Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Multimodal Clinical Benchmark for Emergency Care (MC-BEC): A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Models in Emergency Medicine

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.04937 v1 pith:GKMY3WOM submitted 2023-11-07 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords emergencymultimodalbenchmarkclinicalmc-becmodelsevaluationfoundation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose the Multimodal Clinical Benchmark for Emergency Care (MC-BEC), a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating foundation models in Emergency Medicine using a dataset of 100K+ continuously monitored Emergency Department visits from 2020-2022. MC-BEC focuses on clinically relevant prediction tasks at timescales from minutes to days, including predicting patient decompensation, disposition, and emergency department (ED) revisit, and includes a standardized evaluation framework with train-test splits and evaluation metrics. The multimodal dataset includes a wide range of detailed clinical data, including triage information, prior diagnoses and medications, continuously measured vital signs, electrocardiogram and photoplethysmograph waveforms, orders placed and medications administered throughout the visit, free-text reports of imaging studies, and information on ED diagnosis, disposition, and subsequent revisits. We provide performance baselines for each prediction task to enable the evaluation of multimodal, multitask models. We believe that MC-BEC will encourage researchers to develop more effective, generalizable, and accessible foundation models for multimodal clinical data.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MuteBench: Modality Unavailability Tolerance Evaluation for Incomplete Multimodal Fusion

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    MuteBench evaluates multimodal fusion robustness to modality missing and within-modality missing on 125000 samples from 9 clinical datasets, finding architecture family predicts tolerance better than parameter count.

Pith tools