REVIEW 2 cited by
Multi-Task Adversarial Attack
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Deep neural networks have achieved impressive performance in various areas, but they are shown to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Previous works on adversarial attacks mainly focused on the single-task setting. However, in real applications, it is often desirable to attack several models for different tasks simultaneously. To this end, we propose Multi-Task adversarial Attack (MTA), a unified framework that can craft adversarial examples for multiple tasks efficiently by leveraging shared knowledge among tasks, which helps enable large-scale applications of adversarial attacks on real-world systems. More specifically, MTA uses a generator for adversarial perturbations which consists of a shared encoder for all tasks and multiple task-specific decoders. Thanks to the shared encoder, MTA reduces the storage cost and speeds up the inference when attacking multiple tasks simultaneously. Moreover, the proposed framework can be used to generate per-instance and universal perturbations for targeted and non-targeted attacks. Experimental results on the Office-31 and NYUv2 datasets demonstrate that MTA can improve the quality of attacks when compared with its single-task counterpart.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Multi-Task Consistency-based Detection of Adversarial Attacks
A multi-task consistency score detects PGD adversarial attacks on vision models with 99.9% ROC-AUC on the BDD100k dataset.
-
Stealthy Multi-Task Adversarial Attacks
A multi-task adversarial attack that selectively degrades a target task while preserving or improving other tasks, using negative loss weights and automated weight tuning.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.