REVIEW 2 cited by
ExaRanker: Explanation-Augmented Neural Ranker
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent work has shown that inducing a large language model (LLM) to generate explanations prior to outputting an answer is an effective strategy to improve performance on a wide range of reasoning tasks. In this work, we show that neural rankers also benefit from explanations. We use LLMs such as GPT-3.5 to augment retrieval datasets with explanations and train a sequence-to-sequence ranking model to output a relevance label and an explanation for a given query-document pair. Our model, dubbed ExaRanker, finetuned on a few thousand examples with synthetic explanations performs on par with models finetuned on 3x more examples without explanations. Furthermore, the ExaRanker model incurs no additional computational cost during ranking and allows explanations to be requested on demand.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
PaSa: An LLM Agent for Comprehensive Academic Paper Search
PaSa, a two-agent LLM system trained with session-level RL, reports substantially higher recall than existing academic search baselines on complex paper-finding queries.
-
Towards Trustworthy Retrieval Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey
A survey organizes current research on trustworthy RAG into six pillars, reliability, privacy, safety, fairness, explainability, and accountability, and maps methods, metrics, and open problems for each.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.