Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Exact Sampling of Gibbs Measures with Estimated Losses

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.15649 v2 pith:GLVIEPHE submitted 2024-04-24 math.ST stat.COstat.MEstat.TH

classification math.STstat.COstat.MEstat.TH
keywords lossesposteriorpseudo-observationsdependencegibbsnumberestimatedhowever
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent years, the shortcomings of Bayesian posteriors as inferential devices have received increased attention. A popular strategy for fixing them has been to instead target a Gibbs measure based on losses that connect a parameter of interest to observed data. However, existing theory for such inference procedures assumes these losses are analytically available, while in many situations these losses must be stochastically estimated using pseudo-observations. In such cases, we show that when standard Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithms are used to produce posterior samples, the resulting posterior exhibits strong dependence on the number of pseudo-observations: unless the number of pseudo-observations diverge sufficiently fast the resulting posterior will concentrate very slowly. However, we show that in many situations it is feasible to alleviate this dependence entirely using a modified piecewise deterministic Markov process (PDMP) sampler, and we formally and empirically show that these samplers produce posterior draws that have no dependence on the number of pseudo-observations used to estimate the loss within the Gibbs Measure. We apply our results to three examples that feature intractable likelihoods and model misspecification.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Concentration and Calibration in Predictive Bayesian Inference

    stat.ME 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Predictive Bayesian inference posteriors concentrate onto a forward-model-dependent quantity and produce miscalibrated credible sets unless the predictive model contains the true data-generating process.

  2. Predictively Oriented Posteriors

    stat.ME 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new posterior family scores the posterior predictive directly, giving slower concentration but better predictive performance under model misspecification.

Pith tools