Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

SayTap: Language to Quadrupedal Locomotion

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.07580 v3 pith:GJA3ROWM submitted 2023-06-13 cs.RO

SayTap: Language to Quadrupedal Locomotion

classification cs.RO
keywords locomotionpatternscommandscontactcontrollerlanguageapproachdesign
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the potential to perform high-level planning. Yet, it remains a challenge for LLMs to comprehend low-level commands, such as joint angle targets or motor torques. This paper proposes an approach to use foot contact patterns as an interface that bridges human commands in natural language and a locomotion controller that outputs these low-level commands. This results in an interactive system for quadrupedal robots that allows the users to craft diverse locomotion behaviors flexibly. We contribute an LLM prompt design, a reward function, and a method to expose the controller to the feasible distribution of contact patterns. The results are a controller capable of achieving diverse locomotion patterns that can be transferred to real robot hardware. Compared with other design choices, the proposed approach enjoys more than 50% success rate in predicting the correct contact patterns and can solve 10 more tasks out of a total of 30 tasks. Our project site is: https://saytap.github.io.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When are LLMs Sufficient Policy Optimizers for Sequential RL Tasks?

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PromptPO shows LLMs can act as black-box policy optimizers for sequential RL, matching or exceeding standard baselines with fewer interactions in exploration and robotics tasks when leveraging prior knowledge, but und...

  2. When are LLMs Sufficient Policy Optimizers for Sequential RL Tasks?

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PromptPO shows LLMs can act as black-box policy optimizers for sequential RL when leveraging prior knowledge, matching baselines in exploration and robotics but underperforming in MuJoCo.

  3. Learning Task-Invariant Properties via Dreamer: Enabling Efficient Policy Transfer for Quadruped Robots

    cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DreamTIP adds LLM-identified task-invariant properties as auxiliary targets in Dreamer's world model plus a mixed-replay adaptation step, delivering 28.1% average simulated transfer gains and 100% real-world climb suc...