REVIEW 1 cited by
Infrared renormalon in the supersymmetric $\mathbb{C}P^{N-1}$ model on $\mathbb{R}\times S^1$
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
In the leading order of the large-$N$ approximation, we study the renormalon ambiguity in the gluon (or, more appropriately, photon) condensate in the 2D supersymmetric $\mathbb{C}P^{N-1}$ model on~$\mathbb{R}\times S^1$ with the $\mathbb{Z}_N$ twisted boundary conditions. In our large~$N$ limit, the combination $\Lambda R$, where $\Lambda$ is the dynamical scale and $R$~is the $S^1$ radius, is kept fixed (we set $\Lambda R\ll1$ so that the perturbative expansion with respect to the coupling constant at the mass scale~$1/R$ is meaningful). We extract the perturbative part from the large-$N$ expression of the gluon condensate and obtain the corresponding Borel transform~$B(u)$. For~$\mathbb{R}\times S^1$, we find that the Borel singularity at~$u=2$, which exists in the system on the uncompactified~$\mathbb{R}^2$ and corresponds to twice the minimal bion action, disappears. Instead, an unfamiliar renormalon singularity \emph{emerges\/} at~$u=3/2$ for the compactified space~$\mathbb{R}\times S^1$. The semi-classical interpretation of this peculiar singularity is not clear because $u=3/2$ is not dividable by the minimal bion action. It appears that our observation for the system on~$\mathbb{R}\times S^1$ prompts reconsideration on the semi-classical bion picture of the infrared renormalon.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
To be, or not to be finite? The Higgs potential in Gauge-Higgs Unification
The Higgs effective potential in non-Abelian gauge-Higgs unification on M4 x S1 is finite at two loops, but in an M5 x S1 example it depends on a four-Fermi counterterm at three loops.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.