Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 72 references

This paper argues that a Weyl-invariant version of the Standard Model plus gravity has no genuine even trace anomalies, and that the required counterterms can cancel the quartic-derivative terms that threaten unitarity.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 05:04 UTC pith:GM26VC2R

load-bearing objection Solid scaffolding, unproven conclusions: the claimed triviality of the Weyl cohomology and the ghost-cancellation mechanism both rest on assumptions the paper does not prove. the 5 major comments →

arxiv 2607.22354 v2 pith:GM26VC2R submitted 2026-07-24 hep-th

Conformal symmetry, SM and Gravity

Loriano Bonora This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords Weyl invariancedilatontrace anomalyBRST cohomologyconformal anomalymirror dark matterhigher-derivative gravityunitarity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper attempts to build a single quantum field theory that contains both the Standard Model and general relativity, made Weyl-invariant by introducing dilaton fields. Its central claim is that the enlarged BRST cohomology of this theory is trivial: every even-parity conformal trace anomaly is a coboundary, not a true anomaly, so conformal invariance can be restored by local counterterms. The same counterterms, evaluated at a constant dilaton value, can cancel the quartic-derivative curvature terms that would otherwise introduce negative-norm ghost states. If correct, the model would be anomaly-free, renormalizable in a higher-derivative sense, and have a credible path toward unitarity. The right-handed mirror sector is proposed as a dark matter world, interacting with ordinary matter mainly through gravity and the common weak force.

Core claim

The core discovery is that in a conformally invariant theory of gravity plus matter with a dilaton, the conformal BRST cohomology is trivial: the only even trace anomalies are exact cocycles, i.e. coboundaries that can be canceled by local counterterms. The paper identifies all candidate anomaly densities built from the Weyl-invariant metric, curvature tensors, and dilaton derivatives, and shows that each one either vanishes by the consistency conditions or is the BRST variation of a counterterm. It further shows that when the dilaton is set to a constant value, the counterterms needed to cancel the coboundaries match the forms of the Weyl-squared and Ricci-scalar-squared actions, so tuning

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the enlarged BRST operator s = δ_ξ + δ_ω, which combines diffeomorphism and Weyl transformations into a nilpotent symmetry of the quantized action. The paper analyzes the cohomology of this operator on local functionals of dimension four and ghost number one. The relevant differential space is built from conformal invariants: the Weyl-covariant curvature tensors, the Weyl-covariant derivative, and the dilaton φ, with the metric rescaled as g̃=e^{-2φ}g. The central objects are the 1-cocycles (candidate anomalies) constructed from the fifteen-term basis of Weyl cochain densities and their consistency relations. The load-bearing move is that every such cocycle is a cobounda

Load-bearing premise

The central claim rests on the assumption that the enumerated fifteen-term basis of local Weyl cochain densities is complete and that the linear consistency system has maximal rank (seven), so every candidate anomaly is a coboundary; a missing cocycle or lower rank would reintroduce genuine anomalies.

What would settle it

Compute the rank of the consistency system explicitly for the full fifteen-term basis: if the 8-term reduced system has rank less than 7 for any choice of the functions f_i(φ), or if a mixed diffeomorphism-Weyl cocycle not reducible to diffeomorphism-covariant form exists, then non-trivial anomalies exist and the counterterm-based ghost-cancellation program loses its foundation. As a direct check, evaluate the one-loop trace anomaly of a free scalar coupled to the dilaton using the algebraic subtraction scheme; the appearance of any non-coboundary term would falsify the triviality claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the trivial cohomology result holds, the one-loop effective action of T^W is anomaly-free: every even trace anomaly is removable by a local counterterm without breaking diffeomorphism invariance.
  • The counterterms are interaction terms, not modifications of the kinetic operator, so they do not change the zeroth-order propagator structure.
  • Choosing the dilaton gauge φ=constant can cancel both the Weyl-squared term S_C and the Ricci-scalar-squared term S_Q, eliminating the quartic momentum poles that give rise to negative-norm states.
  • With two dilaton fields, S_C and S_Q can be canceled separately, and the multi-dilaton framework also accommodates multiple mass scales, addressing the hierarchy between the weak scale and the cosmological constant.
  • The left-right mirror construction remains essential for odd-parity anomalies: those cannot be canceled by Wess-Zumino counterterms without introducing imaginary terms, and their absence requires the mirror fermion spectrum with shared SU(2) and metric.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: The trivial-cohomology result, if confirmed by a complete rank computation, suggests that Weyl-invariant dilaton theories are generically anomaly-free in the even-parity sector, making conformal symmetry far easier to maintain at quantum level than chiral gauge symmetry.
  • Editorial inference: The cancellation of quartic-derivative terms through a dilaton gauge is analogous to choosing a unitary gauge; it implies that ghost-freedom is a statement about conformal gauge rather than a fixed property of the action coefficients, and would make unitarity a gauge-choice-dependent statement in an unusual sense.
  • Editorial inference: A concrete test would be to compute the one-loop trace anomaly of a single massless scalar coupled to the dilaton in the algebraic scheme; if a non-coboundary term with density such as e□eR survives, the fifteen-term basis is incomplete and the central claim fails.
  • Editorial inference: If the mirror sector is dark matter, its only low-energy couplings to ordinary matter are gravitational plus the common SU(2) interaction; this gives a specific, falsifiable signature at high energies and distinguishes the model from generic WIMP scenarios.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs T^W, a Weyl-invariant extension of a left-right symmetric SM+gravity model, and develops its algebraic renormalization program. It writes the BPHZL setup, derives the joint graviton-dilaton-ghost kinetic operator and propagators (eqs. (59)-(68)), verifies (modulo gaps) Lowenstein convergence conditions, defines the Slavnov-Taylor identity and enlarged BRST operator s = δ_ξ + δ_ω, and computes the local cohomology. The central claims are: (i) the conformal BRST cohomology is trivial, so there are no non-trivial even trace anomalies in theories with dilatons, only coboundaries; (ii) the required counterterms can cancel the quartic-derivative terms S_C and S_Q at a constant dilaton background, removing ghost states and opening a route to unitarity. The mirror (right-handed) sector is interpreted as dark matter.

Significance. If both claims held, the paper would offer a concrete, anomaly-free, power-counting renormalizable and potentially unitary framework unifying SM and gravity, with a testable dark-matter structure. The technical apparatus is substantial: explicit inversion of the joint kinetic operator, propagators (65)-(68), UV/IR degree counting (73)-(82), non-renormalization arguments for gauge fixing and ghost equations (Appendix B), and external-field cohomology (Appendix C). These parts are coherent and pass spot-checks. However, the headline triviality result is not proven: it rests on an unproven enumeration and rank assumption, excludes mixed diffeo-Weyl cocycles by fiat, and the WZ construction (140)-(143) makes every anomaly a coboundary once the dilaton is the WZ field, so the weight falls entirely on the completeness assumption. The unitarity mechanism is also not established, as the paper concedes in §9. The paper is a valuable exploratory contribution, but the central claims are conditional.

major comments (5)
  1. [§6.1, Eqs. (124)-(131), footnote 3] The central claim of trivial Weyl cohomology rests on unproven assumptions: the enumerated list (124),(125),(129)+e□eR is complete, and the linear system has maximal rank ('supposing the rank is maximal, that is 7', after (131)). Footnote 3 excludes by fiat mixed diffeo×Weyl cocycles not reducible to diffeo-covariant form. Since s=δξ+δω on a semidirect product, descent equations can produce mixed cocycles; excluding them without proof leaves the cohomology of G uncomputed. If rank <7 or the basis incomplete, non-trivial cocycles exist and the counterterm/ghost-cancellation program loses its foundation.
  2. [§7, Eqs. (145)-(146)] The proposed cancellation of S_C and S_Q by C(W) and C(Q) conflates a one-loop counterterm with a tree-level term: S_C=(1/η)∫√g C² and S_Q=(6/γ)∫√g Q² are zeroth-order in S0 (39), while C(W), C(Q) are 'multiplied by ℏ' and subtracted at one loop. A ℏ-order counterterm cannot cancel an order-one tree-level coupling; it renormalizes 1/η, 1/γ. With constant φ, C(W)=φ0∫√g W² is not Weyl-invariant since δφ=ω; the paper itself says the counterterm cannot enter at zeroth order. Thus the claim that the quartic terms 'disappear in this specific gauge of φ' is unsupported; §9 concedes no conclusive evidence.
  3. [§5.2, Eqs. (90)-(91)] Eq. (91) has a sign error: '4≤4−c(γ)−Σc(λ_i)' implies c(γ)+Σc(λ_i)≤0, contradicting nonnegativity of the c's. The correct combination of (85)-(89) gives c(γ)≥Σc(λ_i). As written, the proof that IR Lowenstein conditions hold for reduced diagrams is invalid, so the BPHZL convergence foundation for the ST identity is not established.
  4. [§5.4, after Eq. (122)] Gauge independence rests on an unproven assumption: 'an explicit proof is lacking' for convergence in gauges other than α0=β0=0. The use of a particular gauge to draw physical conclusions (§7) depends on this. Claims should be restricted to α0=β0=0 until the proof is supplied.
  5. [§8, 'Summarizing' paragraph] The paper itself identifies an unresolved discrepancy between the algebraic and down-to-earth approaches: 'There is a mismatch between the two. This may indicate either that the cancelation of the quartic derivative terms in S_C and S_Q is impossible, or that the down-to-earth approach ... is too simplistic.' Since this mismatch concerns the same cancellation underlying the unitarity claim, the §7 assertion cannot be considered established; it should be clearly labeled a conjecture.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract, §1, §7] Numerous typos: 'quamtum', 'garanteeing', 'demostrate', 'confomal', 'renormaliztion', 'attepts'.
  2. [§6.1] The numbering of the 15/16 cochains (1-7, 13-15, 8-12, plus 16) is confusing; a single consolidated table would improve readability.
  3. [§5.2, Eqs. (85)-(91)] The notation for reduced diagrams is imprecise; 'nX i=n' is a typo for 'Σ_{i=1}^n'. The relation (85)-(86) could be stated with explicit definitions of the reduced diagram.
  4. [References] Ref. [40] is malformed; Ref. [12] contains 'worshop'. A general reference cleanup is needed.
  5. [§7, Eqs. (147)-(149)] The two-dilaton construction with mixing parameter ε is introduced without verifying conformal invariance of S_{12}^{(c)}; a short check would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the cohomology triviality is a derived theorem (WZ construction), and the central claim does not reduce to a fitted input or to the authors' prior results.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that the Weyl BRST cohomology is trivial in the presence of a dilaton—is derived rather than assumed. In §6.3 the WZ construction (eqs. (140)-(143)) constructs a local functional F_WZ[σ,g,f] with δωF_WZ = −Aω for any consistent anomaly Aω, and setting σ = −φ (since δφ = ω) exhibits Aω as a coboundary: Aω = δω(−F_WZ[−φ]). This is a mathematical derivation, not a definitional equivalence; the cocycle is shown to be a coboundary. The explicit enumeration in §6.1 is a separate computational argument; its reliance on 'supposing the rank is maximal, that is 7' is an unproven hypothesis, and footnote 3 explicitly excludes mixed diffeo-Weyl cocycles, but these are gaps in completeness/correctness, not inputs disguised as outputs. Likewise §5.4 admits 'an explict proof is lacking' for gauge independence, and §9 states the unitarity conclusion is inconclusive ('not been able to reach conclusive evidence'). Self-citations to [11] and [12] provide the background model and anomaly-cancellation setup, but the cohomology theorem and the counterterm construction are worked out in this paper from stated formulas. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work. Therefore no circularity is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 6 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claims rest on: (i) the mirror-model type-O anomaly cancellation inherited from the author's [11,12] — published, parameter-free derivations, treated as independent support rather than circularity; (ii) a cohomology computation whose 'no non-trivial anomalies' output depends on an unproven maximal-rank and basis-completeness assumption and on excluding mixed diff×Weyl cocycles; (iii) the standard Wess-Zumino trivialization, which by construction makes every anomaly a coboundary once the dilaton transforms as δφ=ω; and (iv) a ghost-cancellation mechanism that requires the coboundary anomalies to be present with non-zero coefficients and requires a one-loop counterterm to cancel tree-level quartic couplings at a hand-chosen constant dilaton vev. The free parameters are the chosen dilaton backgrounds, the working gauge α0=β0=0, the two-dilaton mixing ε, and (peripherally) the constants of the §4.1 cosmological ansatz.

free parameters (4)
  • dilaton background values φ0 (or φ1, φ2) = chosen so counterterms cancel 1/η and 1/γ; one dilaton cannot cancel both
    The ghost-cancellation result is conditional on choosing the Weyl gauge in which the trivial-anomaly counterterms exactly cancel the quartic-derivative terms; the value is not predicted (§7).
  • gauge parameters α0, β0 = 0
    Chosen by hand so the BPHZL Lowenstein conditions could be checked (§5.2); gauge independence is asserted but explicitly unproven (§5.4).
  • two-dilaton mixing ε = free real number
    §7, eq. (148): S_μ = ε ∂φ1 + (1−ε) ∂φ2; an arbitrary real parameter in the conformal two-dilaton action.
  • cosmological ansatz constants (α, β, γ) = free; a(t)=γt, φ=ln(βt), Φ=α/t
    §4.1, eq. (34): undetermined constants of a proposed pre-inflationary solution; no stability or perturbation analysis. Peripheral to the central claim.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption The anomaly cancellations established for the two-metric model of [11] survive replacing two metrics by one shared metric.
    §2 adopts the one-metric simplification: 'since, contrary to [11] there is only one metric, the presence of the sterile neutrinos ... is not necessary'. The full O-type anomaly count is not re-derived here.
  • ad hoc to paper The 15/16-term enumeration of local Weyl cochains — lists (124), (125), (129) plus e□eR — is complete, and the δω-consistency system has maximal rank 7.
    §6.1: 'supposing the rank is maximal, that is 7, it determines 7 independent solutions'; the triviality of all 1-cocycles ('no true anomalies') follows only if both hold.
  • domain assumption No mixed diffeomorphism×Weyl cocycles exist that are not reducible to diffeomorphism-covariant expressions.
    Footnote 3: 'A cocycle ... which is not reducible to a diffeomorphism-covariant form, is not known, and is excluded here.' Such cocycles would be non-trivial anomalies outside the analysis.
  • ad hoc to paper The trivial (coboundary) trace anomalies are present with non-zero coefficients at one loop, so counterterms of the form φ·W² and φ·eR̃² exist that can cancel S_C and S_Q.
    §7: 'If the anomaly whose density is proportional to eeR² is present in the theory, as the above analysis suggests'; §8 checks only free-field cases (Dirac fermion, gauge fields, scalars), never the full T^W matter+ghost content.
  • ad hoc to paper A one-loop counterterm can cancel tree-level quartic couplings (1/η, 1/γ) at a constant dilaton vev without spoiling the BPHZL/ST framework.
    §7 matches one-loop counterterms against tree-level S_C/S_Q and sets φ constant; the ℏ-ordering of the cancellation and back-reaction on the convergence conditions are not discussed. §9 calls unitarity only 'not impossible'.
  • ad hoc to paper Results proved in the α0=β0=0 gauge (convergence, ghost equations) extend to the whole gauge-independence argument.
    §5.2 restricts the convergence check to α0=β0=0; §5.4: 'We can reasonably suppose that the convergence conditions are satisfied ... However an explict proof is lacking and would be most desirable.'
invented entities (2)
  • Mirror (right-handed) SM sector T_R no independent evidence
    purpose: Cancels type-O anomalies left over from the SM chiral multiplet and supplies a dark-matter world (§2-3).
    Inherited from [11,12], not introduced here. §3 explicitly concedes the absence of falsification handles ('figure out experiments that permit to falsify the idea'). No masses, cross-sections, or abundances are predicted.
  • Dilaton field(s) φ± (φ; φ1, φ2) no independent evidence
    purpose: Renders the theory Weyl-invariant, dresses masses, controls the effective cosmological constant, and (claimed) annihilates quartic-derivative ghost terms via gauge choice (§4, §7).
    No mass, coupling, or observational signature is predicted; its vev is a free choice on which the headline mechanism depends. A standard device in conformal gravity, but unconstrained here.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 35982 in / 37258 out tokens · 353763 ms · 2026-08-01T05:04:07.423314+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper is a bottom up attempt to incorporate the standard model and general relativity in a unique quantum field theory. The tentative model presented here in particular is free of chiral gauge and gravitational anomalies that appear in the divergence of currents, and in the divergence and trace of the energy-momentum tensor when the SM matter couples to gravity. The fermion spectrum is composed of two multiplets, the SM (left) multiplet and a mirror copy (right) with opposite handedness. The right multiplet is interpreted as describing the dark matter world. The natural symmetry of the theory is enlarged to incorporate also Weyl invariance, by introducing one or more dilaton fields. After the cosmological and theoretical motivations, the necessary formalism is introduced for algebraic renormalization: gauge fixings, ghosts, propagators and vertices and their interplay in garanteeing the conditions for convergence of the subtracted amplitudes according to the BPHZL scheme, the Slavnov-Taylor identity and the relevant enlarged BRST symmetry. The corresponding (conformal) cohomology is analyzed and found to be trivial: there are no non-trivial even trace anomalies in theories with dilatons, but there are plenty of trivial ones, which require corresponding counterterms in the effective action. It is shown that such counterterms can play an important role in freeing the theory of unphysical particles.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 31 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Arbey and F

    A. Arbey and F. Mahmoudi,Dark matter and the early Universe: a review, ArXiv:2104.11488v1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Chiara Arina,Review of Dark Matter tools, PoS,TOOLS2020, arXiv:2012.0962v2[hep-th]

    arXiv 2012

  3. [3]

    M. F. Atiyah and I. M. SingerDirac operators coupled to vector potentials, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 81(1984), 2597. M. F. Atiyah,K-Theory, Addison-Wesley, 1989. 41

    1984

  4. [4]

    Y.Bai and P.Schwaller,Scale of dark QCD, Phys.Rev.D89(2014) 063522-1

    2014

  5. [5]

    Bambi and A

    C. Bambi and A. D. Dolgov,Introduction to Particle Cosmology, Springer Verlag GmbH, Berlin Heidelberg 2021

    2021

  6. [6]

    Becchi, A

    C. Becchi, A. Rouet and R. Stora,Renormalization of gauge theories, Ann. Phys.98(1976) 287

    1976

  7. [7]

    Bergstr¨ om,Non-Baryonic Dark Matter: Observational Evidence and Detection Methods, Rept.Prog.Phys.63:793,2000, arXiv:hep-ph/0002126v1

    L. Bergstr¨ om,Non-Baryonic Dark Matter: Observational Evidence and Detection Methods, Rept.Prog.Phys.63:793,2000, arXiv:hep-ph/0002126v1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  8. [8]

    Bertone, D

    G. Bertone, D. Hopper and J. Silk,Particle dark matter:evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rep.405(2005), 279

    2005

  9. [9]

    N. N. Bogolyubov and D. V. Shirkov,Introduction to the theory of quatized fields. vol. 3, 1959

    1959

  10. [10]

    Bonora,Fermions and Anomalies in Quantum Field Theories, Springer 2023

    L. Bonora,Fermions and Anomalies in Quantum Field Theories, Springer 2023

    2023

  11. [11]

    Bonora and S

    L. Bonora and S. Giaccari,Something Anomalies can tell about SM and GravitySymmetry17 (2025) 273, arXiv:2412.07470 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    What comes beyond the standard model

    L. Bonora,Anomaly footprints in SM+Gravity, worshop “What comes beyond the standard model” Bled 2025, arXiv:2510.25217 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    S. M. Boucenna and S. Morisi,Theories relating baryon asymmetry and dark matter. Mini review, Front. Physics 1:33, arXiv:1310.1904v3 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    R. H. Brandenberger,Lectures on the Theory of Cosmological Perturbations,Lect. Notes Phys. 646(2004) 127-167, arXiv:hep-th/0306071v1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  15. [15]

    C. P. Burgess,Dark Energy and the Symbiosis between Micro-physics and Cosmology (Naturally), arXiv:2509.00688v1[hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    S. M. Carrol,The cosmological constant, http://www.livingreviewes.org/Articles/index.html

  17. [17]

    S. M. Christensen and M. J. Duff,Axial and conformal anomalies for arbitrary spin in gravity and supergravity,Phys.Lett.B 76(1978) 571

    1978

  18. [18]

    B 154(1979) 301

    S.M.ChristensenandM.J.Duff,New gravitational index theorems and super theorems,Nucl.Phys. B 154(1979) 301

    1979

  19. [19]

    Codello, G

    A. Codello, G. D’Odorico, C. Pagani, R. Percacci,The Renormalization Group and Weyl- invariance, Class.Quant.Grav. 30 (2013) 115015, e-Print: 1210.3284 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  20. [20]

    Drees and G

    M. Drees and G. Gerbier,Mini-Review of Dark Matter: 2012, arXiv:1204.2373v1 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  21. [21]

    M.J.Duff,Twenty years of the Weyl anomaly, Class. Quant. Grav.11(1994) 1387 [hep- th,9308075]

    1994

  22. [22]

    M.J.Duff,Weyl, Pontryagin, Euler, Eguchi and Freund, Jour. Phys. A: Mathematical and The- oretical,53(2020) 301001 [arXiv:2006.03574]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    L. H. Ford and L. Parker,Quantized gravitational wave perturbations In Robertson-Walker uni- verses, Phys.Rev.D16(1977) 1601. 42

    1977

  24. [24]

    L. H. Ford,Cosmological Particle Production: A Review, Rep. Prog. Phys.84(2021) 116901, arXiv:2112.02444v1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Gell-Mann, R

    M. Gell-Mann, R. J. Oakex and B. Renner,Behavior of current divergences underSU(3)×SU(3). Phys. Rev.175(1968) 2195

    1968

  26. [26]

    D. M. Ghilencea,Standard model in Weyl conformal geometry,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 23, arXiv:2104.15118 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    D. M. Ghilencea,Non-metric geometry as the origin of mass in gauge theories of scale invariance, Eur. Phys. J.C 83(2023) 176, [arXiv:2203.05381 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    D. M. Ghilencea,Quantum gravity from Weyl conformal geometry,, arXiv:2408.07160v1 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    D. M. Ghilencea and V. M. Mandric,Weyl conformal geometry vs Riemannian geometry of Weyl invariant dressed metric, arXiv:2606.08080v1 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    P. B. Greene, L. Kofman, A. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky,Structure of resonance in preheating after inflation, Phys.Rev.D56(1997) 6175

    1997

  31. [31]

    Julve and M

    J. Julve and M. Tonin,Quamtum Gravity with Higher Derivative Terms, Il Nuovo Cimento,46 (1978) 137

    1978

  32. [32]

    H. M. Hodges,Mirror baryons as the dark matter, Phys.Rev.D47(1993) 456

    1993

  33. [33]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,On the Present Status of Inflationary Cosmology, arXiv:2505.13646v1[hep-th], Lemaˆitre Conference 2004

    arXiv 2004

  34. [34]

    Kofman, A

    L. Kofman, A. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky, |it Towards the theory of reheating after inflation, Phys. Rev.D56(1995) 3258

    1995

  35. [35]

    J. H. Lowenstein and W. Zimmenrmann,On the formulation of Theories with zero-mass propaga- tors, Nucl.Phys.B86(1975) 77

    1975

  36. [36]

    J. H. Lowenstein,BPHZ Renormalization, in International School of Mathematical Physics, 2nd corse; Renormalization theory 12 1975 (G.Velo and A.S. Wightman, eds.), D.Reidel Publ.Comp., Dordrecht, Holland, 1976

    1975

  37. [37]

    J. H. Lowenstein,Convergence theorems in Renormalized Feynman Integrals with zero-mass prop- agators, Comm.Math.Phys.47(1976) 53

    1976

  38. [38]

    Mohammedi,A note on Weyl gauge symmetry in gravity, arXiv:2402.04712 [hep-th]

    N. Mohammedi,A note on Weyl gauge symmetry in gravity, arXiv:2402.04712 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    R. N. Mohapatra and V. I. Teplitz,STRUCTURES IN THE MIRROR UNIVERSE, The As- trophisical Journal478(1997) 29

    1997

  40. [40]

    Rep.215(19992) 203-233

    , V.F.Mukhanov, H.A.FeldmanandR.H.Brandenberger,Theory of Cosmological Perturbations, Phys. Rep.215(19992) 203-233

  41. [41]

    Oda,Quantum scale invariant gravity with DeDonder gauge, Phys

    I. Oda,Quantum scale invariant gravity with DeDonder gauge, Phys. Rev.D 105(2022) 066001

    2022

  42. [42]

    Oda,Quantum Theory of Weyl-invariant Scalar-tensor Gravity, Phys

    I. Oda,Quantum Theory of Weyl-invariant Scalar-tensor Gravity, Phys. Rev.D 105(2022) 120618. http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.11200v1 [hep-th] 43

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    Oda and P

    I. Oda and P. Saake,BRST Formalism of Weyl Conformal Gravity, Phys. Rev.D 106(2022) 106007. http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.14533v1 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    Oda and M

    I. Oda and M. Ohta,Quantum Conformal Gravity, JHEP02(2024) 213. http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09582v1 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Oda,Conformal Symmetry in Quantum Gravity, arXiv:2403.04056v1 [hep-th]

    I. Oda,Conformal Symmetry in Quantum Gravity, arXiv:2403.04056v1 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    Oda,BRST Formalism of f (R) Gravity, ArXiv:2410.20270 [hep-th]

    I. Oda,BRST Formalism of f (R) Gravity, ArXiv:2410.20270 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [47]

    Oda,Confinement of Massive Ghost in Quadratic Gravity, arXiv:2605.01966 [hep-th]

    I. Oda,Confinement of Massive Ghost in Quadratic Gravity, arXiv:2605.01966 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    Parker,Quantized Fields and Particle Creation in Expanding Universes

    L. Parker,Quantized Fields and Particle Creation in Expanding Universes. I, Phys.Rev.183 (1969) 1057

    1969

  49. [49]

    Parker,Quantized Fields and Particle Creation in Expanding Universes

    L. Parker,Quantized Fields and Particle Creation in Expanding Universes. II, Phys.Rev.D3 (1971) 346

    1971

  50. [50]

    L. Parker,Aspects of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time: Effective Action and Energy Momentum Tensor,in *Cargese 1978, Proceedings, Recent Developments In Gravitation*, 219- 273

    1978

  51. [51]

    Parker and D

    L. Parker and D. Toms,Quantum fields in curved space, Cambridge University Press, 2009

    2009

  52. [52]

    Piguet and S

    O. Piguet and S. P. Sorella,Algebraic Renormalization, Springer 1995

    1995

  53. [53]

    Pottel and K

    S. Pottel and K. Sibold.Perturbative quantization of Einstein-Hilbert gravity embedded in a higher derivative model.Physical ReviewD 104(2021) 086012. arXiv:2012.11450v3 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    Pottel and K

    S. Pottel and K. Sibold.Perturbative quantization of Einstein-Hilbert gravity embedded in a higher derivative model. II, arXiv:2308.15824v2 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [55]

    Rachwal,Introduction to Quantization of Conformal Gravity, arXiv:2204.13856 [hep-th]

    L. Rachwal,Introduction to Quantization of Conformal Gravity, arXiv:2204.13856 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  56. [56]

    Racker,Mini-review on baryogenesis at the TeV scale and possible connection with dark matter, Contribution to the proceedings of ICHEP 2014, arXiv:410.5482v1 [hep-ph]

    J. Racker,Mini-review on baryogenesis at the TeV scale and possible connection with dark matter, Contribution to the proceedings of ICHEP 2014, arXiv:410.5482v1 [hep-ph]

    2014

  57. [57]

    D.Roumelioti, S.Stefas, G.Zoupanos,Unification of Conformal Gravity and Internal Interactions, http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.17511v1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    Scholz,The Unexpected Resurgence of Weyl Geometry in late 20th-Century Physics,Einstein Stud.14(2018) 261-360, arXiv:1703.03187 [math.HO]

    E. Scholz,The Unexpected Resurgence of Weyl Geometry in late 20th-Century Physics,Einstein Stud.14(2018) 261-360, arXiv:1703.03187 [math.HO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  59. [59]

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zhakarov,QCD and resonance physics, sum rules, Nucl. Phys.B 147(1979) 385

    1979

  60. [60]

    Shtanov, J

    Y. Shtanov, J. Traschen and R. Brandenberger,Universe reheating after inflation, Phys.Rev.D51 (1995) 5438

    1995

  61. [61]

    Sibold.Einstein-Hilbert Gravity, Higher Derivatives And a Scalar Matter Field, arXiv:2405.00528v1 [hep-th]

    K. Sibold.Einstein-Hilbert Gravity, Higher Derivatives And a Scalar Matter Field, arXiv:2405.00528v1 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [62]

    K. S. Stelle,Renormalization of higher-derivative quantum gravity. Phys. Rev.D 16(1977) 953. 44

    1977

  63. [63]

    V. I. Tkach,Toward ghost free gravity and Standard Model, Mod. Phys. Lett.A 27(2012) 125031, arXiv:1204.6523[hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  64. [64]

    J. H. Traschen and R. H. Brandenberger,Particie production during out-of-equilibrium phase transitions, Phys.Rev.D422491

  65. [65]

    Modern Cosmology

    S. Tsuchikawa,Introductory Review of Cosmic Inflation, lecture notes given at The Second Tah Poe School on Cosmology "Modern Cosmology", Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand, April 17 -25, 2003, arXiv:hep-ph/0304257v1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  66. [66]

    J. A. Vasquez, L. E. Padilla and T. Matos,Inflationary Cosmology: From Theory to Observations, Rev. Mex. Fis.E17(2020) 1, arXiv:1810.09934v3 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  67. [67]

    Vilenkin,Cosmological constant problems and their solutions, arXiv:hep-th/0106083

    A. Vilenkin,Cosmological constant problems and their solutions, arXiv:hep-th/0106083

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [68]

    Weinberg,The cosmological constant problem, Rev.Mod

    S. Weinberg,The cosmological constant problem, Rev.Mod. Phys.61(1989)

    1989

  69. [69]

    Weinberg,The cosmological constant problem, arXiv:astro-phys/0005265

    S. Weinberg,The cosmological constant problem, arXiv:astro-phys/0005265

    arXiv

  70. [70]

    Zimmermann,The power counting theorem for Minkowski metric, Comm.Math.Phys.11 (1968) 1-8

    W. Zimmermann,The power counting theorem for Minkowski metric, Comm.Math.Phys.11 (1968) 1-8

    1968

  71. [71]

    Zimmermann,Convergence of Bogoliubov’s method of renormalization in momentum space, Comm.Math.Phys.15(1969) 208-234

    W. Zimmermann,Convergence of Bogoliubov’s method of renormalization in momentum space, Comm.Math.Phys.15(1969) 208-234

    1969

  72. [72]

    Zimmermann,Normal products and the short distance expansion in the perturbation theory of renormalizable interactionsAnn

    W. Zimmermann,Normal products and the short distance expansion in the perturbation theory of renormalizable interactionsAnn. Phys77(1973) 570. 45

    1973