew Johnson, Katie Millican, Albin Cassirer, Chris Jones,...

    2022

  11. [19]

    Conde, Gregor Geigle, and Radu Timofte

    Marcos V . Conde, Gregor Geigle, and Radu Timofte. Instructir: High-quality image restoration following human instructions. In ECCV, 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    Learning a deep convolutional network for image super-resolution

    Chao Dong, Chen Change Loy, Kaiming He, and Xiaoou Tang. Learning a deep convolutional network for image super-resolution. In ECCV, 2014

    2014

  13. [21]

    A general decoupled learning framework for parameterized image operators

    Qingnan Fan, Dongdong Chen, Lu Yuan, Gang Hua, Nenghai Yu, and Baoquan Chen. A general decoupled learning framework for parameterized image operators. IEEE TPAMI, 2019

    2019

  14. [22]

    Switch transformers: Scaling to trillion parameter models with simple and efficient sparsity

    William Fedus, Barret Zoph, and Noam Shazeer. Switch transformers: Scaling to trillion parameter models with simple and efficient sparsity. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2022. 31

    2022

  15. [23]

    Removing rain from single images via a deep detail network

    Xueyang Fu, Jiabin Huang, Delu Zeng, Yue Huang, Xinghao Ding, and John Paisley. Removing rain from single images via a deep detail network. In CVPR, 2017

    2017

  16. [24]

    Onerestore: A universal restoration framework for composite degradation

    Yu Guo, Yuan Gao, Yuxu Lu, Ryan Wen Liu, and Shengfeng He. Onerestore: A universal restoration framework for composite degradation. In ECCV, 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    From sky to the ground: A large-scale benchmark and simple baseline towards real rain removal

    Yun Guo, Xueyao Xiao, Yi Chang, Shumin Deng, and Luxin Yan. From sky to the ground: A large-scale benchmark and simple baseline towards real rain removal. In ICCV, 2023

    2023

  18. [26]

    Modulating image restoration with continual levels via adaptive feature modification layers

    Jingwen He, Chao Dong, and Yu Qiao. Modulating image restoration with continual levels via adaptive feature modification layers. In The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2019

    2019

  19. [27]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition

    Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In CVPR, 2016

    2016

  20. [28]

    Parameter-efficient transfer learning for nlp

    Neil Houlsby, Andrei Giurgiu, Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Bruna Morrone, Quentin de Laroussilhe, Andrea Gesmundo, Mona Attariyan, and Sylvain Gelly. Parameter-efficient transfer learning for nlp. In ICML, 2019

    2019

  21. [29]

    LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models

    Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. In ICLR, 2022

    2022

  22. [30]

    Jacobs, Michael I

    Robert A. Jacobs, Michael I. Jordan, Steven J. Nowlan, and Geoffrey E. Hinton. Adaptive mixtures of local experts. Neural Computation, 1991

    1991

  23. [31]

    Universal image restoration pre-training via degradation classification

    Hu JiaKui, Zhengjian Yao, Jin Lujia, and Lu Yanye. Universal image restoration pre-training via degradation classification. In ICLR, 2025

    2025

  24. [32]

    A survey on all-in-one image restoration: Taxonomy, evaluation and future trends

    Junjun Jiang, Zengyuan Zuo, Gang Wu, Kui Jiang, and Xianming Liu. A survey on all-in-one image restoration: Taxonomy, evaluation and future trends. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15067, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Jordan and R.A

    M.I. Jordan and R.A. Jacobs. Hierarchical mixtures of experts and the em algorithm. In Proceedings of 1993 International Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN-93-Nagoya, Japan) , 1993

    1993

  26. [34]

    Deblurgan-v2: Deblurring (orders-of- magnitude) faster and better

    Orest Kupyn, Tetiana Martyniuk, Junru Wu, and Zhangyang Wang. Deblurgan-v2: Deblurring (orders-of- magnitude) faster and better. In ICCV, Oct 2019

    2019

  27. [35]

    The frobnicatable foo filter, 2014

    FirstName LastName. The frobnicatable foo filter, 2014. Face and Gesture submission ID 324. Supplied as supplemental material fg324.pdf

    2014

  28. [36]

    Frobnication tutorial, 2014

    FirstName LastName. Frobnication tutorial, 2014. Supplied as supplemental material tr.pdf

    2014

  29. [37]

    {GS}hard: Scaling giant models with conditional computation and automatic sharding

    Dmitry Lepikhin, HyoukJoong Lee, Yuanzhong Xu, Dehao Chen, Orhan Firat, Yanping Huang, Maxim Krikun, Noam Shazeer, and Zhifeng Chen. {GS}hard: Scaling giant models with conditional computation and automatic sharding. In ICLR, 2021

    2021

  30. [38]

    Base layers: Simplify- ing training of large, sparse models

    Mike Lewis, Shruti Bhosale, Tim Dettmers, Naman Goyal, and Luke Zettlemoyer. Base layers: Simplify- ing training of large, sparse models. In NeurIPS, 2021

    2021

  31. [39]

    Benchmarking single-image dehazing and beyond

    Boyi Li, Wenqi Ren, Dengpan Fu, Dacheng Tao, Dan Feng, Wenjun Zeng, and Zhangyang Wang. Benchmarking single-image dehazing and beyond. IEEE TIP, 28(1):492–505, 2019

    2019

  32. [40]

    All-In-One Image Restoration for Unknown Corruption

    Boyun Li, Xiao Liu, Peng Hu, Zhongqin Wu, Jiancheng Lv, and Xi Peng. All-In-One Image Restoration for Unknown Corruption. In CVPR, 2022

    2022

  33. [41]

    An underwater image enhancement benchmark dataset and beyond

    Chongyi Li, Chunle Guo, Wenqi Ren, Runmin Cong, Junhui Hou, Sam Kwong, and Dacheng Tao. An underwater image enhancement benchmark dataset and beyond. IEEE TIP, 29:4376–4389, 2020

    2020

  34. [42]

    Foundir: Unleashing million-scale training data to advance foundation models for image restoration

    Hao Li, Xiang Chen, Jiangxin Dong, Jinhui Tang, and Jinshan Pan. Foundir: Unleashing million-scale training data to advance foundation models for image restoration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.01427, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Caiming Xiong, and Steven C. H. Hoi. BLIP: bootstrapping language-image pre-training for unified vision-language understanding and generation. In ICML, 2022

    2022

  36. [44]

    Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Silvio Savarese, and Steven C. H. Hoi. BLIP-2: bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models. In ICML, 2023

    2023

  37. [45]

    Spatially adaptive self-supervised learning for real-world image denoising

    Junyi Li, Zhilu Zhang, Xiaoyu Liu, Chaoyu Feng, Xiaotao Wang, Lei Lei, and Wangmeng Zuo. Spatially adaptive self-supervised learning for real-world image denoising. In CVPR, 2023. 32

    2023

  38. [46]

    Tbsn: Transformer-based blind-spot network for self- supervised image denoising

    Junyi Li, Zhilu Zhang, and Wangmeng Zuo. Tbsn: Transformer-based blind-spot network for self- supervised image denoising. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07846, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    D2c-sr: A divergence to convergence approach for real-world image super-resolution

    Youwei Li, Haibin Huang, Lanpeng Jia, Haoqiang Fan, and Shuaicheng Liu. D2c-sr: A divergence to convergence approach for real-world image super-resolution. In ECCV, 2022

    2022

  40. [48]

    Efficient and degradation-adaptive network for real-world image super-resolution

    Jie Liang, Hui Zeng, and Lei Zhang. Efficient and degradation-adaptive network for real-world image super-resolution. In ECCV, 2022

    2022

  41. [49]

    Swinir: Image restoration using swin transformer

    Jingyun Liang, Jiezhang Cao, Guolei Sun, Kai Zhang, Luc Van Gool, and Radu Timofte. Swinir: Image restoration using swin transformer. In ICCVW, 2021

    2021

  42. [50]

    Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution

    Bee Lim, Sanghyun Son, Heewon Kim, Seungjun Nah, and Kyoung Mu Lee. Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution. In CVPRW, July 2017

    2017

  43. [51]

    Improving image restoration through removing degradations in textual representations

    Jingbo Lin, Zhilu Zhang, Yuxiang Wei, Dongwei Ren, Dongsheng Jiang, Qi Tian, and Wangmeng Zuo. Improving image restoration through removing degradations in textual representations. In CVPR, 2024

    2024

  44. [52]

    Tape: Task-agnostic prior embedding for image restoration

    Lin Liu, Lingxi Xie, Xiaopeng Zhang, Shanxin Yuan, Xiangyu Chen, Wengang Zhou, Houqiang Li, and Qi Tian. Tape: Task-agnostic prior embedding for image restoration. In ECCV, 2022

    2022

  45. [53]

    Learning real-world image de-weathering with imperfect supervision

    Xiaohui Liu, Zhilu Zhang, Xiaohe Wu, Chaoyu Feng, Xiaotao Wang, Lei Lei, and Wangmeng Zuo. Learning real-world image de-weathering with imperfect supervision. In AAAI, 2024

    2024

  46. [54]

    semantics

    Yihao Liu, Anran Liu, Jinjin Gu, Zhipeng Zhang, Wenhao Wu, Yu Qiao, and Chao Dong. Discovering distinctive "semantics" in super-resolution networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.00406, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Degae: A new pretraining paradigm for low-level vision

    Yihao Liu, Jingwen He, Jinjin Gu, Xiangtao Kong, Yu Qiao, and Chao Dong. Degae: A new pretraining paradigm for low-level vision. In CVPR, June 2023

    2023

  48. [57]

    Desnownet: Context-aware deep network for snow removal

    Yun-Fu Liu, Da-Wei Jaw, Shih-Chia Huang, and Jenq-Neng Hwang. Desnownet: Context-aware deep network for snow removal. IEEE TIP, 27(6):3064–3073, 2018

    2018

  49. [58]

    Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows

    Ze Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu, Yixuan Wei, Zheng Zhang, Stephen Lin, and Baining Guo. Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. In ICCV, 2021

    2021

  50. [59]

    Controlling vision-language models for universal image restoration

    Ziwei Luo, Fredrik K Gustafsson, Zheng Zhao, Jens Sjölund, and Thomas B Schön. Controlling vision-language models for universal image restoration. In ICLR, 2024

    2024

  51. [60]

    Waterloo exploration database: New challenges for image quality assessment models

    Kede Ma, Zhengfang Duanmu, Qingbo Wu, Zhou Wang, Hongwei Yong, Hongliang Li, and Lei Zhang. Waterloo exploration database: New challenges for image quality assessment models. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2017

    2017

  52. [61]

    Martin, Charless C

    David R. Martin, Charless C. Fowlkes, Doron Tal, and Jitendra Malik. A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics. In ICCV, 2001

    2001

  53. [62]

    Machine learning, volume 1

    Tom M Mitchell. Machine learning, volume 1. 1997

    1997

  54. [63]

    Multimodal contrastive learning with LIMoe: the language-image mixture of experts

    Basil Mustafa, Carlos Riquelme Ruiz, Joan Puigcerver, Rodolphe Jenatton, and Neil Houlsby. Multimodal contrastive learning with LIMoe: the language-image mixture of experts. In NeurIPS, 2022

    2022

  55. [65]

    Deep multi-scale convolutional neural network for dynamic scene deblurring

    Seungjun Nah, Tae Hyun Kim, and Kyoung Mu Lee. Deep multi-scale convolutional neural network for dynamic scene deblurring. In CVPR, July 2017

    2017

  56. [66]

    All-in-one image restoration for unknown degradations using adaptive discriminative filters for specific degradations

    Dongwon Park, Byung Hyun Lee, and Se Young Chun. All-in-one image restoration for unknown degradations using adaptive discriminative filters for specific degradations. In CVPR, 2023

    2023

  57. [67]

    Promptir: Prompting for all-in-one image restoration

    Vaishnav Potlapalli, Syed Waqas Zamir, Salman Khan, and Fahad Khan. Promptir: Prompting for all-in-one image restoration. In NeurIPS, 2023

    2023

  58. [68]

    From sparse to soft mixtures of experts

    Joan Puigcerver, Carlos Riquelme Ruiz, Basil Mustafa, and Neil Houlsby. From sparse to soft mixtures of experts. In ICLR, 2024. 33

    2024

  59. [69]

    Tan, Wenhan Yang, Jiajun Su, and Jiaying Liu

    Rui Qian, Robby T. Tan, Wenhan Yang, Jiajun Su, and Jiaying Liu. Attentive generative adversarial network for raindrop removal from a single image. In CVPR, June 2018

    2018

  60. [70]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, Gretchen Krueger, and Ilya Sutskever. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In ICML, 2021

    2021

  61. [71]

    Deepspeed-moe: Advancing mixture-of-experts inference and training to power next-generation ai scale

    Samyam Rajbhandari, Conglong Li, Zhewei Yao, Minjia Zhang, Reza Yazdani Aminabadi, Ammar Ahmad Awan, Jeff Rasley, and Yuxiong He. Deepspeed-moe: Advancing mixture-of-experts inference and training to power next-generation ai scale. In ICML, 2022

    2022

  62. [72]

    Progressive image deraining networks: A better and simpler baseline

    Dongwei Ren, Wangmeng Zuo, Qinghua Hu, Pengfei Zhu, and Deyu Meng. Progressive image deraining networks: A better and simpler baseline. In CVPR, 2019

    2019

  63. [73]

    Real-world blur dataset for learning and benchmarking deblurring algorithms

    Jaesung Rim, Haeyun Lee, Jucheol Won, and Sunghyun Cho. Real-world blur dataset for learning and benchmarking deblurring algorithms. In ECCV, 2020

    2020

  64. [74]

    Scaling vision with sparse mixture of experts

    Carlos Riquelme Ruiz, Joan Puigcerver, Basil Mustafa, Maxim Neumann, Rodolphe Jenatton, André Su- sano Pinto, Daniel Keysers, and Neil Houlsby. Scaling vision with sparse mixture of experts. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2021

    2021

  65. [75]

    Outrageously large neural networks: The sparsely-gated mixture-of-experts layer

    Noam Shazeer, *Azalia Mirhoseini, *Krzysztof Maziarz, Andy Davis, Quoc Le, Geoffrey Hinton, and Jeff Dean. Outrageously large neural networks: The sparsely-gated mixture-of-experts layer. In ICLR, 2017

    2017

  66. [76]

    Sheikh, Z.Wang, L

    H.R. Sheikh, Z.Wang, L. Cormack, and A.C. Bovik. Live image quality assessment database release 2. http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/quality

  67. [77]

    Scaling vision- language models with sparse mixture of experts

    Sheng Shen, Zhewei Yao, Chunyuan Li, Trevor Darrell, Kurt Keutzer, and Yuxiong He. Scaling vision- language models with sparse mixture of experts. In EMNLP, 2023

    2023

  68. [78]

    Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition

    Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. In ICLR, 2015

    2015

  69. [79]

    Vision transformers for single image dehazing

    Yuda Song, Zhuqing He, Hui Qian, and Xin Du. Vision transformers for single image dehazing. IEEE TIP, 32:1927–1941, 2023

    1927

  70. [80]

    Moiré photo restoration using multiresolution convolutional neural networks

    Yujing Sun, Yizhou Yu, and Wenping Wang. Moiré photo restoration using multiresolution convolutional neural networks. IEEE TIP, 27(8):4160–4172, 2018

    2018

  71. [81]

    Instruct-ipt: All-in-one image processing transformer via weight modulation

    Yuchuan Tian, Jianhong Han, Hanting Chen, Yuanyuan Xi, Guoyang Zhang, Jie Hu, Chao Xu, and Yunhe Wang. Instruct-ipt: All-in-one image processing transformer via weight modulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.00676, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  72. [82]

    Jeya Maria Jose Valanarasu, Rajeev Yasarla, and Vishal M. Patel. Transweather: Transformer-based restoration of images degraded by adverse weather conditions. In CVPR, 2022

    2022

  73. [83]

    Attention is all you need

    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Ł ukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. In NeurIPS, 2017

    2017

  74. [84]

    Additive margin softmax for face verification

    Feng Wang, Jian Cheng, Weiyang Liu, and Haijun Liu. Additive margin softmax for face verification. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2018

    2018

  75. [85]

    Real-esrgan: Training real-world blind super-resolution with pure synthetic data

    Xintao Wang, Liangbin Xie, Chao Dong, and Ying Shan. Real-esrgan: Training real-world blind super-resolution with pure synthetic data. In ICCVW, 2021

    2021

  76. [86]

    Deep retinex decomposition for low-light enhancement

    Chen Wei, Wenjing Wang, Wenhan Yang, and Jiaying Liu. Deep retinex decomposition for low-light enhancement. In BMVC, 2018

    2018

  77. [87]

    Real-world image super-resolution as multi-task learning

    Zhang Wenlong, Li Xiaohui, Guangyuan SHI, Chen Xiangyu, Qiao Yu, Zhang Xiaoyun, Wu Xiao-Ming, and Dong Chao. Real-world image super-resolution as multi-task learning. In NeurIPS, 2023

    2023

  78. [88]

    Debiased all-in-one image restoration with task uncertainty regularization

    Gang Wu, Junjun Jiang, Yijun Wang, Kui Jiang, and Xianming Liu. Debiased all-in-one image restoration with task uncertainty regularization. In AAAI, 2025

    2025

  79. [89]

    Residual mixture of experts

    Lemeng Wu, Mengchen Liu, Yinpeng Chen, Dongdong Chen, Xiyang Dai, and Lu Yuan. Residual mixture of experts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.09636, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  80. [90]

    Mixture of loRA experts

    Xun Wu, Shaohan Huang, and Furu Wei. Mixture of loRA experts. In ICLR, 2024. 34

    2024

  81. [91]

    Towards effective multiple-in-one image restoration: A sequential and prompt learning strategy

    Kong Xiangtao, Dong Chao, and Zhang Lei. Towards effective multiple-in-one image restoration: A sequential and prompt learning strategy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.03379, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  82. [92]

    Finding discriminative filters for specific degradations in blind super-resolution

    Liangbin Xie, Xintao Wang, Chao Dong, Zhongang Qi, and Ying Shan. Finding discriminative filters for specific degradations in blind super-resolution. In NeurIPS, 2021

    2021

  83. [93]

    Snr-aware low-light image enhancement

    Xiaogang Xu, Ruixing Wang, Chi-Wing Fu, , and Jiaya Jia. Snr-aware low-light image enhancement. In CVPR, 2022

    2022

  84. [95]

    Hq-50k: A large-scale, high-quality dataset for image restoration

    Qinhong Yang, Dongdong Chen, Zhentao Tan, Qiankun Liu, Qi Chu, Jianmin Bao, Lu Yuan, Gang Hua, and Nenghai Yu. Hq-50k: A large-scale, high-quality dataset for image restoration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05390, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  85. [96]

    Tan, Jiashi Feng, Jiaying Liu, Zongming Guo, and Shuicheng Yan

    Wenhan Yang, Robby T. Tan, Jiashi Feng, Jiaying Liu, Zongming Guo, and Shuicheng Yan. Deep joint rain detection and removal from a single image. In CVPR, 2017

    2017

  86. [97]

    Efficient degradation-aware any image restoration

    Eduard Zamfir, Zongwei Wu, Nancy Mehta, Danda Dani Paudel, Yulun Zhang, and Radu Timofte. Efficient degradation-aware any image restoration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.15475, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  87. [98]

    Complexity experts are task-discriminative learners for any image restoration

    Eduard Zamfir, Zongwei Wu, Nancy Mehta, Yuedong Tan, Danda Pani Paudel, Yulun Zhang, and Radu Timofte. Complexity experts are task-discriminative learners for any image restoration. In CVPR, 2025

    2025

  88. [99]

    Multi-stage progressive image restoration

    Syed Waqas Zamir, Aditya Arora, Salman Khan, Munawar Hayat, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, Ming-Hsuan Yang, and Ling Shao. Multi-stage progressive image restoration. In CVPR, 2021

    2021

  89. [100]

    Restormer: Efficient transformer for high-resolution image restoration

    Syed Waqas Zamir, Aditya Arora, Salman Khan, Munawar Hayat, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. Restormer: Efficient transformer for high-resolution image restoration. In CVPR, 2022

    2022

  90. [101]

    He Zhang and Vishal M. Patel. Density-aware single image de-raining using a multi-stream dense network. In CVPR, 2018

    2018

  91. [102]

    Ingredient- oriented multi-degradation learning for image restoration

    Jinghao Zhang, Jie Huang, Mingde Yao, Zizheng Yang, Hu Yu, Man Zhou, and Feng Zhao. Ingredient- oriented multi-degradation learning for image restoration. In CVPR, 2023

    2023

  92. [103]

    Beyond a gaussian denoiser: Residual learning of deep CNN for image denoising

    Kai Zhang, Wangmeng Zuo, Yunjin Chen, Deyu Meng, and Lei Zhang. Beyond a gaussian denoiser: Residual learning of deep CNN for image denoising. IEEE TIP, 26(7):3142–3155, 2017

    2017

  93. [104]

    Learning a single convolutional super-resolution network for multiple degradations

    Kai Zhang, Wangmeng Zuo, and Lei Zhang. Learning a single convolutional super-resolution network for multiple degradations. In CVPR, 2018

    2018

  94. [105]

    Designing a practical degradation model for deep blind image super-resolution

    Kai Zhang, Jingyun Liang, Luc Van Gool, and Radu Timofte. Designing a practical degradation model for deep blind image super-resolution. In ICCV, 2021

    2021

  95. [106]

    Color demosaicking by local directional interpolation and nonlocal adaptive thresholding

    Lei Zhang, Xiaolin Wu, Antoni Buades, and Xin Li. Color demosaicking by local directional interpolation and nonlocal adaptive thresholding. J. Electronic Imaging, 20(2):023016, 2011

    2011

  96. [107]

    Crafting training degradation distribution for the accuracy-generalization trade-off in real-world super-resolution

    Ruofan Zhang, Jinjin Gu, Haoyu Chen, Chao Dong, Yulun Zhang, and Wenming Yang. Crafting training degradation distribution for the accuracy-generalization trade-off in real-world super-resolution. In ICML, 2023

    2023

  97. [108]

    A closer look at blind super-resolution: Degradation models, baselines, and performance upper bounds

    Wenlong Zhang, Guangyuan Shi, Yihao Liu, Chao Dong, and Xiao-Ming Wu. A closer look at blind super-resolution: Degradation models, baselines, and performance upper bounds. In CVPRW, June 2022

    2022

  98. [109]

    Learning to restore hazy video: A new real-world dataset and a new method

    Xinyi Zhang, Hang Dong, Jinshan Pan, Chao Zhu, Ying Tai, Chengjie Wang, Jilin Li, Feiyue Huang, and Fei Wang. Learning to restore hazy video: A new real-world dataset and a new method. In CVPR, pages 9239–9248, 2021

    2021

  99. [110]

    Con- trolvideo: Training-free controllable text-to-video generation

    Yabo Zhang, Yuxiang Wei, Dongsheng Jiang, Xiaopeng Zhang, Wangmeng Zuo, and Qi Tian. Con- trolvideo: Training-free controllable text-to-video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13077, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  100. [111]

    Learning raw-to-srgb mappings with inaccurately aligned supervision

    Zhilu Zhang, Haolin Wang, Ming Liu, Ruohao Wang, Jiawei Zhang, and Wangmeng Zuo. Learning raw-to-srgb mappings with inaccurately aligned supervision. In ICCV, 2021

    2021

  101. [112]

    Self-supervised image restoration with blurry and noisy pairs

    Zhilu Zhang, RongJian Xu, Ming Liu, Zifei Yan, and Wangmeng Zuo. Self-supervised image restoration with blurry and noisy pairs. In NeurIPS, 2022. 35

    2022

  102. [113]

    Bracketing is all you need: Unifying image restoration and enhancement tasks with multi-exposure images

    Zhilu Zhang, Shuohao Zhang, Renlong Wu, Zifei Yan, and Wangmeng Zuo. Bracketing is all you need: Unifying image restoration and enhancement tasks with multi-exposure images. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.00766, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  103. [114]

    Convolution meets loRA: Parameter efficient finetuning for segment anything model

    Zihan Zhong, Zhiqiang Tang, Tong He, Haoyang Fang, and Chun Yuan. Convolution meets loRA: Parameter efficient finetuning for segment anything model. In ICLR, 2024

    2024

  104. [115]

    Image restoration for under-display camera

    Yuqian Zhou, David Ren, Neil Emerton, Sehoon Lim, and Timothy Large. Image restoration for under-display camera. In CVPR, 2021

    2021

  105. [116]

    Uni-perceiver-moe: Learning sparse generalist models with conditional moes

    Jinguo Zhu, Xizhou Zhu, Wenhai Wang, Xiaohua Wang, Hongsheng Li, Xiaogang Wang, and Jifeng Dai. Uni-perceiver-moe: Learning sparse generalist models with conditional moes. In NeurIPS, 2022

    2022

  106. [117]

    Learning weather-general and weather-specific features for image restoration under multiple ad verse weather conditions

    Yurui Zhu, Tianyu Wang, Xueyang Fu, Xuanyu Yang, Xin Guo, Jifeng Dai, Yu Qiao, and Xiaowei Hu. Learning weather-general and weather-specific features for image restoration under multiple ad verse weather conditions. In CVPR, 2023

    2023

  107. [118]

    St-moe: Design stable and transferable sparse expert models

    Barret Zoph, Irwan Bello, Sameer Kumar, Nan Du, Yanping Huang, Jeff Dean, Noam Shazeer, and William Fedus. St-moe: Design stable and transferable sparse expert models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.08906, 2022. 36

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.