The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2410.05434 · v1 · pith:GN6CNVM2 · submitted 2024-10-07 · cs.LG · cs.AI

Better than Your Teacher: LLM Agents that learn from Privileged AI Feedback

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:GN6CNVM2record.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords privilegedleapmodelsinformationstudentweakagentsallows
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

While large language models (LLMs) show impressive decision-making abilities, current methods lack a mechanism for automatic self-improvement from errors during task execution. We propose LEAP, an iterative fine-tuning framework that continually improves LLM agents using feedback from AI expert teachers. Our key insight is to equip the expert teachers with a privileged state -- information that is available during training but hidden at test time. This allows even weak experts to provide precise guidance, significantly improving the student agent's performance without access to privileged information at test time. We evaluate LEAP on diverse decision-making benchmarks, including text-based games (ALFWorld), web navigation (WebShop), and interactive coding (Intercode Bash). Our experiments show that LEAP (1) outperforms behavior cloning and ReAct baselines (2) enables weak student models (e.g., Llama3-8B) to exceed the performance of strong teacher models (GPT4-o), and (3) allows weak models to self-improve using privileged versions of themselves. We also provide a theoretical analysis showing that LEAP's success hinges on balancing privileged information with the student's realizability, which we empirically validate. Our code is available at https://leap-llm.github.io

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. What Drives Interactive Improvement from Feedback?

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Controlled student-teacher experiments across four benchmarks show interactive gains are driven more by the student's ability to use feedback than by teacher quality, with self-feedback adding little beyond unguided retries.

  2. Autoregressive Diffusion World Models for Off-Policy Evaluation of LLM Agents

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ADWM learns a latent diffusion world model with per-transition independent denoising and policy-conditioned guidance to enable accurate offline evaluation of LLM agent policies.